On 9/2/2024 9:09 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <ptkBO.12104$D_21.10712@fx14.iad>, rc.@hendrie.con says...
>>
>> On 9/2/2024 7:58 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>> On 9/1/24 13:05, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>> On 9/1/2024 3:43 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>> On 8/31/24 21:21, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>> Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote in news:XnsB1DF8B6D87AC3629555@
>>>>>> 185.151.15.190:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> David Hartung <junk@nogood.com> wrote in news:aN-
>>>>>>> dnRGdS7hLpU77nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 8/31/24 09:57, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>>> David Hartung <junk@nogood.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>> news:vbGcncLhNsYXvE77nZ2dnZfqnPhXyJ2d@giganews.com:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/30/24 08:19, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> David Hartung <junk@nogood.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>> news:XdWdnfbdjcGAIEz7nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dailycaller.com/2024/08/28/noaa-improving-billion-dollar-
>>>>>>>>> disast
>>>>>>>>>>>> ers-climate-change-data-correction-request-pielke/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>>>> The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has
>>>>>>>>>>>> committed to improving the ?documentation and transparency? of
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>> key data set frequently cited by activists and policymakers to
>>>>>>>>> suggest
>>>>>>>>>>>> that climate change is getting worse.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Roger Pielke Jr., a former environmental studies professor at the
>>>>>>>>>>>> University of Colorado, requested that NOAA correct its billion
>>>>>>>>> dollar
>>>>>>>>>>>> disasters (BDD) dataset in January, alleging that the dataset?s
>>>>>>>>>>>> sourcing and methodology are not sufficiently transparent for the
>>>>>>>>>>>> metric to inform policy. NOAA responded to Pielke?s correction
>>>>>>>>>>>> request on Aug. 21, admitting that the dataset has not undergone
>>>>>>>>>>>> external peer review since 2015 and committing to improving its
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?documentation and transparency? of the dataset?s component
>>>>>>>>>>>> parts going forward. [...]
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds like shoddy science to me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> As an evolution-denying Creationist
>>>>>>>>>>> you have no grounds to judge science.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Oh? Please explain.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>       Explain what?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>       You have repeatedly admitted
>>>>>>>>> you don't believe in evolution
>>>>>>>>> and think the Ye Talking Snake
>>>>>>>>> story is factual.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>       Have you changed that?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "As Genesis has never been reliably "debunked",
>>>>>>>>> you seem to have a problem."
>>>>>>>>> David Hartung, Nov 11, 2014
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You should really learn to read. Rather than rejecting evolution, I am
>>>>>>>> waiting for valid evidence that small, simple organisms evolved into
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> highly complex life we see today. Thus far I haven't seen it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Likewise you haven't "seen" a pile of
>>>>>>> dust turn into a man or that man's rib
>>>>>>> turn into a woman or a snake talk. Your
>>>>>>> reliance on what you have "seen" is
>>>>>>> badly misplaced.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Where is the "valid evidence" (your
>>>>>>> term) for ANYTHING in Genesis?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      And this is where Hartung disappears.........
>>>>>
>>>>> Not at all. I am still waiting for evidence supporting evolution.
>>>>
>>>> You've been given loads of it before, and you simply reject it because it
>>>> offends your fuckwitted nasty religious beliefs.
>>>
>>>
>>> If you have to attack another's religious beliefs
>>
>> Your religious beliefs are irrational bullshit, and those fuckwitted irrational
>> beliefs are why you reject the compelling evidence for the *fact* of evolution
>> out of hand. You refuse to engage with them honestly.
>
> Evolution is a theory only.

No, evolution is a *fact*. There have been multiple theories to explain the
*fact*, and one of them, the Darwinian theory, currently dominates scientific
thinking on the subject. The Darwinian theory best explains the *facts* of
evolution that we observe.

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing

On 9/2/2024 2:33 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <_RlBO.2$83Ue.0@fx37.iad>, mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut
> says...
>>
>> On 9/2/2024 9:09 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>> of lies:
>>
>>> In article <ptkBO.12104$D_21.10712@fx14.iad>, rc.@hendrie.con says...
>>>>
>>>> On 9/2/2024 7:58 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>> On 9/1/24 13:05, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/1/2024 3:43 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/31/24 21:21, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>> Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote in news:XnsB1DF8B6D87AC3629555@
>>>>>>>> 185.151.15.190:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> David Hartung <junk@nogood.com> wrote in news:aN-
>>>>>>>>> dnRGdS7hLpU77nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/31/24 09:57, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> David Hartung <junk@nogood.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>> news:vbGcncLhNsYXvE77nZ2dnZfqnPhXyJ2d@giganews.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/30/24 08:19, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> David Hartung <junk@nogood.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:XdWdnfbdjcGAIEz7nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dailycaller.com/2024/08/28/noaa-improving-billion-dollar-
>>>>>>>>>>> disast
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ers-climate-change-data-correction-request-pielke/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> committed to improving the ?documentation and transparency? of
>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> key data set frequently cited by activists and policymakers to
>>>>>>>>>>> suggest
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that climate change is getting worse.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roger Pielke Jr., a former environmental studies professor at the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> University of Colorado, requested that NOAA correct its billion
>>>>>>>>>>> dollar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disasters (BDD) dataset in January, alleging that the dataset?s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sourcing and methodology are not sufficiently transparent for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metric to inform policy. NOAA responded to Pielke?s correction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> request on Aug. 21, admitting that the dataset has not undergone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> external peer review since 2015 and committing to improving its
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?documentation and transparency? of the dataset?s component
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parts going forward. [...]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds like shoddy science to me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> As an evolution-denying Creationist
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you have no grounds to judge science.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh? Please explain.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>       Explain what?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>       You have repeatedly admitted
>>>>>>>>>>> you don't believe in evolution
>>>>>>>>>>> and think the Ye Talking Snake
>>>>>>>>>>> story is factual.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>       Have you changed that?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "As Genesis has never been reliably "debunked",
>>>>>>>>>>> you seem to have a problem."
>>>>>>>>>>> David Hartung, Nov 11, 2014
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You should really learn to read. Rather than rejecting evolution, I am
>>>>>>>>>> waiting for valid evidence that small, simple organisms evolved into
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> highly complex life we see today. Thus far I haven't seen it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Likewise you haven't "seen" a pile of
>>>>>>>>> dust turn into a man or that man's rib
>>>>>>>>> turn into a woman or a snake talk. Your
>>>>>>>>> reliance on what you have "seen" is
>>>>>>>>> badly misplaced.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Where is the "valid evidence" (your
>>>>>>>>> term) for ANYTHING in Genesis?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>      And this is where Hartung disappears.........
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not at all. I am still waiting for evidence supporting evolution.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You've been given loads of it before, and you simply reject it because it
>>>>>> offends your fuckwitted nasty religious beliefs.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If you have to attack another's religious beliefs
>>>>
>>>> Your religious beliefs are irrational bullshit, and those fuckwitted irrational
>>>> beliefs are why you reject the compelling evidence for the *fact* of evolution
>>>> out of hand. You refuse to engage with them honestly.
>>>
>>> Evolution is a theory only.
>>
>> No, evolution is a *fact*. There have been multiple theories to explain the
>> *fact*, and one of them, the Darwinian theory, currently dominates scientific
>> thinking on the subject. The Darwinian theory best explains the *facts* of
>> evolution that we observe.
>
> No proof.

Proof beyond rational dispute.

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing