On 10/22/2024 11:28 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
content-free batch of lies:

> In article <WCRRO.101986$S9Vb.13679@fx45.iad>, smythlejon2@hotmail.com
> says...
>>
>> On 10/22/2024 10:44 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>> Yak <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>> news:N7PRO.110215$xO0f.28681@fx48.iad:
>>>
>>>> On 10/22/2024 4:05 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 13:49:08 -0600, Skeeter
>>>>> <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <vf5uoq$vos8$4@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 10/21/2024 8:43 AM, Lee wrote:
>>>>>>>> NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 16:48:20 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 19 Oct 2024 16:20:38 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:57:01 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jan. 6 case appendix to be released
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Friday after judge denies Trump's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> request
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oct 18
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The judge in former President Trump's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> federal Jan. 6 case on Thursday
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evening rejected his lawyers' request
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to delay the court-ordered release of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a redacted appendix of new evidence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from special counsel Jack Smith.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why it matters: Trump's lawyers said
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delaying the case until after the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election would allow them to submit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a counter to the appendix that the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> special counsel's office filed, but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> U.S. District Court Judge Tanya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chutkan denied their request and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ordered Smith's dossier be unsealed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with redactions on Friday.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.axios.com/2024/10/17/trump-jan-6-case-documents-r
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> elease-jack-smith
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Look at you approving at prosecutors and judges engaging in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> election interference.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Election interfernce - like the Jan 6 riots?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> How did Jan 6 influence the election?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What were the "Hang Mike Pence" Trump
>>>>>>>>>> supporters trying to accomplish, if not
>>>>>>>>>> interfering with the election?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The voting process was complete but nice try with your spin.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Changing the subject, I see.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The ELECTION includes more than
>>>>>>>> just "the voting process" and you
>>>>>>>> know it. Even Trump acknowelged the
>>>>>>>> Pence role in certifying the ELECTION
>>>>>>>> which his rioters
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> His *insurrectionists*. It was far more, and far worse, than a mere
>>>>>>> riot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yet you support the riots across the country that burned, looted and
>>>>>> killed.
>>>>
>>>> That's a lie.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> THEY were the insurrectionists.
>>>>
>>>> That's another. An insurrection is a violent attack on the government
>>>> with a well-defined political goal, e.g. keep the election loser in
>>>> office. The protests of 2020 were:
>>>>
>>>> * not an attack on government; and
>>>> * had no well-defined political goal
>>>
>>> The BLM protests were a call for the
>>> ENFORCEMENT of law (hold police accountable),
>>> not an attack on the law.
>>
>> When some of them ? only a few, not the majority ? devolved into violent
>> rioting, they were no longer about upholding the law. But your basic point is
>> well taken.
>>
>>>
>>> "Nobody" is just being an idiot trying
>>> to equate them with Jan 6.
>>
>> Par for the course. I swear, it is as if she works at being stupid. She doesn't
>> really need to work at it, because it comes so naturally to her.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> The protests of 2020 were not in any way an insurrection.
>>>
>>>
>>> Exactly.
>>>
>>> In some cases police actually JOINED
>>> the protesters.
>>>
>>>
>>> Why some police officers stood with
>>> protesters outraged over George Floyd's
>>> death
>>> June 1, 2020
>>> https://abcnews.go.com/US/police-officers-stood-protesters-outraged-
>>> george-floyds-death/story?id=70984369
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Trump's
>>>> planned and calculated attack on the electoral count certification
>>>> process was an insurrection. This is not in rational dispute.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Trump would happily have seen his
>>> supporters kill his vice president if it
>>> meant another Trump term.
>> Exactly right. He was cheering them on as they chanted "Hang Mike Pence."
>
> Nope,

Yes, he certainly was.

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing

On 10/22/2024 12:36 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
content-free batch of lies:

> In article <0ESRO.423991$FzW1.84487@fx14.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 10/22/2024 11:28 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
>> content-free batch of lies:
>>
>>> In article <WCRRO.101986$S9Vb.13679@fx45.iad>, smythlejon2@hotmail.com
>>> says...
>>>>
>>>> On 10/22/2024 10:44 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>> Yak <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>>>> news:N7PRO.110215$xO0f.28681@fx48.iad:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/22/2024 4:05 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 13:49:08 -0600, Skeeter
>>>>>>> <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In article <vf5uoq$vos8$4@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 10/21/2024 8:43 AM, Lee wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 16:48:20 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 19 Oct 2024 16:20:38 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:57:01 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jan. 6 case appendix to be released
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Friday after judge denies Trump's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> request
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oct 18
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The judge in former President Trump's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> federal Jan. 6 case on Thursday
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evening rejected his lawyers' request
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to delay the court-ordered release of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a redacted appendix of new evidence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from special counsel Jack Smith.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why it matters: Trump's lawyers said
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delaying the case until after the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election would allow them to submit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a counter to the appendix that the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> special counsel's office filed, but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> U.S. District Court Judge Tanya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chutkan denied their request and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ordered Smith's dossier be unsealed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with redactions on Friday.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.axios.com/2024/10/17/trump-jan-6-case-documents-r
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> elease-jack-smith
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Look at you approving at prosecutors and judges engaging in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election interference.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Election interfernce - like the Jan 6 riots?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> How did Jan 6 influence the election?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> What were the "Hang Mike Pence" Trump
>>>>>>>>>>>> supporters trying to accomplish, if not
>>>>>>>>>>>> interfering with the election?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The voting process was complete but nice try with your spin.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Changing the subject, I see.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The ELECTION includes more than
>>>>>>>>>> just "the voting process" and you
>>>>>>>>>> know it. Even Trump acknowelged the
>>>>>>>>>> Pence role in certifying the ELECTION
>>>>>>>>>> which his rioters
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> His *insurrectionists*. It was far more, and far worse, than a mere
>>>>>>>>> riot.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yet you support the riots across the country that burned, looted and
>>>>>>>> killed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's a lie.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> THEY were the insurrectionists.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's another. An insurrection is a violent attack on the government
>>>>>> with a well-defined political goal, e.g. keep the election loser in
>>>>>> office. The protests of 2020 were:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * not an attack on government; and
>>>>>> * had no well-defined political goal
>>>>>
>>>>> The BLM protests were a call for the
>>>>> ENFORCEMENT of law (hold police accountable),
>>>>> not an attack on the law.
>>>>
>>>> When some of them ? only a few, not the majority ? devolved into violent
>>>> rioting, they were no longer about upholding the law. But your basic point is
>>>> well taken.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Nobody" is just being an idiot trying
>>>>> to equate them with Jan 6.
>>>>
>>>> Par for the course. I swear, it is as if she works at being stupid. She doesn't
>>>> really need to work at it, because it comes so naturally to her.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The protests of 2020 were not in any way an insurrection.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Exactly.
>>>>>
>>>>> In some cases police actually JOINED
>>>>> the protesters.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Why some police officers stood with
>>>>> protesters outraged over George Floyd's
>>>>> death
>>>>> June 1, 2020
>>>>> https://abcnews.go.com/US/police-officers-stood-protesters-outraged-
>>>>> george-floyds-death/story?id=70984369
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Trump's
>>>>>> planned and calculated attack on the electoral count certification
>>>>>> process was an insurrection. This is not in rational dispute.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Trump would happily have seen his
>>>>> supporters kill his vice president if it
>>>>> meant another Trump term.
>>>> Exactly right. He was cheering them on as they chanted "Hang Mike Pence."
>>>
>>> Nope,
>>
>> Yes, he certainly was.
>
> He wasn't.

On 10/22/2024 3:14 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <wPURO.54978$5Cq3.759@fx06.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 10/22/2024 12:36 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
>> content-free batch of lies:
>>
>>> In article <0ESRO.423991$FzW1.84487@fx14.iad>,
>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>
>>>> On 10/22/2024 11:28 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>>>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
>>>> content-free batch of lies:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <WCRRO.101986$S9Vb.13679@fx45.iad>, smythlejon2@hotmail.com
>>>>> says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/22/2024 10:44 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>> Yak <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:N7PRO.110215$xO0f.28681@fx48.iad:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/22/2024 4:05 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 13:49:08 -0600, Skeeter
>>>>>>>>> <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In article <vf5uoq$vos8$4@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/21/2024 8:43 AM, Lee wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 16:48:20 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 19 Oct 2024 16:20:38 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:57:01 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jan. 6 case appendix to be released
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Friday after judge denies Trump's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> request
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oct 18
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The judge in former President Trump's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> federal Jan. 6 case on Thursday
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evening rejected his lawyers' request
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to delay the court-ordered release of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a redacted appendix of new evidence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from special counsel Jack Smith.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why it matters: Trump's lawyers said
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delaying the case until after the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election would allow them to submit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a counter to the appendix that the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> special counsel's office filed, but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> U.S. District Court Judge Tanya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chutkan denied their request and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ordered Smith's dossier be unsealed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with redactions on Friday.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.axios.com/2024/10/17/trump-jan-6-case-documents-r
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> elease-jack-smith
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Look at you approving at prosecutors and judges engaging in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election interference.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Election interfernce - like the Jan 6 riots?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How did Jan 6 influence the election?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What were the "Hang Mike Pence" Trump
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supporters trying to accomplish, if not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interfering with the election?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The voting process was complete but nice try with your spin.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Changing the subject, I see.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The ELECTION includes more than
>>>>>>>>>>>> just "the voting process" and you
>>>>>>>>>>>> know it. Even Trump acknowelged the
>>>>>>>>>>>> Pence role in certifying the ELECTION
>>>>>>>>>>>> which his rioters
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> His *insurrectionists*. It was far more, and far worse, than a mere
>>>>>>>>>>> riot.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yet you support the riots across the country that burned, looted and
>>>>>>>>>> killed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's a lie.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> THEY were the insurrectionists.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's another. An insurrection is a violent attack on the government
>>>>>>>> with a well-defined political goal, e.g. keep the election loser in
>>>>>>>> office. The protests of 2020 were:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> * not an attack on government; and
>>>>>>>> * had no well-defined political goal
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The BLM protests were a call for the
>>>>>>> ENFORCEMENT of law (hold police accountable),
>>>>>>> not an attack on the law.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When some of them ? only a few, not the majority ? devolved into violent
>>>>>> rioting, they were no longer about upholding the law. But your basic point is
>>>>>> well taken.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Nobody" is just being an idiot trying
>>>>>>> to equate them with Jan 6.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Par for the course. I swear, it is as if she works at being stupid. She doesn't
>>>>>> really need to work at it, because it comes so naturally to her.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The protests of 2020 were not in any way an insurrection.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Exactly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In some cases police actually JOINED
>>>>>>> the protesters.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why some police officers stood with
>>>>>>> protesters outraged over George Floyd's
>>>>>>> death
>>>>>>> June 1, 2020
>>>>>>> https://abcnews.go.com/US/police-officers-stood-protesters-outraged-
>>>>>>> george-floyds-death/story?id=70984369
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Trump's
>>>>>>>> planned and calculated attack on the electoral count certification
>>>>>>>> process was an insurrection. This is not in rational dispute.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Trump would happily have seen his
>>>>>>> supporters kill his vice president if it
>>>>>>> meant another Trump term.
>>>>>> Exactly right. He was cheering them on as they chanted "Hang Mike Pence."
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope,
>>>>
>>>> Yes, he certainly was.
>>>
>>> He wasn't.
>>
>> He was. It's settled and not in dispute.
>
> Nope.

On 10/22/2024 8:44 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <nJZRO.728287$_o_3.191211@fx17.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 10/22/2024 3:14 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>> of lies:
>>
>>> In article <wPURO.54978$5Cq3.759@fx06.iad>,
>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>
>>>> On 10/22/2024 12:36 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>>>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
>>>> content-free batch of lies:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <0ESRO.423991$FzW1.84487@fx14.iad>,
>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/22/2024 11:28 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>>>>>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
>>>>>> content-free batch of lies:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <WCRRO.101986$S9Vb.13679@fx45.iad>, smythlejon2@hotmail.com
>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/22/2024 10:44 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Yak <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>> news:N7PRO.110215$xO0f.28681@fx48.iad:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 10/22/2024 4:05 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 13:49:08 -0600, Skeeter
>>>>>>>>>>> <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vf5uoq$vos8$4@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/21/2024 8:43 AM, Lee wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 16:48:20 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 19 Oct 2024 16:20:38 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:57:01 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jan. 6 case appendix to be released
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Friday after judge denies Trump's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> request
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oct 18
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The judge in former President Trump's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> federal Jan. 6 case on Thursday
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evening rejected his lawyers' request
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to delay the court-ordered release of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a redacted appendix of new evidence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from special counsel Jack Smith.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why it matters: Trump's lawyers said
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delaying the case until after the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election would allow them to submit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a counter to the appendix that the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> special counsel's office filed, but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> U.S. District Court Judge Tanya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chutkan denied their request and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ordered Smith's dossier be unsealed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with redactions on Friday.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.axios.com/2024/10/17/trump-jan-6-case-documents-r
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> elease-jack-smith
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Look at you approving at prosecutors and judges engaging in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election interference.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Election interfernce - like the Jan 6 riots?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How did Jan 6 influence the election?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What were the "Hang Mike Pence" Trump
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supporters trying to accomplish, if not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interfering with the election?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The voting process was complete but nice try with your spin.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changing the subject, I see.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The ELECTION includes more than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just "the voting process" and you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know it. Even Trump acknowelged the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pence role in certifying the ELECTION
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which his rioters
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> His *insurrectionists*. It was far more, and far worse, than a mere
>>>>>>>>>>>>> riot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet you support the riots across the country that burned, looted and
>>>>>>>>>>>> killed.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That's a lie.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> THEY were the insurrectionists.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That's another. An insurrection is a violent attack on the government
>>>>>>>>>> with a well-defined political goal, e.g. keep the election loser in
>>>>>>>>>> office. The protests of 2020 were:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> * not an attack on government; and
>>>>>>>>>> * had no well-defined political goal
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The BLM protests were a call for the
>>>>>>>>> ENFORCEMENT of law (hold police accountable),
>>>>>>>>> not an attack on the law.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When some of them ? only a few, not the majority ? devolved into violent
>>>>>>>> rioting, they were no longer about upholding the law. But your basic point is
>>>>>>>> well taken.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Nobody" is just being an idiot trying
>>>>>>>>> to equate them with Jan 6.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Par for the course. I swear, it is as if she works at being stupid. She doesn't
>>>>>>>> really need to work at it, because it comes so naturally to her.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The protests of 2020 were not in any way an insurrection.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Exactly.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In some cases police actually JOINED
>>>>>>>>> the protesters.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why some police officers stood with
>>>>>>>>> protesters outraged over George Floyd's
>>>>>>>>> death
>>>>>>>>> June 1, 2020
>>>>>>>>> https://abcnews.go.com/US/police-officers-stood-protesters-outraged-
>>>>>>>>> george-floyds-death/story?id=70984369
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Trump's
>>>>>>>>>> planned and calculated attack on the electoral count certification
>>>>>>>>>> process was an insurrection. This is not in rational dispute.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Trump would happily have seen his
>>>>>>>>> supporters kill his vice president if it
>>>>>>>>> meant another Trump term.
>>>>>>>> Exactly right. He was cheering them on as they chanted "Hang Mike Pence."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nope,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, he certainly was.
>>>>>
>>>>> He wasn't.
>>>>
>>>> He was. It's settled and not in dispute.
>>>
>>> Nope.
>>
>> Yep. And I've proved it, too.
>
> You didn't.