"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:udqf9jhdtq7arej208h4n6l0jab1o6kt6n@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:05:53 -0400, "Scout"
> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com...
>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
>>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>>>>Defendant: No
>>>>Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be carried
>>>>out
>>>>within 48 hours.
>>>>
>>>>That's all it would take.
>>>
>>> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year.
>>
>>Why?
>
> Where they gonna sleep while you're processing them?

How long does it take to confirm they never entered though a point of entry,
and load them up for transport to the border.
If they want to sleep.. they have the floor they are standing on.

Why should they expect more?

>
>>> You gotta find out
>>> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back.
>>
>>No, we don't. Nothing says they have to be given a free ride home.
>
> So if they can't afford a return ticket, we just let them stay?
>
>>> What if you get
>>> stuck with some you can't send back?
>>
>>Send them back to Mexico.. or whatever country they last departed from.
>
> Mexico doesn't have to take them back if they're not Mexicans. They've
> already announced
> this.

Well , then Mexico can see about transporting them to their southern
border..
or better stop shipping them to our border..
... Better yet would be to catch them at their southern border and deport
them right there.

Otherwise, they get turned over to Mexican authorities.. or returned to
Mexico from which they came.. either way.. it's not our problem.

>>> What if there are delays and you have to put them up
>>> and feed them indefinitely?
>>
>>Shouldn't take more than a couple of hours to boot them over the border.
>
> Can't just boot them back across the border. That would be illegal. They
> get a hearing

Ok..

Judge: I need to see your entry papers.
Defendant: I have none.
Judge: Any record of this person crossing at a point of entry
INS: No your honor.
Judge: And prior offenses in your record?
INS: No your honor.
Judge: Ok, so no need for a fine or jail time. With no evidence you legally
entered the US, your lack the documentation on you as required by law to
show you are here legally. You are hereby remanded back into the custody of
the INS for immediate deportation. *Bang* Next case.

Shouldn't take much longer than that.

We could even do it in mass for most cases.. breaking them into groups for
those where this is there first offense, to those with repeated offenses who
may need to pay fines and/or jail time.

If we need more judges we can hire them.. would be cheaper than the costs of
all those criminals.

>> > Do you have the staff just to *process* these people, let
>>> alone get them physically to their home country.
>>
>>When did we have to return them home? Return them to the last country they
>>were in.
>
> Mexico is under no legal compunction to accept people in who aren't
> Mexican.

As we are under no compunction to accept people coming in from Mexico.
However, I suppose they can be put to work until their work produces enough
net profits to pay for returning them home.. Then they can still pick crops
other otherwise work until they are deported.

>>> How many agents will you hire to do the
>>> actual work and how many can they process in a day each.
>>
>>We have plenty now, if we would allow them to actually do what they should
>>be.
>
> Wrong again. We have nowhere near enough agents to cover the border.

Then we clearly need better passive defenses on the border, and possibly
even consider automated active defenses. Because if we can't afford to
prevent their entry we certainly can't afford to have them here and
continuing to violate the law.

But at least you're not admitting they don't belong here.

Now the only question is how to deport them.

>>> What? You think you're Samantha
>>> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
>>
>>No, but I can make it a lot less than it was.
>
> How you going to do that without breaking any laws?

What laws would I be breaking to deport people under existing laws?

>>> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000 hidden
>>> aliens out of our
>>> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
>>
>>Well, that would probably take much more than a year, but we can
>>streamline
>>the deportation process. Could probably have them over the border within
>>6-7
>>days.
>
> So where they going to sleep at night?

The floor, ground, standing up.. that's their problem.

>>> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't want
>>> any resolution
>>> that lets not white people into the country.
>>
>>If they aren't citizens or entered illegally, white, black, tan.. doesn't
>>matter, they get deported.
>
> After they get their hearing and if their home country will take them
> back.

So, if they are so bad their own country doesn't want them.. why would we
want them?

"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:fmqf9jdf511uhj97l8uvv80u7b7i0d7ovd@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 16:10:09 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>No matter where they came from, they came here from Mexico. They should
>>have stopped them. So send them there and let Mexico deal with it.
>
> Shoulda, woulda, coulda. Mexico is under no legal obligation to take non
> Mexican citizens
> into their country.

And we are??????

Point, Set, Match.

"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:q6qf9jhjq466sfnm7kc9s4a36uliv4etn5@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 12:17:53 -0400, "Scout"
> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:fstc9jdqb6jgiamk1q3hvvjhiqfm8solk8@4ax.com...
>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 20:13:44 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
>>>>governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
>>>>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>>>>> >Defendant: No
>>>>> >Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be
>>>>> >carried out
>>>>> >within 48 hours.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >That's all it would take.
>>>>>
>>>>> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year.
>>>>> You gotta find out
>>>>> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back.
>>>>> What if you get
>>>>> stuck with some you can't send back? What if there are delays and you
>>>>> have to put them up
>>>>> and feed them indefinitely? Do you have the staff just to *process*
>>>>> these people, let
>>>>> alone get them physically to their home country. How many agents will
>>>>> you hire to do the
>>>>> actual work and how many can they process in a day each. What? You
>>>>> think you're Samantha
>>>>> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
>>>>
>>>>When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
>>>>Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
>>>>what to do.
>>>>>
>>>>> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000
>>>>> hidden
>>>>> aliens out of our
>>>>> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
>>>>
>>>>Oh we will handle that.
>>>
>>> No pie in the sky, details.
>>>
>>>>> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't
>>>>> want
>>>>> any resolution
>>>>> that lets not white people into the country.
>>>>
>>>>Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
>>>
>>> Because it *is* about race to many conservatives.
>>
>>Prove it. Then explain why it's always about race with you?
>>

<crickets>

"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
news:6697eb5e$1$1774$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
> In article <q6qf9jhjq466sfnm7kc9s4a36uliv4etn5@4ax.com>,
> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 12:17:53 -0400, "Scout"
>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> >news:fstc9jdqb6jgiamk1q3hvvjhiqfm8solk8@4ax.com...
>> >> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 20:13:44 -0600, Skeeter
>> >> <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
>> >>>governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
>> >>>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> >Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>> >>>> >Defendant: No
>> >>>> >Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be
>> >>>> >carried out
>> >>>> >within 48 hours.
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >That's all it would take.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a
>> >>>> year.
>> >>>> You gotta find out
>> >>>> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back.
>> >>>> What if you get
>> >>>> stuck with some you can't send back? What if there are delays and
>> >>>> you
>> >>>> have to put them up
>> >>>> and feed them indefinitely? Do you have the staff just to *process*
>> >>>> these people, let
>> >>>> alone get them physically to their home country. How many agents
>> >>>> will
>> >>>> you hire to do the
>> >>>> actual work and how many can they process in a day each. What? You
>> >>>> think you're Samantha
>> >>>> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
>> >>>
>> >>>When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross
>> >>>in
>> >>>Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
>> >>>what to do.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000
>> >>>> hidden
>> >>>> aliens out of our
>> >>>> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
>> >>>
>> >>>Oh we will handle that.
>> >>
>> >> No pie in the sky, details.
>> >>
>> >>>> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't
>> >>>> want
>> >>>> any resolution
>> >>>> that lets not white people into the country.
>> >>>
>> >>>Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
>> >>
>> >> Because it *is* about race to many conservatives.
>> >
>> >Prove it. Then explain why it's always about race with you?
>> >
>> >> Not for everybody, but *any* solution
>> >> that involves letting immigrants in under any circumstances runs into
>> >> a
>> >> brick wall with a
>> >> great many conservatives.
>> >
>> >The only circumstance I'm aware of is when it starts with a crime.
>> >That and the follow-up that criminals should not be rewarded for
>> >committing
>> >crime.
>> >
>> >> Let's go back to immigration policy circa 1880.
>> >
>> >I'm sure you would like that. But how about dealing with today, or are
>> >you
>> >stuck in the past?
>> >
>> >
>> >> We can scatter mini Ellis Island type facilities across the southern
>> >> border.
>> >
>> >We already have them....
>> >
>> >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Mexico%E2%80%93United_States_border_crossings
>> >
>> >However, apparently liberals feel that going through them should be
>> >optional, no matter what the law says.
>> >
>>
>> Your fantasy world is engaging. How do you propose to make them all use
>> entry points?
>>
>> Swill
>
> It's not about "making" them. The know the law. They follow it or pay
> the price.
>

Yep, and if they aren't going to obey such a law.. why would we even want
them?

Think of it as the first test.. if they enter illegally, they failed and
they get shown out of the country to never legally enter again.

"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:l0qf9j1k3bj85bagnmt4ousk8rcrbp0904@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 12:20:18 -0400, "Scout"
> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:669685d5$1$3068684$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>>> In article <fstc9jdqb6jgiamk1q3hvvjhiqfm8solk8@4ax.com>,
>>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 20:13:44 -0600, Skeeter
>>>> <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
>>>> >governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
>>>> >> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>>> >> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> >Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>>>> >> >Defendant: No
>>>> >> >Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be
>>>> >> >carried out
>>>> >> >within 48 hours.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >That's all it would take.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a
>>>> >> year.
>>>> >> You gotta find out
>>>> >> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back.
>>>> >> What if you get
>>>> >> stuck with some you can't send back? What if there are delays and
>>>> >> you
>>>> >> have to put them up
>>>> >> and feed them indefinitely? Do you have the staff just to *process*
>>>> >> these people, let
>>>> >> alone get them physically to their home country. How many agents
>>>> >> will
>>>> >> you hire to do the
>>>> >> actual work and how many can they process in a day each. What? You
>>>> >> think you're Samantha
>>>> >> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
>>>> >
>>>> >When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross
>>>> >in
>>>> >Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
>>>> >what to do.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000
>>>> >> hidden aliens out of our
>>>> >> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
>>>> >
>>>> >Oh we will handle that.
>>>>
>>>> No pie in the sky, details.
>>>
>>> Round them up. Not to hard.
>>>>
>>>> >> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't
>>>> >> want any resolution
>>>> >> that lets not white people into the country.
>>>> >
>>>> >Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
>>>>
>>>> Because it *is* about race to many conservatives. Not for everybody,
>>>> but
>>>> *any* solution
>>>> that involves letting immigrants in under any circumstances runs into a
>>>> brick wall with a
>>>> great many conservatives.
>>>
>>>
>>> We need to know who they are first. Just like when you apply for a job.
>>>>
>>>> Let's go back to immigration policy circa 1880.
>>>>
>>>> We can scatter mini Ellis Island type facilities across the southern
>>>> border. Change them
>>>> to apply for entry even, if you like. We could actually make billions
>>>> by
>>>> charging for
>>>> application for entry into the US. Why should they spend a thousand
>>>> bucks on a Coyote?
>>>> Let them drive up and pay US that thousand. We would make direct
>>>> profit
>>>> just from letting
>>>> them in.
>>>>
>>>> But let them in. We need them. China has three times the people we
>>>> do.
>>>> That means China
>>>> can have an economy three times the size of ours. If we both spend the
>>>> same %GDP on
>>>> defense, they'll spend three dollars to our one.
>>>>
>>>> We need population. Let's work out an efficient and productive system
>>>> for getting them
>>>> into the country and working.
>>>>
>>> So just open the gates and let them go? Doesn't sound to secure to me.
>>
>>Particularly when we already have evidence that terrorists
> *click*

facts cause Swill's mind to shut off.

"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4ipf9jhv1mkr0p6r97ulkebsijjb4iakme@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:38:12 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>In article <fstc9jdqb6jgiamk1q3hvvjhiqfm8solk8@4ax.com>,
>>governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>>
>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 20:13:44 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
>>> >governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
>>> >> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> >Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>>> >> >Defendant: No
>>> >> >Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be
>>> >> >carried out
>>> >> >within 48 hours.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >That's all it would take.
>>> >>
>>> >> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year.
>>> >> You gotta find out
>>> >> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back.
>>> >> What if you get
>>> >> stuck with some you can't send back? What if there are delays and
>>> >> you have to put them up
>>> >> and feed them indefinitely? Do you have the staff just to *process*
>>> >> these people, let
>>> >> alone get them physically to their home country. How many agents
>>> >> will you hire to do the
>>> >> actual work and how many can they process in a day each. What? You
>>> >> think you're Samantha
>>> >> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
>>> >
>>> >When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
>>> >Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
>>> >what to do.
>>> >>
>>> >> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000
>>> >> hidden aliens out of our
>>> >> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
>>> >
>>> >Oh we will handle that.
>>>
>>> No pie in the sky, details.
>>
>>Round them up. Not to hard.
>
> Ok. All eight million. You'll be done before morning?

Sure. Won't be tomorrow morning but by some morning it could be done.

Ignoring it certainly wont make it go away....

>
>>>
>>> >> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't
>>> >> want any resolution
>>> >> that lets not white people into the country.
>>> >
>>> >Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
>>>
>>> Because it *is* about race to many conservatives. Not for everybody,
>>> but *any* solution
>>> that involves letting immigrants in under any circumstances runs into a
>>> brick wall with a
>>> great many conservatives.
>>
>>
>>We need to know who they are first. Just like when you apply for a job.
>
> Thus the need to fingerprint, DNA and ID them on the way in.

So using a port of entry then... which you claim shouldn't exist.

>>> Let's go back to immigration policy circa 1880.
>>>
>>> We can scatter mini Ellis Island type facilities across the southern
>>> border. Change them
>>> to apply for entry even, if you like. We could actually make billions
>>> by charging for
>>> application for entry into the US. Why should they spend a thousand
>>> bucks on a Coyote?
>>> Let them drive up and pay US that thousand. We would make direct profit
>>> just from letting
>>> them in.
>>>
>>> But let them in. We need them. China has three times the people we do.
>>> That means China
>>> can have an economy three times the size of ours. If we both spend the
>>> same %GDP on
>>> defense, they'll spend three dollars to our one.
>>>
>>> We need population. Let's work out an efficient and productive system
>>> for getting them
>>> into the country and working.
>>>
>>So just open the gates and let them go? Doesn't sound to secure to me.
>
> Was secure enough in 1885.

As long as the money uses only the same security features as were used in
1885..

Oh, let me guess that's not secure enough anymore.

"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
news:6697ea9f$1$1778$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
> In article <4ipf9jhv1mkr0p6r97ulkebsijjb4iakme@4ax.com>,
> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:38:12 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <fstc9jdqb6jgiamk1q3hvvjhiqfm8solk8@4ax.com>,
>> >governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 20:13:44 -0600, Skeeter
>> >> <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
>> >> >governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
>> >> >> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>> >> >> >Defendant: No
>> >> >> >Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be
>> >> >> >carried out
>> >> >> >within 48 hours.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >That's all it would take.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a
>> >> >> year. You gotta find out
>> >> >> what country they're from and hope that country will take them
>> >> >> back. What if you get
>> >> >> stuck with some you can't send back? What if there are delays and
>> >> >> you have to put them up
>> >> >> and feed them indefinitely? Do you have the staff just to
>> >> >> *process* these people, let
>> >> >> alone get them physically to their home country. How many agents
>> >> >> will you hire to do the
>> >> >> actual work and how many can they process in a day each. What?
>> >> >> You think you're Samantha
>> >> >> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
>> >> >
>> >> >When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross
>> >> >in
>> >> >Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
>> >> >what to do.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000
>> >> >> hidden aliens out of our
>> >> >> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
>> >> >
>> >> >Oh we will handle that.
>> >>
>> >> No pie in the sky, details.
>> >
>> >Round them up. Not to hard.
>>
>> Ok. All eight million. You'll be done before morning?
>
> Who put a time limit on it?

He didn't say WHICH morning, did he?

>>
>> >>
>> >> >> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't
>> >> >> want any resolution
>> >> >> that lets not white people into the country.
>> >> >
>> >> >Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
>> >>
>> >> Because it *is* about race to many conservatives. Not for everybody,
>> >> but *any* solution
>> >> that involves letting immigrants in under any circumstances runs into
>> >> a brick wall with a
>> >> great many conservatives.
>> >
>> >
>> >We need to know who they are first. Just like when you apply for a job.
>>
>> Thus the need to fingerprint, DNA and ID them on the way in.
>
> So?

So, if they don't check out.. Swill says they should be refused entry.

>>
>> >> Let's go back to immigration policy circa 1880.
>> >>
>> >> We can scatter mini Ellis Island type facilities across the southern
>> >> border. Change them
>> >> to apply for entry even, if you like. We could actually make billions
>> >> by charging for
>> >> application for entry into the US. Why should they spend a thousand
>> >> bucks on a Coyote?
>> >> Let them drive up and pay US that thousand. We would make direct
>> >> profit just from letting
>> >> them in.
>> >>
>> >> But let them in. We need them. China has three times the people we
>> >> do. That means China
>> >> can have an economy three times the size of ours. If we both spend
>> >> the same %GDP on
>> >> defense, they'll spend three dollars to our one.
>> >>
>> >> We need population. Let's work out an efficient and productive system
>> >> for getting them
>> >> into the country and working.
>> >>
>> >So just open the gates and let them go? Doesn't sound to secure to me.
>>
>> Was secure enough in 1885.
>
> Idiot.

Yep, I suggest Swill only be allowed medical care at an 1885 level.. after
all it was good enough in 1885.

"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1mpf9jpo5a8kagql4k7d496akk0dfd2a22@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 09:09:06 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>In article <JPvlO.24668$ySE.18380@fx11.iad>,
>>mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>
>>> On 7/16/2024 7:38 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>> child
>>> molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>
>>> > In article <fstc9jdqb6jgiamk1q3hvvjhiqfm8solk8@4ax.com>,
>>> > governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 20:13:44 -0600, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off
>>> >> Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking
>>> >> do-nothing, lied:
>>> >>
>>> >>> In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
>>> >>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
>>> >>>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>> >>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>> Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>>> >>>>> Defendant: No
>>> >>>>> Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be
>>> >>>>> carried out
>>> >>>>> within 48 hours.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> That's all it would take.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a
>>> >>>> year. You gotta find out
>>> >>>> what country they're from and hope that country will take them
>>> >>>> back. What if you get
>>> >>>> stuck with some you can't send back? What if there are delays and
>>> >>>> you have to put them up
>>> >>>> and feed them indefinitely? Do you have the staff just to
>>> >>>> *process* these people, let
>>> >>>> alone get them physically to their home country. How many agents
>>> >>>> will you hire to do the
>>> >>>> actual work and how many can they process in a day each. What?
>>> >>>> You think you're Samantha
>>> >>>> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross
>>> >>> in
>>> >>> Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
>>> >>> what to do.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000
>>> >>>> hidden aliens out of our
>>> >>>> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Oh we will handle that.
>>> >>
>>> >> No pie in the sky, details.
>>> >
>>> > Round them up. Not to [sic] hard.
>>>
>>> *too*, not "to." And it's much harder than a fuckwit like you ca
>>
>>Nope. Just allow the police to check them out.
>
> You mean, let them sneak in and assign the cops to find and deport them?

Well, apprehending criminals is one of the things we have cops for...

>
>>> >>>> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't
>>> >>>> want any resolution
>>> >>>> that lets not white people into the country.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
>>> >>
>>> >> Because it *is* about race to many conservatives. Not for everybody,
>>> >> but *any* solution
>>> >> that involves letting immigrants in under any circumstances runs into
>>> >> a brick wall with a
>>> >> great many conservatives.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > We need to know who they are first.
>>>
>>> You don't give a fuck who they are, you lying racist. They're not white,
>>> and to
>>> you and Trump and all your Nazi fellows, that's reason enough to keep
>>> them out.
>>
>>The Nazi thing tosses you out of the race.
>
> Severe as it may be, the right's position on immigration is a racist one.

Translation: I can't argue the point, so I will claim it's racist because
that's all I've got.

"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:dcqf9j5sfshcseic16bf1bf53v5198olir@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 16:56:49 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>In article <v76q8d$109m3$6@news.mixmin.net>, kha@none.com says...
>>>
>>> On 7/16/2024 7:36 AM, Michael A Terrell wrote:
>>> > On 7/15/2024 7:13 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>>> > convicted
>>> > child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>> >
>>> >> In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
>>> >> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
>>> >>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>>> >>>> Defendant: No
>>> >>>> Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be
>>> >>>> carried out
>>> >>>> within 48 hours.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> That's all it would take.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a
>>> >>> year. You gotta find out
>>> >>> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back.
>>> >>> What if you get
>>> >>> stuck with some you can't send back? What if there are delays and
>>> >>> you have to put them up
>>> >>> and feed them indefinitely? Do you have the staff just to *process*
>>> >>> these people, let
>>> >>> alone get them physically to their home country. How many agents
>>> >>> will you hire to do the
>>> >>> actual work and how many can they process in a day each. What? You
>>> >>> think you're Samantha
>>> >>> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
>>> >>
>>> >> When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross
>>> >> in
>>> >> Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
>>> >> what to do.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000
>>> >>> hidden aliens out of our
>>> >>> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
>>> >>
>>> >> Oh we will handle that.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't
>>> >>> want any resolution
>>> >>> that lets not white people into the country.
>>> >>
>>> >> Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
>>> >
>>> > It's about race with *you*. The reason *you* don't want them is
>>> > they're
>>> > not white. It has nothing to do with "legal" or "illegal" immigration.
>>> > It's about race for you, and that's all it is.
>>>
>>> You're the one who entered the race variable, so it was first in your
>>> derailed train of thought. Myself, I don't want them because they are
>>> stealing everything they can get their hands on.
>>
>>It is a crime to enter illegally. So he supports allowing someone to
>>milk us who started off by committing a crime.
>
> Then decriminalize that act. Not unlike decriminalizing weed.

Fine, you see about getting that done.. until then.. we should work towards
deporting every illegal alien in the country while preventing the entry of
others.

"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:gqqf9j1d2reba5328cvksoo31dgd5gb6q1@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:44:02 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>In article <ocuc9jt9ai419glm5ji3h908ej2eknodhf@4ax.com>,
>>governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>>
>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 22:08:06 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >In article <prkb9jhs65l5lqprnmikdcgfues7ftppd0@4ax.com>,
>>> >governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:51:47 -0400, "Scout"
>>> >> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> >> >news:5ul59jp65kc8j848tajkcl40nkk3btmkg8@4ax.com...
>>> >> >> On Sat, 13 Jul 2024 08:53:24 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>"Rudy Canoza" <rudy@phil.hendrie.con> wrote in message
>>> >> >>>news:McekO.22237$xYQc.1806@fx12.iad...
>>> >> >>>> Medical providers and public health experts worry that the
>>> >> >>>> health care
>>> >> >>>> system is poorly equipped to handle the influx.
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>Well we could close our southern Border to illegal aliens and that
>>> >> >>>would
>>> >> >>>help out with that problem a lot.
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Yeah, you keep saying that but you never get around to explaining
>>> >> >> how that
>>> >> >> is to be done.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >Well the wall is a good start.
>>> >> >Deporting anyone found illegally on this side of the border would
>>> >> >greatly
>>> >> >benefit.
>>> >> >Automatic denial of refugee status to anyone that enters at other
>>> >> >than a
>>> >> >port of entry and subsequent deportation.
>>> >> >You know.. actually enforcing our laws.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> Trump asked for wall money and Republicans told him no.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >Well, Democrats told him no... so he came up with the money and
>>> >> >built a lot
>>> >> >of the wall on the border despite Congress. Which has been shown to
>>> >> >be
>>> >> >effective.
>>> >>
>>> >> Yeah, he raided a Pentagon reserve fund. Wanna see how effective his
>>> >> wall was?
>>> >> <https://www.newsnationnow.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/108/2023/12/Border-Wall-Fronton_010920.jpg?w=1280&h=720&crop=1>
>>> >>
>>> >> And that's the bit that didn't wash away in the first spring floods.
>>> >>
>>> >> Then there's all that wall Biden had to repair, rebuild or enhance
>>> >> and yeah it's been
>>> >> documented and pictures linked to in here. There's a bend in the Rio
>>> >> Grand in Texas. Got
>>> >> this long, broad sandbar sticking up out of the water. With wire and
>>> >> barriers it looks
>>> >> like Omaha Beach on D Day.
>>> >>
>>> >> >> Biden asked for border security money and Republicans told him no.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >After asserting that he wouldn't build even a foot of wall.
>>> >>
>>> >> But he did build and got in hot water with his left because of it.
>>> >>
>>> >> >Seems even Biden agrees:
>>> >> >1) That border security is needed
>>> >> >2) Walls do work to help in border security.
>>> >>
>>> >> They help but you can't seal it. And what about those who come in on
>>> >> a visa but don't
>>> >> leave when it expires?
>>> >
>>> >Gotta go.
>>>
>>> How much do you think it would cost to track down and deport all those
>>> millions and how
>>> would you replace them in the work force?
>>
>>Less then it cost for us to feed and clothe them.
>
> Most of them are feeding and clothing themselves.

Using what for money?

In article <udqf9jhdtq7arej208h4n6l0jab1o6kt6n@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:05:53 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com...
> >> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
> >> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
> >>>Defendant: No
> >>>Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be carried
> >>>out
> >>>within 48 hours.
> >>>
> >>>That's all it would take.
> >>
> >> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year.
> >
> >Why?
>
> Where they gonna sleep while you're processing them?

You don't seem to be having trouble finding places for them now.
>
> >> You gotta find out
> >> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back.
> >
> >No, we don't. Nothing says they have to be given a free ride home.
>
> So if they can't afford a return ticket, we just let them stay?

One large airplane. Maybe arrest, transport and deport on the spot. Or
they can go to prison.
>
> >> What if you get
> >> stuck with some you can't send back?
> >
> >Send them back to Mexico.. or whatever country they last departed from.
>
> Mexico doesn't have to take them back if they're not Mexicans. They've already announced
> this.
If they allowed them into their country first then they are responsible.
Trump threatened to raise tariffs and cut funds if they didn't cooperate
and it was working.
>
> >> What if there are delays and you have to put them up
> >> and feed them indefinitely?
> >
> >Shouldn't take more than a couple of hours to boot them over the border.
>
> Can't just boot them back across the border. That would be illegal. They get a hearing.

A fast deportation hearing and instant ride to the border. You either
leave or go to prison.

>
> > > Do you have the staff just to *process* these people, let
> >> alone get them physically to their home country.
> >
> >When did we have to return them home? Return them to the last country they
> >were in.
>
> Mexico is under no legal compunction to accept people in who aren't Mexican.

If they allow them to enter their country they are responsible.
>
> >> How many agents will you hire to do the
> >> actual work and how many can they process in a day each.
> >
and it was no where as bad as it is now.
> >be.
>
> Wrong again. We have nowhere near enough agents to cover the border.

We used to. We also have better technology. Drones, cameras, motion
sensors, satellites, much more. They didn't have that when I lived on
the border
>
> >> What? You think you're Samantha
> >> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
> >
> >No, but I can make it a lot less than it was.
>
> How you going to do that without breaking any laws?
>
> >> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000 hidden
> >> aliens out of our
> >> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
> >
> >Well, that would probably take much more than a year, but we can streamline
> >the deportation process. Could probably have them over the border within 6-7
> >days.
>
> So where they going to sleep at night?

How about where you're putting them up now?
>
> >> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't want
> >> any resolution
> >> that lets not white people into the country.
> >
> >If they aren't citizens or entered illegally, white, black, tan.. doesn't
> >matter, they get deported.
>
> After they get their hearing and if their home country will take them back.

It's that or make them join our military or prison.
>
> Swill

--

BITCH! YOU MISSED!

In article <v79359$1v9kr$1@dont-email.me>,
me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
>
> "Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:udqf9jhdtq7arej208h4n6l0jab1o6kt6n@4ax.com...
> > On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:05:53 -0400, "Scout"
> > <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >>news:56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com...
> >>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
> >>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
> >>>>Defendant: No
> >>>>Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be carried
> >>>>out
> >>>>within 48 hours.
> >>>>
> >>>>That's all it would take.
> >>>
> >>> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year.
> >>
> >>Why?
> >
> > Where they gonna sleep while you're processing them?
>
> How long does it take to confirm they never entered though a point of entry,
> and load them up for transport to the border.
> If they want to sleep.. they have the floor they are standing on.
>
> Why should they expect more?
>
> >
> >>> You gotta find out
> >>> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back.
> >>
> >>No, we don't. Nothing says they have to be given a free ride home.
> >
> > So if they can't afford a return ticket, we just let them stay?
> >
> >>> What if you get
> >>> stuck with some you can't send back?
> >>
> >>Send them back to Mexico.. or whatever country they last departed from.
> >
> > Mexico doesn't have to take them back if they're not Mexicans. They've
> > already announced
> > this.
>
> Well , then Mexico can see about transporting them to their southern
> border..
> or better stop shipping them to our border..
> .. Better yet would be to catch them at their southern border and deport
> them right there.

Bingo!
>
> Otherwise, they get turned over to Mexican authorities.. or returned to
> Mexico from which they came.. either way.. it's not our problem.
>
>
> >>> What if there are delays and you have to put them up
> >>> and feed them indefinitely?
> >>
> >>Shouldn't take more than a couple of hours to boot them over the border.
> >
> > Can't just boot them back across the border. That would be illegal. They
> > get a hearing
>
> Ok..
>
> Judge: I need to see your entry papers.
> Defendant: I have none.
> Judge: Any record of this person crossing at a point of entry
> INS: No your honor.
> Judge: And prior offenses in your record?
> INS: No your honor.
> Judge: Ok, so no need for a fine or jail time. With no evidence you legally
> entered the US, your lack the documentation on you as required by law to
> show you are here legally. You are hereby remanded back into the custody of
> the INS for immediate deportation. *Bang* Next case.
>
> Shouldn't take much longer than that.
>
> We could even do it in mass for most cases.. breaking them into groups for
> those where this is there first offense, to those with repeated offenses who
> may need to pay fines and/or jail time.
>
> If we need more judges we can hire them.. would be cheaper than the costs of
> all those criminals.
>
>
> >> > Do you have the staff just to *process* these people, let
> >>> alone get them physically to their home country.
> >>
> >>When did we have to return them home? Return them to the last country they
> >>were in.
> >
> > Mexico is under no legal compunction to accept people in who aren't
> > Mexican.
>
> As we are under no compunction to accept people coming in from Mexico.
> However, I suppose they can be put to work until their work produces enough
> net profits to pay for returning them home.. Then they can still pick crops
> other otherwise work until they are deported.
>
> >>> How many agents will you hire to do the
> >>> actual work and how many can they process in a day each.
> >>
> >>We have plenty now, if we would allow them to actually do what they should
> >>be.
> >
> > Wrong again. We have nowhere near enough agents to cover the border.
>
> Then we clearly need better passive defenses on the border, and possibly
> even consider automated active defenses. Because if we can't afford to
> prevent their entry we certainly can't afford to have them here and
> continuing to violate the law.
>
> But at least you're not admitting they don't belong here.
>
> Now the only question is how to deport them.
>
> >>> What? You think you're Samantha
> >>> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
> >>
> >>No, but I can make it a lot less than it was.
> >
> > How you going to do that without breaking any laws?
>
> What laws would I be breaking to deport people under existing laws?
>
>
> >>> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000 hidden
> >>> aliens out of our
> >>> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
> >>
> >>Well, that would probably take much more than a year, but we can
> >>streamline
> >>the deportation process. Could probably have them over the border within
> >>6-7
> >>days.
> >
> > So where they going to sleep at night?
>
> The floor, ground, standing up.. that's their problem.
>
>
>
> >>> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't want
> >>> any resolution
> >>> that lets not white people into the country.
> >>
> >>If they aren't citizens or entered illegally, white, black, tan.. doesn't
> >>matter, they get deported.
> >
> > After they get their hearing and if their home country will take them
> > back.
>
> So, if they are so bad their own country doesn't want them.. why would we
> want them?
>
>

--

BITCH! YOU MISSED!

In article <fmqf9jdf511uhj97l8uvv80u7b7i0d7ovd@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 16:10:09 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>
> >No matter where they came from, they came here from Mexico. They should
> >have stopped them. So send them there and let Mexico deal with it.
>
> Shoulda, woulda, coulda. Mexico is under no legal obligation to take non Mexican citizens
> into their country. Mexico is having this same problem - illegals crossing their southern
> border. Their problem is, those illegals look like them and speak the same language
> making them much harder to catch.
>
> Swill

Well that was racist of you.

--

BITCH! YOU MISSED!

In article <gqqf9j1d2reba5328cvksoo31dgd5gb6q1@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:44:02 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <ocuc9jt9ai419glm5ji3h908ej2eknodhf@4ax.com>,
> >governor.swill@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 22:08:06 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <prkb9jhs65l5lqprnmikdcgfues7ftppd0@4ax.com>,
> >> >governor.swill@gmail.com says...
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:51:47 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> >> >news:5ul59jp65kc8j848tajkcl40nkk3btmkg8@4ax.com...
> >> >> >> On Sat, 13 Jul 2024 08:53:24 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>"Rudy Canoza" <rudy@phil.hendrie.con> wrote in message
> >> >> >>>news:McekO.22237$xYQc.1806@fx12.iad...
> >> >> >>>> Medical providers and public health experts worry that the health care
> >> >> >>>> system is poorly equipped to handle the influx.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>Well we could close our southern Border to illegal aliens and that would
> >> >> >>>help out with that problem a lot.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Yeah, you keep saying that but you never get around to explaining how that
> >> >> >> is to be done.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Well the wall is a good start.
> >> >> >Deporting anyone found illegally on this side of the border would greatly
> >> >> >benefit.
> >> >> >Automatic denial of refugee status to anyone that enters at other than a
> >> >> >port of entry and subsequent deportation.
> >> >> >You know.. actually enforcing our laws.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Trump asked for wall money and Republicans told him no.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Well, Democrats told him no... so he came up with the money and built a lot
> >> >> >of the wall on the border despite Congress. Which has been shown to be
> >> >> >effective.
> >> >>
> >> >> Yeah, he raided a Pentagon reserve fund. Wanna see how effective his wall was?
> >> >> <https://www.newsnationnow.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/108/2023/12/Border-Wall-Fronton_010920.jpg?w=1280&h=720&crop=1>
> >> >>
> >> >> And that's the bit that didn't wash away in the first spring floods.
> >> >>
> >> >> Then there's all that wall Biden had to repair, rebuild or enhance and yeah it's been
> >> >> documented and pictures linked to in here. There's a bend in the Rio Grand in Texas. Got
> >> >> this long, broad sandbar sticking up out of the water. With wire and barriers it looks
> >> >> like Omaha Beach on D Day.
> >> >>
> >> >> >> Biden asked for border security money and Republicans told him no.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >After asserting that he wouldn't build even a foot of wall.
> >> >>
> >> >> But he did build and got in hot water with his left because of it.
> >> >>
> >> >> >Seems even Biden agrees:
> >> >> >1) That border security is needed
> >> >> >2) Walls do work to help in border security.
> >> >>
> >> >> They help but you can't seal it. And what about those who come in on a visa but don't
> >> >> leave when it expires?
> >> >
> >> >Gotta go.
> >>
> >> How much do you think it would cost to track down and deport all those millions and how
> >> would you replace them in the work force?
> >
> >Less then it cost for us to feed and clothe them.
>
> Most of them are feeding and clothing themselves. The only ones not doing so are the
> trapped ones that got caught and are being forced to NOT take care of themselves by short
> sighted legal authorities. Denver has the right idea. It's giving them work permission
> inside the city.
>
> >> Running a country means thinking about things the voters don't want to be bothered with.
> >
> >Like you know what running a country is all about.
>
> Ditto.
>
> >> >> >Further, it wasn't that he asked for such money, it's just that Democrats
> >> >> >tied so much other stupid spending to it that it would be irresponsible to
> >> >> >pass it with all that junk attached to it.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Dunno about you man, but it sounds like the Republicans don't want the
> >> >> >> border sealed.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Sure we do. We just don't want to spend a ton of money on stupid Democrat
> >> >> >projects while doing it.
> >> >>
> >> >> Oh. So Republican pork is ok but Democrat pork isn't.
> >> >
> >> >We didn't add any pork to the "border bill".
> >>
> >> Neither did the Democrats - that was right wing disinfo. The border bill they complain
> >> the Dems 'larded up' was actually written and originally sponsored by REPUBLICANS in the
> >> Senate. It was proposed for debate but the HOUSE GOP shot it down before any discussion
> >> could take place.
> >
> >So all the money in that bill for Ukraine and Israel was just a ruse?
>
> In case you didn't notice, the immigration bits were cut out and the rest of it, the
> "pork", was all that got passed. So, how did not passing the immigration bill stop the
> pork attached to it.
>
> >> Republicans in the Senate blocked two Biden requests for resources in '21 and '22.
> >> Republicans in the House blocked two different Republican authored immigration bills.
> >
> >
> >Because they were full of pork.
>
> But according to you, the pork passed but the immigration restrictions were not.
>
> >> Trump's wall was full of holes and portions of it didn't last two rainy seasons.
> >
> >Because they cut his funding.
>
> "They" were Senate Republicans, so stop blaming liberals and moderates for what the
> conservatives did.
>
> >The "border bill" said nothing about building a wall.
>
> So? Republicans in the Senate and the House both shot down wall funding and have been
> doing so since Trump's first year in office.
>
> >> Vote Republican if you want, but at least admit the truth. The GOP is the party of
> >> Business which does NOT want the supply of cheap, immigrant labor reduced.
> >>
> >> >> That's just an excuse to be lazy, man. If you don't do something, you'll never accomplish
> >> >> anything. So you take what you can get. Yeah, you got to install a line of park benches
> >> >> along the wall for the wetbacks to rest on, but if that gets you anything near 100%
> >> >> apprehension with the average alien turnaround, say, month to get them home.
> >> >
> >> >As soon as they cross illegally. Simple.
> >>
> >> How many agents are you prepared to hire? How many cameras, sensors, vehicles and
> >> internment facilities are you willing to pay for? Where's the money? Do you think border
> >> enforcement is free? House magoos seem to.
> >
> >I used to live on the border and it was never like it is now.
>
> Nothing is like it was. Times change and that's what conservatives fear most; change.

I know what I am saying and so do you.
>
> >> Republicans in Congress seem unwilling take any steps to do even your simple solution.
> >
> >Go back to how it was. Don't cross illegally.
>
> Maybe we should wag our fingers at them while we're at it. Btw, since when did they *not*
> cross illegally?

In article <v7935h$1v9kr$10@dont-email.me>,
me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
>
> "Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:gqqf9j1d2reba5328cvksoo31dgd5gb6q1@4ax.com...
> > On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:44:02 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>In article <ocuc9jt9ai419glm5ji3h908ej2eknodhf@4ax.com>,
> >>governor.swill@gmail.com says...
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 22:08:06 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> >In article <prkb9jhs65l5lqprnmikdcgfues7ftppd0@4ax.com>,
> >>> >governor.swill@gmail.com says...
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:51:47 -0400, "Scout"
> >>> >> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> >>> >> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >>> >> >news:5ul59jp65kc8j848tajkcl40nkk3btmkg8@4ax.com...
> >>> >> >> On Sat, 13 Jul 2024 08:53:24 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>>"Rudy Canoza" <rudy@phil.hendrie.con> wrote in message
> >>> >> >>>news:McekO.22237$xYQc.1806@fx12.iad...
> >>> >> >>>> Medical providers and public health experts worry that the
> >>> >> >>>> health care
> >>> >> >>>> system is poorly equipped to handle the influx.
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>>Well we could close our southern Border to illegal aliens and that
> >>> >> >>>would
> >>> >> >>>help out with that problem a lot.
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> Yeah, you keep saying that but you never get around to explaining
> >>> >> >> how that
> >>> >> >> is to be done.
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >Well the wall is a good start.
> >>> >> >Deporting anyone found illegally on this side of the border would
> >>> >> >greatly
> >>> >> >benefit.
> >>> >> >Automatic denial of refugee status to anyone that enters at other
> >>> >> >than a
> >>> >> >port of entry and subsequent deportation.
> >>> >> >You know.. actually enforcing our laws.
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >> Trump asked for wall money and Republicans told him no.
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >Well, Democrats told him no... so he came up with the money and
> >>> >> >built a lot
> >>> >> >of the wall on the border despite Congress. Which has been shown to
> >>> >> >be
> >>> >> >effective.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Yeah, he raided a Pentagon reserve fund. Wanna see how effective his
> >>> >> wall was?
> >>> >> <https://www.newsnationnow.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/108/2023/12/Border-Wall-Fronton_010920.jpg?w=1280&h=720&crop=1>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> And that's the bit that didn't wash away in the first spring floods.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Then there's all that wall Biden had to repair, rebuild or enhance
> >>> >> and yeah it's been
> >>> >> documented and pictures linked to in here. There's a bend in the Rio
> >>> >> Grand in Texas. Got
> >>> >> this long, broad sandbar sticking up out of the water. With wire and
> >>> >> barriers it looks
> >>> >> like Omaha Beach on D Day.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> >> Biden asked for border security money and Republicans told him no.
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >After asserting that he wouldn't build even a foot of wall.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> But he did build and got in hot water with his left because of it.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> >Seems even Biden agrees:
> >>> >> >1) That border security is needed
> >>> >> >2) Walls do work to help in border security.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> They help but you can't seal it. And what about those who come in on
> >>> >> a visa but don't
> >>> >> leave when it expires?
> >>> >
> >>> >Gotta go.
> >>>
> >>> How much do you think it would cost to track down and deport all those
> >>> millions and how
> >>> would you replace them in the work force?
> >>
> >>Less then it cost for us to feed and clothe them.
> >
> > Most of them are feeding and clothing themselves.
>
> Using what for money?
>
>

Bingo. I would like to know about pics from the border and interviews.
People from all over wearing Nikes and talking on cell hones. Dressed
pretty nice for having to cross a desert. Some even wearing "Let us in
Biden" tee shirts. I guess some guy in a van was parked in the desert
selling shirts.

--

BITCH! YOU MISSED!

On 7/17/2024 8:42 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:

> In article <JWQlO.17523$dnl5.5027@fx48.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 7/17/2024 7:34 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>
>>> In article <e8le9j9jod26n1rd84906fr5cr203m8mio@4ax.com>,
>>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:10:45 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:6695d759$1$1895495$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>>>>>> In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
>>>>>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
>>>>>>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>>>>>>>> Defendant: No
>>>>>>>> Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be carried
>>>>>>>> out
>>>>>>>> within 48 hours.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's all it would take.
>>>>
>>>> Republicans in Congress have repeatedly refused to grant the resources to do that.
>>>>
>>>> Swill
>>>
>>> They were already in place.
>>
>> They were not. Trump did not secure the border.
>
> They were long before Trump was in office.

They were not. The border was never secure.

On 7/16/2024 6:27 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:

> In article <uJElO.6389$Ymbe.3620@fx37.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 7/16/2024 3:59 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>
>>> In article <xKClO.7576$h64d.6531@fx40.iad>,
>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>
>>>> On 7/16/2024 8:06 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <AzvlO.2848$jCQf.202@fx04.iad>, mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut
>>>>> says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/15/2024 7:13 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>>>>>>>>> Defendant: No
>>>>>>>>> Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be carried out
>>>>>>>>> within 48 hours.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That's all it would take.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year. You gotta find out
>>>>>>>> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back. What if you get
>>>>>>>> stuck with some you can't send back? What if there are delays and you have to put them up
>>>>>>>> and feed them indefinitely? Do you have the staff just to *process* these people, let
>>>>>>>> alone get them physically to their home country. How many agents will you hire to do the
>>>>>>>> actual work and how many can they process in a day each. What? You think you're Samantha
>>>>>>>> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
>>>>>>> Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
>>>>>>> what to do.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000 hidden aliens out of our
>>>>>>>> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh we will handle that.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't want any resolution
>>>>>>>> that lets not white people into the country.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's about race with *you*. The reason *you* don't want them is they're not
>>>>>> white. It has nothing to do with "legal" or "illegal" immigration. It's about
>>>>>> race for you, and that's all it is.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's about following the law.
>>>>
>>>> It's not. That's just your lie cover story. You don't want any immigrants even
>>>> if they follow the law. None of you fucking racist right-wingnuts do.
>>>
>>> My first wife was from Mexico
>>
>> She was white.
>
> What was her name?

No one cares. You cheated on her and beat her, so she split.

On 7/16/2024 6:26 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:

> In article <SIElO.6385$Ymbe.3131@fx37.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 7/16/2024 3:56 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
>> molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>
>>> In article <v76q8d$109m3$6@news.mixmin.net>, kha@none.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 7/16/2024 7:36 AM, Michael A Terrell wrote:
>>>>> On 7/15/2024 7:13 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
>>>>>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
>>>>>>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>>>>>>>> Defendant: No
>>>>>>>> Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be
>>>>>>>> carried out
>>>>>>>> within 48 hours.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's all it would take.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a
>>>>>>> year.  You gotta find out
>>>>>>> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back.
>>>>>>> What if you get
>>>>>>> stuck with some you can't send back?  What if there are delays and
>>>>>>> you have to put them up
>>>>>>> and feed them indefinitely?  Do you have the staff just to *process*
>>>>>>> these people, let
>>>>>>> alone get them physically to their home country.  How many agents
>>>>>>> will you hire to do the
>>>>>>> actual work and how many can they process in a day each.  What?  You
>>>>>>> think you're Samantha
>>>>>>> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
>>>>>> Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
>>>>>> what to do.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000
>>>>>>> hidden aliens out of our
>>>>>>> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh we will handle that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't
>>>>>>> want any resolution
>>>>>>> that lets not white people into the country.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
>>>>>
>>>>> It's about race with *you*. The reason *you* don't want them is they're
>>>>> not white. It has nothing to do with "legal" or "illegal" immigration.
>>>>> It's about race for you, and that's all it is.
>>>>
>>>> You're the one who entered the race variable, so it was first in your
>>>> derailed train of thought. Myself, I don't want them because they are
>>>> stealing everything they can get their hands on.
>>>
>>> It is a crime to enter illegally.
>>
>> About on the same scale as jaywalking.
>
> Cross my fence without permission and see how I deal with it.

I already did. You just slept right through it.

On 7/17/2024 5:49 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:

> In article <luZlO.60673$xL%b.8799@fx17.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 7/16/2024 6:27 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>
>>> In article <uJElO.6389$Ymbe.3620@fx37.iad>,
>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>
>>>> On 7/16/2024 3:59 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <xKClO.7576$h64d.6531@fx40.iad>,
>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/16/2024 8:06 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <AzvlO.2848$jCQf.202@fx04.iad>, mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut
>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 7/15/2024 7:13 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>>>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>>>>>>>>>>> Defendant: No
>>>>>>>>>>> Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be carried out
>>>>>>>>>>> within 48 hours.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> That's all it would take.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year. You gotta find out
>>>>>>>>>> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back. What if you get
>>>>>>>>>> stuck with some you can't send back? What if there are delays and you have to put them up
>>>>>>>>>> and feed them indefinitely? Do you have the staff just to *process* these people, let
>>>>>>>>>> alone get them physically to their home country. How many agents will you hire to do the
>>>>>>>>>> actual work and how many can they process in a day each. What? You think you're Samantha
>>>>>>>>>> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
>>>>>>>>> Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
>>>>>>>>> what to do.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000 hidden aliens out of our
>>>>>>>>>> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Oh we will handle that.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't want any resolution
>>>>>>>>>> that lets not white people into the country.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's about race with *you*. The reason *you* don't want them is they're not
>>>>>>>> white. It has nothing to do with "legal" or "illegal" immigration. It's about
>>>>>>>> race for you, and that's all it is.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's about following the law.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's not. That's just your lie cover story. You don't want any immigrants even
>>>>>> if they follow the law. None of you fucking racist right-wingnuts do.
>>>>>
>>>>> My first wife was from Mexico
>>>>
>>>> She was white.
>>>
>>> What was her name?
>>
>> No one cares. You cheated on her and beat her, so she split.
>
> What was her name?

Doesn't matter. She was white. I saw her.

On 7/17/2024 5:48 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:

> In article <ZtZlO.60671$xL%b.47743@fx17.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 7/17/2024 8:42 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>
>>> In article <JWQlO.17523$dnl5.5027@fx48.iad>,
>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>
>>>> On 7/17/2024 7:34 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <e8le9j9jod26n1rd84906fr5cr203m8mio@4ax.com>,
>>>>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:10:45 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:6695d759$1$1895495$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>>>>>>>> In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
>>>>>>>>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>>>>>>>>>> Defendant: No
>>>>>>>>>> Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be carried
>>>>>>>>>> out
>>>>>>>>>> within 48 hours.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That's all it would take.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Republicans in Congress have repeatedly refused to grant the resources to do that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Swill
>>>>>
>>>>> They were already in place.
>>>>
>>>> They were not. Trump did not secure the border.
>>>
>>> They were long before Trump was in office.
>>
>> They were not. The border was never secure.
>
> I didn't say it was. I said the rules were already in place you idiot.

They didn't work. The border wasn't secure.

On 7/17/2024 5:49 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:

> In article <xuZlO.60674$xL%b.9467@fx17.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 7/16/2024 6:26 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>
>>> In article <SIElO.6385$Ymbe.3131@fx37.iad>,
>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>
>>>> On 7/16/2024 3:56 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <v76q8d$109m3$6@news.mixmin.net>, kha@none.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/16/2024 7:36 AM, Michael A Terrell wrote:
>>>>>>> On 7/15/2024 7:13 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
>>>>>>>>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>>>>>>>>>> Defendant: No
>>>>>>>>>> Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be
>>>>>>>>>> carried out
>>>>>>>>>> within 48 hours.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That's all it would take.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a
>>>>>>>>> year.  You gotta find out
>>>>>>>>> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back.
>>>>>>>>> What if you get
>>>>>>>>> stuck with some you can't send back?  What if there are delays and
>>>>>>>>> you have to put them up
>>>>>>>>> and feed them indefinitely?  Do you have the staff just to *process*
>>>>>>>>> these people, let
>>>>>>>>> alone get them physically to their home country.  How many agents
>>>>>>>>> will you hire to do the
>>>>>>>>> actual work and how many can they process in a day each.  What?  You
>>>>>>>>> think you're Samantha
>>>>>>>>> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
>>>>>>>> Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
>>>>>>>> what to do.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000
>>>>>>>>> hidden aliens out of our
>>>>>>>>> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oh we will handle that.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't
>>>>>>>>> want any resolution
>>>>>>>>> that lets not white people into the country.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's about race with *you*. The reason *you* don't want them is they're
>>>>>>> not white. It has nothing to do with "legal" or "illegal" immigration.
>>>>>>> It's about race for you, and that's all it is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're the one who entered the race variable, so it was first in your
>>>>>> derailed train of thought. Myself, I don't want them because they are
>>>>>> stealing everything they can get their hands on.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is a crime to enter illegally.
>>>>
>>>> About on the same scale as jaywalking.
>>>
>>> Cross my fence without permission and see how I deal with it.
>>
>> I already did. You just slept right through it.
>
> No.

Yes. You never heard or saw me, but I saw you.

On 7/17/2024 7:10 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:

> In article <Yw_lO.45039$BYv6.25952@fx09.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 7/17/2024 5:49 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>
>>
>>> In article <luZlO.60673$xL%b.8799@fx17.iad>,
>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>
>>>> On 7/16/2024 6:27 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <uJElO.6389$Ymbe.3620@fx37.iad>,
>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/16/2024 3:59 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <xKClO.7576$h64d.6531@fx40.iad>,
>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 7/16/2024 8:06 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <AzvlO.2848$jCQf.202@fx04.iad>, mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut
>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 7/15/2024 7:13 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Defendant: No
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be carried out
>>>>>>>>>>>>> within 48 hours.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's all it would take.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year. You gotta find out
>>>>>>>>>>>> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back. What if you get
>>>>>>>>>>>> stuck with some you can't send back? What if there are delays and you have to put them up
>>>>>>>>>>>> and feed them indefinitely? Do you have the staff just to *process* these people, let
>>>>>>>>>>>> alone get them physically to their home country. How many agents will you hire to do the
>>>>>>>>>>>> actual work and how many can they process in a day each. What? You think you're Samantha
>>>>>>>>>>>> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
>>>>>>>>>>> Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
>>>>>>>>>>> what to do.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000 hidden aliens out of our
>>>>>>>>>>>> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Oh we will handle that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't want any resolution
>>>>>>>>>>>> that lets not white people into the country.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's about race with *you*. The reason *you* don't want them is they're not
>>>>>>>>>> white. It has nothing to do with "legal" or "illegal" immigration. It's about
>>>>>>>>>> race for you, and that's all it is.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's about following the law.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's not. That's just your lie cover story. You don't want any immigrants even
>>>>>>>> if they follow the law. None of you fucking racist right-wingnuts do.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My first wife was from Mexico
>>>>>>
>>>>>> She was white.
>>>>>
>>>>> What was her name?
>>>>
>>>> No one cares. You cheated on her and beat her, so she split.
>>>
>>> What was her name?
>>
>> Doesn't matter. She was white. I saw her.
>
> What year?

Doesn't matter. I saw her. She's white.

On 7/17/2024 7:10 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:

> In article <fx_lO.45040$BYv6.27429@fx09.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 7/17/2024 5:48 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>
>>> In article <ZtZlO.60671$xL%b.47743@fx17.iad>,
>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>
>>>> On 7/17/2024 8:42 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <JWQlO.17523$dnl5.5027@fx48.iad>,
>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/17/2024 7:34 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <e8le9j9jod26n1rd84906fr5cr203m8mio@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:10:45 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:6695d759$1$1895495$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>>>>>>>>>> In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>>>>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
>>>>>>>>>>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Defendant: No
>>>>>>>>>>>> Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be carried
>>>>>>>>>>>> out
>>>>>>>>>>>> within 48 hours.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> That's all it would take.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Republicans in Congress have repeatedly refused to grant the resources to do that.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Swill
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They were already in place.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They were not. Trump did not secure the border.
>>>>>
>>>>> They were long before Trump was in office.
>>>>
>>>> They were not. The border was never secure.
>>>
>>> I didn't say it was. I said the rules were already in place you idiot.
>>
>> They didn't work. The border wasn't secure.
>
> They did work.

They didn't work. For 80+ years, unauthorized migrants have been streaming over
the border. As conditions worsened in Latin America thanks to Republiscum/QAnon
policies, the flow of migrants increased.

On 7/17/2024 7:11 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:

> In article <qx_lO.45041$BYv6.29874@fx09.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 7/17/2024 5:49 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>
>>> In article <xuZlO.60674$xL%b.9467@fx17.iad>,
>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>
>>>> On 7/16/2024 6:26 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <SIElO.6385$Ymbe.3131@fx37.iad>,
>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/16/2024 3:56 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <v76q8d$109m3$6@news.mixmin.net>, kha@none.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 7/16/2024 7:36 AM, Michael A Terrell wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 7/15/2024 7:13 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>>>>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
>>>>>>>>>>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Defendant: No
>>>>>>>>>>>> Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be
>>>>>>>>>>>> carried out
>>>>>>>>>>>> within 48 hours.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> That's all it would take.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a
>>>>>>>>>>> year.  You gotta find out
>>>>>>>>>>> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back.
>>>>>>>>>>> What if you get
>>>>>>>>>>> stuck with some you can't send back?  What if there are delays and
>>>>>>>>>>> you have to put them up
>>>>>>>>>>> and feed them indefinitely?  Do you have the staff just to *process*
>>>>>>>>>>> these people, let
>>>>>>>>>>> alone get them physically to their home country.  How many agents
>>>>>>>>>>> will you hire to do the
>>>>>>>>>>> actual work and how many can they process in a day each.  What?  You
>>>>>>>>>>> think you're Samantha
>>>>>>>>>>> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
>>>>>>>>>> Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
>>>>>>>>>> what to do.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000
>>>>>>>>>>> hidden aliens out of our
>>>>>>>>>>> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Oh we will handle that.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't
>>>>>>>>>>> want any resolution
>>>>>>>>>>> that lets not white people into the country.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's about race with *you*. The reason *you* don't want them is they're
>>>>>>>>> not white. It has nothing to do with "legal" or "illegal" immigration.
>>>>>>>>> It's about race for you, and that's all it is.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're the one who entered the race variable, so it was first in your
>>>>>>>> derailed train of thought. Myself, I don't want them because they are
>>>>>>>> stealing everything they can get their hands on.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is a crime to enter illegally.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> About on the same scale as jaywalking.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cross my fence without permission and see how I deal with it.
>>>>
>>>> I already did. You just slept right through it.
>>>
>>> No.
>>
>> Yes. You never heard or saw me, but I saw you.
>
> What kind of dog do I have?

You didn't have a dog when I sneaked in and spied on you.

Your CPAP sounded like it wasn't working quite right.

"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
news:66982bb9$0$212416$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
> In article <fmqf9jdf511uhj97l8uvv80u7b7i0d7ovd@4ax.com>,
> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 16:10:09 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >No matter where they came from, they came here from Mexico. They should
>> >have stopped them. So send them there and let Mexico deal with it.
>>
>> Shoulda, woulda, coulda. Mexico is under no legal obligation to take non
>> Mexican citizens
>> into their country. Mexico is having this same problem - illegals
>> crossing their southern
>> border. Their problem is, those illegals look like them and speak the
>> same language
>> making them much harder to catch.
>>
>> Swill
>
> Well that was racist of you.

What gets me is this:

"Mexico is under no legal obligation to take non Mexican citizens into their
country. "

Yet at the same time, he seems to feels that :

'America has a legal obligation to take non American citizens into our
country'

It's a marvelous double standard..