In article <o7ho7jhp5caijttuk8r5frb4qnq10jvoer@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:50:11 -0700, "Cune I. Form" <anc@ie.nt> wrote:
>
> >On 6/25/2024 4:04 PM, Andrew Wished He Had a Brain wrote:
> >
> >> Idiot.
> >
> >Is that your new .sig, fucktard?
>
> It ought to be. They don't come much more ignorant and stupid than Andrew W.
>

You really think you're a tuff guy huh?

In article <v5hp6l$29muh$9@dont-email.me>,
me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
>
> "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
> news:v5h9dt$260uh$2@dont-email.me...
> > pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
> > news:v5h4fi$24qtc$3@dont-email.me:
> >
> >> On 2024-06-26, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>> It's rigged and you know it. Why does Joe have to hide for a week and
> >>> a half to study up on shit he should already know about?
> >>
> >> And who is running the country?
> >> We have Russian warships off the coast of the US for goodness sakes.
> >>
> >> Supposedly Biden has 16+ advisors pumping his head full of strategies
> >> to use against Trump. Of course Joe could also be memorizing the
> >> questions and answers already provided to him by CNN.
> >>
> >> Neither is going to work without a little help from his "friends" to
> >> quote The Beatles.
> >>
> >> Has Joe Biden agreed to a pre/post drug test yet?
> >> CNN's reaction when a guest brought that talking point up was sheer
> >> panic. MSNBC is too frightened to even discuss the topic.
> >>
> >> Why is that?
> >>
> >>
> > It's difficult to debate tRump because it's nearly impossible to identify
> > what his arguments even are.
>
> Thanks for admitting your inability to follow adult discussions..
>

He's a puppet for the crooked left.

In article <v5hpil$29o4r$1@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
>
> On 6/26/2024 12:06 PM, Scout wrote:
> >
> >
> > "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
> > news:v5h9dt$260uh$2@dont-email.me...
> >> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
> >> news:v5h4fi$24qtc$3@dont-email.me:
> >>
> >>> On 2024-06-26, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>> It's rigged and you know it. Why does Joe have to hide for a week and
> >>>> a half to study up on shit he should already know about?
> >>>
> >>> And who is running the country?
> >>> We have Russian warships off the coast of the US for goodness sakes.
> >>>
> >>> Supposedly Biden has 16+ advisors pumping his head full of strategies
> >>> to use against Trump. Of course Joe could also be memorizing the
> >>> questions and answers already provided to him by CNN.
> >>>
> >>> Neither is going to work without a little help from his "friends" to
> >>> quote The Beatles.
> >>>
> >>> Has Joe Biden agreed to a pre/post drug test yet?
> >>> CNN's reaction when a guest brought that talking point up was sheer
> >>> panic. MSNBC is too frightened to even discuss the topic.
> >>>
> >>> Why is that?
> >>>
> >>>
> >> It's difficult to debate tRump because it's nearly impossible to identify
> >> what his arguments even are.
> >
> > Thanks for admitting your inability to follow adult discussions..
>
> Demented Trump:
>
> "By the way, they never report the crowd on Jan. 6. You know Nikki Haley,
> Nikki Haley, Nikki Haley? You know, they ? do you know they destroyed all of
> the information, all of the evidence, everything? Deleted and destroyed all
> of it. All of it. Because of lots of things? like Nikki Haley is in charge
> of security ? we offered her 10,000 people, soldiers, National Guards,
> whatever they want. They turned it down. They don?t want to talk about that.
> These are very dishonest people."
>
> https://twitter.com/i/status/1748537448420786529

Means nothing. Joe has to do homework and disappear for a week to
prepare for a debate. Either he don't know shit or he knows Trump is
smarter than he thought.

On 6/26/2024 1:06 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:

> In article <vqgo7jlj01hv5mmtruncim1o03n5lrnt4v@4ax.com>,
> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 13:18:43 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>
>>> And who is running the country?
>>> We have Russian warships off the coast of the US for goodness sakes.
>>
>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA!
>>
>> First, they're in international waters which our Navy keeps secure for *everybody's* use.
>>
>> Second, they're visiting Cuba by invitation.
>
> You really are that dumb.

No, he's right.

>>
>> Third, they're shit. Their submarine has holes in its hull where the acoustic tiles are
>> falling off. Don't you watch *any* news?
>
> Obviously you don't.

Obviously *you* don't; you only read right-wingnut lie sites.

"Russian Submarine's Damaged Hull During Cuba Visit Raises Questions"

https://www.newsweek.com/russia-submarine-nuclear-cuba-havana-kazan-damage-hull-1914065

You're stupid because you want to be stupid.

On 6/26/2024 1:26 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:

> In article <v5hpil$29o4r$1@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
>>
>> On 6/26/2024 12:06 PM, Scout wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>>> news:v5h9dt$260uh$2@dont-email.me...
>>>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
>>>> news:v5h4fi$24qtc$3@dont-email.me:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2024-06-26, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> It's rigged and you know it. Why does Joe have to hide for a week and
>>>>>> a half to study up on shit he should already know about?
>>>>>
>>>>> And who is running the country?
>>>>> We have Russian warships off the coast of the US for goodness sakes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Supposedly Biden has 16+ advisors pumping his head full of strategies
>>>>> to use against Trump. Of course Joe could also be memorizing the
>>>>> questions and answers already provided to him by CNN.
>>>>>
>>>>> Neither is going to work without a little help from his "friends" to
>>>>> quote The Beatles.
>>>>>
>>>>> Has Joe Biden agreed to a pre/post drug test yet?
>>>>> CNN's reaction when a guest brought that talking point up was sheer
>>>>> panic. MSNBC is too frightened to even discuss the topic.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why is that?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> It's difficult to debate tRump because it's nearly impossible to identify
>>>> what his arguments even are.
>>>
>>> Thanks for admitting your inability to follow adult discussions..
>>
>> Demented Trump:
>>
>> "By the way, they never report the crowd on Jan. 6. You know Nikki Haley,
>> Nikki Haley, Nikki Haley? You know, they ? do you know they destroyed all of
>> the information, all of the evidence, everything? Deleted and destroyed all
>> of it. All of it. Because of lots of things? like Nikki Haley is in charge
>> of security ? we offered her 10,000 people, soldiers, National Guards,
>> whatever they want. They turned it down. They don?t want to talk about that.
>> These are very dishonest people."
>>
>> https://twitter.com/i/status/1748537448420786529
>
> Means nothing.

Means Trump is shot.

J Carlson wrote:
>
> You're stupid because you want to be stupid.

>> Means nothing.
>
> Means Trump is shot.

> Getting rid of Trump permanently
> is an important step to getting there.

That constitutes a DEATH THREAT against a former President, Rudey:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/871
18 U.S. Code § 871 - Threats against President and successors to the
Presidency
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail
or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any
letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any
threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon
the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice
President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office
of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or
knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the
President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the
order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years,
or both.
(b)The terms “President-elect” and “Vice President-elect” as used in
this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful
candidates for the offices of President and Vice President,
respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections
held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in
accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2. The
phrase “other officer next in the order of succession to the office of
President” as used in this section shall mean the person next in the
order of succession to act as President in accordance with title 3,
United States Code, sections 19 and 20.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 740; June 1, 1955, ch. 115, § 1, 69
Stat. 80; Pub. L. 87–829, § 1, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 956; Pub. L.
97–297, § 2, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1318; Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

9-65.200 - Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency; Threats Against Former Presidents; and Certain Other Secret
Service Protectees
The Counterterrorism Section of the National Security Division has
supervisory authority over 18 U.S.C. §§ 871 and 879 cases. As great
caution must be taken in matters relating to the security of the persons
protected by 18 U.S.C. § 871, United States Attorneys are encouraged to
consult with the Counterterrorism Section (CTS) of the National Security
Division when they have doubts on the prosecutive merit of a case. For
the same reason, dismissal of complaints under 18 U.S.C. § 871, when the
defendant is in custody under the Mental Incompetency Statutes (18
U.S.C. §§ 4244, 4246), requires approval from CTS. In other cases,
United States Attorneys must consult prior to dismissing a count
involving, or entering into any sentence commitment or other case
settlement involving a § 871 charge.

https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2024/01/phoenix-man-arrested-making-online-death-threats-against-president-and

PHOENIX –David Michael Hanson, 41, of Phoenix, was arrested on Wednesday
for making online threats against the President and Vice-President.
Hanson was charged by Federal criminal complaint on Tuesday with five
counts of Threats Against the President and Successors to the Presidency
and five counts of Interstate Communication of Threats.

The complaint alleges that in November and December of 2023, while
living in Arizona, Hanson used a social media platform to post threats
to murder the President and Vice President of the United States. On
November 19, 2023, Hanson posted online a series of threatening
statements including one that stated, “#joeAndKamala I’m asking you to
resign on Monday your alternative is death brutally murdered.” After the
U.S. Secret Service spoke to Hanson and warned him that it was a Federal
crime to post such threats, on December 23, 2023, Hanson posted another
series of similar threats aimed at the President and Vice-President.

Each count of Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, a fine of
up to $250,000, and up to three years of supervised release. Each count
of Interstate Communication of Threats carries a maximum sentence of
five years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and up to three years of
supervised release.

A complaint is simply a method by which a person is charged with
criminal activity and raises no inference of guilt. An individual is
presumed innocent until evidence is presented to a jury that establishes
guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The United States Secret Service is conducting the investigation in this
case. The United States Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, is
handling the prosecution.

Those can be reported here:

https://tips.fbi.gov/home

https://www.justice.gov/action-center/report-crime-or-submit-complaint

https://www.secretservice.gov/contact

https://www.dhs.gov/see-something-say-something/reporting/california

Fellow citizens, won't you join in ending Rudey's terrorism here?

J Carlson wrote:
> Demented Trump:

> Getting rid of Trump permanently is an important step to getting
> there.

> Means Trump is shot.

That constitutes a DEATH THREAT against a former President, Rudey:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/871
18 U.S. Code § 871 - Threats against President and successors to the
Presidency
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail
or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any
letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any
threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon
the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice
President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office
of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or
knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the
President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the
order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years,
or both.
(b)The terms “President-elect” and “Vice President-elect” as used in
this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful
candidates for the offices of President and Vice President,
respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections
held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in
accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2. The
phrase “other officer next in the order of succession to the office of
President” as used in this section shall mean the person next in the
order of succession to act as President in accordance with title 3,
United States Code, sections 19 and 20.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 740; June 1, 1955, ch. 115, § 1, 69
Stat. 80; Pub. L. 87–829, § 1, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 956; Pub. L.
97–297, § 2, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1318; Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

9-65.200 - Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency; Threats Against Former Presidents; and Certain Other Secret
Service Protectees
The Counterterrorism Section of the National Security Division has
supervisory authority over 18 U.S.C. §§ 871 and 879 cases. As great
caution must be taken in matters relating to the security of the persons
protected by 18 U.S.C. § 871, United States Attorneys are encouraged to
consult with the Counterterrorism Section (CTS) of the National Security
Division when they have doubts on the prosecutive merit of a case. For
the same reason, dismissal of complaints under 18 U.S.C. § 871, when the
defendant is in custody under the Mental Incompetency Statutes (18
U.S.C. §§ 4244, 4246), requires approval from CTS. In other cases,
United States Attorneys must consult prior to dismissing a count
involving, or entering into any sentence commitment or other case
settlement involving a § 871 charge.

https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2024/01/phoenix-man-arrested-making-online-death-threats-against-president-and

PHOENIX –David Michael Hanson, 41, of Phoenix, was arrested on Wednesday
for making online threats against the President and Vice-President.
Hanson was charged by Federal criminal complaint on Tuesday with five
counts of Threats Against the President and Successors to the Presidency
and five counts of Interstate Communication of Threats.

The complaint alleges that in November and December of 2023, while
living in Arizona, Hanson used a social media platform to post threats
to murder the President and Vice President of the United States. On
November 19, 2023, Hanson posted online a series of threatening
statements including one that stated, “#joeAndKamala I’m asking you to
resign on Monday your alternative is death brutally murdered.” After the
U.S. Secret Service spoke to Hanson and warned him that it was a Federal
crime to post such threats, on December 23, 2023, Hanson posted another
series of similar threats aimed at the President and Vice-President.

Each count of Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, a fine of
up to $250,000, and up to three years of supervised release. Each count
of Interstate Communication of Threats carries a maximum sentence of
five years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and up to three years of
supervised release.

A complaint is simply a method by which a person is charged with
criminal activity and raises no inference of guilt. An individual is
presumed innocent until evidence is presented to a jury that establishes
guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The United States Secret Service is conducting the investigation in this
case. The United States Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, is
handling the prosecution.

Those can be reported here:

https://tips.fbi.gov/home

https://www.justice.gov/action-center/report-crime-or-submit-complaint

https://www.secretservice.gov/contact

https://www.dhs.gov/see-something-say-something/reporting/california

Fellow citizens, won't you join in ending Rudey's terrorism here?

On 6/26/2024 4:12 PM, Chips Loral wrote:
> J Carlson wrote:
>>
>> You're stupid because you want to be stupid.
>
>>> Means nothing.
>>
>> Means Trump is shot.
>
> > Getting rid of Trump permanently
> > is an important step to getting there.
>
>
>
>
> That constitutes a DEATH THREAT against a former President

No, spammy, it does not.

On 6/26/2024 4:15 PM, Chips Loral wrote:
> J Carlson wrote:
>> Demented Trump:
>
> > Getting rid of Trump permanently is an important step to getting
> > there.
>
>> Means Trump is shot.
>
>
>
>
>
> That constitutes a DEATH THREAT against a former President

No, spammy, it doesn't.

On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 09:24:46 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
wrote:

>
>
>"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>news:667b36c5$0$951$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>> In article <v5fccl$1nmg1$9@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
>> says...
>>>
>>> Dave Wainwright <nospam@comcast.net> wrote in
>>> news:v5f184$8t8t$1@news.mixmin.net:
>>>
>>> > On 6/25/2024 7:43 AM, Baxter wrote:
>>> >> "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
>>> >> news:v5d9p0$1bin0$1@dont-email.me:
>>> >>
>>> >>> "Skeeter" wrote in message
>>> >>> news:6677425c$0$951$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> In article <bgce7j1k1nvd2s81qb4knk16mtps8al75v@4ax.com>,
>>> >>>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>
>>> >>>>> Trump met recently with some corporate execs and since then has
>>> >>>>> moderated his tone on
>>> >>>>> immigration. Business wants the cheap labor.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> No he hasn't. Where do you get your info?
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> The garbage bin, essentially.
>>> >>>
>>> >> =============
>>> >> “But what I want to do, and what I will do is you graduate from a
>>> >> college I think you should get, automatically as part of your
>>> >> diploma, a green card to be able to stay in this country, and that
>>> >> includes junior colleges too. Anybody graduates from a college, you
>>> >> go in there for two years or four years, if you graduate, or you get
>>> >> a doctorate degree from a college, you should be able to stay in this
>>> >> country.�
>>> >>
>>> >> For Trump � who has demonized undocumented immigrants and railed
>>> >> against the record levels of migration at the Southern border as a
>>> >> cornerstone of his 2024 presidential campaign � it was a
>>> >> significant change. Trump has called for mass deportations on the
>>> >> first day of his administration, has said that migrants are
>>> >> “poisoning the bloodâ€? of this country, and has highlighted
>>> >> high-profile crimes committed by migrants in the U.S. illegally.
>>> >>
>>> >> https://www.politico.com/news/2024/06/22/trump-policy-flip-flop-001645
>>> >> 38
>>> >
>>> > Facts change minds.
>>> >
>>> > That's why intelligent and successful people have meetings, Baxter.
>>> > So they can be presented facts and make the best decisions.
>>>
>>> You got any proof he actually changed his mind? He does a lot of
>>> pandering.
>>>
>>> >
>>> > Which would you rather have? A motivated educated self-supporting
>>> > smart immigrant, or some fat immigrant welfare slut, with nine kids
>>> > and one in the oven, who is too stupid to know when to close her legs?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> Or maybe she has nine kids because lack of contraceptives. But from what
>>> I've seen, there is no "fat immigrant welfare slut, with nine kids",
>>> rather one or two kids at most, and many work their butts off in the
>>> orchards and fields and don't get welfare.
>>
>> What planet do you live on?
>
>He lives on the planet DeLusion were anything you can think becomes the
>truth in your imagination though reality remains unchanged. However for
>DeLusionians reality is considered an outrageous and overrated notion.
>

I find it fascinating that the high birth rates of the lower classes upsets white people
so much. As far as immigrants, you guys just make it up as you go along. They're here
for the same reasons your ancestors came here; opportunity.

Swill
NP: Billy Preston - Will It Go Round In Circles

On 6/25/24 1:57 PM, Scout wrote:
>
>
> "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
> news:667b0243$1$3068686$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>> In article <v5el1s$1jk6h$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
>> says...
>>>
>>> "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
>>> news:v5d9p0$1bin0$1@dont-email.me:
>>>
>>> > "Skeeter"  wrote in message
>>> > news:6677425c$0$951$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>>> >>
>>> >>In article <bgce7j1k1nvd2s81qb4knk16mtps8al75v@4ax.com>,
>>> >>governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>> >>>
>>>
>>> >>> Trump met recently with some corporate execs and since then has
>>> >>> moderated his tone on
>>> >>> immigration.  Business wants the cheap labor.
>>> >>
>>> >>No he hasn't. Where do you get your info?
>>> >>>
>>> >
>>> > The garbage bin, essentially.
>>> >
>>> =============
>>> ?But what I want to do, and what I will do is you graduate from a
>>> college
>>> I think you should get, automatically as part of your diploma, a green
>>> card to be able to stay in this country, and that includes junior
>>> colleges too. Anybody graduates from a college, you go in there for two
>>> years or four years, if you graduate, or you get a doctorate degree from
>>> a college, you should be able to stay in this country.?
>>>
>>> For Trump ? who has demonized undocumented immigrants and railed against
>>> the record levels of migration at the Southern border as a
>>> cornerstone of
>>> his 2024 presidential campaign ? it was a significant change. Trump has
>>> called for mass deportations on the first day of his administration, has
>>> said that migrants are ?poisoning the blood? of this country, and has
>>> highlighted high-profile crimes committed by migrants in the U.S.
>>> illegally.
>>>
>>> https://www.politico.com/news/2024/06/22/trump-policy-flip-flop-00164538
>>
>> Trump owns you. Bidens son is a drug addicted felon.
>
> And Biden is a senile old man who has no clue of what is going on around
> him.
> Apparently liberals like an unelected shadow government that isn't
> accountable to anyone running things.

Are you afraid of sharks in the water when there are tremendous
batteries nearby too? Hey, at least you show some sort of sense of
humor with that steaming pile of shit.

"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
news:667c7971$0$7056$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
> In article <v5hpil$29o4r$1@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
>>
>> On 6/26/2024 12:06 PM, Scout wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>> > news:v5h9dt$260uh$2@dont-email.me...
>> >> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
>> >> news:v5h4fi$24qtc$3@dont-email.me:
>> >>
>> >>> On 2024-06-26, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>> It's rigged and you know it. Why does Joe have to hide for a week
>> >>>> and
>> >>>> a half to study up on shit he should already know about?
>> >>>
>> >>> And who is running the country?
>> >>> We have Russian warships off the coast of the US for goodness sakes.
>> >>>
>> >>> Supposedly Biden has 16+ advisors pumping his head full of strategies
>> >>> to use against Trump. Of course Joe could also be memorizing the
>> >>> questions and answers already provided to him by CNN.
>> >>>
>> >>> Neither is going to work without a little help from his "friends" to
>> >>> quote The Beatles.
>> >>>
>> >>> Has Joe Biden agreed to a pre/post drug test yet?
>> >>> CNN's reaction when a guest brought that talking point up was sheer
>> >>> panic. MSNBC is too frightened to even discuss the topic.
>> >>>
>> >>> Why is that?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >> It's difficult to debate tRump because it's nearly impossible to
>> >> identify
>> >> what his arguments even are.
>> >
>> > Thanks for admitting your inability to follow adult discussions..
>>
>> Demented Trump:
>>
>> "By the way, they never report the crowd on Jan. 6. You know Nikki
>> Haley,
>> Nikki Haley, Nikki Haley? You know, they ? do you know they destroyed
>> all of
>> the information, all of the evidence, everything? Deleted and
>> destroyed all
>> of it. All of it. Because of lots of things? like Nikki Haley is in
>> charge
>> of security ? we offered her 10,000 people, soldiers, National
>> Guards,
>> whatever they want. They turned it down. They don?t want to talk
>> about that.
>> These are very dishonest people."
>>
>> https://twitter.com/i/status/1748537448420786529
>
> Means nothing. Joe has to do homework and disappear for a week to
> prepare for a debate. Either he don't know shit or he knows Trump is
> smarter than he thought.

More likely they are trying to figure out what combination of drugs will
pull him out of his dementia long enough to even read it off a teleprompter
without showing he's stoned off his ass.....

I mean who can forget:

"America is a nation that can be defined in a single word
Asufutimaehaehfutbw".
Joe Biden

And this isn't a one time slip.. he regularly does this, and let's not
forget his regular claims of doing something that are total lies.

In article <jkap7jpfhbu03ip99g5k5v43ec175vf0k0@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 09:24:46 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:667b36c5$0$951$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
> >> In article <v5fccl$1nmg1$9@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
> >> says...
> >>>
> >>> Dave Wainwright <nospam@comcast.net> wrote in
> >>> news:v5f184$8t8t$1@news.mixmin.net:
> >>>
> >>> > On 6/25/2024 7:43 AM, Baxter wrote:
> >>> >> "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
> >>> >> news:v5d9p0$1bin0$1@dont-email.me:
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> "Skeeter" wrote in message
> >>> >>> news:6677425c$0$951$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> In article <bgce7j1k1nvd2s81qb4knk16mtps8al75v@4ax.com>,
> >>> >>>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>>>> Trump met recently with some corporate execs and since then has
> >>> >>>>> moderated his tone on
> >>> >>>>> immigration. Business wants the cheap labor.
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> No he hasn't. Where do you get your info?
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> The garbage bin, essentially.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >> =============
> >>> >> â??But what I want to do, and what I will do is you graduate from a
> >>> >> college I think you should get, automatically as part of your
> >>> >> diploma, a green card to be able to stay in this country, and that
> >>> >> includes junior colleges too. Anybody graduates from a college, you
> >>> >> go in there for two years or four years, if you graduate, or you get
> >>> >> a doctorate degree from a college, you should be able to stay in this
> >>> >> country.â??
> >>> >>
> >>> >> For Trump â?? who has demonized undocumented immigrants and railed
> >>> >> against the record levels of migration at the Southern border as a
> >>> >> cornerstone of his 2024 presidential campaign â?? it was a
> >>> >> significant change. Trump has called for mass deportations on the
> >>> >> first day of his administration, has said that migrants are
> >>> >> â??poisoning the bloodâ?? of this country, and has highlighted
> >>> >> high-profile crimes committed by migrants in the U.S. illegally.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> https://www.politico.com/news/2024/06/22/trump-policy-flip-flop-001645
> >>> >> 38
> >>> >
> >>> > Facts change minds.
> >>> >
> >>> > That's why intelligent and successful people have meetings, Baxter.
> >>> > So they can be presented facts and make the best decisions.
> >>>
> >>> You got any proof he actually changed his mind? He does a lot of
> >>> pandering.
> >>>
> >>> >
> >>> > Which would you rather have? A motivated educated self-supporting
> >>> > smart immigrant, or some fat immigrant welfare slut, with nine kids
> >>> > and one in the oven, who is too stupid to know when to close her legs?
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> Or maybe she has nine kids because lack of contraceptives. But from what
> >>> I've seen, there is no "fat immigrant welfare slut, with nine kids",
> >>> rather one or two kids at most, and many work their butts off in the
> >>> orchards and fields and don't get welfare.
> >>
> >> What planet do you live on?
> >
> >He lives on the planet DeLusion were anything you can think becomes the
> >truth in your imagination though reality remains unchanged. However for
> >DeLusionians reality is considered an outrageous and overrated notion.
> >
>
> I find it fascinating that the high birth rates of the lower classes upsets white people
> so much. As far as immigrants, you guys just make it up as you go along. They're here
> for the same reasons your ancestors came here; opportunity.
>
Some yes. Some no.

"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
news:667d6eba$0$970$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
> In article <jkap7jpfhbu03ip99g5k5v43ec175vf0k0@4ax.com>,
> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 09:24:46 -0400, "Scout"
>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>> >news:667b36c5$0$951$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>> >> In article <v5fccl$1nmg1$9@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
>> >> says...
>> >>>
>> >>> Dave Wainwright <nospam@comcast.net> wrote in
>> >>> news:v5f184$8t8t$1@news.mixmin.net:
>> >>>
>> >>> > On 6/25/2024 7:43 AM, Baxter wrote:
>> >>> >> "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
>> >>> >> news:v5d9p0$1bin0$1@dont-email.me:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> "Skeeter" wrote in message
>> >>> >>> news:6677425c$0$951$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>> In article <bgce7j1k1nvd2s81qb4knk16mtps8al75v@4ax.com>,
>> >>> >>>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>>>> Trump met recently with some corporate execs and since then has
>> >>> >>>>> moderated his tone on
>> >>> >>>>> immigration. Business wants the cheap labor.
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>> No he hasn't. Where do you get your info?
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> The garbage bin, essentially.
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >> =============
>> >>> >> â??But what I want to do, and what I will do is you graduate from
>> >>> >> a
>> >>> >> college I think you should get, automatically as part of your
>> >>> >> diploma, a green card to be able to stay in this country, and that
>> >>> >> includes junior colleges too. Anybody graduates from a college,
>> >>> >> you
>> >>> >> go in there for two years or four years, if you graduate, or you
>> >>> >> get
>> >>> >> a doctorate degree from a college, you should be able to stay in
>> >>> >> this
>> >>> >> country.â??
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> For Trump â?? who has demonized undocumented immigrants and railed
>> >>> >> against the record levels of migration at the Southern border as a
>> >>> >> cornerstone of his 2024 presidential campaign â?? it was a
>> >>> >> significant change. Trump has called for mass deportations on the
>> >>> >> first day of his administration, has said that migrants are
>> >>> >> â??poisoning the bloodâ?? of this country, and has highlighted
>> >>> >> high-profile crimes committed by migrants in the U.S. illegally.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> https://www.politico.com/news/2024/06/22/trump-policy-flip-flop-001645
>> >>> >> 38
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Facts change minds.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > That's why intelligent and successful people have meetings, Baxter.
>> >>> > So they can be presented facts and make the best decisions.
>> >>>
>> >>> You got any proof he actually changed his mind? He does a lot of
>> >>> pandering.
>> >>>
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Which would you rather have? A motivated educated self-supporting
>> >>> > smart immigrant, or some fat immigrant welfare slut, with nine kids
>> >>> > and one in the oven, who is too stupid to know when to close her
>> >>> > legs?
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> Or maybe she has nine kids because lack of contraceptives. But from
>> >>> what
>> >>> I've seen, there is no "fat immigrant welfare slut, with nine kids",
>> >>> rather one or two kids at most, and many work their butts off in the
>> >>> orchards and fields and don't get welfare.
>> >>
>> >> What planet do you live on?
>> >
>> >He lives on the planet DeLusion were anything you can think becomes the
>> >truth in your imagination though reality remains unchanged. However for
>> >DeLusionians reality is considered an outrageous and overrated notion.
>> >
>>
>> I find it fascinating that the high birth rates of the lower classes
>> upsets white people
>> so much.

I have no care who is having the children. What upsets me is how the welfare
system is set up and being used by poor people as a source of income that
increases based on how many children they have, Thereby financially
encouraging the poor to have more children and further to remain poor, as
you have to take a massive cut in income attempting to get out of the
welfare trap. Worse if you have children involved.

If you think that applies more to minorities than whites, then who is it
that set up the system?

>> As far as immigrants, you guys just make it up as you go along. They're
>> here
>> for the same reasons your ancestors came here; opportunity.

Yes, but the difference is my parents entered legally though Ellis island..
they didn't illegally enter the country.

The difference being one way was legal, the other is not. If they can not
respect our laws enough to enter legally, how can we expect them to respect
our laws once here?

Answer.. they won't. They don't.

>>
> Some yes. Some no.
>
>

On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 12:17:17 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
wrote:

>Yes, but the difference is my parents entered legally though Ellis island..
>they didn't illegally enter the country.

What were the entry requirements at that time? What was US immigration policy?

Swill

In article <gi3s7jtmnah7oruun7neac230p2skjhknp@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>
> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 12:17:17 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> wrote:
>
> >Yes, but the difference is my parents entered legally though Ellis island..
> >they didn't illegally enter the country.
>
> What were the entry requirements at that time? What was US immigration policy?
>
Who cares? The law is the law.

"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
news:667e162d$0$3068679$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
> In article <gi3s7jtmnah7oruun7neac230p2skjhknp@4ax.com>,
> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 12:17:17 -0400, "Scout"
>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Yes, but the difference is my parents entered legally though Ellis
>> >island..
>> >they didn't illegally enter the country.
>>
>> What were the entry requirements at that time? What was US immigration
>> policy?
>>
> Who cares? The law is the law.

Yep and those ILLEGALLY crossing the border are breaking the law......

Now what should we do with criminals?

Reward them for engaging in crime... or punish them somehow?

On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:47:25 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 12:17:17 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Yes, but the difference is my parents entered legally though Ellis island..
>> >they didn't illegally enter the country.
>>
>> What were the entry requirements at that time? What was US immigration policy?
>>
>Who cares? The law is the law.
>

So you're afraid to answer the question?

Once again you prove how cowardly you are.

Swill
NP: Matchbox Twenty - Disease

In article <bs4u7j5dagsf0umbm62lt9qcl6jlkhqfvi@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>
> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:47:25 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >governor.swill@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 12:17:17 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Yes, but the difference is my parents entered legally though Ellis island..
> >> >they didn't illegally enter the country.
> >>
> >> What were the entry requirements at that time? What was US immigration policy?
> >>
> >Who cares? The law is the law.
> >
>
> So you're afraid to answer the question?

See? You puppets take something and twist it around. The law says enter
at the proper points of entry. It always has. Just follow the law. You
cross anywhere else you get sent back or arrested. Pretty simple.
>
> Once again you prove how cowardly you are.

How so? Explain.
>
> Swill
> NP: Matchbox Twenty - Disease

At least we agree on music.

Governor Swill wrote:
> What were the entry requirements at that time?

And your J Carlson nym, the same:

From: J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.immigration,alt.politics.nationalism.white,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: AP Lies by Ommission About Identity of Invaders Charged with
Rape, Murder of 12-Year-Old
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:35:52 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <v5f66o$1mps9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v54h6j$39cuk$1@dont-email.me> <v54hrs$38mfs$18@dont-email.me>
<moKcnZP3dbqUm-r7nZ2dnZfqnPcAAAAA@giganews.com>
<v58c4f$6squ$8@dont-email.me>
<v5df1n$1caue$1@dont-email.me> <v5edju$1hv3p$3@dont-email.me>
<tgrl7j14lbg6f9csput4jca09qqujgd9d5@4ax.com>
<v5erpf$1jkrf$20@dont-email.me>
<O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me;
posting-host="f3de9d0c1e618b255237332494133eec";
logging-data="1795977";
mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195k8uMNmZfnyDG9tQmsu21WqljX3bfQxM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PNoPW9d+9gKJj0fX+YCk+YFslQg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
Xref: news.eternal-september.org alt.politics.immigration:383549
alt.politics.nationalism.white:10913 talk.politics.misc:1295918
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:3024985

> No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people to
thrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently
> is an important step to getting there.

That constitutes a DEATH THREAT against a former President, Rudey:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/871
18 U.S. Code § 871 - Threats against President and successors to the
Presidency
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail
or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any
letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any
threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon
the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice
President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office
of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or
knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the
President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the
order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years,
or both.
(b)The terms “President-elect” and “Vice President-elect” as used in
this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful
candidates for the offices of President and Vice President,
respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections
held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in
accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2. The
phrase “other officer next in the order of succession to the office of
President” as used in this section shall mean the person next in the
order of succession to act as President in accordance with title 3,
United States Code, sections 19 and 20.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 740; June 1, 1955, ch. 115, § 1, 69
Stat. 80; Pub. L. 87–829, § 1, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 956; Pub. L.
97–297, § 2, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1318; Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

9-65.200 - Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency; Threats Against Former Presidents; and Certain Other Secret
Service Protectees
The Counterterrorism Section of the National Security Division has
supervisory authority over 18 U.S.C. §§ 871 and 879 cases. As great
caution must be taken in matters relating to the security of the persons
protected by 18 U.S.C. § 871, United States Attorneys are encouraged to
consult with the Counterterrorism Section (CTS) of the National Security
Division when they have doubts on the prosecutive merit of a case. For
the same reason, dismissal of complaints under 18 U.S.C. § 871, when the
defendant is in custody under the Mental Incompetency Statutes (18
U.S.C. §§ 4244, 4246), requires approval from CTS. In other cases,
United States Attorneys must consult prior to dismissing a count
involving, or entering into any sentence commitment or other case
settlement involving a § 871 charge.

https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2024/01/phoenix-man-arrested-making-online-death-threats-against-president-and

PHOENIX –David Michael Hanson, 41, of Phoenix, was arrested on Wednesday
for making online threats against the President and Vice-President.
Hanson was charged by Federal criminal complaint on Tuesday with five
counts of Threats Against the President and Successors to the Presidency
and five counts of Interstate Communication of Threats.

The complaint alleges that in November and December of 2023, while
living in Arizona, Hanson used a social media platform to post threats
to murder the President and Vice President of the United States. On
November 19, 2023, Hanson posted online a series of threatening
statements including one that stated, “#joeAndKamala I’m asking you to
resign on Monday your alternative is death brutally murdered.” After the
U.S. Secret Service spoke to Hanson and warned him that it was a Federal
crime to post such threats, on December 23, 2023, Hanson posted another
series of similar threats aimed at the President and Vice-President.

Each count of Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, a fine of
up to $250,000, and up to three years of supervised release. Each count
of Interstate Communication of Threats carries a maximum sentence of
five years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and up to three years of
supervised release.

A complaint is simply a method by which a person is charged with
criminal activity and raises no inference of guilt. An individual is
presumed innocent until evidence is presented to a jury that establishes
guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The United States Secret Service is conducting the investigation in this
case. The United States Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, is
handling the prosecution.

Those can be reported here:

https://tips.fbi.gov/home

https://www.justice.gov/action-center/report-crime-or-submit-complaint

https://www.secretservice.gov/contact

https://www.dhs.gov/see-something-say-something/reporting/california

Fellow citizens, won't you join in ending Rudey's terrorism here?

Governor Swill wrote:
> So you're afraid to answer the question?
>
> Once again you prove how cowardly you are.

And your J Carlson nym, the same:

From: J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.immigration,alt.politics.nationalism.white,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: AP Lies by Ommission About Identity of Invaders Charged with
Rape, Murder of 12-Year-Old
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:35:52 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <v5f66o$1mps9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v54h6j$39cuk$1@dont-email.me> <v54hrs$38mfs$18@dont-email.me>
<moKcnZP3dbqUm-r7nZ2dnZfqnPcAAAAA@giganews.com>
<v58c4f$6squ$8@dont-email.me>
<v5df1n$1caue$1@dont-email.me> <v5edju$1hv3p$3@dont-email.me>
<tgrl7j14lbg6f9csput4jca09qqujgd9d5@4ax.com>
<v5erpf$1jkrf$20@dont-email.me>
<O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me;
posting-host="f3de9d0c1e618b255237332494133eec";
logging-data="1795977";
mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195k8uMNmZfnyDG9tQmsu21WqljX3bfQxM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PNoPW9d+9gKJj0fX+YCk+YFslQg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
Xref: news.eternal-september.org alt.politics.immigration:383549
alt.politics.nationalism.white:10913 talk.politics.misc:1295918
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:3024985

> No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people to
thrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently
> is an important step to getting there.

That constitutes a DEATH THREAT against a former President, Rudey:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/871
18 U.S. Code § 871 - Threats against President and successors to the
Presidency
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail
or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any
letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any
threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon
the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice
President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office
of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or
knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the
President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the
order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years,
or both.
(b)The terms “President-elect” and “Vice President-elect” as used in
this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful
candidates for the offices of President and Vice President,
respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections
held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in
accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2. The
phrase “other officer next in the order of succession to the office of
President” as used in this section shall mean the person next in the
order of succession to act as President in accordance with title 3,
United States Code, sections 19 and 20.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 740; June 1, 1955, ch. 115, § 1, 69
Stat. 80; Pub. L. 87–829, § 1, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 956; Pub. L.
97–297, § 2, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1318; Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

9-65.200 - Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency; Threats Against Former Presidents; and Certain Other Secret
Service Protectees
The Counterterrorism Section of the National Security Division has
supervisory authority over 18 U.S.C. §§ 871 and 879 cases. As great
caution must be taken in matters relating to the security of the persons
protected by 18 U.S.C. § 871, United States Attorneys are encouraged to
consult with the Counterterrorism Section (CTS) of the National Security
Division when they have doubts on the prosecutive merit of a case. For
the same reason, dismissal of complaints under 18 U.S.C. § 871, when the
defendant is in custody under the Mental Incompetency Statutes (18
U.S.C. §§ 4244, 4246), requires approval from CTS. In other cases,
United States Attorneys must consult prior to dismissing a count
involving, or entering into any sentence commitment or other case
settlement involving a § 871 charge.

https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2024/01/phoenix-man-arrested-making-online-death-threats-against-president-and

PHOENIX –David Michael Hanson, 41, of Phoenix, was arrested on Wednesday
for making online threats against the President and Vice-President.
Hanson was charged by Federal criminal complaint on Tuesday with five
counts of Threats Against the President and Successors to the Presidency
and five counts of Interstate Communication of Threats.

The complaint alleges that in November and December of 2023, while
living in Arizona, Hanson used a social media platform to post threats
to murder the President and Vice President of the United States. On
November 19, 2023, Hanson posted online a series of threatening
statements including one that stated, “#joeAndKamala I’m asking you to
resign on Monday your alternative is death brutally murdered.” After the
U.S. Secret Service spoke to Hanson and warned him that it was a Federal
crime to post such threats, on December 23, 2023, Hanson posted another
series of similar threats aimed at the President and Vice-President.

Each count of Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, a fine of
up to $250,000, and up to three years of supervised release. Each count
of Interstate Communication of Threats carries a maximum sentence of
five years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and up to three years of
supervised release.

A complaint is simply a method by which a person is charged with
criminal activity and raises no inference of guilt. An individual is
presumed innocent until evidence is presented to a jury that establishes
guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The United States Secret Service is conducting the investigation in this
case. The United States Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, is
handling the prosecution.

Those can be reported here:

https://tips.fbi.gov/home

https://www.justice.gov/action-center/report-crime-or-submit-complaint

https://www.secretservice.gov/contact

https://www.dhs.gov/see-something-say-something/reporting/california

Fellow citizens, won't you join in ending Rudey's terrorism here?

On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 14:02:00 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:

>In article <bs4u7j5dagsf0umbm62lt9qcl6jlkhqfvi@4ax.com>,
>governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:47:25 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> >governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 12:17:17 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Yes, but the difference is my parents entered legally though Ellis island..
>> >> >they didn't illegally enter the country.
>> >>
>> >> What were the entry requirements at that time? What was US immigration policy?
>> >>
>> >Who cares? The law is the law.
>> >
>>
>> So you're afraid to answer the question?
>
>See? You puppets take something and twist it around. The law says enter
>at the proper points of entry. It always has. Just follow the law. You
>cross anywhere else you get sent back or arrested. Pretty simple.

It should still be that simple. Show up, don't be sick, be willing to work hard and good
luck!

It was when Anglos became terrified of non Anglo immigration and started setting quotas
that immigration became a problem.

America exploded into the top economic power on earth surpassing even the mighty British
Empire by the 1890s, less than three decades after the Civil War. That wealth and
production capacity was built by immigrants on the backs of immigrant labor. The
Union-Pacific was built by immigrant labor and recently freed slaves.

Folks complain about immigrant crime. First, it's a far lower crime rate than the native
born. Second, if we'd let them in legally and ID them, prints, DNA, issue a photo ID,
crime would be easier to control and they'd be put on the grid.

It astonishes me that as we dig into a century where we'll have serious competition from
India and China and their massive populations, we could perhaps lose our dominance, maybe
even Pax Americana. Yet there are Americans who want to prevent immigration from the
global south just when we need it most!
>> Once again you prove how cowardly you are.
>
>How so? Explain.

By dodging a question. Attacking the messenger instead of addressing the issue.

>> Swill
>> NP: Matchbox Twenty - Disease
>
>At least we agree on music.

That's one of the reasons I like to note what I'm listening to when posting. Music can
bring people together.

Swill
NP: Queen - We Are The Champions

"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
news:667f16b8$0$3620713$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
> In article <bs4u7j5dagsf0umbm62lt9qcl6jlkhqfvi@4ax.com>,
> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:47:25 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 12:17:17 -0400, "Scout"
>> >> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Yes, but the difference is my parents entered legally though Ellis
>> >> >island..
>> >> >they didn't illegally enter the country.
>> >>
>> >> What were the entry requirements at that time? What was US
>> >> immigration policy?
>> >>
>> >Who cares? The law is the law.
>> >
>>
>> So you're afraid to answer the question?

No, I just filter you out due to your conduct.

Like the above. My ancestors obeyed the law and entered legally... You
support illegal entry.. and you can't or refuse to see the difference.

So let me spell it out for you. One is legal, the other is criminal.... so
we want immigrants that will obey the law or immigrants that violate our
laws?

It's a very simple and basic concept.

>
> See? You puppets take something and twist it around. The law says enter
> at the proper points of entry. It always has. Just follow the law. You
> cross anywhere else you get sent back or arrested. Pretty simple.

And yet, they can't seem to grasp the concept that some ways are legal, and
other ways are illegal... it's like there is no crime.

I mean if I decided to murder him.. would he accept my right to do so just
because it might benefit me?

>> Once again you prove how cowardly you are.
>
> How so? Explain.

He apparently thinks no one should be filtered, and have a moral obligation
to answer anyone. I notice he hasn't answered your questions so by his own
standards would that make him a coward?

In article <m84v7j1r48hpia65oeauvfci13deqmf991@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>
> On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 14:02:00 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <bs4u7j5dagsf0umbm62lt9qcl6jlkhqfvi@4ax.com>,
> >governor.swill@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:47:25 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >> >governor.swill@gmail.com says...
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 12:17:17 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >Yes, but the difference is my parents entered legally though Ellis island..
> >> >> >they didn't illegally enter the country.
> >> >>
> >> >> What were the entry requirements at that time? What was US immigration policy?
> >> >>
> >> >Who cares? The law is the law.
> >> >
> >>
> >> So you're afraid to answer the question?
> >
> >See? You puppets take something and twist it around. The law says enter
> >at the proper points of entry. It always has. Just follow the law. You
> >cross anywhere else you get sent back or arrested. Pretty simple.
>
> It should still be that simple. Show up, don't be sick, be willing to work hard and good
> luck!

and enter by the legal means.
>
> It was when Anglos became terrified of non Anglo immigration and started setting quotas
> that immigration became a problem.
>
> America exploded into the top economic power on earth surpassing even the mighty British
> Empire by the 1890s, less than three decades after the Civil War. That wealth and
> production capacity was built by immigrants on the backs of immigrant labor. The
> Union-Pacific was built by immigrant labor and recently freed slaves.
>
> Folks complain about immigrant crime. First, it's a far lower crime rate than the native
> born. Second, if we'd let them in legally and ID them, prints, DNA, issue a photo ID,
> crime would be easier to control and they'd be put on the grid.
>
> It astonishes me that as we dig into a century where we'll have serious competition from
> India and China and their massive populations, we could perhaps lose our dominance, maybe
> even Pax Americana. Yet there are Americans who want to prevent immigration from the
> global south just when we need it most!
>
> >> Once again you prove how cowardly you are.
> >
> >How so? Explain.
>
> By dodging a question. Attacking the messenger instead of addressing the issue.
>
> >> Swill
> >> NP: Matchbox Twenty - Disease
> >
> >At least we agree on music.
>
> That's one of the reasons I like to note what I'm listening to when posting. Music can
> bring people together.
>
> Swill
> NP: Queen - We Are The Champions

On Sat, 29 Jun 2024 07:24:21 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
wrote:

>
>
>"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>news:667f16b8$0$3620713$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>> In article <bs4u7j5dagsf0umbm62lt9qcl6jlkhqfvi@4ax.com>,
>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>>
>>> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:47:25 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 12:17:17 -0400, "Scout"
>>> >> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> >Yes, but the difference is my parents entered legally though Ellis
>>> >> >island..
>>> >> >they didn't illegally enter the country.
>>> >>
>>> >> What were the entry requirements at that time? What was US
>>> >> immigration policy?
>>> >>
>>> >Who cares? The law is the law.
>>> >
>>>
>>> So you're afraid to answer the question?
>
>No, I just filter you out due to your conduct.

You filter me out because I repeatedly correct you. For example, in your recent post
about gas prices, you faked the prices you gave out. I corrected them in a following
post. You don't get to see where I catch you out in your distortions and
*coughmistakescough*, but everybody else does because you can only filter me from YOUR
feed.

>Like the above. My ancestors obeyed the law and entered legally... You
>support illegal entry..

No, I don't, and if you didn't have me filtered, you would know that.

>and you can't or refuse to see the difference.

Irrelevant to my views.

>So let me spell it out for you. One is legal, the other is criminal.... so
>we want immigrants that will obey the law or immigrants that violate our
>laws?
>
>It's a very simple and basic concept.

And my point is that we should return to the immigration policies of the post Civil War
era. The vast majority of illegal immigration today is because white Anglos fear
"contamination" of their purity by brown, non English speaking non Protestants. When the
massive influx of immigrants, such as our forbears, were white, Christian and came from
northern and western Europe, there wasn't a problem.

But then a wave of Catholics and Orthodox eastern Europe started flowing in along with
"olive" skinned Mediterraneans and the white Fundies got the heebie jeebies.

Current immigration policy is ethnic and religious based and is a mistake.

>> See? You puppets take something and twist it around. The law says enter
>> at the proper points of entry. It always has. Just follow the law. You
>> cross anywhere else you get sent back or arrested. Pretty simple.
>
>And yet, they can't seem to grasp the concept that some ways are legal, and
>other ways are illegal... it's like there is no crime.
>
>I mean if I decided to murder him.. would he accept my right to do so just
>because it might benefit me?

Murder who?

>>> Once again you prove how cowardly you are.
>>
>> How so? Explain.
>
>He apparently thinks no one should be filtered, and have a moral obligation
>to answer anyone. I notice he hasn't answered your questions so by his own
>standards would that make him a coward?

I answer plenty. In fact, Skeeter and I have entered into some dialog and gotten away
from the insult tossing and knee jerk reactions we have up to now been engaging in.

See, that's the difference. I'm up for intelligent discourse, but if you start tossing
out talking points and slogans without consideration for the actual issues, you can go
fuck yourself.

There are no simple answers, only simple minds.

Swill
NP: Beatles - Savoy Truffle