On 10/17/2024 4:33 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <67119b50$4$1895505$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 4:09:13 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> <671198e6$4$2756$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>
>>> In article <67119743$4$2758$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 3:58:28 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>> <6711967e$5$3826$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <67118ce8$1$2873018$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 3:00:38 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>> <671188f1$0$3829$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <671180d7$0$1895500$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 2:14:18 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
>>>>>>>> <verun9$2tegq$1@dont-email.me>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-17, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In article <671175b5$2$2873000$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 1:36:21 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
>>>>>>>>>>> <versg5$2stfd$2@dont-email.me>:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-17, P. Coonan <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17 Oct 2024, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> posted some
>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:1lj2hjdh81bp6l51k7lm780n4mld88clag@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This shouldn't be a surprise. Even to the morons at msnbc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'MSNBC Interviews Early Voters In Key Battleground State, Struggles To
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Find Anyone Who Voted For Harris'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://dailycaller.com/2024/10/16/msnbc-arizona-early-voting-kamala-harris/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'NBC News correspondent Vaughn Hillyard said Wednesday that not one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> early voter interviewed by his team in the battleground state of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arizona admitted they were voting for Vice President Kamala Harris.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans are voting by mail or returning their ballots early at a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> two-to-one margin over Democrats, though Democrats outpaced
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans with early voting in 2020, Hillyard said on ?Jose-Diaz
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Balart Reports.? Not a single voter lining up at the polling
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> locations in Mohave County openly said they were voting for Harris,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the NBC correspondent added.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?We went to a couple early voting locations, and we saw lengthy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lines during the lunch hour. Thirty people waiting in line, and we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should note, we did not find a single person who audibly would tell us
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that they voted for Kamala Harris,? Hillyard said. ?These were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump supporters getting out to vote early in the all-important Mohave
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> County.?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WATCH:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One supporter of Republican nominee Donald Trump named Jim Coddington
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said that voters are making a ?special effort? to vote this year
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and that it is important for those to come out early. Shelley Schwarz,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a voter in Mohave County, said she voted early for the first time ever
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because Trump encouraged voters to do so. (RELATED: Democrats?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Championing Of Early Voting Could Come Back To Haunt Them)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?He keeps saying it, and I?ve been thinking about it, and so here
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am,? Schwarz said.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another voter said he did not vote in 2020 but voted early in 2024
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because he is ?horrified by the state of the country,? Hillyard
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said. Three other voters he spoke to said they moved to Arizona from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blue states to support Trump.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump is currently ahead in Arizona, 49% to 47%, according to The New
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> York Times. President Joe Biden narrowly won the state in 2020 by less
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than one point, 49.4% to 49.1%, while the former president won the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton 49.5% to 45.4%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2016
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We're going to see a repeat of the Hillary Clinton chokefest and shocked
>>>>>>>>>>>>> expressions on CBS talking heads.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I sure hope so, however the demoncrats have been plotting their
>>>>>>>>>>>> cheating methods for 4 years so who knows what they have up their
>>>>>>>>>>>> sleeves this time.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Where do you get these wild stories?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Stay blind.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And stupid as well.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Just a few anomalies regarding the 2020 election.*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1. Six states changed their election laws two months before the 2020
>>>>>>>>> election by executive fiat, instead of going through the proper channels
>>>>>>>>> in the legislature. That is a violation of their state constitutions and
>>>>>>>>> that in and of itself is enough to invalidate the results of the 2020
>>>>>>>>> election.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2. Mark Zuckerberg, hard left, spent $450 million dollars of private
>>>>>>>>> money on our elections. After the 2020 election analysis revealed that
>>>>>>>>> most of that money went to benefit Democrats.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 3. 6 swing states stopped counting the votes on election night for the
>>>>>>>>> first time in American history. At the time that they stopped counting
>>>>>>>>> the votes, Donald Trump was ahead of Biden in each of them.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 4. The unelected tech oligarchs in conjunction with the FBI in this
>>>>>>>>> country censored a very important story about Hunter Biden?s laptop and
>>>>>>>>> Joe Biden?s corruption. People who worked in the intelligence community,
>>>>>>>>> came out and said it was Russian disinformation only to have that laptop
>>>>>>>>> be admitted into evidence as part of an FBI investigation and criminal
>>>>>>>>> prosecution of Hunter Biden. Polling after the election showed that if
>>>>>>>>> people knew about the Hunter Biden laptop story it would?ve changed 17%
>>>>>>>>> of the vote.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 5. 2,036,041 ballots were touched by anomalies.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 6. 923 American citizens filled out affidavits alleging voter fraud, and
>>>>>>>>> signed them under penalties of perjury.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 7. 50 plus courts blocked evidentiary hearings into the alleged fraud
>>>>>>>>> found in 2020.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 8. Prior to 2020 there were four other contested elections, one in
>>>>>>>>> Florida, one in the 78th district of Missouri, one in the ninth district
>>>>>>>>> of North Carolina, and one in the 22nd district of New York. In every
>>>>>>>>> single one of those four instances, there was an evidentiary hearing. In
>>>>>>>>> the 2020 election, there was no evidentiary hearing. For the first time
>>>>>>>>> in American history.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 9. No election contest in American history has had 923 fact witnesses
>>>>>>>>> sign under penalties of perjury and stake their personal freedom in
>>>>>>>>> testimony to attest to the irregularities and legal issues found in
>>>>>>>>> various states.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 10. 37 states in the United States of America altered their absentee or
>>>>>>>>> mail in ballots ballot integrity procedures before the 2020 election.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 11. If those 37 states used the same ballot integrity procedures that
>>>>>>>>> they used in 2018, swing states would?ve found an upwards of 30,000 more
>>>>>>>>> ineligible ballots.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 12. In Pennsylvania, counties allowed new ballots to be filled out after
>>>>>>>>> the election.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 13. Any one of those is enough to say that there was enough fraud in the
>>>>>>>>> 2020 election to doubt the outcome. Can I prove Donald Trump would?ve
>>>>>>>>> won the election if the Democrats hadn?t cheated? No I can?t prove a
>>>>>>>>> counter-narrative, but I can tell you that this amount of fraud leads
>>>>>>>>> any reasonable person to the conclusion that Joe Biden didn?t win.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The insurrection therefore was on 11/3/2020.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1/6 was a lawful protest with permits that got out of hand. Unlike
>>>>>>>>> Democrats who spent 10 months burning down this country to the tune of
>>>>>>>>> $2 billion dollars, and injuring 740 police officers nationwide, the
>>>>>>>>> capital riot had a couple million dollars in damages, 140 police
>>>>>>>>> officers that were injured and zero deaths. Except the 3 Trump
>>>>>>>>> supporters who were unarmed and killed without any investigation by the
>>>>>>>>> corrupt government.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Anybody who is clutching their pearls about January 6 without mentioning
>>>>>>>>> the fact that there was a large federal presence and many anomalies that
>>>>>>>>> have yet to be answered is a liar and a partisan hack.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You sound like an uninformed stage 10 TDS patient who needs to detox
>>>>>>>>> from CNN and MSNBC.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You can endorse the cackling communist from California, but..don?t you
>>>>>>>>> dare pretend like the reason why you?re doing it is because Donald Trump
>>>>>>>>> did something wrong.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Let?s break down and address these claims one by one:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Claim 1: States changing election laws by executive fiat
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It?s true that some states changed voting procedures before the 2020 election
>>>>>>>> due to the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly to expand access to mail-in voting.
>>>>>>>> However, these changes were largely made through emergency powers or by state
>>>>>>>> election boards and officials, often with judicial review. In most cases, the
>>>>>>>> courts ruled these changes were legal under state constitutions. Even in
>>>>>>>> states where the legality was questioned, no court invalidated the election
>>>>>>>> results based solely on these procedural changes.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Claim 2: Mark Zuckerberg spent $450 million to benefit Democrats
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mark Zuckerberg and his wife donated to a non-partisan group, the Center for
>>>>>>>> Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), which provided funds to help local election
>>>>>>>> offices run elections during the pandemic. While some of the funds went to
>>>>>>>> areas that leaned Democrat (which are often more populous), Republican-leaning
>>>>>>>> areas also received funds. There?s no evidence that this funding was used to
>>>>>>>> favor one party over another.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Claim 3: 6 swing states stopped counting votes on election night
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In 2020, due to the unprecedented number of mail-in ballots, some states did
>>>>>>>> stop counting votes temporarily on election night. This wasn?t a unique event
>>>>>>>> in history?vote counting has often extended beyond election night in previous
>>>>>>>> elections, especially in states with close races. Mail-in ballots take longer
>>>>>>>> to process, and the delays were expected and announced beforehand. Trump?s
>>>>>>>> early lead in some states was due to the ?red mirage? phenomenon, where
>>>>>>>> same-day in-person votes (which leaned Republican) were counted first,
>>>>>>>> followed by mail-in ballots (which leaned Democrat).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Claim 4: Hunter Biden laptop story and censorship
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The Hunter Biden laptop story was published just weeks before the 2020
>>>>>>>> election. Some media outlets and social media platforms took steps to limit
>>>>>>>> its distribution, citing concerns about the authenticity of the information
>>>>>>>> and potential foreign interference. While subsequent investigations confirmed
>>>>>>>> that the laptop was part of a legitimate investigation into Hunter Biden,
>>>>>>>> there is no evidence that the suppression of this story changed the election
>>>>>>>> outcome. Polls suggesting otherwise are speculative.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Claim 5: 2 million ballots touched by anomalies
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This claim is vague and lacks concrete evidence. Many claims about voting
>>>>>>>> anomalies have been thoroughly investigated, and none have shown widespread
>>>>>>>> fraud that would alter the outcome of the election. Anomalies are common in
>>>>>>>> every election, but they are generally clerical or minor errors that do not
>>>>>>>> affect the overall result.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Claim 6: 923 affidavits alleging voter fraud
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> While it?s true that some people signed affidavits, affidavits are not proof
>>>>>>>> of fraud?they are simply statements by individuals. Many of these affidavits
>>>>>>>> were dismissed by courts due to lack of evidence or because they described
>>>>>>>> misunderstandings of normal election processes. Simply filing an affidavit
>>>>>>>> does not prove fraud.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Claim 7: 50+ courts blocked evidentiary hearings
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Many courts rejected election fraud claims because the evidence presented was
>>>>>>>> insufficient or non-existent. Courts didn?t block hearings out of bias but
>>>>>>>> rather followed legal standards that require concrete evidence before
>>>>>>>> proceeding. Most cases were dismissed because they didn?t meet the burden of
>>>>>>>> proof.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Claim 8: No evidentiary hearing for the 2020 election
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There were numerous hearings and legal challenges related to the 2020
>>>>>>>> election, including in key states like Georgia, Arizona, and Pennsylvania. In
>>>>>>>> most cases, judges found no credible evidence of widespread fraud. The idea
>>>>>>>> that there was ?no evidentiary hearing? is false.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Claim 9: 923 fact witnesses signed under perjury
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> While hundreds of people may have signed affidavits, it?s important to note
>>>>>>>> that many of these affidavits were dismissed by courts due to a lack of
>>>>>>>> supporting evidence. An affidavit alone does not constitute proof, and many
>>>>>>>> were based on misunderstandings or hearsay rather than direct knowledge of
>>>>>>>> fraud.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Claim 10: 37 states altered absentee or mail-in ballot procedures
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, many states made adjustments to their mail-in voting procedures in
>>>>>>>> response to the pandemic, which is entirely legal if done in accordance with
>>>>>>>> state laws. These changes were made to ensure voter safety and accessibility.
>>>>>>>> Courts generally upheld these changes as legal, with some minor exceptions.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Claim 11: 30,000 more ineligible ballots in swing states
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is no evidence to support the claim that 30,000 ineligible ballots were
>>>>>>>> cast in swing states. Audits and recounts in key states, including Georgia and
>>>>>>>> Arizona, have consistently shown that the number of ineligible ballots was
>>>>>>>> extremely low and nowhere near enough to affect the outcome of the election.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Claim 12: Pennsylvania allowed new ballots after the election
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This claim is false. Pennsylvania followed court-approved deadlines for
>>>>>>>> accepting mail-in ballots that were postmarked by Election Day and received
>>>>>>>> within a certain window after the election, which is a standard practice.
>>>>>>>> There is no evidence that ballots were illegally counted after the election.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Claim 13: Any one of these is enough to invalidate the election
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Each of these claims has been investigated and largely debunked. While there
>>>>>>>> were some procedural changes due to the pandemic, none of the claims provide
>>>>>>>> credible evidence of widespread fraud that would invalidate the results of the
>>>>>>>> 2020 election.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> January 6 vs. Summer 2020 Protests
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The January 6 attack was not a lawful protest. It was a violent breach of the
>>>>>>>> U.S. Capitol aimed at overturning the results of a democratic election. There
>>>>>>>> were investigations into the conduct of Capitol Police, but there is no
>>>>>>>> evidence of a government cover-up of the deaths of protesters. In contrast,
>>>>>>>> while the summer 2020 protests did lead to property damage and injuries, they
>>>>>>>> were largely protests against police brutality, and widespread condemnation
>>>>>>>> occurred when violence took place.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In summary, the 2020 election was one of the most scrutinized elections in
>>>>>>>> U.S. history, with no credible evidence found to support claims of widespread
>>>>>>>> fraud that would have changed the outcome. The claims made here have been
>>>>>>>> widely investigated, with no proof supporting the narrative that the election
>>>>>>>> was stolen.
>>
>> A shame you have no reasoned response not this content. That is OK, though,
>> just means we have reached agreement -- the election was fair or at the very
>> least there is no good evidence or reason to think it was not. Thank you.
>
> It was a

On 10/17/2024 7:42 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <%%iQO.266436$v8v2.152889@fx18.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 10/17/2024 4:33 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>> of lies:
>>
>>> In article <67119b50$4$1895505$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 4:09:13 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>> <671198e6$4$2756$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <67119743$4$2758$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 3:58:28 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>> <6711967e$5$3826$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <67118ce8$1$2873018$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 3:00:38 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>>>> <671188f1$0$3829$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <671180d7$0$1895500$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 2:14:18 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
>>>>>>>>>> <verun9$2tegq$1@dont-email.me>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-17, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <671175b5$2$2873000$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 1:36:21 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <versg5$2stfd$2@dont-email.me>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-17, P. Coonan <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17 Oct 2024, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> posted some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:1lj2hjdh81bp6l51k7lm780n4mld88clag@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This shouldn't be a surprise. Even to the morons at msnbc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'MSNBC Interviews Early Voters In Key Battleground State, Struggles To
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Find Anyone Who Voted For Harris'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://dailycaller.com/2024/10/16/msnbc-arizona-early-voting-kamala-harris/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'NBC News correspondent Vaughn Hillyard said Wednesday that not one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> early voter interviewed by his team in the battleground state of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arizona admitted they were voting for Vice President Kamala Harris.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans are voting by mail or returning their ballots early at a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> two-to-one margin over Democrats, though Democrats outpaced
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans with early voting in 2020, Hillyard said on ?Jose-Diaz
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Balart Reports.? Not a single voter lining up at the polling
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> locations in Mohave County openly said they were voting for Harris,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the NBC correspondent added.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?We went to a couple early voting locations, and we saw lengthy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lines during the lunch hour. Thirty people waiting in line, and we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should note, we did not find a single person who audibly would tell us
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that they voted for Kamala Harris,? Hillyard said. ?These were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump supporters getting out to vote early in the all-important Mohave
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> County.?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WATCH:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One supporter of Republican nominee Donald Trump named Jim Coddington
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said that voters are making a ?special effort? to vote this year
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and that it is important for those to come out early. Shelley Schwarz,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a voter in Mohave County, said she voted early for the first time ever
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because Trump encouraged voters to do so. (RELATED: Democrats?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Championing Of Early Voting Could Come Back To Haunt Them)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?He keeps saying it, and I?ve been thinking about it, and so here
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am,? Schwarz said.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another voter said he did not vote in 2020 but voted early in 2024
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because he is ?horrified by the state of the country,? Hillyard
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said. Three other voters he spoke to said they moved to Arizona from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blue states to support Trump.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump is currently ahead in Arizona, 49% to 47%, according to The New
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> York Times. President Joe Biden narrowly won the state in 2020 by less
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than one point, 49.4% to 49.1%, while the former president won the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton 49.5% to 45.4%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2016
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We're going to see a repeat of the Hillary Clinton chokefest and shocked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expressions on CBS talking heads.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I sure hope so, however the demoncrats have been plotting their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cheating methods for 4 years so who knows what they have up their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sleeves this time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where do you get these wild stories?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Stay blind.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And stupid as well.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *Just a few anomalies regarding the 2020 election.*
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Six states changed their election laws two months before the 2020
>>>>>>>>>>> election by executive fiat, instead of going through the proper channels
>>>>>>>>>>> in the legislature. That is a violation of their state constitutions and
>>>>>>>>>>> that in and of itself is enough to invalidate the results of the 2020
>>>>>>>>>>> election.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Mark Zuckerberg, hard left, spent $450 million dollars of private
>>>>>>>>>>> money on our elections. After the 2020 election analysis revealed that
>>>>>>>>>>> most of that money went to benefit Democrats.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 3. 6 swing states stopped counting the votes on election night for the
>>>>>>>>>>> first time in American history. At the time that they stopped counting
>>>>>>>>>>> the votes, Donald Trump was ahead of Biden in each of them.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 4. The unelected tech oligarchs in conjunction with the FBI in this
>>>>>>>>>>> country censored a very important story about Hunter Biden?s laptop and
>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Biden?s corruption. People who worked in the intelligence community,
>>>>>>>>>>> came out and said it was Russian disinformation only to have that laptop
>>>>>>>>>>> be admitted into evidence as part of an FBI investigation and criminal
>>>>>>>>>>> prosecution of Hunter Biden. Polling after the election showed that if
>>>>>>>>>>> people knew about the Hunter Biden laptop story it would?ve changed 17%
>>>>>>>>>>> of the vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 5. 2,036,041 ballots were touched by anomalies.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 6. 923 American citizens filled out affidavits alleging voter fraud, and
>>>>>>>>>>> signed them under penalties of perjury.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 7. 50 plus courts blocked evidentiary hearings into the alleged fraud
>>>>>>>>>>> found in 2020.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 8. Prior to 2020 there were four other contested elections, one in
>>>>>>>>>>> Florida, one in the 78th district of Missouri, one in the ninth district
>>>>>>>>>>> of North Carolina, and one in the 22nd district of New York. In every
>>>>>>>>>>> single one of those four instances, there was an evidentiary hearing. In
>>>>>>>>>>> the 2020 election, there was no evidentiary hearing. For the first time
>>>>>>>>>>> in American history.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 9. No election contest in American history has had 923 fact witnesses
>>>>>>>>>>> sign under penalties of perjury and stake their personal freedom in
>>>>>>>>>>> testimony to attest to the irregularities and legal issues found in
>>>>>>>>>>> various states.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 10. 37 states in the United States of America altered their absentee or
>>>>>>>>>>> mail in ballots ballot integrity procedures before the 2020 election.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 11. If those 37 states used the same ballot integrity procedures that
>>>>>>>>>>> they used in 2018, swing states would?ve found an upwards of 30,000 more
>>>>>>>>>>> ineligible ballots.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 12. In Pennsylvania, counties allowed new ballots to be filled out after
>>>>>>>>>>> the election.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 13. Any one of those is enough to say that there was enough fraud in the
>>>>>>>>>>> 2020 election to doubt the outcome. Can I prove Donald Trump would?ve
>>>>>>>>>>> won the election if the Democrats hadn?t cheated? No I can?t prove a
>>>>>>>>>>> counter-narrative, but I can tell you that this amount of fraud leads
>>>>>>>>>>> any reasonable person to the conclusion that Joe Biden didn?t win.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The insurrection therefore was on 11/3/2020.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 1/6 was a lawful protest with permits that got out of hand. Unlike
>>>>>>>>>>> Democrats who spent 10 months burning down this country to the tune of
>>>>>>>>>>> $2 billion dollars, and injuring 740 police officers nationwide, the
>>>>>>>>>>> capital riot had a couple million dollars in damages, 140 police
>>>>>>>>>>> officers that were injured and zero deaths. Except the 3 Trump
>>>>>>>>>>> supporters who were unarmed and killed without any investigation by the
>>>>>>>>>>> corrupt government.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Anybody who is clutching their pearls about January 6 without mentioning
>>>>>>>>>>> the fact that there was a large federal presence and many anomalies that
>>>>>>>>>>> have yet to be answered is a liar and a partisan hack.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You sound like an uninformed stage 10 TDS patient who needs to detox
>>>>>>>>>>> from CNN and MSNBC.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You can endorse the cackling communist from California, but..don?t you
>>>>>>>>>>> dare pretend like the reason why you?re doing it is because Donald Trump
>>>>>>>>>>> did something wrong.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Let?s break down and address these claims one by one:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Claim 1: States changing election laws by executive fiat
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It?s true that some states changed voting procedures before the 2020 election
>>>>>>>>>> due to the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly to expand access to mail-in voting.
>>>>>>>>>> However, these changes were largely made through emergency powers or by state
>>>>>>>>>> election boards and officials, often with judicial review. In most cases, the
>>>>>>>>>> courts ruled these changes were legal under state constitutions. Even in
>>>>>>>>>> states where the legality was questioned, no court invalidated the election
>>>>>>>>>> results based solely on these procedural changes.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Claim 2: Mark Zuckerberg spent $450 million to benefit Democrats
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Mark Zuckerberg and his wife donated to a non-partisan group, the Center for
>>>>>>>>>> Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), which provided funds to help local election
>>>>>>>>>> offices run elections during the pandemic. While some of the funds went to
>>>>>>>>>> areas that leaned Democrat (which are often more populous), Republican-leaning
>>>>>>>>>> areas also received funds. There?s no evidence that this funding was used to
>>>>>>>>>> favor one party over another.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Claim 3: 6 swing states stopped counting votes on election night
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In 2020, due to the unprecedented number of mail-in ballots, some states did
>>>>>>>>>> stop counting votes temporarily on election night. This wasn?t a unique event
>>>>>>>>>> in history?vote counting has often extended beyond election night in previous
>>>>>>>>>> elections, especially in states with close races. Mail-in ballots take longer
>>>>>>>>>> to process, and the delays were expected and announced beforehand. Trump?s
>>>>>>>>>> early lead in some states was due to the ?red mirage? phenomenon, where
>>>>>>>>>> same-day in-person votes (which leaned Republican) were counted first,
>>>>>>>>>> followed by mail-in ballots (which leaned Democrat).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Claim 4: Hunter Biden laptop story and censorship
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The Hunter Biden laptop story was published just weeks before the 2020
>>>>>>>>>> election. Some media outlets and social media platforms took steps to limit
>>>>>>>>>> its distribution, citing concerns about the authenticity of the information
>>>>>>>>>> and potential foreign interference. While subsequent investigations confirmed
>>>>>>>>>> that the laptop was part of a legitimate investigation into Hunter Biden,
>>>>>>>>>> there is no evidence that the suppression of this story changed the election
>>>>>>>>>> outcome. Polls suggesting otherwise are speculative.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Claim 5: 2 million ballots touched by anomalies
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This claim is vague and lacks concrete evidence. Many claims about voting
>>>>>>>>>> anomalies have been thoroughly investigated, and none have shown widespread
>>>>>>>>>> fraud that would alter the outcome of the election. Anomalies are common in
>>>>>>>>>> every election, but they are generally clerical or minor errors that do not
>>>>>>>>>> affect the overall result.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Claim 6: 923 affidavits alleging voter fraud
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> While it?s true that some people signed affidavits, affidavits are not proof
>>>>>>>>>> of fraud?they are simply statements by individuals. Many of these affidavits
>>>>>>>>>> were dismissed by courts due to lack of evidence or because they described
>>>>>>>>>> misunderstandings of normal election processes. Simply filing an affidavit
>>>>>>>>>> does not prove fraud.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Claim 7: 50+ courts blocked evidentiary hearings
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Many courts rejected election fraud claims because the evidence presented was
>>>>>>>>>> insufficient or non-existent. Courts didn?t block hearings out of bias but
>>>>>>>>>> rather followed legal standards that require concrete evidence before
>>>>>>>>>> proceeding. Most cases were dismissed because they didn?t meet the burden of
>>>>>>>>>> proof.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Claim 8: No evidentiary hearing for the 2020 election
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There were numerous hearings and legal challenges related to the 2020
>>>>>>>>>> election, including in key states like Georgia, Arizona, and Pennsylvania. In
>>>>>>>>>> most cases, judges found no credible evidence of widespread fraud. The idea
>>>>>>>>>> that there was ?no evidentiary hearing? is false.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Claim 9: 923 fact witnesses signed under perjury
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> While hundreds of people may have signed affidavits, it?s important to note
>>>>>>>>>> that many of these affidavits were dismissed by courts due to a lack of
>>>>>>>>>> supporting evidence. An affidavit alone does not constitute proof, and many
>>>>>>>>>> were based on misunderstandings or hearsay rather than direct knowledge of
>>>>>>>>>> fraud.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Claim 10: 37 states altered absentee or mail-in ballot procedures
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes, many states made adjustments to their mail-in voting procedures in
>>>>>>>>>> response to the pandemic, which is entirely legal if done in accordance with
>>>>>>>>>> state laws. These changes were made to ensure voter safety and accessibility.
>>>>>>>>>> Courts generally upheld these changes as legal, with some minor exceptions.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Claim 11: 30,000 more ineligible ballots in swing states
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There is no evidence to support the claim that 30,000 ineligible ballots were
>>>>>>>>>> cast in swing states. Audits and recounts in key states, including Georgia and
>>>>>>>>>> Arizona, have consistently shown that the number of ineligible ballots was
>>>>>>>>>> extremely low and nowhere near enough to affect the outcome of the election.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Claim 12: Pennsylvania allowed new ballots after the election
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This claim is false. Pennsylvania followed court-approved deadlines for
>>>>>>>>>> accepting mail-in ballots that were postmarked by Election Day and received
>>>>>>>>>> within a certain window after the election, which is a standard practice.
>>>>>>>>>> There is no evidence that ballots were illegally counted after the election.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Claim 13: Any one of these is enough to invalidate the election
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Each of these claims has been investigated and largely debunked. While there
>>>>>>>>>> were some procedural changes due to the pandemic, none of the claims provide
>>>>>>>>>> credible evidence of widespread fraud that would invalidate the results of the
>>>>>>>>>> 2020 election.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> January 6 vs. Summer 2020 Protests
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The January 6 attack was not a lawful protest. It was a violent breach of the
>>>>>>>>>> U.S. Capitol aimed at overturning the results of a democratic election. There
>>>>>>>>>> were investigations into the conduct of Capitol Police, but there is no
>>>>>>>>>> evidence of a government cover-up of the deaths of protesters. In contrast,
>>>>>>>>>> while the summer 2020 protests did lead to property damage and injuries, they
>>>>>>>>>> were largely protests against police brutality, and widespread condemnation
>>>>>>>>>> occurred when violence took place.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In summary, the 2020 election was one of the most scrutinized elections in
>>>>>>>>>> U.S. history, with no credible evidence found to support claims of widespread
>>>>>>>>>> fraud that would have changed the outcome. The claims made here have been
>>>>>>>>>> widely investigated, with no proof supporting the narrative that the election
>>>>>>>>>> was stolen.
>>>>
>>>> A shame you have no reasoned response not this content. That is OK, though,
>>>> just means we have reached agreement -- the election was fair or at the very
>>>> least there is no good evidence or reason to think it was not. Thank you.
>>>
>>> It was a
>>
>> It was a free, fair and clean election, and everyone knows it, including Trump ?
>> *especially* Trump.
>
> Nope.

On 10/18/2024 8:20 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <nXuQO.382676$FzW1.325758@fx14.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 10/17/2024 7:42 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>> of lies:
>>
>>> In article <%%iQO.266436$v8v2.152889@fx18.iad>,
>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>
>>>> On 10/17/2024 4:33 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>> of lies:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <67119b50$4$1895505$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 4:09:13 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>> <671198e6$4$2756$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <67119743$4$2758$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 3:58:28 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>>>> <6711967e$5$3826$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <67118ce8$1$2873018$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 3:00:38 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>>>>>> <671188f1$0$3829$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <671180d7$0$1895500$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 2:14:18 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>> <verun9$2tegq$1@dont-email.me>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-17, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <671175b5$2$2873000$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 1:36:21 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <versg5$2stfd$2@dont-email.me>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-17, P. Coonan <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17 Oct 2024, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> posted some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:1lj2hjdh81bp6l51k7lm780n4mld88clag@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This shouldn't be a surprise. Even to the morons at msnbc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'MSNBC Interviews Early Voters In Key Battleground State, Struggles To
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Find Anyone Who Voted For Harris'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://dailycaller.com/2024/10/16/msnbc-arizona-early-voting-kamala-harris/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'NBC News correspondent Vaughn Hillyard said Wednesday that not one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> early voter interviewed by his team in the battleground state of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arizona admitted they were voting for Vice President Kamala Harris.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans are voting by mail or returning their ballots early at a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> two-to-one margin over Democrats, though Democrats outpaced
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans with early voting in 2020, Hillyard said on ?Jose-Diaz
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Balart Reports.? Not a single voter lining up at the polling
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> locations in Mohave County openly said they were voting for Harris,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the NBC correspondent added.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?We went to a couple early voting locations, and we saw lengthy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lines during the lunch hour. Thirty people waiting in line, and we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should note, we did not find a single person who audibly would tell us
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that they voted for Kamala Harris,? Hillyard said. ?These were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump supporters getting out to vote early in the all-important Mohave
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> County.?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WATCH:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One supporter of Republican nominee Donald Trump named Jim Coddington
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said that voters are making a ?special effort? to vote this year
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and that it is important for those to come out early. Shelley Schwarz,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a voter in Mohave County, said she voted early for the first time ever
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because Trump encouraged voters to do so. (RELATED: Democrats?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Championing Of Early Voting Could Come Back To Haunt Them)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?He keeps saying it, and I?ve been thinking about it, and so here
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am,? Schwarz said.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another voter said he did not vote in 2020 but voted early in 2024
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because he is ?horrified by the state of the country,? Hillyard
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said. Three other voters he spoke to said they moved to Arizona from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blue states to support Trump.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump is currently ahead in Arizona, 49% to 47%, according to The New
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> York Times. President Joe Biden narrowly won the state in 2020 by less
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than one point, 49.4% to 49.1%, while the former president won the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton 49.5% to 45.4%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2016
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We're going to see a repeat of the Hillary Clinton chokefest and shocked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expressions on CBS talking heads.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I sure hope so, however the demoncrats have been plotting their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cheating methods for 4 years so who knows what they have up their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sleeves this time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where do you get these wild stories?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stay blind.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And stupid as well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Just a few anomalies regarding the 2020 election.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Six states changed their election laws two months before the 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>> election by executive fiat, instead of going through the proper channels
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the legislature. That is a violation of their state constitutions and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that in and of itself is enough to invalidate the results of the 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>> election.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Mark Zuckerberg, hard left, spent $450 million dollars of private
>>>>>>>>>>>>> money on our elections. After the 2020 election analysis revealed that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> most of that money went to benefit Democrats.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. 6 swing states stopped counting the votes on election night for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> first time in American history. At the time that they stopped counting
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the votes, Donald Trump was ahead of Biden in each of them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. The unelected tech oligarchs in conjunction with the FBI in this
>>>>>>>>>>>>> country censored a very important story about Hunter Biden?s laptop and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Biden?s corruption. People who worked in the intelligence community,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> came out and said it was Russian disinformation only to have that laptop
>>>>>>>>>>>>> be admitted into evidence as part of an FBI investigation and criminal
>>>>>>>>>>>>> prosecution of Hunter Biden. Polling after the election showed that if
>>>>>>>>>>>>> people knew about the Hunter Biden laptop story it would?ve changed 17%
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5. 2,036,041 ballots were touched by anomalies.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6. 923 American citizens filled out affidavits alleging voter fraud, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> signed them under penalties of perjury.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7. 50 plus courts blocked evidentiary hearings into the alleged fraud
>>>>>>>>>>>>> found in 2020.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8. Prior to 2020 there were four other contested elections, one in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Florida, one in the 78th district of Missouri, one in the ninth district
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of North Carolina, and one in the 22nd district of New York. In every
>>>>>>>>>>>>> single one of those four instances, there was an evidentiary hearing. In
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the 2020 election, there was no evidentiary hearing. For the first time
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in American history.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9. No election contest in American history has had 923 fact witnesses
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sign under penalties of perjury and stake their personal freedom in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> testimony to attest to the irregularities and legal issues found in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> various states.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 10. 37 states in the United States of America altered their absentee or
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mail in ballots ballot integrity procedures before the 2020 election.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 11. If those 37 states used the same ballot integrity procedures that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> they used in 2018, swing states would?ve found an upwards of 30,000 more
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ineligible ballots.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12. In Pennsylvania, counties allowed new ballots to be filled out after
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the election.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 13. Any one of those is enough to say that there was enough fraud in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020 election to doubt the outcome. Can I prove Donald Trump would?ve
>>>>>>>>>>>>> won the election if the Democrats hadn?t cheated? No I can?t prove a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> counter-narrative, but I can tell you that this amount of fraud leads
>>>>>>>>>>>>> any reasonable person to the conclusion that Joe Biden didn?t win.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The insurrection therefore was on 11/3/2020.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1/6 was a lawful protest with permits that got out of hand. Unlike
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Democrats who spent 10 months burning down this country to the tune of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> $2 billion dollars, and injuring 740 police officers nationwide, the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> capital riot had a couple million dollars in damages, 140 police
>>>>>>>>>>>>> officers that were injured and zero deaths. Except the 3 Trump
>>>>>>>>>>>>> supporters who were unarmed and killed without any investigation by the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> corrupt government.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anybody who is clutching their pearls about January 6 without mentioning
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the fact that there was a large federal presence and many anomalies that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have yet to be answered is a liar and a partisan hack.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound like an uninformed stage 10 TDS patient who needs to detox
>>>>>>>>>>>>> from CNN and MSNBC.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can endorse the cackling communist from California, but..don?t you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> dare pretend like the reason why you?re doing it is because Donald Trump
>>>>>>>>>>>>> did something wrong.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Let?s break down and address these claims one by one:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 1: States changing election laws by executive fiat
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It?s true that some states changed voting procedures before the 2020 election
>>>>>>>>>>>> due to the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly to expand access to mail-in voting.
>>>>>>>>>>>> However, these changes were largely made through emergency powers or by state
>>>>>>>>>>>> election boards and officials, often with judicial review. In most cases, the
>>>>>>>>>>>> courts ruled these changes were legal under state constitutions. Even in
>>>>>>>>>>>> states where the legality was questioned, no court invalidated the election
>>>>>>>>>>>> results based solely on these procedural changes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 2: Mark Zuckerberg spent $450 million to benefit Democrats
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Mark Zuckerberg and his wife donated to a non-partisan group, the Center for
>>>>>>>>>>>> Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), which provided funds to help local election
>>>>>>>>>>>> offices run elections during the pandemic. While some of the funds went to
>>>>>>>>>>>> areas that leaned Democrat (which are often more populous), Republican-leaning
>>>>>>>>>>>> areas also received funds. There?s no evidence that this funding was used to
>>>>>>>>>>>> favor one party over another.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 3: 6 swing states stopped counting votes on election night
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In 2020, due to the unprecedented number of mail-in ballots, some states did
>>>>>>>>>>>> stop counting votes temporarily on election night. This wasn?t a unique event
>>>>>>>>>>>> in history?vote counting has often extended beyond election night in previous
>>>>>>>>>>>> elections, especially in states with close races. Mail-in ballots take longer
>>>>>>>>>>>> to process, and the delays were expected and announced beforehand. Trump?s
>>>>>>>>>>>> early lead in some states was due to the ?red mirage? phenomenon, where
>>>>>>>>>>>> same-day in-person votes (which leaned Republican) were counted first,
>>>>>>>>>>>> followed by mail-in ballots (which leaned Democrat).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 4: Hunter Biden laptop story and censorship
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The Hunter Biden laptop story was published just weeks before the 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>> election. Some media outlets and social media platforms took steps to limit
>>>>>>>>>>>> its distribution, citing concerns about the authenticity of the information
>>>>>>>>>>>> and potential foreign interference. While subsequent investigations confirmed
>>>>>>>>>>>> that the laptop was part of a legitimate investigation into Hunter Biden,
>>>>>>>>>>>> there is no evidence that the suppression of this story changed the election
>>>>>>>>>>>> outcome. Polls suggesting otherwise are speculative.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 5: 2 million ballots touched by anomalies
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This claim is vague and lacks concrete evidence. Many claims about voting
>>>>>>>>>>>> anomalies have been thoroughly investigated, and none have shown widespread
>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud that would alter the outcome of the election. Anomalies are common in
>>>>>>>>>>>> every election, but they are generally clerical or minor errors that do not
>>>>>>>>>>>> affect the overall result.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 6: 923 affidavits alleging voter fraud
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> While it?s true that some people signed affidavits, affidavits are not proof
>>>>>>>>>>>> of fraud?they are simply statements by individuals. Many of these affidavits
>>>>>>>>>>>> were dismissed by courts due to lack of evidence or because they described
>>>>>>>>>>>> misunderstandings of normal election processes. Simply filing an affidavit
>>>>>>>>>>>> does not prove fraud.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 7: 50+ courts blocked evidentiary hearings
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Many courts rejected election fraud claims because the evidence presented was
>>>>>>>>>>>> insufficient or non-existent. Courts didn?t block hearings out of bias but
>>>>>>>>>>>> rather followed legal standards that require concrete evidence before
>>>>>>>>>>>> proceeding. Most cases were dismissed because they didn?t meet the burden of
>>>>>>>>>>>> proof.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 8: No evidentiary hearing for the 2020 election
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> There were numerous hearings and legal challenges related to the 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>> election, including in key states like Georgia, Arizona, and Pennsylvania. In
>>>>>>>>>>>> most cases, judges found no credible evidence of widespread fraud. The idea
>>>>>>>>>>>> that there was ?no evidentiary hearing? is false.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 9: 923 fact witnesses signed under perjury
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> While hundreds of people may have signed affidavits, it?s important to note
>>>>>>>>>>>> that many of these affidavits were dismissed by courts due to a lack of
>>>>>>>>>>>> supporting evidence. An affidavit alone does not constitute proof, and many
>>>>>>>>>>>> were based on misunderstandings or hearsay rather than direct knowledge of
>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 10: 37 states altered absentee or mail-in ballot procedures
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, many states made adjustments to their mail-in voting procedures in
>>>>>>>>>>>> response to the pandemic, which is entirely legal if done in accordance with
>>>>>>>>>>>> state laws. These changes were made to ensure voter safety and accessibility.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Courts generally upheld these changes as legal, with some minor exceptions.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 11: 30,000 more ineligible ballots in swing states
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no evidence to support the claim that 30,000 ineligible ballots were
>>>>>>>>>>>> cast in swing states. Audits and recounts in key states, including Georgia and
>>>>>>>>>>>> Arizona, have consistently shown that the number of ineligible ballots was
>>>>>>>>>>>> extremely low and nowhere near enough to affect the outcome of the election.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 12: Pennsylvania allowed new ballots after the election
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This claim is false. Pennsylvania followed court-approved deadlines for
>>>>>>>>>>>> accepting mail-in ballots that were postmarked by Election Day and received
>>>>>>>>>>>> within a certain window after the election, which is a standard practice.
>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no evidence that ballots were illegally counted after the election.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 13: Any one of these is enough to invalidate the election
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Each of these claims has been investigated and largely debunked. While there
>>>>>>>>>>>> were some procedural changes due to the pandemic, none of the claims provide
>>>>>>>>>>>> credible evidence of widespread fraud that would invalidate the results of the
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020 election.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> January 6 vs. Summer 2020 Protests
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The January 6 attack was not a lawful protest. It was a violent breach of the
>>>>>>>>>>>> U.S. Capitol aimed at overturning the results of a democratic election. There
>>>>>>>>>>>> were investigations into the conduct of Capitol Police, but there is no
>>>>>>>>>>>> evidence of a government cover-up of the deaths of protesters. In contrast,
>>>>>>>>>>>> while the summer 2020 protests did lead to property damage and injuries, they
>>>>>>>>>>>> were largely protests against police brutality, and widespread condemnation
>>>>>>>>>>>> occurred when violence took place.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In summary, the 2020 election was one of the most scrutinized elections in
>>>>>>>>>>>> U.S. history, with no credible evidence found to support claims of widespread
>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud that would have changed the outcome. The claims made here have been
>>>>>>>>>>>> widely investigated, with no proof supporting the narrative that the election
>>>>>>>>>>>> was stolen.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A shame you have no reasoned response not this content. That is OK, though,
>>>>>> just means we have reached agreement -- the election was fair or at the very
>>>>>> least there is no good evidence or reason to think it was not. Thank you.
>>>>>
>>>>> It was a
>>>>
>>>> It was a free, fair and clean election, and everyone knows it, including Trump ?
>>>> *especially* Trump.
>>>
>>> Nope.
>>
>> Yep. You know it was. There is *zero* evidence of any "massive,"
>> election-changing fraud. There are only insurrectionist Trump's lies about it.
>>
>> Free, fair and clean election — settled.
>
> You believe the lies of the left.

On 10/18/2024 8:52 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <IlvQO.34574$MoU3.23874@fx36.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>> On 10/18/2024 8:20 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>> of lies:
>>
>>> In article <nXuQO.382676$FzW1.325758@fx14.iad>,
>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>
>>>> On 10/17/2024 7:42 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>> of lies:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <%%iQO.266436$v8v2.152889@fx18.iad>,
>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/17/2024 4:33 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>>>>>> convicted
>>>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free
>>>>>> batch
>>>>>> of lies:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <67119b50$4$1895505$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 4:09:13 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>>>> <671198e6$4$2756$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <67119743$4$2758$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 3:58:28 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>>>>>> <6711967e$5$3826$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <67118ce8$1$2873018$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 3:00:38 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>> <671188f1$0$3829$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <671180d7$0$1895500$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 2:14:18 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <verun9$2tegq$1@dont-email.me>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-17, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <671175b5$2$2873000$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 1:36:21 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <versg5$2stfd$2@dont-email.me>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-17, P. Coonan <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17 Oct 2024, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> posted some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:1lj2hjdh81bp6l51k7lm780n4mld88clag@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This shouldn't be a surprise. Even to the morons at msnbc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'MSNBC Interviews Early Voters In Key Battleground State,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Struggles To
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Find Anyone Who Voted For Harris'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://dailycaller.com/2024/10/16/msnbc-arizona-early-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voting-kamala-harris/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'NBC News correspondent Vaughn Hillyard said Wednesday that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> early voter interviewed by his team in the battleground state of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arizona admitted they were voting for Vice President Kamala
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Harris.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans are voting by mail or returning their ballots
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> early at a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> two-to-one margin over Democrats, though Democrats outpaced
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans with early voting in 2020, Hillyard said on ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jose-Diaz
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Balart Reports.? Not a single voter lining up at the polling
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> locations in Mohave County openly said they were voting for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Harris,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the NBC correspondent added.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?We went to a couple early voting locations, and we saw lengthy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lines during the lunch hour. Thirty people waiting in line,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should note, we did not find a single person who audibly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would tell us
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that they voted for Kamala Harris,? Hillyard said. ?These were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump supporters getting out to vote early in the all-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> important Mohave
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> County.?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WATCH:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One supporter of Republican nominee Donald Trump named Jim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Coddington
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said that voters are making a ?special effort? to vote this year
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and that it is important for those to come out early. Shelley
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Schwarz,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a voter in Mohave County, said she voted early for the first
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time ever
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because Trump encouraged voters to do so. (RELATED: Democrats?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Championing Of Early Voting Could Come Back To Haunt Them)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?He keeps saying it, and I?ve been thinking about it, and so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am,? Schwarz said.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another voter said he did not vote in 2020 but voted early in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2024
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because he is ?horrified by the state of the country,? Hillyard
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said. Three other voters he spoke to said they moved to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arizona from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blue states to support Trump.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump is currently ahead in Arizona, 49% to 47%, according to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The New
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> York Times. President Joe Biden narrowly won the state in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020 by less
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than one point, 49.4% to 49.1%, while the former president
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton 49.5%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to 45.4%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2016
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We're going to see a repeat of the Hillary Clinton chokefest
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and shocked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expressions on CBS talking heads.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I sure hope so, however the demoncrats have been plotting their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cheating methods for 4 years so who knows what they have up their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sleeves this time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where do you get these wild stories?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stay blind.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And stupid as well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Just a few anomalies regarding the 2020 election.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Six states changed their election laws two months before the 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election by executive fiat, instead of going through the proper
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> channels
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the legislature. That is a violation of their state
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> constitutions and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that in and of itself is enough to invalidate the results of the 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Mark Zuckerberg, hard left, spent $450 million dollars of private
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> money on our elections. After the 2020 election analysis revealed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> most of that money went to benefit Democrats.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. 6 swing states stopped counting the votes on election night for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first time in American history. At the time that they stopped
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> counting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the votes, Donald Trump was ahead of Biden in each of them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. The unelected tech oligarchs in conjunction with the FBI in this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> country censored a very important story about Hunter Biden?s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> laptop and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Biden?s corruption. People who worked in the intelligence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> community,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> came out and said it was Russian disinformation only to have that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> laptop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be admitted into evidence as part of an FBI investigation and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criminal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prosecution of Hunter Biden. Polling after the election showed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people knew about the Hunter Biden laptop story it would?ve
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changed 17%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5. 2,036,041 ballots were touched by anomalies.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6. 923 American citizens filled out affidavits alleging voter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> signed them under penalties of perjury.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7. 50 plus courts blocked evidentiary hearings into the alleged fraud
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found in 2020.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8. Prior to 2020 there were four other contested elections, one in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Florida, one in the 78th district of Missouri, one in the ninth
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> district
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of North Carolina, and one in the 22nd district of New York. In every
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> single one of those four instances, there was an evidentiary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hearing. In
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the 2020 election, there was no evidentiary hearing. For the first
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in American history.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9. No election contest in American history has had 923 fact witnesses
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sign under penalties of perjury and stake their personal freedom in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testimony to attest to the irregularities and legal issues found in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> various states.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 10. 37 states in the United States of America altered their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> absentee or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mail in ballots ballot integrity procedures before the 2020 election.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 11. If those 37 states used the same ballot integrity procedures that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they used in 2018, swing states would?ve found an upwards of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 30,000 more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ineligible ballots.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12. In Pennsylvania, counties allowed new ballots to be filled out
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the election.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 13. Any one of those is enough to say that there was enough fraud
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020 election to doubt the outcome. Can I prove Donald Trump would?ve
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won the election if the Democrats hadn?t cheated? No I can?t prove a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> counter-narrative, but I can tell you that this amount of fraud leads
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any reasonable person to the conclusion that Joe Biden didn?t win.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The insurrection therefore was on 11/3/2020.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1/6 was a lawful protest with permits that got out of hand. Unlike
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Democrats who spent 10 months burning down this country to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tune of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $2 billion dollars, and injuring 740 police officers nationwide, the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capital riot had a couple million dollars in damages, 140 police
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officers that were injured and zero deaths. Except the 3 Trump
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supporters who were unarmed and killed without any investigation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> corrupt government.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anybody who is clutching their pearls about January 6 without
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mentioning
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the fact that there was a large federal presence and many
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anomalies that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have yet to be answered is a liar and a partisan hack.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You sound like an uninformed stage 10 TDS patient who needs to detox
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from CNN and MSNBC.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can endorse the cackling communist from California, but..don?t
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dare pretend like the reason why you?re doing it is because Donald
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did something wrong.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let?s break down and address these claims one by one:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 1: States changing election laws by executive fiat
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It?s true that some states changed voting procedures before the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020 election
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> due to the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly to expand access to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mail-in voting.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, these changes were largely made through emergency powers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or by state
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election boards and officials, often with judicial review. In most
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cases, the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> courts ruled these changes were legal under state constitutions.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> states where the legality was questioned, no court invalidated the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> results based solely on these procedural changes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 2: Mark Zuckerberg spent $450 million to benefit Democrats
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mark Zuckerberg and his wife donated to a non-partisan group, the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Center for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), which provided funds to help local
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> offices run elections during the pandemic. While some of the funds
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> went to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> areas that leaned Democrat (which are often more populous),
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republican-leaning
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> areas also received funds. There?s no evidence that this funding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was used to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> favor one party over another.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 3: 6 swing states stopped counting votes on election night
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In 2020, due to the unprecedented number of mail-in ballots, some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> states did
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stop counting votes temporarily on election night. This wasn?t a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unique event
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in history?vote counting has often extended beyond election night
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in previous
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> elections, especially in states with close races. Mail-in ballots
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take longer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to process, and the delays were expected and announced beforehand.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump?s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> early lead in some states was due to the ?red mirage? phenomenon,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> where
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> same-day in-person votes (which leaned Republican) were counted first,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> followed by mail-in ballots (which leaned Democrat).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 4: Hunter Biden laptop story and censorship
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Hunter Biden laptop story was published just weeks before the 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election. Some media outlets and social media platforms took steps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to limit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its distribution, citing concerns about the authenticity of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and potential foreign interference. While subsequent investigations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> confirmed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that the laptop was part of a legitimate investigation into Hunter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Biden,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is no evidence that the suppression of this story changed the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> outcome. Polls suggesting otherwise are speculative.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 5: 2 million ballots touched by anomalies
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This claim is vague and lacks concrete evidence. Many claims about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anomalies have been thoroughly investigated, and none have shown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> widespread
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud that would alter the outcome of the election. Anomalies are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> common in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> every election, but they are generally clerical or minor errors
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that do not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> affect the overall result.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 6: 923 affidavits alleging voter fraud
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> While it?s true that some people signed affidavits, affidavits are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not proof
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of fraud?they are simply statements by individuals. Many of these
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> affidavits
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were dismissed by courts due to lack of evidence or because they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> described
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> misunderstandings of normal election processes. Simply filing an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> affidavit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does not prove fraud.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 7: 50+ courts blocked evidentiary hearings
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Many courts rejected election fraud claims because the evidence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> presented was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> insufficient or non-existent. Courts didn?t block hearings out of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bias but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rather followed legal standards that require concrete evidence before
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proceeding. Most cases were dismissed because they didn?t meet the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> burden of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proof.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 8: No evidentiary hearing for the 2020 election
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were numerous hearings and legal challenges related to the 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election, including in key states like Georgia, Arizona, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pennsylvania. In
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> most cases, judges found no credible evidence of widespread fraud.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The idea
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that there was ?no evidentiary hearing? is false.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 9: 923 fact witnesses signed under perjury
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> While hundreds of people may have signed affidavits, it?s important
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to note
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that many of these affidavits were dismissed by courts due to a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lack of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supporting evidence. An affidavit alone does not constitute proof,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and many
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were based on misunderstandings or hearsay rather than direct
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> knowledge of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 10: 37 states altered absentee or mail-in ballot procedures
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, many states made adjustments to their mail-in voting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> procedures in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response to the pandemic, which is entirely legal if done in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accordance with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state laws. These changes were made to ensure voter safety and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accessibility.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Courts generally upheld these changes as legal, with some minor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exceptions.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 11: 30,000 more ineligible ballots in swing states
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no evidence to support the claim that 30,000 ineligible
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ballots were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cast in swing states. Audits and recounts in key states, including
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Georgia and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arizona, have consistently shown that the number of ineligible
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ballots was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extremely low and nowhere near enough to affect the outcome of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 12: Pennsylvania allowed new ballots after the election
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This claim is false. Pennsylvania followed court-approved deadlines
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accepting mail-in ballots that were postmarked by Election Day and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> received
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> within a certain window after the election, which is a standard
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> practice.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no evidence that ballots were illegally counted after the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Claim 13: Any one of these is enough to invalidate the election
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Each of these claims has been investigated and largely debunked.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> While there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were some procedural changes due to the pandemic, none of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> claims provide
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> credible evidence of widespread fraud that would invalidate the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> results of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020 election.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> January 6 vs. Summer 2020 Protests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The January 6 attack was not a lawful protest. It was a violent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> breach of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> U.S. Capitol aimed at overturning the results of a democratic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election. There
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were investigations into the conduct of Capitol Police, but there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evidence of a government cover-up of the deaths of protesters. In
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contrast,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> while the summer 2020 protests did lead to property damage and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> injuries, they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were largely protests against police brutality, and widespread
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> condemnation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> occurred when violence took place.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In summary, the 2020 election was one of the most scrutinized
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> elections in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> U.S. history, with no credible evidence found to support claims of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> widespread
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud that would have changed the outcome. The claims made here
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> widely investigated, with no proof supporting the narrative that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the election
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was stolen.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A shame you have no reasoned response not this content. That is OK, though,
>>>>>>>> just means we have reached agreement -- the election was fair or at the very
>>>>>>>> least there is no good evidence or reason to think it was not. Thank you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It was a
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It was a free, fair and clean election, and everyone knows it, including
>>>>>> Trump ?
>>>>>> *especially* Trump.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope.
>>>>
>>>> Yep. You know it was. There is *zero* evidence of any "massive,"
>>>> election-changing fraud. There are only insurrectionist Trump's lies about it.
>>>>
>>>> Free, fair and clean election — settled.
>>>
>>> You believe the lies of the left.
>>
>> No, I believe the rock-solid unquestioned facts. No "massive" election-changing
>> fraud. This is settled. And you and Trump know it.
>
> I don't believe the lies your side tells.
*All* you believe are Trump lies. You're a gullible, unthinking fuckwit with an
empty bullshit life. All you do all fucking day long is post meaningless
content-free bullshit to Usenet.

Michael A Terrell wrote:
> You're a gullible, unthinking fuckwit with an empty bullshit life.

....exposing your origins and shields:

https://x.com/JoshWalkos/status/1846949635018940587

Now why would the Pentagon want to “create deepfake internet users”?

Wouldn’t that be “misinformation” and a “threat to our democracy”?

The answer is, yes it would, and that’s the entire point with these ghouls
--
⛨ 🥐🥖🗼🤪

Michael A Terrell wrote:
> This is settled.

....exposing your origins and shields:

https://x.com/JoshWalkos/status/1846949635018940587

Now why would the Pentagon want to “create deepfake internet users”?

Wouldn’t that be “misinformation” and a “threat to our democracy”?

The answer is, yes it would, and that’s the entire point with these ghouls
--
⛨ 🥐🥖🗼🤪

Michael A Terrell wrote:
> fair and clean election

....exposing your origins and shields, little man Ball/glowie:

https://x.com/JoshWalkos/status/1846949635018940587

Now why would the Pentagon want to “create deepfake internet users”?

Wouldn’t that be “misinformation” and a “threat to our democracy”?

The answer is, yes it would, and that’s the entire point with these ghouls
--
⛨ 🥐🥖🗼🤪