On 7/16/2024 3:59 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:

> In article <xKClO.7576$h64d.6531@fx40.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 7/16/2024 8:06 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>
>>> In article <AzvlO.2848$jCQf.202@fx04.iad>, mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut
>>> says...
>>>>
>>>> On 7/15/2024 7:13 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
>>>>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>>>>>>> Defendant: No
>>>>>>> Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be carried out
>>>>>>> within 48 hours.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's all it would take.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year. You gotta find out
>>>>>> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back. What if you get
>>>>>> stuck with some you can't send back? What if there are delays and you have to put them up
>>>>>> and feed them indefinitely? Do you have the staff just to *process* these people, let
>>>>>> alone get them physically to their home country. How many agents will you hire to do the
>>>>>> actual work and how many can they process in a day each. What? You think you're Samantha
>>>>>> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
>>>>>
>>>>> When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
>>>>> Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
>>>>> what to do.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000 hidden aliens out of our
>>>>>> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh we will handle that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't want any resolution
>>>>>> that lets not white people into the country.
>>>>>
>>>>> Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
>>>>
>>>> It's about race with *you*. The reason *you* don't want them is they're not
>>>> white. It has nothing to do with "legal" or "illegal" immigration. It's about
>>>> race for you, and that's all it is.
>>>
>>> It's about following the law.
>>
>> It's not. That's just your lie cover story. You don't want any immigrants even
>> if they follow the law. None of you fucking racist right-wingnuts do.
>
> My first wife was from Mexico

She was white.

On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:10:45 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
wrote:

>
>
>"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>news:6695d759$1$1895495$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>> In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>>
>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
>>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>>> >Defendant: No
>>> >Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be carried
>>> >out
>>> >within 48 hours.
>>> >
>>> >That's all it would take.

Republicans in Congress have repeatedly refused to grant the resources to do that.

Swill

"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
news:6696efc1$0$1736$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
> In article <v7665h$1baud$4@dont-email.me>,
> me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
>>
>> "Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com...
>> > On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
>> > <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >>Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>> >>Defendant: No
>> >>Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be
>> >>carried
>> >>out
>> >>within 48 hours.
>> >>
>> >>That's all it would take.
>> >
>> > No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year.
>>
>> Why?
>>
>>
>> > You gotta find out
>> > what country they're from and hope that country will take them back.
>>
>> No, we don't. Nothing says they have to be given a free ride home.
>>
>> > What if you get
>> > stuck with some you can't send back?
>>
>> Send them back to Mexico.. or whatever country they last departed from.
>>
>>
>> > What if there are delays and you have to put them up
>> > and feed them indefinitely?
>>
>> Shouldn't take more than a couple of hours to boot them over the border.
>>
>> > Do you have the staff just to *process* these people, let
>> > alone get them physically to their home country.
>>
>> When did we have to return them home? Return them to the last country
>> they
>> were in.
>>
>> > How many agents will you hire to do the
>> > actual work and how many can they process in a day each.
>>
>> We have plenty now, if we would allow them to actually do what they
>> should
>> be.
>>
>> > What? You think you're Samantha
>> > and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
>>
>> No, but I can make it a lot less than it was.
>>
>> > How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000 hidden
>> > aliens out of our
>> > country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
>>
>> Well, that would probably take much more than a year, but we can
>> streamline
>> the deportation process. Could probably have them over the border within
>> 6-7
>> days.
>>
>> > You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't
>> > want
>> > any resolution
>> > that lets not white people into the country.
>>
>> If they aren't citizens or entered illegally, white, black, tan.. doesn't
>> matter, they get deported.
>>
>>
>
> No matter where they came from, they came here from Mexico. They should
> have stopped them. So send them there and let Mexico deal with it.

Yep.. And since Mexico is a 'safe' country.. they can't even claim refugee
status.. that ended when they entered Mexico, if not before.

As set forth in both international law and US law.

"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
news:6696eff3$0$1740$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
> In article <v7665i$1baud$5@dont-email.me>,
> me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
>>
>> "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:6695d759$1$1895495$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>> > In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
>> > governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
>> >> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>> >> >Defendant: No
>> >> >Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be
>> >> >carried
>> >> >out
>> >> >within 48 hours.
>> >> >
>> >> >That's all it would take.
>> >>
>> >> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year.
>> >> You gotta find out
>> >> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back.
>> >> What if you get
>> >> stuck with some you can't send back? What if there are delays and you
>> >> have to put them up
>> >> and feed them indefinitely? Do you have the staff just to *process*
>> >> these people, let
>> >> alone get them physically to their home country. How many agents will
>> >> you hire to do the
>> >> actual work and how many can they process in a day each. What? You
>> >> think you're Samantha
>> >> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
>> >
>> > When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
>> > Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
>> > what to do.
>>
>> Bingo.
>>
>> >>
>> >> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000
>> >> hidden
>> >> aliens out of our
>> >> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
>> >
>> > Oh we will handle that.
>>
>> We already have the means, we simply have to allow the BP to do their
>> jobs.
>>
>> >>
>> >> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't
>> >> want
>> >> any resolution
>> >> that lets not white people into the country.
>> >
>> > Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
>>
>> Because it's all he's got?
>>
>> After all, seem to me as if the real racist is the person who is always
>> looking at or making it about race.
>> If it didn't matter, why would they try to make it all about race?
>>
>>
>
> It's all they got. Follow the agenda instead of looking at facts.
>

Exactly, when when you know they are lying about this, you have to wonder
what else are they lying about...

"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e8le9j9jod26n1rd84906fr5cr203m8mio@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:10:45 -0400, "Scout"
> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:6695d759$1$1895495$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>>> In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
>>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
>>>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>>>> >Defendant: No
>>>> >Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be
>>>> >carried
>>>> >out
>>>> >within 48 hours.
>>>> >
>>>> >That's all it would take.
>
> Republicans in Congress have repeatedly refused to grant the resources to
> do that.

They have done more than Democrats have.

My suggestion if house them in the Capital building, their offices and their
homes.. until deportation proceedings are done.

I be we would have a bill waiting for a signature within 24 hours.

On 2024-07-16, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>> >Defendant: No
>> >Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be carried out
>> >within 48 hours.
>> >
>> >That's all it would take.
>>
>> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year. You gotta find out
>> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back. What if you get
>> stuck with some you can't send back? What if there are delays and you have to put them up
>> and feed them indefinitely? Do you have the staff just to *process* these people, let
>> alone get them physically to their home country. How many agents will you hire to do the
>> actual work and how many can they process in a day each. What? You think you're Samantha
>> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
>
> When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
> Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
> what to do.

Just like every other country with immigration laws does.
So how much has the US spent to secure Ukraine and Israel's border?

<https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-senate-unveils-118-billion-bipartisan-bill-tighten-border-
security-aid-2024-02-04/>

Ummm.
That's a lot of money

Joe Biden's "America Last Program" strikes once again.

>> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000 hidden aliens out of our
>> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
>
> Oh we will handle that.

The savings in long term costs will be worth it.

>> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't want any resolution
>> that lets not white people into the country.
>
> Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
>
Libbys love the race card.
Race doesn't matter.
An illegal migrant is a criminal regardless of race or skin color.

--
pothead
Joe Biden is the absolute WORST President Of the U.S. ever.
Nobody else is even close. Including Jimmy Carter.
Vote for ANYBODY but Joe Biden in 2024.

In article <e8le9j9jod26n1rd84906fr5cr203m8mio@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:10:45 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:6695d759$1$1895495$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
> >> In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
> >> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
> >>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> >Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
> >>> >Defendant: No
> >>> >Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be carried
> >>> >out
> >>> >within 48 hours.
> >>> >
> >>> >That's all it would take.
>
> Republicans in Congress have repeatedly refused to grant the resources to do that.
>
> Swill

They were already in place. Long before Joe started allowing just anyone
to enter just anywhere.

--

BITCH! YOU MISSED!

In article <v78g90$1rltp$7@dont-email.me>,
me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
>
> "Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:e8le9j9jod26n1rd84906fr5cr203m8mio@4ax.com...
> > On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:10:45 -0400, "Scout"
> > <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
> >>news:6695d759$1$1895495$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
> >>> In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
> >>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
> >>>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> >Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
> >>>> >Defendant: No
> >>>> >Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be
> >>>> >carried
> >>>> >out
> >>>> >within 48 hours.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >That's all it would take.
> >
> > Republicans in Congress have repeatedly refused to grant the resources to
> > do that.
>
> They have done more than Democrats have.
>
> My suggestion if house them in the Capital building, their offices and their
> homes.. until deportation proceedings are done.
>
> I be we would have a bill waiting for a signature within 24 hours.
>

Just like The "sanctuary" city of Marthas Vineyard that got rid of them
as soon as they could.

--

BITCH! YOU MISSED!

On 7/17/2024 7:34 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:

> In article <e8le9j9jod26n1rd84906fr5cr203m8mio@4ax.com>,
> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:10:45 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:6695d759$1$1895495$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>>>> In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
>>>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
>>>>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>>>>>> Defendant: No
>>>>>> Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be carried
>>>>>> out
>>>>>> within 48 hours.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's all it would take.
>>
>> Republicans in Congress have repeatedly refused to grant the resources to do that.
>>
>> Swill
>
> They were already in place.

They were not. Trump did not secure the border.

On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:38:12 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:

>In article <fstc9jdqb6jgiamk1q3hvvjhiqfm8solk8@4ax.com>,
>governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 20:13:44 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
>> >governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>> >> >Defendant: No
>> >> >Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be carried out
>> >> >within 48 hours.
>> >> >
>> >> >That's all it would take.
>> >>
>> >> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year. You gotta find out
>> >> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back. What if you get
>> >> stuck with some you can't send back? What if there are delays and you have to put them up
>> >> and feed them indefinitely? Do you have the staff just to *process* these people, let
>> >> alone get them physically to their home country. How many agents will you hire to do the
>> >> actual work and how many can they process in a day each. What? You think you're Samantha
>> >> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
>> >
>> >When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
>> >Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
>> >what to do.
>> >>
>> >> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000 hidden aliens out of our
>> >> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
>> >
>> >Oh we will handle that.
>>
>> No pie in the sky, details.
>
>Round them up. Not to hard.

Ok. All eight million. You'll be done before morning?

>>
>> >> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't want any resolution
>> >> that lets not white people into the country.
>> >
>> >Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
>>
>> Because it *is* about race to many conservatives. Not for everybody, but *any* solution
>> that involves letting immigrants in under any circumstances runs into a brick wall with a
>> great many conservatives.
>
>
>We need to know who they are first. Just like when you apply for a job.

Thus the need to fingerprint, DNA and ID them on the way in.
>> Let's go back to immigration policy circa 1880.
>>
>> We can scatter mini Ellis Island type facilities across the southern border. Change them
>> to apply for entry even, if you like. We could actually make billions by charging for
>> application for entry into the US. Why should they spend a thousand bucks on a Coyote?
>> Let them drive up and pay US that thousand. We would make direct profit just from letting
>> them in.
>>
>> But let them in. We need them. China has three times the people we do. That means China
>> can have an economy three times the size of ours. If we both spend the same %GDP on
>> defense, they'll spend three dollars to our one.
>>
>> We need population. Let's work out an efficient and productive system for getting them
>> into the country and working.
>>
>So just open the gates and let them go? Doesn't sound to secure to me.

Was secure enough in 1885.

Swill

On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 09:09:06 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:

>In article <JPvlO.24668$ySE.18380@fx11.iad>,
>mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 7/16/2024 7:38 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
>> molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>
>> > In article <fstc9jdqb6jgiamk1q3hvvjhiqfm8solk8@4ax.com>,
>> > governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 20:13:44 -0600, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>> >>
>> >>> In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
>> >>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>> >>>>> Defendant: No
>> >>>>> Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be carried out
>> >>>>> within 48 hours.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> That's all it would take.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year. You gotta find out
>> >>>> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back. What if you get
>> >>>> stuck with some you can't send back? What if there are delays and you have to put them up
>> >>>> and feed them indefinitely? Do you have the staff just to *process* these people, let
>> >>>> alone get them physically to their home country. How many agents will you hire to do the
>> >>>> actual work and how many can they process in a day each. What? You think you're Samantha
>> >>>> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
>> >>>
>> >>> When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
>> >>> Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
>> >>> what to do.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000 hidden aliens out of our
>> >>>> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
>> >>>
>> >>> Oh we will handle that.
>> >>
>> >> No pie in the sky, details.
>> >
>> > Round them up. Not to [sic] hard.
>>
>> *too*, not "to." And it's much harder than a fuckwit like you ca
>
>Nope. Just allow the police to check them out.

You mean, let them sneak in and assign the cops to find and deport them?

>> >>>> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't want any resolution
>> >>>> that lets not white people into the country.
>> >>>
>> >>> Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
>> >>
>> >> Because it *is* about race to many conservatives. Not for everybody, but *any* solution
>> >> that involves letting immigrants in under any circumstances runs into a brick wall with a
>> >> great many conservatives.
>> >
>> >
>> > We need to know who they are first.
>>
>> You don't give a fuck who they are, you lying racist. They're not white, and to
>> you and Trump and all your Nazi fellows, that's reason enough to keep them out.
>
>The Nazi thing tosses you out of the race.

Severe as it may be, the right's position on immigration is a racist one.

Swill

On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 12:20:18 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
wrote:

>
>
>"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>news:669685d5$1$3068684$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>> In article <fstc9jdqb6jgiamk1q3hvvjhiqfm8solk8@4ax.com>,
>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>>
>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 20:13:44 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
>>> >governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
>>> >> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> >Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>>> >> >Defendant: No
>>> >> >Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be
>>> >> >carried out
>>> >> >within 48 hours.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >That's all it would take.
>>> >>
>>> >> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year.
>>> >> You gotta find out
>>> >> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back.
>>> >> What if you get
>>> >> stuck with some you can't send back? What if there are delays and you
>>> >> have to put them up
>>> >> and feed them indefinitely? Do you have the staff just to *process*
>>> >> these people, let
>>> >> alone get them physically to their home country. How many agents will
>>> >> you hire to do the
>>> >> actual work and how many can they process in a day each. What? You
>>> >> think you're Samantha
>>> >> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
>>> >
>>> >When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
>>> >Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
>>> >what to do.
>>> >>
>>> >> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000
>>> >> hidden aliens out of our
>>> >> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
>>> >
>>> >Oh we will handle that.
>>>
>>> No pie in the sky, details.
>>
>> Round them up. Not to hard.
>>>
>>> >> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't
>>> >> want any resolution
>>> >> that lets not white people into the country.
>>> >
>>> >Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
>>>
>>> Because it *is* about race to many conservatives. Not for everybody, but
>>> *any* solution
>>> that involves letting immigrants in under any circumstances runs into a
>>> brick wall with a
>>> great many conservatives.
>>
>>
>> We need to know who they are first. Just like when you apply for a job.
>>>
>>> Let's go back to immigration policy circa 1880.
>>>
>>> We can scatter mini Ellis Island type facilities across the southern
>>> border. Change them
>>> to apply for entry even, if you like. We could actually make billions by
>>> charging for
>>> application for entry into the US. Why should they spend a thousand
>>> bucks on a Coyote?
>>> Let them drive up and pay US that thousand. We would make direct profit
>>> just from letting
>>> them in.
>>>
>>> But let them in. We need them. China has three times the people we do.
>>> That means China
>>> can have an economy three times the size of ours. If we both spend the
>>> same %GDP on
>>> defense, they'll spend three dollars to our one.
>>>
>>> We need population. Let's work out an efficient and productive system
>>> for getting them
>>> into the country and working.
>>>
>> So just open the gates and let them go? Doesn't sound to secure to me.
>
>Particularly when we already have evidence that terrorists
*click*

On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 12:17:53 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
wrote:

>
>
>"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:fstc9jdqb6jgiamk1q3hvvjhiqfm8solk8@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 20:13:44 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
>>>governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
>>>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>>>> >Defendant: No
>>>> >Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be
>>>> >carried out
>>>> >within 48 hours.
>>>> >
>>>> >That's all it would take.
>>>>
>>>> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year.
>>>> You gotta find out
>>>> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back.
>>>> What if you get
>>>> stuck with some you can't send back? What if there are delays and you
>>>> have to put them up
>>>> and feed them indefinitely? Do you have the staff just to *process*
>>>> these people, let
>>>> alone get them physically to their home country. How many agents will
>>>> you hire to do the
>>>> actual work and how many can they process in a day each. What? You
>>>> think you're Samantha
>>>> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
>>>
>>>When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
>>>Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
>>>what to do.
>>>>
>>>> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000 hidden
>>>> aliens out of our
>>>> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
>>>
>>>Oh we will handle that.
>>
>> No pie in the sky, details.
>>
>>>> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't want
>>>> any resolution
>>>> that lets not white people into the country.
>>>
>>>Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
>>
>> Because it *is* about race to many conservatives.
>
>Prove it. Then explain why it's always about race with you?
>
>> Not for everybody, but *any* solution
>> that involves letting immigrants in under any circumstances runs into a
>> brick wall with a
>> great many conservatives.
>
>The only circumstance I'm aware of is when it starts with a crime.
>That and the follow-up that criminals should not be rewarded for committing
>crime.
>
>> Let's go back to immigration policy circa 1880.
>
>I'm sure you would like that. But how about dealing with today, or are you
>stuck in the past?
>
>
>> We can scatter mini Ellis Island type facilities across the southern
>> border.
>
>We already have them....
>
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Mexico%E2%80%93United_States_border_crossings
>
>However, apparently liberals feel that going through them should be
>optional, no matter what the law says.
>

Your fantasy world is engaging. How do you propose to make them all use entry points?

Swill

On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 14:55:29 -0700, kha <kha@none.com> wrote:

>On 7/16/2024 7:36 AM, Michael A Terrell wrote:
>> On 7/15/2024 7:13 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>
>>> In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
>>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
>>>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>>>>> Defendant: No
>>>>> Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be
>>>>> carried out
>>>>> within 48 hours.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's all it would take.
>>>>
>>>> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a
>>>> year.  You gotta find out
>>>> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back.
>>>> What if you get
>>>> stuck with some you can't send back?  What if there are delays and
>>>> you have to put them up
>>>> and feed them indefinitely?  Do you have the staff just to *process*
>>>> these people, let
>>>> alone get them physically to their home country.  How many agents
>>>> will you hire to do the
>>>> actual work and how many can they process in a day each.  What?  You
>>>> think you're Samantha
>>>> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
>>>
>>> When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
>>> Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
>>> what to do.
>>>>
>>>> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000
>>>> hidden aliens out of our
>>>> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
>>>
>>> Oh we will handle that.
>>>>
>>>> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't
>>>> want any resolution
>>>> that lets not white people into the country.
>>>
>>> Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
>>
>> It's about race with *you*. The reason *you* don't want them is they're
>> not white. It has nothing to do with "legal" or "illegal" immigration.
>> It's about race for you, and that's all it is.
>
>You're the one who entered the race variable, so it was first in your
>derailed train of thought. Myself, I don't want them because they are
>stealing everything they can get their hands on.

That's a lie and brands you as a racist as well. Accusing 'the other' of being thieves
has always been a favorite ploy of bigots.

Swill

On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 16:56:49 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:

>In article <v76q8d$109m3$6@news.mixmin.net>, kha@none.com says...
>>
>> On 7/16/2024 7:36 AM, Michael A Terrell wrote:
>> > On 7/15/2024 7:13 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>> > child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>> >
>> >> In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
>> >> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
>> >>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>> >>>> Defendant: No
>> >>>> Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be
>> >>>> carried out
>> >>>> within 48 hours.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> That's all it would take.
>> >>>
>> >>> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a
>> >>> year.  You gotta find out
>> >>> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back.
>> >>> What if you get
>> >>> stuck with some you can't send back?  What if there are delays and
>> >>> you have to put them up
>> >>> and feed them indefinitely?  Do you have the staff just to *process*
>> >>> these people, let
>> >>> alone get them physically to their home country.  How many agents
>> >>> will you hire to do the
>> >>> actual work and how many can they process in a day each.  What?  You
>> >>> think you're Samantha
>> >>> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
>> >>
>> >> When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
>> >> Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
>> >> what to do.
>> >>>
>> >>> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000
>> >>> hidden aliens out of our
>> >>> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
>> >>
>> >> Oh we will handle that.
>> >>>
>> >>> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't
>> >>> want any resolution
>> >>> that lets not white people into the country.
>> >>
>> >> Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
>> >
>> > It's about race with *you*. The reason *you* don't want them is they're
>> > not white. It has nothing to do with "legal" or "illegal" immigration.
>> > It's about race for you, and that's all it is.
>>
>> You're the one who entered the race variable, so it was first in your
>> derailed train of thought. Myself, I don't want them because they are
>> stealing everything they can get their hands on.
>
>It is a crime to enter illegally. So he supports allowing someone to
>milk us who started off by committing a crime.

Then decriminalize that act. Not unlike decriminalizing weed.

Swill

In article <4ipf9jhv1mkr0p6r97ulkebsijjb4iakme@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:38:12 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <fstc9jdqb6jgiamk1q3hvvjhiqfm8solk8@4ax.com>,
> >governor.swill@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 20:13:44 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
> >> >governor.swill@gmail.com says...
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
> >> >> >Defendant: No
> >> >> >Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be carried out
> >> >> >within 48 hours.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >That's all it would take.
> >> >>
> >> >> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year. You gotta find out
> >> >> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back. What if you get
> >> >> stuck with some you can't send back? What if there are delays and you have to put them up
> >> >> and feed them indefinitely? Do you have the staff just to *process* these people, let
> >> >> alone get them physically to their home country. How many agents will you hire to do the
> >> >> actual work and how many can they process in a day each. What? You think you're Samantha
> >> >> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
> >> >
> >> >When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
> >> >Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
> >> >what to do.
> >> >>
> >> >> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000 hidden aliens out of our
> >> >> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
> >> >
> >> >Oh we will handle that.
> >>
> >> No pie in the sky, details.
> >
> >Round them up. Not to hard.
>
> Ok. All eight million. You'll be done before morning?

Who put a time limit on it?
>
> >>
> >> >> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't want any resolution
> >> >> that lets not white people into the country.
> >> >
> >> >Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
> >>
> >> Because it *is* about race to many conservatives. Not for everybody, but *any* solution
> >> that involves letting immigrants in under any circumstances runs into a brick wall with a
> >> great many conservatives.
> >
> >
> >We need to know who they are first. Just like when you apply for a job.
>
> Thus the need to fingerprint, DNA and ID them on the way in.

So?
>
> >> Let's go back to immigration policy circa 1880.
> >>
> >> We can scatter mini Ellis Island type facilities across the southern border. Change them
> >> to apply for entry even, if you like. We could actually make billions by charging for
> >> application for entry into the US. Why should they spend a thousand bucks on a Coyote?
> >> Let them drive up and pay US that thousand. We would make direct profit just from letting
> >> them in.
> >>
> >> But let them in. We need them. China has three times the people we do. That means China
> >> can have an economy three times the size of ours. If we both spend the same %GDP on
> >> defense, they'll spend three dollars to our one.
> >>
> >> We need population. Let's work out an efficient and productive system for getting them
> >> into the country and working.
> >>
> >So just open the gates and let them go? Doesn't sound to secure to me.
>
> Was secure enough in 1885.

Idiot.
>
> Swill

--

BITCH! YOU MISSED!

On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:05:53 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
wrote:

>
>
>"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>>>Defendant: No
>>>Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be carried
>>>out
>>>within 48 hours.
>>>
>>>That's all it would take.
>>
>> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year.
>
>Why?

Where they gonna sleep while you're processing them?

>> You gotta find out
>> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back.
>
>No, we don't. Nothing says they have to be given a free ride home.

So if they can't afford a return ticket, we just let them stay?

>> What if you get
>> stuck with some you can't send back?
>
>Send them back to Mexico.. or whatever country they last departed from.

Mexico doesn't have to take them back if they're not Mexicans. They've already announced
this.

>> What if there are delays and you have to put them up
>> and feed them indefinitely?
>
>Shouldn't take more than a couple of hours to boot them over the border.

Can't just boot them back across the border. That would be illegal. They get a hearing.

> > Do you have the staff just to *process* these people, let
>> alone get them physically to their home country.
>
>When did we have to return them home? Return them to the last country they
>were in.

Mexico is under no legal compunction to accept people in who aren't Mexican.

>> How many agents will you hire to do the
>> actual work and how many can they process in a day each.
>
>We have plenty now, if we would allow them to actually do what they should
>be.

Wrong again. We have nowhere near enough agents to cover the border.

>> What? You think you're Samantha
>> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
>
>No, but I can make it a lot less than it was.

How you going to do that without breaking any laws?

>> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000 hidden
>> aliens out of our
>> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
>
>Well, that would probably take much more than a year, but we can streamline
>the deportation process. Could probably have them over the border within 6-7
>days.

So where they going to sleep at night?

>> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't want
>> any resolution
>> that lets not white people into the country.
>
>If they aren't citizens or entered illegally, white, black, tan.. doesn't
>matter, they get deported.

After they get their hearing and if their home country will take them back.

Swill

In article <1mpf9jpo5a8kagql4k7d496akk0dfd2a22@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 09:09:06 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <JPvlO.24668$ySE.18380@fx11.iad>,
> >mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
> >>
> >> On 7/16/2024 7:38 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
> >> molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
> >>
> >> > In article <fstc9jdqb6jgiamk1q3hvvjhiqfm8solk8@4ax.com>,
> >> > governor.swill@gmail.com says...
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 20:13:44 -0600, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
> >> >>
> >> >>> In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
> >> >>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> >> >>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
> >> >>>>> Defendant: No
> >> >>>>> Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be carried out
> >> >>>>> within 48 hours.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> That's all it would take.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year. You gotta find out
> >> >>>> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back. What if you get
> >> >>>> stuck with some you can't send back? What if there are delays and you have to put them up
> >> >>>> and feed them indefinitely? Do you have the staff just to *process* these people, let
> >> >>>> alone get them physically to their home country. How many agents will you hire to do the
> >> >>>> actual work and how many can they process in a day each. What? You think you're Samantha
> >> >>>> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
> >> >>> Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
> >> >>> what to do.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000 hidden aliens out of our
> >> >>>> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Oh we will handle that.
> >> >>
> >> >> No pie in the sky, details.
> >> >
> >> > Round them up. Not to [sic] hard.
> >>
> >> *too*, not "to." And it's much harder than a fuckwit like you ca
> >
> >Nope. Just allow the police to check them out.
>
> You mean, let them sneak in and assign the cops to find and deport them?

I didn't say that. You're spinning again.
>
> >> >>>> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't want any resolution
> >> >>>> that lets not white people into the country.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
> >> >>
> >> >> Because it *is* about race to many conservatives. Not for everybody, but *any* solution
> >> >> that involves letting immigrants in under any circumstances runs into a brick wall with a
> >> >> great many conservatives.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > We need to know who they are first.
> >>
> >> You don't give a fuck who they are, you lying racist. They're not white, and to
> >> you and Trump and all your Nazi fellows, that's reason enough to keep them out.
> >
> >The Nazi thing tosses you out of the race.
>
> Severe as it may be, the right's position on immigration is a racist one.

Nope, it's about security. Your view is always racist.
>
> Swill

--

BITCH! YOU MISSED!

On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 16:10:09 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:

>No matter where they came from, they came here from Mexico. They should
>have stopped them. So send them there and let Mexico deal with it.

Shoulda, woulda, coulda. Mexico is under no legal obligation to take non Mexican citizens
into their country. Mexico is having this same problem - illegals crossing their southern
border. Their problem is, those illegals look like them and speak the same language
making them much harder to catch.

Swill

In article <q6qf9jhjq466sfnm7kc9s4a36uliv4etn5@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 12:17:53 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:fstc9jdqb6jgiamk1q3hvvjhiqfm8solk8@4ax.com...
> >> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 20:13:44 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
> >>>governor.swill@gmail.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
> >>>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> >Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
> >>>> >Defendant: No
> >>>> >Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be
> >>>> >carried out
> >>>> >within 48 hours.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >That's all it would take.
> >>>>
> >>>> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year.
> >>>> You gotta find out
> >>>> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back.
> >>>> What if you get
> >>>> stuck with some you can't send back? What if there are delays and you
> >>>> have to put them up
> >>>> and feed them indefinitely? Do you have the staff just to *process*
> >>>> these people, let
> >>>> alone get them physically to their home country. How many agents will
> >>>> you hire to do the
> >>>> actual work and how many can they process in a day each. What? You
> >>>> think you're Samantha
> >>>> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
> >>>
> >>>When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
> >>>Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
> >>>what to do.
> >>>>
> >>>> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000 hidden
> >>>> aliens out of our
> >>>> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
> >>>
> >>>Oh we will handle that.
> >>
> >> No pie in the sky, details.
> >>
> >>>> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't want
> >>>> any resolution
> >>>> that lets not white people into the country.
> >>>
> >>>Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
> >>
> >> Because it *is* about race to many conservatives.
> >
> >Prove it. Then explain why it's always about race with you?
> >
> >> Not for everybody, but *any* solution
> >> that involves letting immigrants in under any circumstances runs into a
> >> brick wall with a
> >> great many conservatives.
> >
> >The only circumstance I'm aware of is when it starts with a crime.
> >That and the follow-up that criminals should not be rewarded for committing
> >crime.
> >
> >> Let's go back to immigration policy circa 1880.
> >
> >I'm sure you would like that. But how about dealing with today, or are you
> >stuck in the past?
> >
> >
> >> We can scatter mini Ellis Island type facilities across the southern
> >> border.
> >
> >We already have them....
> >
> >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Mexico%E2%80%93United_States_border_crossings
> >
> >However, apparently liberals feel that going through them should be
> >optional, no matter what the law says.
> >
>
> Your fantasy world is engaging. How do you propose to make them all use entry points?
>
> Swill

It's not about "making" them. The know the law. They follow it or pay
the price.

--

BITCH! YOU MISSED!

In article <e9qf9jt82qj548usekkesml63hr1qhdf7m@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 14:55:29 -0700, kha <kha@none.com> wrote:
>
> >On 7/16/2024 7:36 AM, Michael A Terrell wrote:
> >> On 7/15/2024 7:13 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
> >> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
> >>
> >>> In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
> >>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
> >>>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
> >>>>> Defendant: No
> >>>>> Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be
> >>>>> carried out
> >>>>> within 48 hours.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That's all it would take.
> >>>>
> >>>> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a
> >>>> year.  You gotta find out
> >>>> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back.
> >>>> What if you get
> >>>> stuck with some you can't send back?  What if there are delays and
> >>>> you have to put them up
> >>>> and feed them indefinitely?  Do you have the staff just to *process*
> >>>> these people, let
> >>>> alone get them physically to their home country.  How many agents
> >>>> will you hire to do the
> >>>> actual work and how many can they process in a day each.  What?  You
> >>>> think you're Samantha
> >>>> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
> >>>
> >>> When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
> >>> Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
> >>> what to do.
> >>>>
> >>>> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000
> >>>> hidden aliens out of our
> >>>> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
> >>>
> >>> Oh we will handle that.
> >>>>
> >>>> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't
> >>>> want any resolution
> >>>> that lets not white people into the country.
> >>>
> >>> Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
> >>
> >> It's about race with *you*. The reason *you* don't want them is they're
> >> not white. It has nothing to do with "legal" or "illegal" immigration.
> >> It's about race for you, and that's all it is.
> >
> >You're the one who entered the race variable, so it was first in your
> >derailed train of thought. Myself, I don't want them because they are
> >stealing everything they can get their hands on.
>
> That's a lie and brands you as a racist as well. Accusing 'the other' of being thieves
> has always been a favorite ploy of bigots.
>
> Swill

Yet he's right.

--

BITCH! YOU MISSED!

In article <dcqf9j5sfshcseic16bf1bf53v5198olir@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 16:56:49 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <v76q8d$109m3$6@news.mixmin.net>, kha@none.com says...
> >>
> >> On 7/16/2024 7:36 AM, Michael A Terrell wrote:
> >> > On 7/15/2024 7:13 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
> >> > child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
> >> >
> >> >> In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
> >> >> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
> >> >>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
> >> >>>> Defendant: No
> >> >>>> Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be
> >> >>>> carried out
> >> >>>> within 48 hours.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> That's all it would take.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a
> >> >>> year.  You gotta find out
> >> >>> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back.
> >> >>> What if you get
> >> >>> stuck with some you can't send back?  What if there are delays and
> >> >>> you have to put them up
> >> >>> and feed them indefinitely?  Do you have the staff just to *process*
> >> >>> these people, let
> >> >>> alone get them physically to their home country.  How many agents
> >> >>> will you hire to do the
> >> >>> actual work and how many can they process in a day each.  What?  You
> >> >>> think you're Samantha
> >> >>> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
> >> >>
> >> >> When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
> >> >> Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
> >> >> what to do.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000
> >> >>> hidden aliens out of our
> >> >>> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
> >> >>
> >> >> Oh we will handle that.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't
> >> >>> want any resolution
> >> >>> that lets not white people into the country.
> >> >>
> >> >> Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
> >> >
> >> > It's about race with *you*. The reason *you* don't want them is they're
> >> > not white. It has nothing to do with "legal" or "illegal" immigration.
> >> > It's about race for you, and that's all it is.
> >>
> >> You're the one who entered the race variable, so it was first in your
> >> derailed train of thought. Myself, I don't want them because they are
> >> stealing everything they can get their hands on.
> >
> >It is a crime to enter illegally. So he supports allowing someone to
> >milk us who started off by committing a crime.
>
> Then decriminalize that act. Not unlike decriminalizing weed.
>
> Swill

Why? It's a law we need. It's called security.

--

BITCH! YOU MISSED!

On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:44:02 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:

>In article <ocuc9jt9ai419glm5ji3h908ej2eknodhf@4ax.com>,
>governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 22:08:06 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <prkb9jhs65l5lqprnmikdcgfues7ftppd0@4ax.com>,
>> >governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:51:47 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> >news:5ul59jp65kc8j848tajkcl40nkk3btmkg8@4ax.com...
>> >> >> On Sat, 13 Jul 2024 08:53:24 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>"Rudy Canoza" <rudy@phil.hendrie.con> wrote in message
>> >> >>>news:McekO.22237$xYQc.1806@fx12.iad...
>> >> >>>> Medical providers and public health experts worry that the health care
>> >> >>>> system is poorly equipped to handle the influx.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>Well we could close our southern Border to illegal aliens and that would
>> >> >>>help out with that problem a lot.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Yeah, you keep saying that but you never get around to explaining how that
>> >> >> is to be done.
>> >> >
>> >> >Well the wall is a good start.
>> >> >Deporting anyone found illegally on this side of the border would greatly
>> >> >benefit.
>> >> >Automatic denial of refugee status to anyone that enters at other than a
>> >> >port of entry and subsequent deportation.
>> >> >You know.. actually enforcing our laws.
>> >> >
>> >> >> Trump asked for wall money and Republicans told him no.
>> >> >
>> >> >Well, Democrats told him no... so he came up with the money and built a lot
>> >> >of the wall on the border despite Congress. Which has been shown to be
>> >> >effective.
>> >>
>> >> Yeah, he raided a Pentagon reserve fund. Wanna see how effective his wall was?
>> >> <https://www.newsnationnow.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/108/2023/12/Border-Wall-Fronton_010920.jpg?w=1280&h=720&crop=1>
>> >>
>> >> And that's the bit that didn't wash away in the first spring floods.
>> >>
>> >> Then there's all that wall Biden had to repair, rebuild or enhance and yeah it's been
>> >> documented and pictures linked to in here. There's a bend in the Rio Grand in Texas. Got
>> >> this long, broad sandbar sticking up out of the water. With wire and barriers it looks
>> >> like Omaha Beach on D Day.
>> >>
>> >> >> Biden asked for border security money and Republicans told him no.
>> >> >
>> >> >After asserting that he wouldn't build even a foot of wall.
>> >>
>> >> But he did build and got in hot water with his left because of it.
>> >>
>> >> >Seems even Biden agrees:
>> >> >1) That border security is needed
>> >> >2) Walls do work to help in border security.
>> >>
>> >> They help but you can't seal it. And what about those who come in on a visa but don't
>> >> leave when it expires?
>> >
>> >Gotta go.
>>
>> How much do you think it would cost to track down and deport all those millions and how
>> would you replace them in the work force?
>
>Less then it cost for us to feed and clothe them.

Most of them are feeding and clothing themselves. The only ones not doing so are the
trapped ones that got caught and are being forced to NOT take care of themselves by short
sighted legal authorities. Denver has the right idea. It's giving them work permission
inside the city.
>> Running a country means thinking about things the voters don't want to be bothered with.
>
>Like you know what running a country is all about.

Ditto.
>> >> >Further, it wasn't that he asked for such money, it's just that Democrats
>> >> >tied so much other stupid spending to it that it would be irresponsible to
>> >> >pass it with all that junk attached to it.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> Dunno about you man, but it sounds like the Republicans don't want the
>> >> >> border sealed.
>> >> >
>> >> >Sure we do. We just don't want to spend a ton of money on stupid Democrat
>> >> >projects while doing it.
>> >>
>> >> Oh. So Republican pork is ok but Democrat pork isn't.
>> >
>> >We didn't add any pork to the "border bill".
>>
>> Neither did the Democrats - that was right wing disinfo. The border bill they complain
>> the Dems 'larded up' was actually written and originally sponsored by REPUBLICANS in the
>> Senate. It was proposed for debate but the HOUSE GOP shot it down before any discussion
>> could take place.
>
>So all the money in that bill for Ukraine and Israel was just a ruse?

In case you didn't notice, the immigration bits were cut out and the rest of it, the
"pork", was all that got passed. So, how did not passing the immigration bill stop the
pork attached to it.

>> Republicans in the Senate blocked two Biden requests for resources in '21 and '22.
>> Republicans in the House blocked two different Republican authored immigration bills.
>
>
>Because they were full of pork.

But according to you, the pork passed but the immigration restrictions were not.
>> Trump's wall was full of holes and portions of it didn't last two rainy seasons.
>
>Because they cut his funding.

"They" were Senate Republicans, so stop blaming liberals and moderates for what the
conservatives did.

>The "border bill" said nothing about building a wall.

So? Republicans in the Senate and the House both shot down wall funding and have been
doing so since Trump's first year in office.
>> Vote Republican if you want, but at least admit the truth. The GOP is the party of
>> Business which does NOT want the supply of cheap, immigrant labor reduced.
>>
>> >> That's just an excuse to be lazy, man. If you don't do something, you'll never accomplish
>> >> anything. So you take what you can get. Yeah, you got to install a line of park benches
>> >> along the wall for the wetbacks to rest on, but if that gets you anything near 100%
>> >> apprehension with the average alien turnaround, say, month to get them home.
>> >
>> >As soon as they cross illegally. Simple.
>>
>> How many agents are you prepared to hire? How many cameras, sensors, vehicles and
>> internment facilities are you willing to pay for? Where's the money? Do you think border
>> enforcement is free? House magoos seem to.
>
>I used to live on the border and it was never like it is now.

Nothing is like it was. Times change and that's what conservatives fear most; change.
>> Republicans in Congress seem unwilling take any steps to do even your simple solution.
>
>Go back to how it was. Don't cross illegally.

Maybe we should wag our fingers at them while we're at it. Btw, since when did they *not*
cross illegally?

Swill

Drug addled trailer trash pissbum Tony Eaks AKA Skeeter wrote:
> In article <dspf9jllf3r5esgoeqa3e1uof1qhb0gmfp@4ax.com>,
> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 11:51:53 -0400, Shiloh Thomas <shilo.thomas@okc.net> wrote:
>>
>>> In article <66968d13$0$212412$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, skeeterweed@photonmail.com
>>> Skeeter says...
>>>> BITCH! YOU MISSED!
>>>>
>>>>
>>> https://tinyurl.com/4nb3j9xn
>>
>> Skeeter, looks like you got your own stalker too! Congratulations!
>>
>> Swill
>
> Had him humping my leg for years. He a coward who has to hide.
>
>
Just pointing out more and more of your hypocrisy, trailer-tard Tony.

"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
news:6697d6db$0$5671$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
> In article <v78g90$1rltp$7@dont-email.me>,
> me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
>>
>> "Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:e8le9j9jod26n1rd84906fr5cr203m8mio@4ax.com...
>> > On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:10:45 -0400, "Scout"
>> > <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>> >>news:6695d759$1$1895495$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>> >>> In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
>> >>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
>> >>>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> >Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>> >>>> >Defendant: No
>> >>>> >Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be
>> >>>> >carried
>> >>>> >out
>> >>>> >within 48 hours.
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >That's all it would take.
>> >
>> > Republicans in Congress have repeatedly refused to grant the resources
>> > to
>> > do that.
>>
>> They have done more than Democrats have.
>>
>> My suggestion if house them in the Capital building, their offices and
>> their
>> homes.. until deportation proceedings are done.
>>
>> I be we would have a bill waiting for a signature within 24 hours.
>>
>
> Just like The "sanctuary" city of Marthas Vineyard that got rid of them
> as soon as they could.
>
>
> BITCH! YOU MISSED!

That was amusing how they declared themselves a "sanctuary city".. so they
got shipped some of the illegal aliens crossing the border.. and the locals
couldn't get them off the island fast enough...

Typical liberal policy.. the advocate for it just as long as they don't have
to actually deal with it.