"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4ce09jlooia9qsmbcu4k0eudm064hpo1hf@4ax.com...
> "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>
>>Why exactly would someone need new hardware, if their current
>>system is still fulfilling their needs and wants?
>
>
> Win7 and Win8 are out of support.

So? You seem to feel I need support.

> Win10 will be before very long.

So? I don't use that POS

> If
> you want to be a Windows user, you need to recognize they don't
> support old hardware indefinitely.

Neither does new versions of Linux.. but I don't see you complaining about
that.

> Linux would.

Run Mint 21.3 on a 32 bit processor.

No? So Linux doesn't.

> I'm trying to help
> you realize what you should be doing.

Sorry, but I don't generally take advise from self deluded individuals such
as yourself.

You can't even be honest with the limitation of Linux, and find you have to
run a crappy emulator that you some how feel is superior to actually running
Windows for your program(s).

"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:b9e09jha9f559mgpo4sq7d7ngmk606u5us@4ax.com...
> "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:2t0e8jtqchamnc84264otr4vj33oer6h2k@4ax.com...
>>> Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>I had Win11.
>>>>
>>>><crickets>
>>>
>>> The fact is, Win10 doesn't really support older computers, it changed
>>> within its life cycle. That's why it took six years for Win11 to come
>>> out, after 10's release. Older boxes *need* Linux to survive.
>>
>>Older boxes can't run Linux Mint 21.3... so are you suggesting they use an
>>older unsupported version?
>>
>>What about updates? Patches? Drivers?
>
>
> I had up to date Mint on my old computer, in 2021. It could still be
> running it, today, if I still had it.

Well, shit a computer from 2021.. That's hardly impressively old.

So to be clear, your idea of an 'old' computer is anything over 3 years old?

You know I could take a computer from at least 2015, and still run Windows
11 on it with full functionality?

Apparently by your standards.. Windows supports older boxes... for at least
3 times longer than you're claiming for Linux.

Point. Set. Match.

"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5ie09j178ng694r1db24pqnqh8shu9l2vj@4ax.com...
> "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>
>>> upgrades to Mint that negate the problem of limited-time
>>> support for the current version,
>>
>>When do you expect native support for 32 bit systems to be added?
>>
>>Oh, that's right.. the latest versions of linux doesn't support old
>>hardware.
>
>
> Get a 32-bit distro.

Then it wouldn't be Mint.. You told me that Mint would support old hardware.

So does it, or doesn't it?

....oh.. but then apparently your idea of "old hardware" is something from
2021

"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5pe09jlimvsv05nvdvqj9pqb78qonn31he@4ax.com...
> "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>
>>why are you concerning yourself with MY system?
>
>
> You post with it, it tells me something about you, that you're
> clinging to WLM and presumably Win7. That's oddball behavior, in
> 2024.

That's ok, we feel the same about your denial of gay sexual relationship
with a cross-dressing homosexual man...

.... that's oddball behavior.

"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:mtd09jt27qk5oh14mgkuojo9a5o91fpviq@4ax.com...
> "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>
>>> I'm running the last version of Agent under Wine in Linux. It's
>>> great. No need for Winblows as an OS, but having all the features I
>>> paid for with Agent upgrades.
>>
>>So you just don't like Windows. That sounds like your problem, not mine.
>
>
> What is your point?

You issues is with Windows.. not with me.

> This thread is crossposted to an OS advocacy
> group, which is where I'm seeing it.

As I said, your issues is with Windows.

Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
wrote:

>>>>>>>>I'm not pretending anything, I'm openly saying I'm running Forte Agent
>>>>>>>>under Wine, because why not?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Because you have to since Linux apps suck so bad.
>>>>>
>>>>><CRICKETS>
>>>
>>><CRICKETS>
>
>>I disagree.
>
>You're a lying Gen-X asshole, so you know I'm right.

You snipped "I use PC Linux, it seems just fine compared to the
commercial platforms." I wouldn't use it if it weren't competing with
Microsoft's platform when the latter is the dominant one for my own
hardware. But people like you will use Win7 and try to skirt around
the need for Linux, but it's disingenuous when the apps begin to lose
support for your OS version.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:

>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>I'm not pretending anything, I'm openly saying I'm running Forte Agent
>>>>>>>>>under Wine, because why not?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Because you have to since Linux apps suck so bad.
>>>>>>
>>>>>><CRICKETS>
>>>>
>>>><CRICKETS>

<CRICKETS>

>>>I disagree.
>>
>>You're a lying Gen-X asshole, so you know I'm right.
>
>
>You snipped "I use PC Linux, it seems just fine compared to the
>commercial platforms."

I snipped it because it has nothing to do with what we're talking
about, stupid Gen-X asshole.

[Default] "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> typed:

>
>
>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote
>in message
>news:s0p09jttcn8lg098emeinruvm7jne17nrr@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>> [Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>>>>
>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>he runs a newsreader designed for Windows and must pretend to have
>>>>>>>>Windows in order to run it, because all the news clients of Linux
>>>>>>>>suck.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>LOL
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I'm not pretending anything, I'm openly saying I'm running Forte Agent
>>>>>>>under Wine, because why not?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Because you have to since Linux apps suck so bad.
>>>>
>>>><CRICKETS>
>>
>> <CRICKETS>
>>
>>
>>>>>>LOL
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>You are also running Agent 8.
>>>>
>>>>And I'm running Windows, and I KNOW it runs better under Windows than
>>>>it does in WINE, because I've used both, you stupid Gen-X asshole.
>>>
>>>How recently? I had some issues with *CrossOver*, in 2010, compared
>>>to generic Wine today.
>>
>> Probably because you're a dumb Gen-X asshole, but mostly because WINE
>> does a shit job of pretending to be a real operating system with
>> useful apps that work.
>
>yea, but we all know that Fake Windows works so much better than actual
>Windows, and he can pretend that a cheap imitation is better than the real
>thing.
>
>It's sort of how his boyfriend is a cheap knockoff of a real woman...
>
>Apparently Joel prefers the fakes.
>

Good point! He probably wears a $39.00 Rolex too.

"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:vin29jput36a506ae2v1pe35be844pev60@4ax.com...
> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>I'm not pretending anything, I'm openly saying I'm running Forte
>>>>>>>>>Agent
>>>>>>>>>under Wine, because why not?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Because you have to since Linux apps suck so bad.
>>>>>>
>>>>>><CRICKETS>
>>>>
>>>><CRICKETS>
>>
>>>I disagree.
>>
>>You're a lying Gen-X asshole, so you know I'm right.
>
>
> You snipped "I use PC Linux, it seems just fine compared to the
> commercial platforms." I wouldn't use it if it weren't competing with
> Microsoft's platform when the latter is the dominant one for my own
> hardware. But people like you will use Win7 and try to skirt around
> the need for Linux, but it's disingenuous when the apps begin to lose
> support for your OS version.

There is no need of Linux. Even you admit to now using programs designed for
Linux because the windows version is better for you.

In fact, you have yet to show any superiority to Linux. It has life
cycles.... Support is dropped.. programs aren't updated or supported.. New
versions don't support the hardware or the existing programs...in sort it
sounds like any other operating system.

Scout wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> In fact, you have yet to show any superiority to Linux. It has life
> cycles.... Support is dropped.. programs aren't updated or supported.. New
> versions don't support the hardware or the existing programs...in sort it
> sounds like any other operating system.

+1

Except, of course, for long running programs like GIMP, LibreOffice,
mpd, VLC, and on and on and on. Been using the same suite of nice programs
since ~2000.

However, the superiority of Linux is that it is far more configurable than
Windows of OSX.

For some, that's a deficit, but not for me.

--
Q: How do you shoot a blue elephant? A: With a blue-elephant gun.
Q: How do you shoot a pink elephant? A: Twist its trunk until it turns
blue, then shoot it with a blue-elephant gun.

On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 16:12:10 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote:

>[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>
>>C_V <c_v@invalid.net> wrote:
>>
>>>> Having certain genitalia doesn't make one a gender necessarily.
>>>>
>>>https://s1.pictoa.com/media/galleries/022/639/02263954b9aac6d33c4/104697854b9aac9807b8.jpg
>>
>>
>>What's wrong with her?
>
>If's a freak of nature.
>
>Deformities and birth defects do not equal a "new gender."

Neither do photoshop jobs. Yecch! If he smells like pussy, I want it to be because he
got some, not because he has one.

Swill

On Sun, 28 Jul 2024 13:25:18 +0000, ??????????Jen?????????? Dershmender
???????????????????? <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:

>I'm guessing you have lots of experience sniffing out dicks.

Bulges are my passion.

Swill

Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
wrote:
>[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>>C_V <c_v@invalid.net> wrote:
>>
>>>> Having certain genitalia doesn't make one a gender necessarily.
>>>>
>>>https://s1.pictoa.com/media/galleries/022/639/02263954b9aac6d33c4/104697854b9aac9807b8.jpg
>>
>>What's wrong with her?
>
>If's a freak of nature.
>
>Deformities and birth defects do not equal a "new gender."

She looks perfectly fuckable to me, get over your insecurity about
"freaks", dumb old boomer retard.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

In article <815daj5a8sjsninkhsqr1drbauv4rfijtn@4ax.com>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
> >>C_V <c_v@invalid.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>>> Having certain genitalia doesn't make one a gender necessarily.
> >>>>
> >>>https://s1.pictoa.com/media/galleries/022/639/02263954b9aac6d33c4/104697854b9aac9807b8.jpg
> >>
> >>What's wrong with her?
> >
> >If's a freak of nature.
> >
> >Deformities and birth defects do not equal a "new gender."
>
>
> he looks perfectly fuckable to me, get over your insecurity about
> "freaks", dumb old boomer retard.
>
>
https://postimg.cc/zHzMvV6Z

[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:

>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>>[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>>>C_V <c_v@invalid.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Having certain genitalia doesn't make one a gender necessarily.
>>>>>
>>>>https://s1.pictoa.com/media/galleries/022/639/02263954b9aac6d33c4/104697854b9aac9807b8.jpg
>>>
>>>What's wrong with her?
>>
>>If's a freak of nature.
>>
>>Deformities and birth defects do not equal a "new gender."
>
>
>She looks perfectly fuckable to me, get over your insecurity about
>"freaks", dumb old boomer retard.

And Joel runs away from the argument, just like he always does.

Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
wrote:
>[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>>[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>>>>C_V <c_v@invalid.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Having certain genitalia doesn't make one a gender necessarily.
>>>>>>
>>>>>https://s1.pictoa.com/media/galleries/022/639/02263954b9aac6d33c4/104697854b9aac9807b8.jpg
>>>>
>>>>What's wrong with her?
>>>
>>>If's a freak of nature.
>>>
>>>Deformities and birth defects do not equal a "new gender."
>>
>>She looks perfectly fuckable to me, get over your insecurity about
>>"freaks", dumb old boomer retard.
>
>And Joel runs away from the argument, just like he always does.

You're the one doing that, you'd have put her in "the river" to drown
as an infant, you call her a "freak of nature", as if there's anything
bad about having a cock-like clit, I think it's kind of attractive,
actually, maybe open your dumb boomer mind.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:

>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>>[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>>[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>>>>>C_V <c_v@invalid.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Having certain genitalia doesn't make one a gender necessarily.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>https://s1.pictoa.com/media/galleries/022/639/02263954b9aac6d33c4/104697854b9aac9807b8.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>>What's wrong with her?
>>>>
>>>>If's a freak of nature.
>>>>
>>>>Deformities and birth defects do not equal a "new gender."
>>>
>>>She looks perfectly fuckable to me, get over your insecurity about
>>>"freaks", dumb old boomer retard.
>>
>>And Joel runs away from the argument, just like he always does.
>
>
>You're the one doing that

Pathetic IKYABWAM defense.

>, you'd have put her in "the river" to drown
>as an infant, you call her a "freak of nature", as if there's anything
>bad about having a cock-like clit, I think it's kind of attractive,

You should be taken to the river too

Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
wrote:
>[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>>[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>>[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>>>>>>C_V <c_v@invalid.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Having certain genitalia doesn't make one a gender necessarily.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>https://s1.pictoa.com/media/galleries/022/639/02263954b9aac6d33c4/104697854b9aac9807b8.jpg
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What's wrong with her?
>>>>>
>>>>>If's a freak of nature.
>>>>>
>>>>>Deformities and birth defects do not equal a "new gender."
>>>>
>>>>She looks perfectly fuckable to me, get over your insecurity about
>>>>"freaks", dumb old boomer retard.
>>>
>>>And Joel runs away from the argument, just like he always does.
>>
>>You're the one doing that
>
>Pathetic IKYABWAM defense.
>
>>, you'd have put her in "the river" to drown
>>as an infant, you call her a "freak of nature", as if there's anything
>>bad about having a cock-like clit, I think it's kind of attractive,
>
>You should be taken to the river too

Gun-nut cracker retarded boomer imbecile, kill yourself.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 2024-07-28, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>>[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>>>>>C_V <c_v@invalid.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Having certain genitalia doesn't make one a gender necessarily.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>https://s1.pictoa.com/media/galleries/022/639/02263954b9aac6d33c4/104697854b9aac9807b8.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>>What's wrong with her?
>>>>
>>>>If's a freak of nature.
>>>>
>>>>Deformities and birth defects do not equal a "new gender."
>>>
>>>She looks perfectly fuckable to me, get over your insecurity about
>>>"freaks", dumb old boomer retard.
>>
>>And Joel runs away from the argument, just like he always does.
>
>
> You're the one doing that, you'd have put her in "the river" to drown
> as an infant, you call her a "freak of nature", as if there's anything
> bad about having a cock-like clit, I think it's kind of attractive,
> actually, maybe open your dumb boomer mind.
>
Well she does give new meaning to the phrase 'go fuck yourself'.

--
Nippy

Nippy wrote:
> On 2024-07-28, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> [Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> [Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>>>>>> C_V <c_v@invalid.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Having certain genitalia doesn't make one a gender necessarily.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://s1.pictoa.com/media/galleries/022/639/02263954b9aac6d33c4/104697854b9aac9807b8.jpg
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What's wrong with her?
>>>>>
>>>>> If's a freak of nature.
>>>>>
>>>>> Deformities and birth defects do not equal a "new gender."
>>>>
>>>> She looks perfectly fuckable to me, get over your insecurity about
>>>> "freaks", dumb old boomer retard.
>>>
>>> And Joel runs away from the argument, just like he always does.
>>
>>
>> You're the one doing that, you'd have put her in "the river" to drown
>> as an infant, you call her a "freak of nature", as if there's anything
>> bad about having a cock-like clit, I think it's kind of attractive,
>> actually, maybe open your dumb boomer mind.
>>
> Well she does give new meaning to the phrase 'go fuck yourself'.
>
>
but , pippy

[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:

>Gun-nut cracker retarded boomer imbecile, kill yourself.

Poor triggered Joel.

Wonder why his parent didn't drown him in the river?

On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 05:37:03 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote:

>[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>
>>Gun-nut cracker retarded boomer imbecile, kill yourself.
>
>Poor triggered Joel.
>
>Wonder why his parent didn't drown him in the river?

He couldn't sink because his daddy kept pumping him back up.

Swill

Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
wrote:

>>Gun-nut cracker retarded boomer imbecile, kill yourself.
>
>Poor triggered Joel.
>
>Wonder why his parent didn't drown him in the river?

I'm an asset to humanity.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[Default] ??????????Jen?????????? Dershmender ????????????????????
<root@127.0.0.1> typed:

>Did you kill a pet as a child, Klaus?

Are you masturbating right now?

[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:

>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>Gun-nut cracker retarded boomer imbecile, kill yourself.
>>
>>Poor triggered Joel.
>>
>>Wonder why his parent didn't drown him in the river?
>
>
>I'm an asset to humanity.

No, you're a waster of oxygen.