Some of scooter's illiterate and nonsensical locutions

scooterisms:

"Actually..." [empty padding]
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent immediately
before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding]
"I acknowledge that..." [something that hasn't happened, so not subject to
acknowledgment]
"So what you're saying..." [what follows is *always* something the opponent
*never* said, i.e. a straw man]
"TRANSLATION:..." [the same as "so what you're saying..." — a straw man]
"Rudy/Baxter/Lee admits..." same as "so what you're saying" and "TRANSLATION:.."
— a straw man]
"Where in the Constitution does it say..." [about shit that wouldn't *be* in the
Constitution anyway]
"it's" [he means the possessive "its"]
"its" [he means the contraction "it's"]
"where" [he means "were"]
"were" [he means "where"]
"creditability" [he means "credibility"; "creditability" is not a word]

He does these *all the fucking time*

Here is another category of scooterism: larding his bullshit with "wiggle room"
wheeze. This is when scooter clearly and undeniably means "all" or "every," but
he adds some padding to give him an out or an escape route when his bullshit is
called. Examples:

"The second amendment to the constitution of the United States of America
would pretty much render any gun control law you want to be null and void."

scooter, lying on 04/26/2023 at 12:45pm ET

"By and large, I would generally state that virtually all, if not all, gun
control laws currently or recently proposed would be Unconstitutional."

scooter, lying on 04/27/2023 at 2:00pm ET

"Actually the fact that election fraud occurred on a massive scale is pretty
much unquestioned by anyone that has researched the issue."

scooter, lying on 04/16/2024 at 8:06am ET

"pretty much," "generally," "virtually all" — scooter means "all" or "any" or
"every" in every instance. This larding with empty wheeze is an indication of an
inferior intellect. Sound thinkers who are good writers just don't do it.

In article <v5k8rm$2p70k$32@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
>
> Some of scooter's illiterate and nonsensical locutions
>
> scooterisms:
>
> "Actually..." [empty padding]
> "Further..." [empty padding]
> "Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
> "And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent immediately
> before fleeing]
> "On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
> "And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and pointless]
> "Heck..." [empty padding]
> "Well..." [empty padding]
> "After all..." [empty padding]
> "In fact..." [empty padding]
> "Indeed..." [empty padding]
> "I acknowledge that..." [something that hasn't happened, so not subject to
> acknowledgment]
> "So what you're saying..." [what follows is *always* something the opponent
> *never* said, i.e. a straw man]
> "TRANSLATION:..." [the same as "so what you're saying..." ? a straw man]
> "Rudy/Baxter/Lee admits..." same as "so what you're saying" and "TRANSLATION:.."
> ? a straw man]
> "Where in the Constitution does it say..." [about shit that wouldn't *be* in the
> Constitution anyway]
> "it's" [he means the possessive "its"]
> "its" [he means the contraction "it's"]
> "where" [he means "were"]
> "were" [he means "where"]
> "creditability" [he means "credibility"; "creditability" is not a word]
>
> He does these *all the fucking time*
>
> Here is another category of scooterism: larding his bullshit with "wiggle room"
> wheeze. This is when scooter clearly and undeniably means "all" or "every," but
> he adds some padding to give him an out or an escape route when his bullshit is
> called. Examples:
>
> "The second amendment to the constitution of the United States of America
> would pretty much render any gun control law you want to be null and void."
>
> scooter, lying on 04/26/2023 at 12:45pm ET
>
>
> "By and large, I would generally state that virtually all, if not all, gun
> control laws currently or recently proposed would be Unconstitutional."
>
> scooter, lying on 04/27/2023 at 2:00pm ET
>
>
> "Actually the fact that election fraud occurred on a massive scale is pretty
> much unquestioned by anyone that has researched the issue."
>
> scooter, lying on 04/16/2024 at 8:06am ET
>
> "pretty much," "generally," "virtually all" ? scooter means "all" or "any" or
> "every" in every instance. This larding with empty wheeze is an indication of an
> inferior intellect. Sound thinkers who are good writers just don't do it.

He so owns you.

On 6/27/2024 11:49 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:

> In article <v5k8rm$2p70k$32@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
>>
>> Some of scooter's illiterate and nonsensical locutions
>>
>> scooterisms:
>>
>> "Actually..." [empty padding]
>> "Further..." [empty padding]
>> "Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
>> "And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent immediately
>> before fleeing]
>> "On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
>> "And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and pointless]
>> "Heck..." [empty padding]
>> "Well..." [empty padding]
>> "After all..." [empty padding]
>> "In fact..." [empty padding]
>> "Indeed..." [empty padding]
>> "I acknowledge that..." [something that hasn't happened, so not subject to
>> acknowledgment]
>> "So what you're saying..." [what follows is *always* something the opponent
>> *never* said, i.e. a straw man]
>> "TRANSLATION:..." [the same as "so what you're saying..." ? a straw man]
>> "Rudy/Baxter/Lee admits..." same as "so what you're saying" and "TRANSLATION:.."
>> ? a straw man]
>> "Where in the Constitution does it say..." [about shit that wouldn't *be* in the
>> Constitution anyway]
>> "it's" [he means the possessive "its"]
>> "its" [he means the contraction "it's"]
>> "where" [he means "were"]
>> "were" [he means "where"]
>> "creditability" [he means "credibility"; "creditability" is not a word]
>>
>> He does these *all the fucking time*
>>
>> Here is another category of scooterism: larding his bullshit with "wiggle room"
>> wheeze. This is when scooter clearly and undeniably means "all" or "every," but
>> he adds some padding to give him an out or an escape route when his bullshit is
>> called. Examples:
>>
>> "The second amendment to the constitution of the United States of America
>> would pretty much render any gun control law you want to be null and void."
>>
>> scooter, lying on 04/26/2023 at 12:45pm ET
>>
>>
>> "By and large, I would generally state that virtually all, if not all, gun
>> control laws currently or recently proposed would be Unconstitutional."
>>
>> scooter, lying on 04/27/2023 at 2:00pm ET
>>
>>
>> "Actually the fact that election fraud occurred on a massive scale is pretty
>> much unquestioned by anyone that has researched the issue."
>>
>> scooter, lying on 04/16/2024 at 8:06am ET
>>
>> "pretty much," "generally," "virtually all" ? scooter means "all" or "any" or
>> "every" in every instance. This larding with empty wheeze is an indication of an
>> inferior intellect. Sound thinkers who are good writers just don't do it.
>
> You own him.

Yep. But it's kind of like owning a refrigerator with a busted compressor. He's
not good for anything, and it's not worth fixing.

On 6/27/24 12:51, J Carlson wrote:
> Some of scooter's illiterate and nonsensical locutions
>
> scooterisms:
>
> "Actually..." [empty padding]
> "Further..." [empty padding]
> "Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
> "And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent
> immediately before fleeing]
> "On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
> "And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and
> pointless]
> "Heck..." [empty padding]
> "Well..." [empty padding]
> "After all..." [empty padding]
> "In fact..." [empty padding]
> "Indeed..." [empty padding]
> "I acknowledge that..." [something that hasn't happened, so not subject
> to acknowledgment]
> "So what you're saying..." [what follows is *always* something the
> opponent *never* said, i.e. a straw man]
> "TRANSLATION:..." [the same as "so what you're saying..." — a straw man]
> "Rudy/Baxter/Lee admits..." same as "so what you're saying" and
> "TRANSLATION:.." — a straw man]
> "Where in the Constitution does it say..." [about shit that wouldn't
> *be* in the Constitution anyway]
> "it's" [he means the possessive "its"]
> "its" [he means the contraction "it's"]
> "where" [he means "were"]
> "were" [he means "where"]
> "creditability" [he means "credibility"; "creditability" is not a word]
>
> He does these *all the fucking time*
>
> Here is another category of scooterism: larding his bullshit with
> "wiggle room" wheeze. This is when scooter clearly and undeniably means
> "all" or "every," but he adds some padding to give him an out or an
> escape route when his bullshit is called. Examples:
>
>    "The second amendment to the constitution of the United States of
> America
>    would pretty much render any gun control law you want to be null and
> void."
>
>    scooter, lying on 04/26/2023 at 12:45pm ET
>
>
>    "By and large, I would generally state that virtually all, if not
> all, gun
>    control laws currently or recently proposed would be Unconstitutional."
>
>    scooter, lying on 04/27/2023 at 2:00pm ET
>
>
>    "Actually the fact that election fraud occurred on a massive scale
> is pretty
>    much unquestioned by anyone that has researched the issue."
>
>    scooter, lying on 04/16/2024 at 8:06am ET
>
> "pretty much," "generally," "virtually all" — scooter means "all" or
> "any" or "every" in every instance. This larding with empty wheeze is an
> indication of an inferior intellect. Sound thinkers who are good writers
> just don't do it.

You obviously have far too much time on your hands.

On 6/27/2024 12:02 PM, David Hartung wrote:
> On 6/27/24 12:51, J Carlson wrote:
>> Some of scooter's illiterate and nonsensical locutions
>>
>> scooterisms:
>>
>> "Actually..." [empty padding]
>> "Further..." [empty padding]
>> "Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
>> "And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent immediately
>> before fleeing]
>> "On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
>> "And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and pointless]
>> "Heck..." [empty padding]
>> "Well..." [empty padding]
>> "After all..." [empty padding]
>> "In fact..." [empty padding]
>> "Indeed..." [empty padding]
>> "I acknowledge that..." [something that hasn't happened, so not subject to
>> acknowledgment]
>> "So what you're saying..." [what follows is *always* something the opponent
>> *never* said, i.e. a straw man]
>> "TRANSLATION:..." [the same as "so what you're saying..." — a straw man]
>> "Rudy/Baxter/Lee admits..." same as "so what you're saying" and
>> "TRANSLATION:.." — a straw man]
>> "Where in the Constitution does it say..." [about shit that wouldn't *be* in
>> the Constitution anyway]
>> "it's" [he means the possessive "its"]
>> "its" [he means the contraction "it's"]
>> "where" [he means "were"]
>> "were" [he means "where"]
>> "creditability" [he means "credibility"; "creditability" is not a word]
>>
>> He does these *all the fucking time*
>>
>> Here is another category of scooterism: larding his bullshit with "wiggle
>> room" wheeze. This is when scooter clearly and undeniably means "all" or
>> "every," but he adds some padding to give him an out or an escape route when
>> his bullshit is called. Examples:
>>
>>     "The second amendment to the constitution of the United States of America
>>     would pretty much render any gun control law you want to be null and void."
>>
>>     scooter, lying on 04/26/2023 at 12:45pm ET
>>
>>
>>     "By and large, I would generally state that virtually all, if not all, gun
>>     control laws currently or recently proposed would be Unconstitutional."
>>
>>     scooter, lying on 04/27/2023 at 2:00pm ET
>>
>>
>>     "Actually the fact that election fraud occurred on a massive scale is pretty
>>     much unquestioned by anyone that has researched the issue."
>>
>>     scooter, lying on 04/16/2024 at 8:06am ET
>>
>> "pretty much," "generally," "virtually all" — scooter means "all" or "any" or
>> "every" in every instance. This larding with empty wheeze is an indication of
>> an inferior intellect. Sound thinkers who are good writers just don't do it.
>
> You obviously have far too much time on your hands.

What I said about scooter's atrocious writing, and about yours, is spot-on correct.

In article <v5kf74$2p70k$47@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
>
> On 6/27/2024 12:02 PM, David Hartung wrote:
> > On 6/27/24 12:51, J Carlson wrote:
> >> Some of scooter's illiterate and nonsensical locutions
> >>
> >> scooterisms:
> >>
> >> "Actually..." [empty padding]
> >> "Further..." [empty padding]
> >> "Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
> >> "And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent immediately
> >> before fleeing]
> >> "On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
> >> "And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and pointless]
> >> "Heck..." [empty padding]
> >> "Well..." [empty padding]
> >> "After all..." [empty padding]
> >> "In fact..." [empty padding]
> >> "Indeed..." [empty padding]
> >> "I acknowledge that..." [something that hasn't happened, so not subject to
> >> acknowledgment]
> >> "So what you're saying..." [what follows is *always* something the opponent
> >> *never* said, i.e. a straw man]
> >> "TRANSLATION:..." [the same as "so what you're saying..." ? a straw man]
> >> "Rudy/Baxter/Lee admits..." same as "so what you're saying" and
> >> "TRANSLATION:.." ? a straw man]
> >> "Where in the Constitution does it say..." [about shit that wouldn't *be* in
> >> the Constitution anyway]
> >> "it's" [he means the possessive "its"]
> >> "its" [he means the contraction "it's"]
> >> "where" [he means "were"]
> >> "were" [he means "where"]
> >> "creditability" [he means "credibility"; "creditability" is not a word]
> >>
> >> He does these *all the fucking time*
> >>
> >> Here is another category of scooterism: larding his bullshit with "wiggle
> >> room" wheeze. This is when scooter clearly and undeniably means "all" or
> >> "every," but he adds some padding to give him an out or an escape route when
> >> his bullshit is called. Examples:
> >>
> >>     "The second amendment to the constitution of the United States of America
> >>     would pretty much render any gun control law you want to be null and void."
> >>
> >>     scooter, lying on 04/26/2023 at 12:45pm ET
> >>
> >>
> >>     "By and large, I would generally state that virtually all, if not all, gun
> >>     control laws currently or recently proposed would be Unconstitutional."
> >>
> >>     scooter, lying on 04/27/2023 at 2:00pm ET
> >>
> >>
> >>     "Actually the fact that election fraud occurred on a massive scale is pretty
> >>     much unquestioned by anyone that has researched the issue."
> >>
> >>     scooter, lying on 04/16/2024 at 8:06am ET
> >>
> >> "pretty much," "generally," "virtually all" ? scooter means "all" or "any" or
> >> "every" in every instance. This larding with empty wheeze is an indication of
> >> an inferior intellect. Sound thinkers who are good writers just don't do it.
> >
> > You obviously have far too much time on your hands.
>
> What I said about scooter's atrocious writing, and about yours, is spot-on correct.

No one listens to a cheater.

J Carlson wrote:
> What I said about

And your J Carlson nym, the same:

From: J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.immigration,alt.politics.nationalism.white,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: AP Lies by Ommission About Identity of Invaders Charged with
Rape, Murder of 12-Year-Old
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:35:52 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <v5f66o$1mps9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v54h6j$39cuk$1@dont-email.me> <v54hrs$38mfs$18@dont-email.me>
<moKcnZP3dbqUm-r7nZ2dnZfqnPcAAAAA@giganews.com>
<v58c4f$6squ$8@dont-email.me>
<v5df1n$1caue$1@dont-email.me> <v5edju$1hv3p$3@dont-email.me>
<tgrl7j14lbg6f9csput4jca09qqujgd9d5@4ax.com>
<v5erpf$1jkrf$20@dont-email.me>
<O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me;
posting-host="f3de9d0c1e618b255237332494133eec";
logging-data="1795977";
mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195k8uMNmZfnyDG9tQmsu21WqljX3bfQxM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PNoPW9d+9gKJj0fX+YCk+YFslQg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
Xref: news.eternal-september.org alt.politics.immigration:383549
alt.politics.nationalism.white:10913 talk.politics.misc:1295918
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:3024985

> No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people to
thrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently
> is an important step to getting there.

That constitutes a DEATH THREAT against a former President, Rudey:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/871
18 U.S. Code § 871 - Threats against President and successors to the
Presidency
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail
or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any
letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any
threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon
the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice
President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office
of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or
knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the
President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the
order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years,
or both.
(b)The terms “President-elect” and “Vice President-elect” as used in
this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful
candidates for the offices of President and Vice President,
respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections
held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in
accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2. The
phrase “other officer next in the order of succession to the office of
President” as used in this section shall mean the person next in the
order of succession to act as President in accordance with title 3,
United States Code, sections 19 and 20.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 740; June 1, 1955, ch. 115, § 1, 69
Stat. 80; Pub. L. 87–829, § 1, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 956; Pub. L.
97–297, § 2, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1318; Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

9-65.200 - Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency; Threats Against Former Presidents; and Certain Other Secret
Service Protectees
The Counterterrorism Section of the National Security Division has
supervisory authority over 18 U.S.C. §§ 871 and 879 cases. As great
caution must be taken in matters relating to the security of the persons
protected by 18 U.S.C. § 871, United States Attorneys are encouraged to
consult with the Counterterrorism Section (CTS) of the National Security
Division when they have doubts on the prosecutive merit of a case. For
the same reason, dismissal of complaints under 18 U.S.C. § 871, when the
defendant is in custody under the Mental Incompetency Statutes (18
U.S.C. §§ 4244, 4246), requires approval from CTS. In other cases,
United States Attorneys must consult prior to dismissing a count
involving, or entering into any sentence commitment or other case
settlement involving a § 871 charge.

https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2024/01/phoenix-man-arrested-making-online-death-threats-against-president-and

PHOENIX –David Michael Hanson, 41, of Phoenix, was arrested on Wednesday
for making online threats against the President and Vice-President.
Hanson was charged by Federal criminal complaint on Tuesday with five
counts of Threats Against the President and Successors to the Presidency
and five counts of Interstate Communication of Threats.

The complaint alleges that in November and December of 2023, while
living in Arizona, Hanson used a social media platform to post threats
to murder the President and Vice President of the United States. On
November 19, 2023, Hanson posted online a series of threatening
statements including one that stated, “#joeAndKamala I’m asking you to
resign on Monday your alternative is death brutally murdered.” After the
U.S. Secret Service spoke to Hanson and warned him that it was a Federal
crime to post such threats, on December 23, 2023, Hanson posted another
series of similar threats aimed at the President and Vice-President.

Each count of Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, a fine of
up to $250,000, and up to three years of supervised release. Each count
of Interstate Communication of Threats carries a maximum sentence of
five years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and up to three years of
supervised release.

A complaint is simply a method by which a person is charged with
criminal activity and raises no inference of guilt. An individual is
presumed innocent until evidence is presented to a jury that establishes
guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The United States Secret Service is conducting the investigation in this
case. The United States Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, is
handling the prosecution.

Those can be reported here:

https://tips.fbi.gov/home

https://www.justice.gov/action-center/report-crime-or-submit-complaint

https://www.secretservice.gov/contact

https://www.dhs.gov/see-something-say-something/reporting/california

Fellow citizens, won't you join in ending Rudey's terrorism here?