On 6/27/2024 10:14 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:

>
>
> "Chris Mueller" <chris.the.guy@usatoday.com> wrote in message
> news:v4f385$2asea$4@dont-email.me...
>> On 6/13/2024 7:44 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
>> molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>
>>> In article <v4cc7t$1mncl$10@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 6/12/2024 4:16 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>> On 6/11/24 20:51, J Carlson wrote:
>>>>>> Trump called dead American soldiers "losers" and "suckers." Trump is filth.
>>>>>
>>>>> Prove it.
>>>>
>>>> John Kelly proved it.
>>>
>>> So no proof from you again.
>>
>> "John Kelly confirms Trump privately disparaged U.S. service members and
>> veterans"
>> https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/john-kelly-confirms-trump-privately-disparaged-us-service-members-vete-rcna118543
>>
>> Trump called dead soldiers "suckers" and "losers." This is not in rational dispute.
>
> Whenever Rudy says this

you know it's true.

[Default] "Cunt Flaps" Canoza typed:

======================================
Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
Pathetic vandalism of follow ups in an impotent attempt
to stop being bitch-slapped into next week
repaired and restored.
======================================

>On 6/27/2024 10:14 AM, Rudy's superior Scout typed

>>> Trump called dead soldiers "suckers" and "losers." This is not in rational
>>> dispute.
>>
>>Whenever Rudy says this you know that it's perfectly rational to dispute it.
>>

>
>you know

Everyone knows it's perfectly rational to dispute it, "Cunt Flaps."

Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> [Default] "Cunt Flaps" Canoza typed:
>
> ======================================
> Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
> Pathetic vandalism of follow ups in an impotent attempt
> to stop being bitch-slapped into next week
> repaired and restored.
> ======================================
>
>
>> On 6/27/2024 10:14 AM, Rudy's superior Scout typed
>
>>>> Trump called dead soldiers "suckers" and "losers." This is not in rational
>>>> dispute.
>>>
>>> Whenever Rudy says this you know that it's perfectly rational to dispute it.
>>>
>
>>
>> you know
>
> Everyone knows it's perfectly rational to dispute it, "Cunt Flaps."
>
and then , *UP**YOUR**BUM*

% wrote:

> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> > [Default] "Cunt Flaps" Canoza typed:
> >
> > ======================================
> > Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
> > Pathetic vandalism of follow ups in an impotent attempt
> > to stop being bitch-slapped into next week
> > repaired and restored.
> > ======================================
> >
> >
> > > On 6/27/2024 10:14 AM, Rudy's superior Scout typed
> >
> > > > > Trump called dead soldiers "suckers" and "losers." This is
> > > > > not in rational dispute.
> > > >
> > > > Whenever Rudy says this you know that it's perfectly rational
> > > > to dispute it.
> > > >
> >
> > >
> > > you know
> >
> > Everyone knows it's perfectly rational to dispute it, "Cunt Flaps."
> >
> and then , *UP**YOUR**BUM*

I suck dick.

In article <fnednUa-AvCAbOP7nZ2dnZfqnPoAAAAA@giganews.com>, pursent100
@gmail.com says...
>
> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> > [Default] "Cunt Flaps" Canoza typed:
> >
> > ======================================
> > Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
> > Pathetic vandalism of follow ups in an impotent attempt
> > to stop being bitch-slapped into next week
> > repaired and restored.
> > ======================================
> >
> >
> >> On 6/27/2024 10:14 AM, Rudy's superior Scout typed
> >
> >>>> Trump called dead soldiers "suckers" and "losers." This is not in rational
> >>>> dispute.
> >>>
> >>> Whenever Rudy says this you know that it's perfectly rational to dispute it.
> >>>
> >
> >>
> >> you know
> >
> > Everyone knows it's perfectly rational to dispute it, "Cunt Flaps."
> >
> and then , *UP**YOUR**BUM*

You tell em buddy.

On 6/28/2024 10:21 AM, % wrote:
> KKKlaun "Cunt Flaps" SchittenPantzen, impotent and harmless Nazi fake Jew and cocksucking dwarf, lied:
>> [Default] Rudy Canoza, the intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior to KKKlaun SchittenPantzen, impotent and harmless Nazi fake Jew, *wrote*:

Yep! That certainly is the default, all right! *HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA*!

>>
>>
>>> On 6/27/2024 10:14 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:

>>
>>>>> Trump called dead soldiers "suckers" and "losers." This is not in rational
>>>>> dispute.
>>>>
>>>> Whenever Rudy says this
>>>
>>> you know it's not in rational dispute. That's right, scooter.
>>
>> Everyone knows it's perfectly rational to dispute it

No, KKKlaun. It may be disputed, but only by irrational brain-damaged fuckheads
like you.

>>
> and then , *UP**YOUR**BUM*

In article <v5n7av$3gkp6$1@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
>
> On 6/28/2024 10:21 AM, % wrote:
> > KKKlaun "Cunt Flaps" SchittenPantzen, impotent and harmless Nazi fake Jew and cocksucking dwarf, lied:
> >> [Default] Rudy Canoza, the intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior to KKKlaun SchittenPantzen, impotent and harmless Nazi fake Jew, *wrote*:
>
> Yep! That certainly is the default, all right! *HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA*!
>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 6/27/2024 10:14 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>
> >>
> >>>>> Trump called dead soldiers "suckers" and "losers." This is not in rational
> >>>>> dispute.
> >>>>
> >>>> Whenever Rudy says this
> >>>
> >>> you know it's not in rational dispute. That's right, scooter.
> >>
> >> Everyone knows it's perfectly rational to dispute it
>
> No, KKKlaun. It may be disputed, but only by irrational brain-damaged fuckheads
> like you.
>
>
> >>
> > and then , *UP**YOUR**BUM*

Rudy evades and runs again.

[Default] J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com> typed:

>On 6/28/2024 10:21 AM, % wrote:

>No, [..]

Address me directly, coward. You know the rules.

LOL

If you wish to address me, scooter, you will do it in direct reply to
my posts; no piggybacking.
-Rudy, thinking he makes the rules
-Message-ID: <ZZacK.8$tTq1.2@fx34.iad>

Videos not allowed.
Imaginärer Gruppenleiter Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
Message-ID: <atw5M.62534$qjm2.26180@fx09.iad>

This video is allowed under the rules of Usenet, because it is
*supporting* a point, not making it.
-"Cunt Flaps" Canoza
Message-ID: <pygXN.16915$nQv.7031@fx10.iad>

[Default] Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> typed:

>In article <v5n7av$3gkp6$1@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
>>
>> On 6/28/2024 10:21 AM, % wrote:
>> > KKKlaun "Cunt Flaps" SchittenPantzen, impotent and harmless Nazi fake Jew and cocksucking dwarf, lied:
>> >> [Default] Rudy Canoza, the intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior to KKKlaun SchittenPantzen, impotent and harmless Nazi fake Jew, *wrote*:
>>
>> Yep! That certainly is the default, all right! *HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA*!
>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> On 6/27/2024 10:14 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>
>> >>
>> >>>>> Trump called dead soldiers "suckers" and "losers." This is not in rational
>> >>>>> dispute.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Whenever Rudy says this
>> >>>
>> >>> you know it's not in rational dispute. That's right, scooter.
>> >>
>> >> Everyone knows it's perfectly rational to dispute it
>>
>> No, KKKlaun. It may be disputed, but only by irrational brain-damaged fuckheads
>> like you.
>>
>>
>> >>
>> > and then , *UP**YOUR**BUM*
>
>Rudy evades and runs again.

I love how he's too afraid of me to respond directly to my post.

ROFLMAO!!!!

J Carlson wrote:
> No, KKKlaun. It may be disputed, but only by

And your J Carlson nym, the same:

From: J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.immigration,alt.politics.nationalism.white,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: AP Lies by Ommission About Identity of Invaders Charged with
Rape, Murder of 12-Year-Old
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:35:52 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <v5f66o$1mps9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v54h6j$39cuk$1@dont-email.me> <v54hrs$38mfs$18@dont-email.me>
<moKcnZP3dbqUm-r7nZ2dnZfqnPcAAAAA@giganews.com>
<v58c4f$6squ$8@dont-email.me>
<v5df1n$1caue$1@dont-email.me> <v5edju$1hv3p$3@dont-email.me>
<tgrl7j14lbg6f9csput4jca09qqujgd9d5@4ax.com>
<v5erpf$1jkrf$20@dont-email.me>
<O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me;
posting-host="f3de9d0c1e618b255237332494133eec";
logging-data="1795977";
mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195k8uMNmZfnyDG9tQmsu21WqljX3bfQxM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PNoPW9d+9gKJj0fX+YCk+YFslQg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
Xref: news.eternal-september.org alt.politics.immigration:383549
alt.politics.nationalism.white:10913 talk.politics.misc:1295918
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:3024985

> No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people to
thrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently
> is an important step to getting there.

That constitutes a DEATH THREAT against a former President, Rudey:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/871
18 U.S. Code § 871 - Threats against President and successors to the
Presidency
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail
or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any
letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any
threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon
the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice
President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office
of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or
knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the
President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the
order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years,
or both.
(b)The terms “President-elect” and “Vice President-elect” as used in
this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful
candidates for the offices of President and Vice President,
respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections
held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in
accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2. The
phrase “other officer next in the order of succession to the office of
President” as used in this section shall mean the person next in the
order of succession to act as President in accordance with title 3,
United States Code, sections 19 and 20.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 740; June 1, 1955, ch. 115, § 1, 69
Stat. 80; Pub. L. 87–829, § 1, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 956; Pub. L.
97–297, § 2, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1318; Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

9-65.200 - Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency; Threats Against Former Presidents; and Certain Other Secret
Service Protectees
The Counterterrorism Section of the National Security Division has
supervisory authority over 18 U.S.C. §§ 871 and 879 cases. As great
caution must be taken in matters relating to the security of the persons
protected by 18 U.S.C. § 871, United States Attorneys are encouraged to
consult with the Counterterrorism Section (CTS) of the National Security
Division when they have doubts on the prosecutive merit of a case. For
the same reason, dismissal of complaints under 18 U.S.C. § 871, when the
defendant is in custody under the Mental Incompetency Statutes (18
U.S.C. §§ 4244, 4246), requires approval from CTS. In other cases,
United States Attorneys must consult prior to dismissing a count
involving, or entering into any sentence commitment or other case
settlement involving a § 871 charge.

https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2024/01/phoenix-man-arrested-making-online-death-threats-against-president-and

PHOENIX –David Michael Hanson, 41, of Phoenix, was arrested on Wednesday
for making online threats against the President and Vice-President.
Hanson was charged by Federal criminal complaint on Tuesday with five
counts of Threats Against the President and Successors to the Presidency
and five counts of Interstate Communication of Threats.

The complaint alleges that in November and December of 2023, while
living in Arizona, Hanson used a social media platform to post threats
to murder the President and Vice President of the United States. On
November 19, 2023, Hanson posted online a series of threatening
statements including one that stated, “#joeAndKamala I’m asking you to
resign on Monday your alternative is death brutally murdered.” After the
U.S. Secret Service spoke to Hanson and warned him that it was a Federal
crime to post such threats, on December 23, 2023, Hanson posted another
series of similar threats aimed at the President and Vice-President.

Each count of Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, a fine of
up to $250,000, and up to three years of supervised release. Each count
of Interstate Communication of Threats carries a maximum sentence of
five years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and up to three years of
supervised release.

A complaint is simply a method by which a person is charged with
criminal activity and raises no inference of guilt. An individual is
presumed innocent until evidence is presented to a jury that establishes
guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The United States Secret Service is conducting the investigation in this
case. The United States Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, is
handling the prosecution.

Those can be reported here:

https://tips.fbi.gov/home

https://www.justice.gov/action-center/report-crime-or-submit-complaint

https://www.secretservice.gov/contact

https://www.dhs.gov/see-something-say-something/reporting/california

Fellow citizens, won't you join in ending Rudey's terrorism here?

J Carlson wrote:
> you know it's true.

And your J Carlson nym death threats on Trump, the same?

From: J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.immigration,alt.politics.nationalism.white,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: AP Lies by Ommission About Identity of Invaders Charged with
Rape, Murder of 12-Year-Old
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:35:52 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <v5f66o$1mps9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v54h6j$39cuk$1@dont-email.me> <v54hrs$38mfs$18@dont-email.me>
<moKcnZP3dbqUm-r7nZ2dnZfqnPcAAAAA@giganews.com>
<v58c4f$6squ$8@dont-email.me>
<v5df1n$1caue$1@dont-email.me> <v5edju$1hv3p$3@dont-email.me>
<tgrl7j14lbg6f9csput4jca09qqujgd9d5@4ax.com>
<v5erpf$1jkrf$20@dont-email.me>
<O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me;
posting-host="f3de9d0c1e618b255237332494133eec";
logging-data="1795977";
mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195k8uMNmZfnyDG9tQmsu21WqljX3bfQxM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PNoPW9d+9gKJj0fX+YCk+YFslQg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
Xref: news.eternal-september.org alt.politics.immigration:383549
alt.politics.nationalism.white:10913 talk.politics.misc:1295918
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:3024985

> No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people to
thrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently
> is an important step to getting there.

That constitutes a DEATH THREAT against a former President, Rudey:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/871
18 U.S. Code § 871 - Threats against President and successors to the
Presidency
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail
or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any
letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any
threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon
the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice
President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office
of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or
knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the
President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the
order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years,
or both.
(b)The terms “President-elect” and “Vice President-elect” as used in
this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful
candidates for the offices of President and Vice President,
respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections
held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in
accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2. The
phrase “other officer next in the order of succession to the office of
President” as used in this section shall mean the person next in the
order of succession to act as President in accordance with title 3,
United States Code, sections 19 and 20.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 740; June 1, 1955, ch. 115, § 1, 69
Stat. 80; Pub. L. 87–829, § 1, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 956; Pub. L.
97–297, § 2, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1318; Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

9-65.200 - Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency; Threats Against Former Presidents; and Certain Other Secret
Service Protectees
The Counterterrorism Section of the National Security Division has
supervisory authority over 18 U.S.C. §§ 871 and 879 cases. As great
caution must be taken in matters relating to the security of the persons
protected by 18 U.S.C. § 871, United States Attorneys are encouraged to
consult with the Counterterrorism Section (CTS) of the National Security
Division when they have doubts on the prosecutive merit of a case. For
the same reason, dismissal of complaints under 18 U.S.C. § 871, when the
defendant is in custody under the Mental Incompetency Statutes (18
U.S.C. §§ 4244, 4246), requires approval from CTS. In other cases,
United States Attorneys must consult prior to dismissing a count
involving, or entering into any sentence commitment or other case
settlement involving a § 871 charge.

https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2024/01/phoenix-man-arrested-making-online-death-threats-against-president-and

PHOENIX –David Michael Hanson, 41, of Phoenix, was arrested on Wednesday
for making online threats against the President and Vice-President.
Hanson was charged by Federal criminal complaint on Tuesday with five
counts of Threats Against the President and Successors to the Presidency
and five counts of Interstate Communication of Threats.

The complaint alleges that in November and December of 2023, while
living in Arizona, Hanson used a social media platform to post threats
to murder the President and Vice President of the United States. On
November 19, 2023, Hanson posted online a series of threatening
statements including one that stated, “#joeAndKamala I’m asking you to
resign on Monday your alternative is death brutally murdered.” After the
U.S. Secret Service spoke to Hanson and warned him that it was a Federal
crime to post such threats, on December 23, 2023, Hanson posted another
series of similar threats aimed at the President and Vice-President.

Each count of Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, a fine of
up to $250,000, and up to three years of supervised release. Each count
of Interstate Communication of Threats carries a maximum sentence of
five years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and up to three years of
supervised release.

A complaint is simply a method by which a person is charged with
criminal activity and raises no inference of guilt. An individual is
presumed innocent until evidence is presented to a jury that establishes
guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The United States Secret Service is conducting the investigation in this
case. The United States Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, is
handling the prosecution.

Those can be reported here:

https://tips.fbi.gov/home

https://www.justice.gov/action-center/report-crime-or-submit-complaint

https://www.secretservice.gov/contact

https://www.dhs.gov/see-something-say-something/reporting/california

Fellow citizens, won't you join in ending Rudey's terrorism here?

"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote
in message
news:n3du7jpc29j29pq4qt9c5to7hl1kjj91mu@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
> [Default] J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com> typed:
>
>>On 6/28/2024 10:21 AM, % wrote:
>
>>No, [..]
>
> Address me directly, coward. You know the rules.

You know as well as I do that his rules are only for OTHER people.. not for
him.

[Default] "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> typed:

>
>
>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote
>in message
>news:n3du7jpc29j29pq4qt9c5to7hl1kjj91mu@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>> [Default] J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com> typed:
>>
>>>On 6/28/2024 10:21 AM, % wrote:
>>
>>>No, [..]
>>
>> Address me directly, coward. You know the rules.
>
>You know as well as I do that his rules are only for OTHER people.. not for
>him.
>

But... but... it's the "Rules of Usenet!"

[chuckle]

On Sat, 29 Jun 2024 07:49:04 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
wrote:

>
>
>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote
>in message
>news:n3du7jpc29j29pq4qt9c5to7hl1kjj91mu@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>> [Default] J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com> typed:
>>
>>>On 6/28/2024 10:21 AM, % wrote:
>>
>>>No, [..]
>>
>> Address me directly, coward. You know the rules.
>
>You know as well as I do that his rules are only for OTHER people.. not for
>him.
>

Where is the Usenet rule that one must directly address a poster whose post one is
commenting on?

Right here will do--------------->

Swill
NP: Beatles - Dear Prudence

On 6/29/2024 4:49 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:

>
>
> KKKlaun "Cunt Flaps" SchittenPantzen, impotent and harmless Nazi fake Jew and cocksucking dwarf, lied:

>> [Default]  Rudy Canoza, the intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior to KKKlaun SchittenPantzen, impotent and harmless Nazi fake Jew, *wrote*:

Yep! That certainly is the default, all right! *HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA*!

>>
>>> On 6/28/2024 10:21 AM, % wrote:
>>
>>> No, [..]
>>
>> Address me directly, coward. You know the rules.
>
> You know as well as I do that his rules are only for OTHER people.. not for him.

Who was trying to dictate rules here, scooter? Why, it was your suck-off buddy
KKKlaun, wasn't it? Why do you never address me directly, scooter?

[Default] Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza typed:

>Who was trying to dictate rules here, scooter?

YOU were, "Cunt Flaps."

If you wish to address me, scooter, you will do it in direct reply to
my posts; no piggybacking.
-Rudy, thinking he makes the rules
-Message-ID: <ZZacK.8$tTq1.2@fx34.iad>

Videos not allowed.
Imaginärer Gruppenleiter Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
Message-ID: <atw5M.62534$qjm2.26180@fx09.iad>

This video is allowed under the rules of Usenet, because it is
*supporting* a point, not making it.
-"Cunt Flaps" Canoza
Message-ID: <pygXN.16915$nQv.7031@fx10.iad>

Of course everyone here just laughed at you.

[Default] Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> typed:

>On Sat, 29 Jun 2024 07:49:04 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote
>>in message
>>news:n3du7jpc29j29pq4qt9c5to7hl1kjj91mu@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>>> [Default] J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com> typed:
>>>
>>>>On 6/28/2024 10:21 AM, % wrote:
>>>
>>>>No, [..]
>>>
>>> Address me directly, coward. You know the rules.
>>
>>You know as well as I do that his rules are only for OTHER people.. not for
>>him.
>>
>
>Where is the Usenet rule that one must directly address a poster whose post one is
>commenting on?
>
>Right here will do--------------->

If you wish to address me, scooter, you will do it in direct reply to
my posts; no piggybacking.
-Rudy, thinking he makes the rules
-Message-ID: <ZZacK.8$tTq1.2@fx34.iad>

Videos not allowed.
Imaginärer Gruppenleiter Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
Message-ID: <atw5M.62534$qjm2.26180@fx09.iad>

This video is allowed under the rules of Usenet, because it is
*supporting* a point, not making it.
-"Cunt Flaps" Canoza
Message-ID: <pygXN.16915$nQv.7031@fx10.iad>

LOL

On 6/29/2024 11:04 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Jun 2024 07:49:04 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote
>> in message
>> news:n3du7jpc29j29pq4qt9c5to7hl1kjj91mu@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>>> [Default] J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com> typed:
>>>
>>>> On 6/28/2024 10:21 AM, % wrote:
>>>
>>>> No, [..]
>>>
>>> Address me directly, coward. You know the rules.
>>
>> You know as well as I do that his rules are only for OTHER people.. not for
>> him.
>>
>
> Where is the Usenet rule that one must directly address a poster whose post one is
> commenting on?
>
> Right here will do--------------->
>

Here's what's funny and truly ironic. KKKlaun, the impotent and harmless Nazi
fake Jew and cocksucking dwarf, is shrieking about my not having addressed him
directly, and then scooter (his toady) is chiming in. But scooter *never*
addresses me directly. He always and only piggybacks in order to respond to me.

[Default] Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza typed:

>Here's what's funny and truly ironic. KKKlaun, the impotent and harmless Nazi
>fake Jew and cocksucking dwarf, is shrieking about my not having addressed him
>directly,

No, what's funny, "Cunt Flaps," is that you're afraid to address me
directly despite your impotent made up "rule," which I keep rubbing
you nose in.

THAT is funny.

"Laugh laugh laugh laugh."
-Lee Harrison 1957-2012, RIP

If you wish to address me, scooter, you will do it in direct reply to
my posts; no piggybacking.
-Rudy, thinking he makes the rules
-Message-ID: <ZZacK.8$tTq1.2@fx34.iad>

Videos not allowed.
Imaginärer Gruppenleiter Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
Message-ID: <atw5M.62534$qjm2.26180@fx09.iad>

This video is allowed under the rules of Usenet, because it is
*supporting* a point, not making it.
-"Cunt Flaps" Canoza
Message-ID: <pygXN.16915$nQv.7031@fx10.iad>

On Sat, 29 Jun 2024 13:05:51 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote:

>[Default] Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> typed:
>
>>On Sat, 29 Jun 2024 07:49:04 -0400, "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote
>>>in message
>>>news:n3du7jpc29j29pq4qt9c5to7hl1kjj91mu@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>>>> [Default] J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com> typed:
>>>>
>>>>>On 6/28/2024 10:21 AM, % wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>No, [..]
>>>>
>>>> Address me directly, coward. You know the rules.
>>>
>>>You know as well as I do that his rules are only for OTHER people.. not for
>>>him.
>>>
>>
>>Where is the Usenet rule that one must directly address a poster whose post one is
>>commenting on?
>>
>>Right here will do--------------->
>
>If you wish to address me, scooter, you will do it in direct reply to
>my posts; no piggybacking.
>-Rudy, thinking he makes the rules
>-Message-ID: <ZZacK.8$tTq1.2@fx34.iad>
>
>Videos not allowed.
>Imaginärer Gruppenleiter Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
>Message-ID: <atw5M.62534$qjm2.26180@fx09.iad>
>
>This video is allowed under the rules of Usenet, because it is
>*supporting* a point, not making it.
>-"Cunt Flaps" Canoza
>Message-ID: <pygXN.16915$nQv.7031@fx10.iad>
>
>LOL

BWAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHA! I *knew* there had to be a rule somewhere. ;)

Swill

"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote
in message
news:1ua08jpsslvmracf569n1vnh75nmjtp2gj@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
> [Default] "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> typed:
>
>>
>>
>>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote
>>in message
>>news:n3du7jpc29j29pq4qt9c5to7hl1kjj91mu@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>>> [Default] J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com> typed:
>>>
>>>>On 6/28/2024 10:21 AM, % wrote:
>>>
>>>>No, [..]
>>>
>>> Address me directly, coward. You know the rules.
>>
>>You know as well as I do that his rules are only for OTHER people.. not
>>for
>>him.
>>
>
> But... but... it's the "Rules of Usenet!"
>
> [chuckle]

You forgot that it's about Rudy's Rules of Usenet.

[Default] "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> typed:

>
>
>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote
>in message
>news:1ua08jpsslvmracf569n1vnh75nmjtp2gj@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>> [Default] "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> typed:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote
>>>in message
>>>news:n3du7jpc29j29pq4qt9c5to7hl1kjj91mu@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>>>> [Default] J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com> typed:
>>>>
>>>>>On 6/28/2024 10:21 AM, % wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>No, [..]
>>>>
>>>> Address me directly, coward. You know the rules.
>>>
>>>You know as well as I do that his rules are only for OTHER people.. not
>>>for
>>>him.
>>>
>>
>> But... but... it's the "Rules of Usenet!"
>>
>> [chuckle]
>
>You forgot that it's about Rudy's Rules of Usenet.

You say that is if

o you think Rudy has zero authority to make rules;
o as if Rudy knows there *are* no rules;
o as if Rudy only makes impotent claims that there are rules to
avoid getting his ass kicked repeatedly by facts and proof.

Am I interpreting the tone of your post correctly?

In article <6rt28jtv92givqnvqvrl5nj65pvu8vafd7
@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com>,
klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com says...
>
> [Default] "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> typed:
>
> >
> >
> >"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote
> >in message
> >news:1ua08jpsslvmracf569n1vnh75nmjtp2gj@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
> >> [Default] "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> typed:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote
> >>>in message
> >>>news:n3du7jpc29j29pq4qt9c5to7hl1kjj91mu@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
> >>>> [Default] J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com> typed:
> >>>>
> >>>>>On 6/28/2024 10:21 AM, % wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>No, [..]
> >>>>
> >>>> Address me directly, coward. You know the rules.
> >>>
> >>>You know as well as I do that his rules are only for OTHER people.. not
> >>>for
> >>>him.
> >>>
> >>
> >> But... but... it's the "Rules of Usenet!"
> >>
> >> [chuckle]
> >
> >You forgot that it's about Rudy's Rules of Usenet.
>
> You say that is if
>
> o you think Rudy has zero authority to make rules;
> o as if Rudy knows there *are* no rules;
> o as if Rudy only makes impotent claims that there are rules to
> avoid getting his ass kicked repeatedly by facts and proof.
>
> Am I interpreting the tone of your post correctly?

That pretty much covers it. He also makes up a few as he goes along.