Marjorie Taylor Greene Calls Boebert a Little Bitch on the House Floor

A feud has been boiling between Marjorie Taylor Greene and Lauren Boebert
for months. It finally reached a new level on Wednesday.

The messy feud between two of MAGA world�s biggest stars burst into
public view on Wednesday, when Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) called
Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) a �little bitch� to her face on the floor of
the U.S. House of Representatives.

The angry exchange came as the two lawmakers have been swiping at each
other over their competing resolutions to impeach President Joe Biden.
But tensions came to a head on Wednesday after Boebert leveraged a
procedural tool to force a vote on her own impeachment resolution within
days�undercutting Greene, who had offered her own resolution, but not
with the procedural advantages of forcing a vote.
ADVERTISING

Greene apparently cursed out Boebert while the House was voting Wednesday
afternoon, as the two spoke in a center aisle of the House floor; part of
their interaction was captured on C-SPAN�s cameras.

According to two sources that saw the exchange and a third familiar with
the matter, the back and forth began when Boebert approached Greene�then
seated in the chamber�and confronted her over �statements you made about
me publicly.� All three of the sources said Greene called Boebert a
�bitch.� One of the sources said Greene called her �a little bitch.�

According to two of the sources, Greene then stood up and alleged that
Boebert �copied my articles of impeachment,� to which the Colorado
lawmaker fired back that she hadn�t even read Greene�s resolution.

�I�ve donated to you, I�ve defended you. But you�ve been nothing but a
little bitch to me,� Greene told Boebert, according to a source who
witnessed the exchange. �And you copied my articles of impeachment after
I asked you to cosponsor them.�

The name-calling was confirmed by another GOP lawmaker and another source
who witnessed the exchange.
ADVERTISING

�I heard Marjorie call Boebert a bitch right to her face,� one GOP
lawmaker said, granted anonymity by The Daily Beast to speak freely about
the argument.

�OK, Marjorie, we�re through,� Boebert then said, shrugging her
shoulders.

With Boebert�s back turned, ??Greene responded: �We were never together.�

Reached for comment about the exchange, Boebert didn�t deny the back and
forth.

�Marjorie is not my enemy. I came here to protect our children and their
posterity. Joe Biden and the Democrats are destroying our country,� she
told The Daily Beast. �My priorities are to correct their bad policies
and save America.�

As for her part, when asked about their exchange, Greene told The Daily
Beast: �Imitation is the greatest form of flattery.�

Earlier in the day, Greene said she has long championed articles of
impeachment against Biden�and strongly suggested Boebert is late to a
push that she herself already owns.

�Lauren Boebert never addressed the conference,� Greene said. �I made it
clear to the conference that I have introduced articles of impeachment,
literally since Joe Biden�s first day in office.�

�I have been talking about it with everybody forever,� Greene continued.
�Literally, everyone. Forever, �til I�m blue in the face. You see me? I�m
blue in the face.�

Boebert declined to speak to the GOP conference on Wednesday about her
fast-tracked impeachment resolution, after Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA)
invited her to do so ahead of a Wednesday morning, closed-door conference
meeting. McCarthy has already come out against the impeachment
resolution.

It�s not just McCarthy, however, who has spoken out against Boebert�s
impeachment articles. Rep. Byron Donalds (R-FL)�a fellow House Freedom
Caucus member�disagreed with Boebert�s decision to force a vote so
quickly on such a weighty matter.

�We do have a process of doing things,� he told The Daily Beast.
�Impeachment is at such a high level that you know there should be some
process for that.�

The bitter impeachment spat is just the latest in a string of
deteriorations that have turned a once warm relationship between Boebert
and Greene ice cold.

After beginning their respective congressional careers in 2021 as MAGA
rabble-rousers fighting a Democratic majority, Greene and Boebert�s paths
began to diverge as the GOP zeroed in on control of the chamber.

REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein

Once a pariah in the Republican ranks, Greene made herself an
indispensable ally to McCarthy, boosting his credibility with the far-
right while she began to win over some former detractors in the party
mainstream.

Despite winning re-election in 2022 by just 500 votes, Boebert has tacked
even harder to the right. She has aligned herself with a small faction of
conservatives who opposed McCarthy�s speakership, and appears determined
to undermine him wherever possible.

In January, The Daily Beast reported that Greene confronted Boebert in
the women�s bathroom off the House floor, accusing her of being disloyal
to McCarthy, whom Boebert was refusing to support for Speaker.

�You were OK taking millions of dollars from McCarthy but you refuse to
vote for him for Speaker, Lauren?� Greene asked, according to a source
familiar with the interaction.

Both Greene and Boebert have since become vocal proponents of impeaching
Biden and other Democrats�to the delight of the MAGA base�but their
jostling to be the first and loudest Republicans to own the push has
resulted in a major escalation of their feud.

Last month, Greene kicked off what she called an �impeachment week,�
filing articles of impeachment against Biden and several of his cabinet
officials.

Not to be outdone, Boebert filed her own articles of impeachment against
Biden, and she leveraged a parliamentary tool on Tuesday�called a
privileged resolution�to force an impeachment vote on the House floor.

Despite her alliance with McCarthy, Greene told Politico on Tuesday that
she would be doing the same thing, pointedly noting that her plans were
laid �before this weekend.�

That indirect back-and-forth, conducted through press releases and quotes
to media outlets, seems to have provided the kindling for Greene and
Boebert�s tense exchange on Wednesday.

In the broader GOP conference, many members believe it is hardly the
right time to push for Biden�s impeachment, and they worry that Boebert
and Greene�s tactics will expose Republican disunity on the issue.

But to Republicans who are supportive of the impeachment push, the
obvious infighting between two of the most vocal and influential
conservatives was met with concern.

A GOP lawmaker warned The Daily Beast about �bad blood� stemming from the
impeachment fight.

�I personally don�t think it�s helpful in any way,� this lawmaker said.

gerajd wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Marjorie Taylor Greene Calls Boebert a Little Bitch on the House Floor
>
> A feud has been boiling between Marjorie Taylor Greene and Lauren Boebert
> for months. It finally reached a new level on Wednesday.
>
> The messy feud between two of MAGA world’s biggest stars burst into
> public view on Wednesday, when Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) called
> Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) a “little bitch” to her face on the floor of
> the U.S. House of Representatives.
>
> <snip>

Dang, I was hoping for a video of some bimbo fu. Or at least some girl-on-girl
action.

https://joebobbriggs.com/

--
Fortune's Office Door Sign of the Week:
Incorrigible punster -- Do not incorrige.

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> some girl-on-girl
> action.

Governor Swill /Rudy Canoza/Lou Bricano/J Carlson/Michael A
Terrell/Chris Ahlstrom/Intelligent Party/Alan Bond and a few dozen other
socks wrote:

Multiple death threats against Trump:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!netnews.com!s1-4.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <emo79jh20rlasuask9094vtlepuu5ui0av@4ax.com>
References: <1oKdnTc9CYmJlg77nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com>
<XnsB1AED5FEA65AA629555@185.151.15.160>
<ONIkO.102541$dFU1.83026@fx11.ams4> <XnsB1AF52A9CDF3B629555@185.151.15.190>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 55
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:38:43 -0400

Oh poor me I got shot at ...

Swill
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!s1-3.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <4ln79j914cpespbrssonesbciii33ess3m@4ax.com>
References: <1oKdnTc9CYmJlg77nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com>
<XnsB1AED5FEA65AA629555@185.151.15.160>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 31
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:37:51 -0400

Cheer up, maybe someone else will try.

Swill

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.immigration,alt.politics.nationalism.white,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: AP Lies by Ommission About Identity of Invaders Charged with
Rape, Murder of 12-Year-Old
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:35:52 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <v5f66o$1mps9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v54h6j$39cuk$1@dont-email.me> <v54hrs$38mfs$18@dont-email.me>
<moKcnZP3dbqUm-r7nZ2dnZfqnPcAAAAA@giganews.com>
<v58c4f$6squ$8@dont-email.me>
<v5df1n$1caue$1@dont-email.me> <v5edju$1hv3p$3@dont-email.me>
<tgrl7j14lbg6f9csput4jca09qqujgd9d5@4ax.com>
<v5erpf$1jkrf$20@dont-email.me>
<O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me;
posting-host="f3de9d0c1e618b255237332494133eec";
logging-data="1795977";
mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195k8uMNmZfnyDG9tQmsu21WqljX3bfQxM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PNoPW9d+9gKJj0fX+YCk+YFslQg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
Xref: news.eternal-september.org alt.politics.immigration:383549
alt.politics.nationalism.white:10913 talk.politics.misc:1295918
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:3024985

> No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people to
thrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently
> is an important step to getting there.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That constitutes a DEATH THREAT against a former President, Rudey:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/871
18 U.S. Code § 871 - Threats against President and successors to the
Presidency
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail
or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any
letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any
threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon
the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice
President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office
of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or
knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the
President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the
order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years,
or both.
(b)The terms “President-elect” and “Vice President-elect” as used in
this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful
candidates for the offices of President and Vice President,
respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections
held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in
accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2. The
phrase “other officer next in the order of succession to the office of
President” as used in this section shall mean the person next in the
order of succession to act as President in accordance with title 3,
United States Code, sections 19 and 20.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 740; June 1, 1955, ch. 115, § 1, 69
Stat. 80; Pub. L. 87–829, § 1, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 956; Pub. L.
97–297, § 2, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1318; Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

9-65.200 - Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency; Threats Against Former Presidents; and Certain Other Secret
Service Protectees
The Counterterrorism Section of the National Security Division has
supervisory authority over 18 U.S.C. §§ 871 and 879 cases. As great
caution must be taken in matters relating to the security of the persons
protected by 18 U.S.C. § 871, United States Attorneys are encouraged to
consult with the Counterterrorism Section (CTS) of the National Security
Division when they have doubts on the prosecutive merit of a case. For
the same reason, dismissal of complaints under 18 U.S.C. § 871, when the
defendant is in custody under the Mental Incompetency Statutes (18
U.S.C. §§ 4244, 4246), requires approval from CTS. In other cases,
United States Attorneys must consult prior to dismissing a count
involving, or entering into any sentence commitment or other case
settlement involving a § 871 charge.

https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2024/01/phoenix-man-arrested-making-online-death-threats-against-president-and

PHOENIX –David Michael Hanson, 41, of Phoenix, was arrested on Wednesday
for making online threats against the President and Vice-President.
Hanson was charged by Federal criminal complaint on Tuesday with five
counts of Threats Against the President and Successors to the Presidency
and five counts of Interstate Communication of Threats.

The complaint alleges that in November and December of 2023, while
living in Arizona, Hanson used a social media platform to post threats
to murder the President and Vice President of the United States. On
November 19, 2023, Hanson posted online a series of threatening
statements including one that stated, “#joeAndKamala I’m asking you to
resign on Monday your alternative is death brutally murdered.” After the
U.S. Secret Service spoke to Hanson and warned him that it was a Federal
crime to post such threats, on December 23, 2023, Hanson posted another
series of similar threats aimed at the President and Vice-President.

Each count of Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, a fine of
up to $250,000, and up to three years of supervised release. Each count
of Interstate Communication of Threats carries a maximum sentence of
five years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and up to three years of
supervised release.

A complaint is simply a method by which a person is charged with
criminal activity and raises no inference of guilt. An individual is
presumed innocent until evidence is presented to a jury that establishes
guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.