"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
news:6692f2cc$0$212402$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
> In article <5ul59jp65kc8j848tajkcl40nkk3btmkg8@4ax.com>,
> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Sat, 13 Jul 2024 08:53:24 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >"Rudy Canoza" <rudy@phil.hendrie.con> wrote in message
>> >news:McekO.22237$xYQc.1806@fx12.iad...
>> >> Medical providers and public health experts worry that the health care
>> >> system is poorly equipped to handle the influx.
>> >
>> >Well we could close our southern Border to illegal aliens and that would
>> >help out with that problem a lot.
>> >
>>
>> Yeah, you keep saying that but you never get around to explaining how
>> that is to be done.
>
> Entry points only. Cross anywhere else you get arrested or deported.
> Simple. That's how it used to be.

Yep, and no seeking asylum or to remain.

Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
Defendant: No
Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be carried out
within 48 hours.

That's all it would take.

Case would take about 90 seconds. If they didn't enter at a port of entry,
and can't produce the documentation they did so... they get immediately
deported.

On a second offense, we could require jail time and community service.. I
mean if they came here to work... they should be required to work to pay for
their incarceration.

Seems only fitting.

>> Trump asked for wall money and Republicans told him no.
>> Biden asked for border security money and Republicans told him no.
>
> Because hardly any of it was going to the border.

Yep, which is why I think we should prohibit making additions to spending
bills. They should be a 'clean bill'.

>> Dunno about you man, but it sounds like the Republicans don't want the
>> border sealed.
> .
> That's how you see it. Like I said. There are laws. Entry points only.
> Anything else is trespassing.

Yep, and that law already exists. It just needs enforcement.

On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
wrote:

>Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>Defendant: No
>Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be carried out
>within 48 hours.
>
>That's all it would take.

No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year. You gotta find out
what country they're from and hope that country will take them back. What if you get
stuck with some you can't send back? What if there are delays and you have to put them up
and feed them indefinitely? Do you have the staff just to *process* these people, let
alone get them physically to their home country. How many agents will you hire to do the
actual work and how many can they process in a day each. What? You think you're Samantha
and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?

How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000 hidden aliens out of our
country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?

You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't want any resolution
that lets not white people into the country.

Swill

In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> wrote:
>
> >Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
> >Defendant: No
> >Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be carried out
> >within 48 hours.
> >
> >That's all it would take.
>
> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year. You gotta find out
> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back. What if you get
> stuck with some you can't send back? What if there are delays and you have to put them up
> and feed them indefinitely? Do you have the staff just to *process* these people, let
> alone get them physically to their home country. How many agents will you hire to do the
> actual work and how many can they process in a day each. What? You think you're Samantha
> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?

When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
what to do.
>
> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000 hidden aliens out of our
> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?

Oh we will handle that.
>
> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't want any resolution
> that lets not white people into the country.

Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
>
> Swill

On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:51:47 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
wrote:

>
>
>"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:5ul59jp65kc8j848tajkcl40nkk3btmkg8@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 13 Jul 2024 08:53:24 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"Rudy Canoza" <rudy@phil.hendrie.con> wrote in message
>>>news:McekO.22237$xYQc.1806@fx12.iad...
>>>> Medical providers and public health experts worry that the health care
>>>> system is poorly equipped to handle the influx.
>>>
>>>Well we could close our southern Border to illegal aliens and that would
>>>help out with that problem a lot.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, you keep saying that but you never get around to explaining how that
>> is to be done.
>
>Well the wall is a good start.
>Deporting anyone found illegally on this side of the border would greatly
>benefit.
>Automatic denial of refugee status to anyone that enters at other than a
>port of entry and subsequent deportation.
>You know.. actually enforcing our laws.
>
>> Trump asked for wall money and Republicans told him no.
>
>Well, Democrats told him no... so he came up with the money and built a lot
>of the wall on the border despite Congress. Which has been shown to be
>effective.

Yeah, he raided a Pentagon reserve fund. Wanna see how effective his wall was?
<https://www.newsnationnow.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/108/2023/12/Border-Wall-Fronton_010920.jpg?w=1280&h=720&crop=1>

And that's the bit that didn't wash away in the first spring floods.

Then there's all that wall Biden had to repair, rebuild or enhance and yeah it's been
documented and pictures linked to in here. There's a bend in the Rio Grand in Texas. Got
this long, broad sandbar sticking up out of the water. With wire and barriers it looks
like Omaha Beach on D Day.

>> Biden asked for border security money and Republicans told him no.
>
>After asserting that he wouldn't build even a foot of wall.

But he did build and got in hot water with his left because of it.

>Seems even Biden agrees:
>1) That border security is needed
>2) Walls do work to help in border security.

They help but you can't seal it. And what about those who come in on a visa but don't
leave when it expires?

>Further, it wasn't that he asked for such money, it's just that Democrats
>tied so much other stupid spending to it that it would be irresponsible to
>pass it with all that junk attached to it.
>
>
>> Dunno about you man, but it sounds like the Republicans don't want the
>> border sealed.
>
>Sure we do. We just don't want to spend a ton of money on stupid Democrat
>projects while doing it.

Oh. So Republican pork is ok but Democrat pork isn't.

That's just an excuse to be lazy, man. If you don't do something, you'll never accomplish
anything. So you take what you can get. Yeah, you got to install a line of park benches
along the wall for the wetbacks to rest on, but if that gets you anything near 100%
apprehension with the average alien turnaround, say, month to get them home.

Swill
NP: Bach - Concerto for Harpsichord No. 6 in F Major, BWV 1057: I. -- (Yeah, I like this
one - Rock and roll)

In article <prkb9jhs65l5lqprnmikdcgfues7ftppd0@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:51:47 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:5ul59jp65kc8j848tajkcl40nkk3btmkg8@4ax.com...
> >> On Sat, 13 Jul 2024 08:53:24 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>"Rudy Canoza" <rudy@phil.hendrie.con> wrote in message
> >>>news:McekO.22237$xYQc.1806@fx12.iad...
> >>>> Medical providers and public health experts worry that the health care
> >>>> system is poorly equipped to handle the influx.
> >>>
> >>>Well we could close our southern Border to illegal aliens and that would
> >>>help out with that problem a lot.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Yeah, you keep saying that but you never get around to explaining how that
> >> is to be done.
> >
> >Well the wall is a good start.
> >Deporting anyone found illegally on this side of the border would greatly
> >benefit.
> >Automatic denial of refugee status to anyone that enters at other than a
> >port of entry and subsequent deportation.
> >You know.. actually enforcing our laws.
> >
> >> Trump asked for wall money and Republicans told him no.
> >
> >Well, Democrats told him no... so he came up with the money and built a lot
> >of the wall on the border despite Congress. Which has been shown to be
> >effective.
>
> Yeah, he raided a Pentagon reserve fund. Wanna see how effective his wall was?
> <https://www.newsnationnow.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/108/2023/12/Border-Wall-Fronton_010920.jpg?w=1280&h=720&crop=1>
>
> And that's the bit that didn't wash away in the first spring floods.
>
> Then there's all that wall Biden had to repair, rebuild or enhance and yeah it's been
> documented and pictures linked to in here. There's a bend in the Rio Grand in Texas. Got
> this long, broad sandbar sticking up out of the water. With wire and barriers it looks
> like Omaha Beach on D Day.
>
> >> Biden asked for border security money and Republicans told him no.
> >
> >After asserting that he wouldn't build even a foot of wall.
>
> But he did build and got in hot water with his left because of it.
>
> >Seems even Biden agrees:
> >1) That border security is needed
> >2) Walls do work to help in border security.
>
> They help but you can't seal it. And what about those who come in on a visa but don't
> leave when it expires?

Gotta go.
>
> >Further, it wasn't that he asked for such money, it's just that Democrats
> >tied so much other stupid spending to it that it would be irresponsible to
> >pass it with all that junk attached to it.
> >
> >
> >> Dunno about you man, but it sounds like the Republicans don't want the
> >> border sealed.
> >
> >Sure we do. We just don't want to spend a ton of money on stupid Democrat
> >projects while doing it.
>
> Oh. So Republican pork is ok but Democrat pork isn't.

We didn't add any pork to the "border bill".
>
> That's just an excuse to be lazy, man. If you don't do something, you'll never accomplish
> anything. So you take what you can get. Yeah, you got to install a line of park benches
> along the wall for the wetbacks to rest on, but if that gets you anything near 100%
> apprehension with the average alien turnaround, say, month to get them home.

As soon as they cross illegally. Simple.
>
> Swill
> NP: Bach - Concerto for Harpsichord No. 6 in F Major, BWV 1057: I. -- (Yeah, I like this
> one - Rock and roll)

On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 20:13:44 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:

>In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
>governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>> >Defendant: No
>> >Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be carried out
>> >within 48 hours.
>> >
>> >That's all it would take.
>>
>> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year. You gotta find out
>> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back. What if you get
>> stuck with some you can't send back? What if there are delays and you have to put them up
>> and feed them indefinitely? Do you have the staff just to *process* these people, let
>> alone get them physically to their home country. How many agents will you hire to do the
>> actual work and how many can they process in a day each. What? You think you're Samantha
>> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
>
>When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
>Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
>what to do.
>>
>> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000 hidden aliens out of our
>> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
>
>Oh we will handle that.

No pie in the sky, details.
>> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't want any resolution
>> that lets not white people into the country.
>
>Huh? Why is it always about race with you?

Because it *is* about race to many conservatives. Not for everybody, but *any* solution
that involves letting immigrants in under any circumstances runs into a brick wall with a
great many conservatives.

Let's go back to immigration policy circa 1880.

We can scatter mini Ellis Island type facilities across the southern border. Change them
to apply for entry even, if you like. We could actually make billions by charging for
application for entry into the US. Why should they spend a thousand bucks on a Coyote?
Let them drive up and pay US that thousand. We would make direct profit just from letting
them in.

But let them in. We need them. China has three times the people we do. That means China
can have an economy three times the size of ours. If we both spend the same %GDP on
defense, they'll spend three dollars to our one.

We need population. Let's work out an efficient and productive system for getting them
into the country and working.

Swill

On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 22:08:06 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:

>In article <prkb9jhs65l5lqprnmikdcgfues7ftppd0@4ax.com>,
>governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:51:47 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> >news:5ul59jp65kc8j848tajkcl40nkk3btmkg8@4ax.com...
>> >> On Sat, 13 Jul 2024 08:53:24 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>"Rudy Canoza" <rudy@phil.hendrie.con> wrote in message
>> >>>news:McekO.22237$xYQc.1806@fx12.iad...
>> >>>> Medical providers and public health experts worry that the health care
>> >>>> system is poorly equipped to handle the influx.
>> >>>
>> >>>Well we could close our southern Border to illegal aliens and that would
>> >>>help out with that problem a lot.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> Yeah, you keep saying that but you never get around to explaining how that
>> >> is to be done.
>> >
>> >Well the wall is a good start.
>> >Deporting anyone found illegally on this side of the border would greatly
>> >benefit.
>> >Automatic denial of refugee status to anyone that enters at other than a
>> >port of entry and subsequent deportation.
>> >You know.. actually enforcing our laws.
>> >
>> >> Trump asked for wall money and Republicans told him no.
>> >
>> >Well, Democrats told him no... so he came up with the money and built a lot
>> >of the wall on the border despite Congress. Which has been shown to be
>> >effective.
>>
>> Yeah, he raided a Pentagon reserve fund. Wanna see how effective his wall was?
>> <https://www.newsnationnow.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/108/2023/12/Border-Wall-Fronton_010920.jpg?w=1280&h=720&crop=1>
>>
>> And that's the bit that didn't wash away in the first spring floods.
>>
>> Then there's all that wall Biden had to repair, rebuild or enhance and yeah it's been
>> documented and pictures linked to in here. There's a bend in the Rio Grand in Texas. Got
>> this long, broad sandbar sticking up out of the water. With wire and barriers it looks
>> like Omaha Beach on D Day.
>>
>> >> Biden asked for border security money and Republicans told him no.
>> >
>> >After asserting that he wouldn't build even a foot of wall.
>>
>> But he did build and got in hot water with his left because of it.
>>
>> >Seems even Biden agrees:
>> >1) That border security is needed
>> >2) Walls do work to help in border security.
>>
>> They help but you can't seal it. And what about those who come in on a visa but don't
>> leave when it expires?
>
>Gotta go.

How much do you think it would cost to track down and deport all those millions and how
would you replace them in the work force?

Running a country means thinking about things the voters don't want to be bothered with.
>> >Further, it wasn't that he asked for such money, it's just that Democrats
>> >tied so much other stupid spending to it that it would be irresponsible to
>> >pass it with all that junk attached to it.
>> >
>> >
>> >> Dunno about you man, but it sounds like the Republicans don't want the
>> >> border sealed.
>> >
>> >Sure we do. We just don't want to spend a ton of money on stupid Democrat
>> >projects while doing it.
>>
>> Oh. So Republican pork is ok but Democrat pork isn't.
>
>We didn't add any pork to the "border bill".

Neither did the Democrats - that was right wing disinfo. The border bill they complain
the Dems 'larded up' was actually written and originally sponsored by REPUBLICANS in the
Senate. It was proposed for debate but the HOUSE GOP shot it down before any discussion
could take place.

Republicans in the Senate blocked two Biden requests for resources in '21 and '22.
Republicans in the House blocked two different Republican authored immigration bills.

Trump's wall was full of holes and portions of it didn't last two rainy seasons.

Vote Republican if you want, but at least admit the truth. The GOP is the party of
Business which does NOT want the supply of cheap, immigrant labor reduced.
>> That's just an excuse to be lazy, man. If you don't do something, you'll never accomplish
>> anything. So you take what you can get. Yeah, you got to install a line of park benches
>> along the wall for the wetbacks to rest on, but if that gets you anything near 100%
>> apprehension with the average alien turnaround, say, month to get them home.
>
>As soon as they cross illegally. Simple.

How many agents are you prepared to hire? How many cameras, sensors, vehicles and
internment facilities are you willing to pay for? Where's the money? Do you think border
enforcement is free? House magoos seem to.

Republicans in Congress seem unwilling take any steps to do even your simple solution.

Swill

On 7/15/2024 7:13 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:

> In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>>> Defendant: No
>>> Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be carried out
>>> within 48 hours.
>>>
>>> That's all it would take.
>>
>> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year. You gotta find out
>> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back. What if you get
>> stuck with some you can't send back? What if there are delays and you have to put them up
>> and feed them indefinitely? Do you have the staff just to *process* these people, let
>> alone get them physically to their home country. How many agents will you hire to do the
>> actual work and how many can they process in a day each. What? You think you're Samantha
>> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
>
> When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
> Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
> what to do.
>>
>> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000 hidden aliens out of our
>> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
>
> Oh we will handle that.
>>
>> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't want any resolution
>> that lets not white people into the country.
>
> Huh? Why is it always about race with you?

It's about race with *you*. The reason *you* don't want them is they're not
white. It has nothing to do with "legal" or "illegal" immigration. It's about
race for you, and that's all it is.

In article <fstc9jdqb6jgiamk1q3hvvjhiqfm8solk8@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 20:13:44 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
> >governor.swill@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
> >> >Defendant: No
> >> >Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be carried out
> >> >within 48 hours.
> >> >
> >> >That's all it would take.
> >>
> >> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year. You gotta find out
> >> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back. What if you get
> >> stuck with some you can't send back? What if there are delays and you have to put them up
> >> and feed them indefinitely? Do you have the staff just to *process* these people, let
> >> alone get them physically to their home country. How many agents will you hire to do the
> >> actual work and how many can they process in a day each. What? You think you're Samantha
> >> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
> >
> >When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
> >Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
> >what to do.
> >>
> >> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000 hidden aliens out of our
> >> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
> >
> >Oh we will handle that.
>
> No pie in the sky, details.

Round them up. Not to hard.
>
> >> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't want any resolution
> >> that lets not white people into the country.
> >
> >Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
>
> Because it *is* about race to many conservatives. Not for everybody, but *any* solution
> that involves letting immigrants in under any circumstances runs into a brick wall with a
> great many conservatives.

We need to know who they are first. Just like when you apply for a job.
>
> Let's go back to immigration policy circa 1880.
>
> We can scatter mini Ellis Island type facilities across the southern border. Change them
> to apply for entry even, if you like. We could actually make billions by charging for
> application for entry into the US. Why should they spend a thousand bucks on a Coyote?
> Let them drive up and pay US that thousand. We would make direct profit just from letting
> them in.
>
> But let them in. We need them. China has three times the people we do. That means China
> can have an economy three times the size of ours. If we both spend the same %GDP on
> defense, they'll spend three dollars to our one.
>
> We need population. Let's work out an efficient and productive system for getting them
> into the country and working.
>
So just open the gates and let them go? Doesn't sound to secure to me.

In article <ocuc9jt9ai419glm5ji3h908ej2eknodhf@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 22:08:06 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <prkb9jhs65l5lqprnmikdcgfues7ftppd0@4ax.com>,
> >governor.swill@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:51:47 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> >news:5ul59jp65kc8j848tajkcl40nkk3btmkg8@4ax.com...
> >> >> On Sat, 13 Jul 2024 08:53:24 -0400, "Scout" wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>"Rudy Canoza" <rudy@phil.hendrie.con> wrote in message
> >> >>>news:McekO.22237$xYQc.1806@fx12.iad...
> >> >>>> Medical providers and public health experts worry that the health care
> >> >>>> system is poorly equipped to handle the influx.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>Well we could close our southern Border to illegal aliens and that would
> >> >>>help out with that problem a lot.
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >> Yeah, you keep saying that but you never get around to explaining how that
> >> >> is to be done.
> >> >
> >> >Well the wall is a good start.
> >> >Deporting anyone found illegally on this side of the border would greatly
> >> >benefit.
> >> >Automatic denial of refugee status to anyone that enters at other than a
> >> >port of entry and subsequent deportation.
> >> >You know.. actually enforcing our laws.
> >> >
> >> >> Trump asked for wall money and Republicans told him no.
> >> >
> >> >Well, Democrats told him no... so he came up with the money and built a lot
> >> >of the wall on the border despite Congress. Which has been shown to be
> >> >effective.
> >>
> >> Yeah, he raided a Pentagon reserve fund. Wanna see how effective his wall was?
> >> <https://www.newsnationnow.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/108/2023/12/Border-Wall-Fronton_010920.jpg?w=1280&h=720&crop=1>
> >>
> >> And that's the bit that didn't wash away in the first spring floods.
> >>
> >> Then there's all that wall Biden had to repair, rebuild or enhance and yeah it's been
> >> documented and pictures linked to in here. There's a bend in the Rio Grand in Texas. Got
> >> this long, broad sandbar sticking up out of the water. With wire and barriers it looks
> >> like Omaha Beach on D Day.
> >>
> >> >> Biden asked for border security money and Republicans told him no.
> >> >
> >> >After asserting that he wouldn't build even a foot of wall.
> >>
> >> But he did build and got in hot water with his left because of it.
> >>
> >> >Seems even Biden agrees:
> >> >1) That border security is needed
> >> >2) Walls do work to help in border security.
> >>
> >> They help but you can't seal it. And what about those who come in on a visa but don't
> >> leave when it expires?
> >
> >Gotta go.
>
> How much do you think it would cost to track down and deport all those millions and how
> would you replace them in the work force?

Less then it cost for us to feed and clothe them.
>
> Running a country means thinking about things the voters don't want to be bothered with.

Like you know what running a country is all about.
>
> >> >Further, it wasn't that he asked for such money, it's just that Democrats
> >> >tied so much other stupid spending to it that it would be irresponsible to
> >> >pass it with all that junk attached to it.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> Dunno about you man, but it sounds like the Republicans don't want the
> >> >> border sealed.
> >> >
> >> >Sure we do. We just don't want to spend a ton of money on stupid Democrat
> >> >projects while doing it.
> >>
> >> Oh. So Republican pork is ok but Democrat pork isn't.
> >
> >We didn't add any pork to the "border bill".
>
> Neither did the Democrats - that was right wing disinfo. The border bill they complain
> the Dems 'larded up' was actually written and originally sponsored by REPUBLICANS in the
> Senate. It was proposed for debate but the HOUSE GOP shot it down before any discussion
> could take place.

So all the money in that bill for Ukraine and Israel was just a ruse?
>
> Republicans in the Senate blocked two Biden requests for resources in '21 and '22.
> Republicans in the House blocked two different Republican authored immigration bills.

Because they were full of pork.
>
> Trump's wall was full of holes and portions of it didn't last two rainy seasons.

Because they cut his funding. The "border bill" said nothing about
building a wall.
>
> Vote Republican if you want, but at least admit the truth. The GOP is the party of
> Business which does NOT want the supply of cheap, immigrant labor reduced.
>
> >> That's just an excuse to be lazy, man. If you don't do something, you'll never accomplish
> >> anything. So you take what you can get. Yeah, you got to install a line of park benches
> >> along the wall for the wetbacks to rest on, but if that gets you anything near 100%
> >> apprehension with the average alien turnaround, say, month to get them home.
> >
> >As soon as they cross illegally. Simple.
>
> How many agents are you prepared to hire? How many cameras, sensors, vehicles and
> internment facilities are you willing to pay for? Where's the money? Do you think border
> enforcement is free? House magoos seem to.

I used to live on the border and it was never like it is now.
>
> Republicans in Congress seem unwilling take any steps to do even your simple solution.

Go back to how it was. Don't cross illegally.
>
> Swill

On 7/16/2024 7:38 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:

> In article <fstc9jdqb6jgiamk1q3hvvjhiqfm8solk8@4ax.com>,
> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 20:13:44 -0600, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>
>>> In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
>>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>>>>> Defendant: No
>>>>> Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be carried out
>>>>> within 48 hours.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's all it would take.
>>>>
>>>> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year. You gotta find out
>>>> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back. What if you get
>>>> stuck with some you can't send back? What if there are delays and you have to put them up
>>>> and feed them indefinitely? Do you have the staff just to *process* these people, let
>>>> alone get them physically to their home country. How many agents will you hire to do the
>>>> actual work and how many can they process in a day each. What? You think you're Samantha
>>>> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
>>>
>>> When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
>>> Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
>>> what to do.
>>>>
>>>> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000 hidden aliens out of our
>>>> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
>>>
>>> Oh we will handle that.
>>
>> No pie in the sky, details.
>
> Round them up. Not to [sic] hard.

*too*, not "to." And it's much harder than a fuckwit like you can imagine.

>>
>>>> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't want any resolution
>>>> that lets not white people into the country.
>>>
>>> Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
>>
>> Because it *is* about race to many conservatives. Not for everybody, but *any* solution
>> that involves letting immigrants in under any circumstances runs into a brick wall with a
>> great many conservatives.
>
>
> We need to know who they are first.

You don't give a fuck who they are, you lying racist. They're not white, and to
you and Trump and all your Nazi fellows, that's reason enough to keep them out.

>>
>> Let's go back to immigration policy circa 1880.
>>
>> We can scatter mini Ellis Island type facilities across the southern border. Change them
>> to apply for entry even, if you like. We could actually make billions by charging for
>> application for entry into the US. Why should they spend a thousand bucks on a Coyote?
>> Let them drive up and pay US that thousand. We would make direct profit just from letting
>> them in.
>>
>> But let them in. We need them. China has three times the people we do. That means China
>> can have an economy three times the size of ours. If we both spend the same %GDP on
>> defense, they'll spend three dollars to our one.
>>
>> We need population. Let's work out an efficient and productive system for getting them
>> into the country and working.
>>
> So just open the gates and let them go? Doesn't sound to secure to me.

You don't give a shit about security. You only care about race.

In article <JPvlO.24668$ySE.18380@fx11.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>
> On 7/16/2024 7:38 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
> molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>
> > In article <fstc9jdqb6jgiamk1q3hvvjhiqfm8solk8@4ax.com>,
> > governor.swill@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 20:13:44 -0600, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
> >>
> >>> In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
> >>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
> >>>>> Defendant: No
> >>>>> Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be carried out
> >>>>> within 48 hours.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That's all it would take.
> >>>>
> >>>> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year. You gotta find out
> >>>> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back. What if you get
> >>>> stuck with some you can't send back? What if there are delays and you have to put them up
> >>>> and feed them indefinitely? Do you have the staff just to *process* these people, let
> >>>> alone get them physically to their home country. How many agents will you hire to do the
> >>>> actual work and how many can they process in a day each. What? You think you're Samantha
> >>>> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
> >>>
> >>> When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
> >>> Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
> >>> what to do.
> >>>>
> >>>> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000 hidden aliens out of our
> >>>> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
> >>>
> >>> Oh we will handle that.
> >>
> >> No pie in the sky, details.
> >
> > Round them up. Not to [sic] hard.
>
> *too*, not "to." And it's much harder than a fuckwit like you ca

Nope. Just allow the police to check them out.
>
> >>
> >>>> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't want any resolution
> >>>> that lets not white people into the country.
> >>>
> >>> Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
> >>
> >> Because it *is* about race to many conservatives. Not for everybody, but *any* solution
> >> that involves letting immigrants in under any circumstances runs into a brick wall with a
> >> great many conservatives.
> >
> >
> > We need to know who they are first.
>
> You don't give a fuck who they are, you lying racist. They're not white, and to
> you and Trump and all your Nazi fellows, that's reason enough to keep them out.

The Nazi thing tosses you out of the race.
>
> >>
> >> Let's go back to immigration policy circa 1880.
> >>
> >> We can scatter mini Ellis Island type facilities across the southern border. Change them
> >> to apply for entry even, if you like. We could actually make billions by charging for
> >> application for entry into the US. Why should they spend a thousand bucks on a Coyote?
> >> Let them drive up and pay US that thousand. We would make direct profit just from letting
> >> them in.
> >>
> >> But let them in. We need them. China has three times the people we do. That means China
> >> can have an economy three times the size of ours. If we both spend the same %GDP on
> >> defense, they'll spend three dollars to our one.
> >>
> >> We need population. Let's work out an efficient and productive system for getting them
> >> into the country and working.
> >>
> > So just open the gates and let them go? Doesn't sound to secure to me.
>
> You don't give a shit about security. You only care about race.

Nascar is cool.

BITCH! YOU MISSED!

"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> wrote:
>
>>Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>>Defendant: No
>>Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be carried
>>out
>>within 48 hours.
>>
>>That's all it would take.
>
> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year.

Why?

> You gotta find out
> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back.

No, we don't. Nothing says they have to be given a free ride home.

> What if you get
> stuck with some you can't send back?

Send them back to Mexico.. or whatever country they last departed from.

> What if there are delays and you have to put them up
> and feed them indefinitely?

Shouldn't take more than a couple of hours to boot them over the border.

> Do you have the staff just to *process* these people, let
> alone get them physically to their home country.

When did we have to return them home? Return them to the last country they
were in.

> How many agents will you hire to do the
> actual work and how many can they process in a day each.

We have plenty now, if we would allow them to actually do what they should
be.

> What? You think you're Samantha
> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?

No, but I can make it a lot less than it was.

> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000 hidden
> aliens out of our
> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?

Well, that would probably take much more than a year, but we can streamline
the deportation process. Could probably have them over the border within 6-7
days.

> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't want
> any resolution
> that lets not white people into the country.

If they aren't citizens or entered illegally, white, black, tan.. doesn't
matter, they get deported.

"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
news:6695d759$1$1895495$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
> In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>> >Defendant: No
>> >Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be carried
>> >out
>> >within 48 hours.
>> >
>> >That's all it would take.
>>
>> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year.
>> You gotta find out
>> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back.
>> What if you get
>> stuck with some you can't send back? What if there are delays and you
>> have to put them up
>> and feed them indefinitely? Do you have the staff just to *process*
>> these people, let
>> alone get them physically to their home country. How many agents will
>> you hire to do the
>> actual work and how many can they process in a day each. What? You
>> think you're Samantha
>> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
>
> When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
> Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
> what to do.

Bingo.

>>
>> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000 hidden
>> aliens out of our
>> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
>
> Oh we will handle that.

We already have the means, we simply have to allow the BP to do their jobs.

>>
>> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't want
>> any resolution
>> that lets not white people into the country.
>
> Huh? Why is it always about race with you?

Because it's all he's got?

After all, seem to me as if the real racist is the person who is always
looking at or making it about race.
If it didn't matter, why would they try to make it all about race?

On 7/16/2024 8:53 AM, Michael A Terrell wrote:
> You only care about race.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.guns,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,or.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.atheism
Subject: Re: Will Joe Biden decide to have #FelonDon sanctioned -
because he has immunity?
Message-ID: <ka1a9jpdehnudrs1v41lptug05u9jtk8bl@4ax.com>
References: <20240708.153908.00b7b277@remailer.frell.eu.org>
<v6gtl9$tiak$1@dont-email.me>
<suro8jl4jf1uh4m49bpflgk26iap2j1emp@4ax.com>
<668ca87e$0$212410$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<c9lp8jhb6bat7onjnb1abi9p257tqrmc5s@4ax.com>
<v6jjcn$1e2h5$2@dont-email.me>
<668d5708$1$3068679$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<n13r8jhdiidn6bd4vg3mhbrkvgp5lmnj1v@4ax.com>
<668dbd83$0$3068680$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<7svr8j9n76dqov4jqr6ltg5ano4qu502h0@4ax.com> <v72aqc$ii07$6@dont-email.me>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 8
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 07:18:28 -0400
X-Received-Bytes: 1435

If trying to steal an election is an "official act", assassinating the
asshole who did it
should be too.

Swill

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!panix!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,pa.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns,sac.politics
Subject: Re: Deranged tranny tries to assassinate Trump, gets killed
instead.
Message-ID: <a0p79jle382dpu7descv1cgmkb7vtjqhtv@4ax.com>
References: <20240714.010115.44a9cb28@erienetworks.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 4
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:43:39 -0400

.... but the stupid bitch missed.

Swill

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!netnews.com!s1-4.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <emo79jh20rlasuask9094vtlepuu5ui0av@4ax.com>
References: <1oKdnTc9CYmJlg77nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com>
<XnsB1AED5FEA65AA629555@185.151.15.160>
<ONIkO.102541$dFU1.83026@fx11.ams4> <XnsB1AF52A9CDF3B629555@185.151.15.190>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 55
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:38:43 -0400

Oh poor me I got shot at ...

Swill
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!s1-3.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <4ln79j914cpespbrssonesbciii33ess3m@4ax.com>
References: <1oKdnTc9CYmJlg77nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com>
<XnsB1AED5FEA65AA629555@185.151.15.160>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 31
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:37:51 -0400

Cheer up, maybe someone else will try.

Swill

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.immigration,alt.politics.nationalism.white,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: AP Lies by Ommission About Identity of Invaders Charged with
Rape, Murder of 12-Year-Old
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:35:52 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <v5f66o$1mps9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v54h6j$39cuk$1@dont-email.me> <v54hrs$38mfs$18@dont-email.me>
<moKcnZP3dbqUm-r7nZ2dnZfqnPcAAAAA@giganews.com>
<v58c4f$6squ$8@dont-email.me>
<v5df1n$1caue$1@dont-email.me> <v5edju$1hv3p$3@dont-email.me>
<tgrl7j14lbg6f9csput4jca09qqujgd9d5@4ax.com>
<v5erpf$1jkrf$20@dont-email.me>
<O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me;
posting-host="f3de9d0c1e618b255237332494133eec";
logging-data="1795977";
mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195k8uMNmZfnyDG9tQmsu21WqljX3bfQxM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PNoPW9d+9gKJj0fX+YCk+YFslQg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
Xref: news.eternal-september.org alt.politics.immigration:383549
alt.politics.nationalism.white:10913 talk.politics.misc:1295918
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:3024985

> No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people to
thrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently
> is an important step to getting there.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That constitutes a DEATH THREAT against a former President, Rudey:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/871
18 U.S. Code § 871 - Threats against President and successors to the
Presidency
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail
or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any
letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any
threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon
the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice
President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office
of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or
knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the
President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the
order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years,
or both.
(b)The terms “President-elect” and “Vice President-elect” as used in
this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful
candidates for the offices of President and Vice President,
respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections
held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in
accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2. The
phrase “other officer next in the order of succession to the office of
President” as used in this section shall mean the person next in the
order of succession to act as President in accordance with title 3,
United States Code, sections 19 and 20.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 740; June 1, 1955, ch. 115, § 1, 69
Stat. 80; Pub. L. 87–829, § 1, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 956; Pub. L.
97–297, § 2, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1318; Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

On 7/16/2024 7:36 AM, Michael A Terrell wrote:
> On 7/15/2024 7:13 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>
>> In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>>
>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
>>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>>>> Defendant: No
>>>> Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be
>>>> carried out
>>>> within 48 hours.
>>>>
>>>> That's all it would take.
>>>
>>> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a
>>> year.  You gotta find out
>>> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back.
>>> What if you get
>>> stuck with some you can't send back?  What if there are delays and
>>> you have to put them up
>>> and feed them indefinitely?  Do you have the staff just to *process*
>>> these people, let
>>> alone get them physically to their home country.  How many agents
>>> will you hire to do the
>>> actual work and how many can they process in a day each.  What?  You
>>> think you're Samantha
>>> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
>>
>> When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
>> Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
>> what to do.
>>>
>>> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000
>>> hidden aliens out of our
>>> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
>>
>> Oh we will handle that.
>>>
>>> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't
>>> want any resolution
>>> that lets not white people into the country.
>>
>> Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
>
> It's about race with *you*. The reason *you* don't want them is they're
> not white. It has nothing to do with "legal" or "illegal" immigration.
> It's about race for you, and that's all it is.

You're the one who entered the race variable, so it was first in your
derailed train of thought. Myself, I don't want them because they are
stealing everything they can get their hands on.

In article <v7665h$1baud$4@dont-email.me>,
me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
>
> "Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com...
> > On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
> > <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
> >>Defendant: No
> >>Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be carried
> >>out
> >>within 48 hours.
> >>
> >>That's all it would take.
> >
> > No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year.
>
> Why?
>
>
> > You gotta find out
> > what country they're from and hope that country will take them back.
>
> No, we don't. Nothing says they have to be given a free ride home.
>
> > What if you get
> > stuck with some you can't send back?
>
> Send them back to Mexico.. or whatever country they last departed from.
>
>
> > What if there are delays and you have to put them up
> > and feed them indefinitely?
>
> Shouldn't take more than a couple of hours to boot them over the border.
>
> > Do you have the staff just to *process* these people, let
> > alone get them physically to their home country.
>
> When did we have to return them home? Return them to the last country they
> were in.
>
> > How many agents will you hire to do the
> > actual work and how many can they process in a day each.
>
> We have plenty now, if we would allow them to actually do what they should
> be.
>
> > What? You think you're Samantha
> > and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
>
> No, but I can make it a lot less than it was.
>
> > How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000 hidden
> > aliens out of our
> > country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
>
> Well, that would probably take much more than a year, but we can streamline
> the deportation process. Could probably have them over the border within 6-7
> days.
>
> > You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't want
> > any resolution
> > that lets not white people into the country.
>
> If they aren't citizens or entered illegally, white, black, tan.. doesn't
> matter, they get deported.
>
>

No matter where they came from, they came here from Mexico. They should
have stopped them. So send them there and let Mexico deal with it.

--

BITCH! YOU MISSED!

In article <v7665i$1baud$5@dont-email.me>,
me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
>
> "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
> news:6695d759$1$1895495$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
> > In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
> > governor.swill@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
> >> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
> >> >Defendant: No
> >> >Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be carried
> >> >out
> >> >within 48 hours.
> >> >
> >> >That's all it would take.
> >>
> >> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year.
> >> You gotta find out
> >> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back.
> >> What if you get
> >> stuck with some you can't send back? What if there are delays and you
> >> have to put them up
> >> and feed them indefinitely? Do you have the staff just to *process*
> >> these people, let
> >> alone get them physically to their home country. How many agents will
> >> you hire to do the
> >> actual work and how many can they process in a day each. What? You
> >> think you're Samantha
> >> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
> >
> > When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
> > Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
> > what to do.
>
> Bingo.
>
> >>
> >> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000 hidden
> >> aliens out of our
> >> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
> >
> > Oh we will handle that.
>
> We already have the means, we simply have to allow the BP to do their jobs.
>
> >>
> >> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't want
> >> any resolution
> >> that lets not white people into the country.
> >
> > Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
>
> Because it's all he's got?
>
> After all, seem to me as if the real racist is the person who is always
> looking at or making it about race.
> If it didn't matter, why would they try to make it all about race?
>
>

It's all they got. Follow the agenda instead of looking at facts.

--

BITCH! YOU MISSED!

In article <v76anh$1c7n8$1@dont-email.me>,
me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
>
> "Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:fstc9jdqb6jgiamk1q3hvvjhiqfm8solk8@4ax.com...
> > On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 20:13:44 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
> >>governor.swill@gmail.com says...
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
> >>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> >Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
> >>> >Defendant: No
> >>> >Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be
> >>> >carried out
> >>> >within 48 hours.
> >>> >
> >>> >That's all it would take.
> >>>
> >>> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year.
> >>> You gotta find out
> >>> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back.
> >>> What if you get
> >>> stuck with some you can't send back? What if there are delays and you
> >>> have to put them up
> >>> and feed them indefinitely? Do you have the staff just to *process*
> >>> these people, let
> >>> alone get them physically to their home country. How many agents will
> >>> you hire to do the
> >>> actual work and how many can they process in a day each. What? You
> >>> think you're Samantha
> >>> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
> >>
> >>When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
> >>Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
> >>what to do.
> >>>
> >>> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000 hidden
> >>> aliens out of our
> >>> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
> >>
> >>Oh we will handle that.
> >
> > No pie in the sky, details.
> >
> >>> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't want
> >>> any resolution
> >>> that lets not white people into the country.
> >>
> >>Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
> >
> > Because it *is* about race to many conservatives.
>
> Prove it. Then explain why it's always about race with you?
>
> > Not for everybody, but *any* solution
> > that involves letting immigrants in under any circumstances runs into a
> > brick wall with a
> > great many conservatives.
>
> The only circumstance I'm aware of is when it starts with a crime.
> That and the follow-up that criminals should not be rewarded for committing
> crime.
>
> > Let's go back to immigration policy circa 1880.
>
> I'm sure you would like that. But how about dealing with today, or are you
> stuck in the past?
>
>
> > We can scatter mini Ellis Island type facilities across the southern
> > border.
>
> We already have them....
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Mexico%E2%80%93United_States_border_crossings
>
> However, apparently liberals feel that going through them should be
> optional, no matter what the law says.
>

Try to enter the whitehouse anywhere than an entry point and see what
happens.

--

BITCH! YOU MISSED!

In article <v76ani$1c7n8$2@dont-email.me>,
me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
>
> "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
> news:669685d5$1$3068684$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
> > In article <fstc9jdqb6jgiamk1q3hvvjhiqfm8solk8@4ax.com>,
> > governor.swill@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 20:13:44 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
> >> >governor.swill@gmail.com says...
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
> >> >> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
> >> >> >Defendant: No
> >> >> >Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be
> >> >> >carried out
> >> >> >within 48 hours.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >That's all it would take.
> >> >>
> >> >> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year.
> >> >> You gotta find out
> >> >> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back.
> >> >> What if you get
> >> >> stuck with some you can't send back? What if there are delays and you
> >> >> have to put them up
> >> >> and feed them indefinitely? Do you have the staff just to *process*
> >> >> these people, let
> >> >> alone get them physically to their home country. How many agents will
> >> >> you hire to do the
> >> >> actual work and how many can they process in a day each. What? You
> >> >> think you're Samantha
> >> >> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
> >> >
> >> >When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
> >> >Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
> >> >what to do.
> >> >>
> >> >> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000
> >> >> hidden aliens out of our
> >> >> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
> >> >
> >> >Oh we will handle that.
> >>
> >> No pie in the sky, details.
> >
> > Round them up. Not to hard.
> >>
> >> >> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't
> >> >> want any resolution
> >> >> that lets not white people into the country.
> >> >
> >> >Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
> >>
> >> Because it *is* about race to many conservatives. Not for everybody, but
> >> *any* solution
> >> that involves letting immigrants in under any circumstances runs into a
> >> brick wall with a
> >> great many conservatives.
> >
> >
> > We need to know who they are first. Just like when you apply for a job.
> >>
> >> Let's go back to immigration policy circa 1880.
> >>
> >> We can scatter mini Ellis Island type facilities across the southern
> >> border. Change them
> >> to apply for entry even, if you like. We could actually make billions by
> >> charging for
> >> application for entry into the US. Why should they spend a thousand
> >> bucks on a Coyote?
> >> Let them drive up and pay US that thousand. We would make direct profit
> >> just from letting
> >> them in.
> >>
> >> But let them in. We need them. China has three times the people we do.
> >> That means China
> >> can have an economy three times the size of ours. If we both spend the
> >> same %GDP on
> >> defense, they'll spend three dollars to our one.
> >>
> >> We need population. Let's work out an efficient and productive system
> >> for getting them
> >> into the country and working.
> >>
> > So just open the gates and let them go? Doesn't sound to secure to me.
>
> Particularly when we already have evidence that terrorists are coming by
> that route, and a very odd number of young fit military age Chinese
> Nationals are regularly entering the country via our southern border. Makes
> you wonder how they got there without the assistance of the Chinese
> government.
> Probably isn't good for our security and national interests.
> But Hey, liberals feel we should let anyone in...
>

I lived right on the border for a while. Douglas AZ. Never were there
people from China, Turkey, South Africa crossing. Just southern people
from Mexico and south. They can't say it's no different than before.

--

BITCH! YOU MISSED!

On 7/16/2024 8:06 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:

> In article <AzvlO.2848$jCQf.202@fx04.iad>, mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut
> says...
>>
>> On 7/15/2024 7:13 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>
>>> In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
>>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>>>>> Defendant: No
>>>>> Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be carried out
>>>>> within 48 hours.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's all it would take.
>>>>
>>>> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year. You gotta find out
>>>> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back. What if you get
>>>> stuck with some you can't send back? What if there are delays and you have to put them up
>>>> and feed them indefinitely? Do you have the staff just to *process* these people, let
>>>> alone get them physically to their home country. How many agents will you hire to do the
>>>> actual work and how many can they process in a day each. What? You think you're Samantha
>>>> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
>>>
>>> When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
>>> Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
>>> what to do.
>>>>
>>>> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000 hidden aliens out of our
>>>> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
>>>
>>> Oh we will handle that.
>>>>
>>>> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't want any resolution
>>>> that lets not white people into the country.
>>>
>>> Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
>>
>> It's about race with *you*. The reason *you* don't want them is they're not
>> white. It has nothing to do with "legal" or "illegal" immigration. It's about
>> race for you, and that's all it is.
>
> It's about following the law.

It's not. That's just your lie cover story. You don't want any immigrants even
if they follow the law. None of you fucking racist right-wingnuts do.

In article <v76q8d$109m3$6@news.mixmin.net>, kha@none.com says...
>
> On 7/16/2024 7:36 AM, Michael A Terrell wrote:
> > On 7/15/2024 7:13 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
> > child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
> >
> >> In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
> >> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
> >>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
> >>>> Defendant: No
> >>>> Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be
> >>>> carried out
> >>>> within 48 hours.
> >>>>
> >>>> That's all it would take.
> >>>
> >>> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a
> >>> year.  You gotta find out
> >>> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back.
> >>> What if you get
> >>> stuck with some you can't send back?  What if there are delays and
> >>> you have to put them up
> >>> and feed them indefinitely?  Do you have the staff just to *process*
> >>> these people, let
> >>> alone get them physically to their home country.  How many agents
> >>> will you hire to do the
> >>> actual work and how many can they process in a day each.  What?  You
> >>> think you're Samantha
> >>> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
> >>
> >> When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
> >> Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
> >> what to do.
> >>>
> >>> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000
> >>> hidden aliens out of our
> >>> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
> >>
> >> Oh we will handle that.
> >>>
> >>> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't
> >>> want any resolution
> >>> that lets not white people into the country.
> >>
> >> Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
> >
> > It's about race with *you*. The reason *you* don't want them is they're
> > not white. It has nothing to do with "legal" or "illegal" immigration.
> > It's about race for you, and that's all it is.
>
> You're the one who entered the race variable, so it was first in your
> derailed train of thought. Myself, I don't want them because they are
> stealing everything they can get their hands on.

It is a crime to enter illegally. So he supports allowing someone to
milk us who started off by committing a crime.

--

BITCH! YOU MISSED!

On 7/16/2024 4:45 PM, Michael A Terrell wrote:
None of you fucking racist
> right-wingnuts do.
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.guns,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,or.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.atheism
Subject: Re: Will Joe Biden decide to have #FelonDon sanctioned -
because he has immunity?
Message-ID: <ka1a9jpdehnudrs1v41lptug05u9jtk8bl@4ax.com>
References: <20240708.153908.00b7b277@remailer.frell.eu.org>
<v6gtl9$tiak$1@dont-email.me>
<suro8jl4jf1uh4m49bpflgk26iap2j1emp@4ax.com>
<668ca87e$0$212410$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<c9lp8jhb6bat7onjnb1abi9p257tqrmc5s@4ax.com>
<v6jjcn$1e2h5$2@dont-email.me>
<668d5708$1$3068679$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<n13r8jhdiidn6bd4vg3mhbrkvgp5lmnj1v@4ax.com>
<668dbd83$0$3068680$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<7svr8j9n76dqov4jqr6ltg5ano4qu502h0@4ax.com> <v72aqc$ii07$6@dont-email.me>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 8
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 07:18:28 -0400
X-Received-Bytes: 1435

If trying to steal an election is an "official act", assassinating the
asshole who did it
should be too.

Swill

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!panix!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,pa.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns,sac.politics
Subject: Re: Deranged tranny tries to assassinate Trump, gets killed
instead.
Message-ID: <a0p79jle382dpu7descv1cgmkb7vtjqhtv@4ax.com>
References: <20240714.010115.44a9cb28@erienetworks.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 4
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:43:39 -0400

.... but the stupid bitch missed.

Swill

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!netnews.com!s1-4.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <emo79jh20rlasuask9094vtlepuu5ui0av@4ax.com>
References: <1oKdnTc9CYmJlg77nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com>
<XnsB1AED5FEA65AA629555@185.151.15.160>
<ONIkO.102541$dFU1.83026@fx11.ams4> <XnsB1AF52A9CDF3B629555@185.151.15.190>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 55
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:38:43 -0400

Oh poor me I got shot at ...

Swill
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!s1-3.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <4ln79j914cpespbrssonesbciii33ess3m@4ax.com>
References: <1oKdnTc9CYmJlg77nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com>
<XnsB1AED5FEA65AA629555@185.151.15.160>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 31
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:37:51 -0400

Cheer up, maybe someone else will try.

Swill

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.immigration,alt.politics.nationalism.white,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: AP Lies by Ommission About Identity of Invaders Charged with
Rape, Murder of 12-Year-Old
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:35:52 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <v5f66o$1mps9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v54h6j$39cuk$1@dont-email.me> <v54hrs$38mfs$18@dont-email.me>
<moKcnZP3dbqUm-r7nZ2dnZfqnPcAAAAA@giganews.com>
<v58c4f$6squ$8@dont-email.me>
<v5df1n$1caue$1@dont-email.me> <v5edju$1hv3p$3@dont-email.me>
<tgrl7j14lbg6f9csput4jca09qqujgd9d5@4ax.com>
<v5erpf$1jkrf$20@dont-email.me>
<O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me;
posting-host="f3de9d0c1e618b255237332494133eec";
logging-data="1795977";
mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195k8uMNmZfnyDG9tQmsu21WqljX3bfQxM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PNoPW9d+9gKJj0fX+YCk+YFslQg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
Xref: news.eternal-september.org alt.politics.immigration:383549
alt.politics.nationalism.white:10913 talk.politics.misc:1295918
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:3024985

> No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people to
thrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently
> is an important step to getting there.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That constitutes a DEATH THREAT against a former President, Rudey:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/871
18 U.S. Code § 871 - Threats against President and successors to the
Presidency
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail
or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any
letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any
threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon
the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice
President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office
of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or
knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the
President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the
order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years,
or both.
(b)The terms “President-elect” and “Vice President-elect” as used in
this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful
candidates for the offices of President and Vice President,
respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections
held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in
accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2. The
phrase “other officer next in the order of succession to the office of
President” as used in this section shall mean the person next in the
order of succession to act as President in accordance with title 3,
United States Code, sections 19 and 20.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 740; June 1, 1955, ch. 115, § 1, 69
Stat. 80; Pub. L. 87–829, § 1, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 956; Pub. L.
97–297, § 2, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1318; Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

On 7/16/2024 4:16 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <v76ani$1c7n8$2@dont-email.me>,
> me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
>>
>> "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:669685d5$1$3068684$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>>> In article <fstc9jdqb6jgiamk1q3hvvjhiqfm8solk8@4ax.com>,
>>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 20:13:44 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
>>>>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
>>>>>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>>>>>>> Defendant: No
>>>>>>> Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be
>>>>>>> carried out
>>>>>>> within 48 hours.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's all it would take.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a year.
>>>>>> You gotta find out
>>>>>> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back.
>>>>>> What if you get
>>>>>> stuck with some you can't send back? What if there are delays and you
>>>>>> have to put them up
>>>>>> and feed them indefinitely? Do you have the staff just to *process*
>>>>>> these people, let
>>>>>> alone get them physically to their home country. How many agents will
>>>>>> you hire to do the
>>>>>> actual work and how many can they process in a day each. What? You
>>>>>> think you're Samantha
>>>>>> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
>>>>>
>>>>> When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
>>>>> Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
>>>>> what to do.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000
>>>>>> hidden aliens out of our
>>>>>> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh we will handle that.
>>>>
>>>> No pie in the sky, details.
>>>
>>> Round them up. Not to hard.
>>>>
>>>>>> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't
>>>>>> want any resolution
>>>>>> that lets not white people into the country.
>>>>>
>>>>> Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
>>>>
>>>> Because it *is* about race to many conservatives. Not for everybody, but
>>>> *any* solution
>>>> that involves letting immigrants in under any circumstances runs into a
>>>> brick wall with a
>>>> great many conservatives.
>>>
>>>
>>> We need to know who they are first. Just like when you apply for a job.
>>>>
>>>> Let's go back to immigration policy circa 1880.
>>>>
>>>> We can scatter mini Ellis Island type facilities across the southern
>>>> border. Change them
>>>> to apply for entry even, if you like. We could actually make billions by
>>>> charging for
>>>> application for entry into the US. Why should they spend a thousand
>>>> bucks on a Coyote?
>>>> Let them drive up and pay US that thousand. We would make direct profit
>>>> just from letting
>>>> them in.
>>>>
>>>> But let them in. We need them. China has three times the people we do.
>>>> That means China
>>>> can have an economy three times the size of ours. If we both spend the
>>>> same %GDP on
>>>> defense, they'll spend three dollars to our one.
>>>>
>>>> We need population. Let's work out an efficient and productive system
>>>> for getting them
>>>> into the country and working.
>>>>
>>> So just open the gates and let them go? Doesn't sound to secure to me.
>>
>> Particularly when we already have evidence that terrorists are coming by
>> that route, and a very odd number of young fit military age Chinese
>> Nationals are regularly entering the country via our southern border. Makes
>> you wonder how they got there without the assistance of the Chinese
>> government.
>> Probably isn't good for our security and national interests.
>> But Hey, liberals feel we should let anyone in...
>>
>
> I lived right on the border for a while. Douglas AZ. Never were there
> people from China, Turkey, South Africa crossing. Just southern people
> from Mexico and south. They can't say it's no different than before.
>
Tidy little town, wide streets, great historic hotel - classic ranching
community.

The same could be said of far busier Nogales too.

This is a planned and orchestrated invasion by our enemies.

On 7/16/2024 3:56 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:

> In article <v76q8d$109m3$6@news.mixmin.net>, kha@none.com says...
>>
>> On 7/16/2024 7:36 AM, Michael A Terrell wrote:
>>> On 7/15/2024 7:13 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>
>>>> In article <56kb9jtbkkcvvpsu7qcffcgf7ukj6ljtku@4ax.com>,
>>>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:57:50 -0400, "Scout"
>>>>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Judge: Did you cross the border at a port of entry?
>>>>>> Defendant: No
>>>>>> Judge: Defendant is to be subject to immediate deportation to be
>>>>>> carried out
>>>>>> within 48 hours.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's all it would take.
>>>>>
>>>>> No it isn't. First you gotta put them up for a couple days or a
>>>>> year.  You gotta find out
>>>>> what country they're from and hope that country will take them back.
>>>>> What if you get
>>>>> stuck with some you can't send back?  What if there are delays and
>>>>> you have to put them up
>>>>> and feed them indefinitely?  Do you have the staff just to *process*
>>>>> these people, let
>>>>> alone get them physically to their home country.  How many agents
>>>>> will you hire to do the
>>>>> actual work and how many can they process in a day each.  What?  You
>>>>> think you're Samantha
>>>>> and we just gotta pass a law and <poof> the problem goes away?
>>>>
>>>> When you break the law where you come from doesn't matter. You cross in
>>>> Mexico to here illegally then you go back to Mexico. Let them decide
>>>> what to do.
>>>>>
>>>>> How many employees do you figure it would take to move 8,000,000
>>>>> hidden aliens out of our
>>>>> country (if we could find a country that'll take them) in a year?
>>>>
>>>> Oh we will handle that.
>>>>>
>>>>> You won't think about a solution that makes sense because you don't
>>>>> want any resolution
>>>>> that lets not white people into the country.
>>>>
>>>> Huh? Why is it always about race with you?
>>>
>>> It's about race with *you*. The reason *you* don't want them is they're
>>> not white. It has nothing to do with "legal" or "illegal" immigration.
>>> It's about race for you, and that's all it is.
>>
>> You're the one who entered the race variable, so it was first in your
>> derailed train of thought. Myself, I don't want them because they are
>> stealing everything they can get their hands on.
>
> It is a crime to enter illegally.

About on the same scale as jaywalking.