In article <v5enlf$1jkrf$7@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
>
> On 6/24/2024 10:33 PM, Andrea W, lying trolling HIV-oozing Nazi whore, lied:
> > "Governor Swill"  wrote in message
> > news:8s3j7j5rq6fns67q2cfv7dtda5vq7iuast@4ax.com...
> >>
> >> On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 11:01:33 +1000, Andrea W, lying trolling HIV-oozing Nazi whore, lied:
> >>
> >>> "Governor Swill"  wrote in message
> >>> news:s1pg7j1jd0rlsfcsb7ajm77k1h8jk5c92p@4ax.com...
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 09:25:29 +1000, Andrea W, lying trolling HIV-oozing Nazi whore, lied:
> >>>>
> >>>>> "Baxter"  wrote in message news:v543qj$376qj$3@dont-email.me...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Andrea W, lying trolling HIV-oozing Nazi whore, lied:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> "Baxter"  wrote in message news:v52rc2$2vlkp$5@dont-email.me...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Andrea W, lying trolling HIV-oozing Nazi whore, lied:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> It's not the same people who are talking about it, dummy. Geez.
> >>>>>>>>> In some cases people who no longer work for gov. and CIA etc. have
> >>>>>>>>> come forward about it, at great risk to themselves and their
> >>>>>> families.
> >>>>>>>>> Many have been murdered as a result.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Murdered?  That's a load of horse shit.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> And how are you so sure of that?
> >>>>>>> Just another mainstream follower.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Where's YOUR evidence?  Go ahead, post references to these killers
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Where's your thinking ability?
> >>>>
> >>>> Even the best thinking abilities require evidence.
> >>>>
> >>>> Where's yours?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> What do you mean where's mine?
> >>> Thinking leads to research. Research leads to evidence. There's plenty out
> >>> there.
> >>
> >> That's a dodge.  Thinking is useless without data so you have to research
> >> before you can
> >> think about it.
> >>
> >
> > Semantics
>
> Any time a knuckle-dragging lying trolling Nazi whore blurts "semantics," she is
> conceding defeat.
>
> >
> >
> >>
> >>>>>>>> We here those conspiracy theories
> >>>>>>>> all the time,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The MSM and gov. keep claiming they're only conspiracy theories and you
> >>>>>>> never question or research it.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> They have been researched extensively.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yes, but not by sheep like you.
> >>>>
> >>>> Nor by sheep like you who buy every bit of drama you're fed because real
> >>>> investigation is
> >>>> too difficult, too time consuming, and takes too long.  Conspiracy theories
> >>>> cannot stand
> >>>> the fact that sometimes we *can't* know the truth because there aren't
> >>>> enough facts.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I don't post 'conspiracy theories'.
> >>
> >> You never stop.  Just mentioning "secret societies" proves you're a conspiracy
> >> theorist.
> >>
> >
> > Secret societies are a reality.
>
> Prove it.
>
> >>
> >>> Here's something you don't know - the CIA popularised the term as a disinfo
> >>> campaign to cover up covert operations from the public.
> >>
> >> Really?  Where is your evidence for that?
> >>
> >
> > It's well known
>
> Concession of defeat by lying trolling HIV-oozing Nazi whore noted.
>
> >>
> >>> The fact that you chuck that term around like the others here shows your
> >>> ignorance.
> >>
> >> Shows yours.  Conspiracy theories have always existed, just the name has changed.
> >>
> >
> > There are some conspiracy theories thrown around for fun
>
> All of yours are thrown around in order to lie.
>
> >
> >>
> >>>>>>>> never any facts to back them. Vince Foster anyong?
> >>>>
> >>>>>>> The MSM that you follow doesn't give any facts.
> >>>>
> >>>> That's all they give.  The fact free zones are the hard right and hard
> >>>> left.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Hahahaha. You've fallen for the mass spread lies.
> >>
> >> That would be you.  The truth is NEVER at the ends.  It's ALWAYS somewhere in
> >> between the
> >> extremes.
> >>
> >
> > You are on an extreme
>
> No. You are an extremist, and you and we all know it.
>
> >
> >>
> >>>> Alex Jones is as fact free as Wonkette.  In a perfect world, neither would
> >>>> exist.
> >>>
> >>> Hahahaha
> >>
> >> Comment on the post, not your fantasies.
> >>
> >>> You obviously know nothing about the CIA and other corrupt agencies and what
> >>> they have been doing for decades.
> >>
> >> Why do you keep bringing up the CIA?  What is your obsession with them?
> >>
> >
> > The CIA is the biggest threat to democracy in American history.
>
> Bullshit. The CIA is just a bogeyman in your febrile conspiracy-obsessed
> imagination. I'll note that some conspiracies have been real, but *none* of the
> ones in which you believe are real. They're all bullshit.
>
> >>
> >>>>>> What you call "facts" are bogus conspiracy theories - not actual facts.
> >>>>
> >>>>> You never looked into it so you can't claim that.
> >>>>
> >>>> Prove it.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> How?
> >>
> >> So you can't prove it.  Typical.  If you believe it, if you know it, you also
> >> know the
> >> proof of it.
> >>
> >
> > You have to tell me how you want it proved.
>
> If you had any clue of how to prove anything, you wouldn't need instruction.
>
> You're just a lying trolling HIV-oozing Nazi whore who believes bullshit that
> can't possibly be proved because it's all false.
>
> >
> >>
> >>>> Prove that he's never done any of that research.  Clearly you haven't.
> >>>
> >>> Give me your alt.atheism definition of research.
> >>
> >> Don't know about alt.atheism.  I'm not posting from there.  One definition of
> >> research
> >> would be reading about and/or experimenting with information to see what
> >> generates
> >> repeatable results in a controlled environment.
> >>
> >
> > That's just science in labs.
>
> It's research, which you can't do.
>
> You have no means of finding the truth. You are immunized against the truth.
>
> >
> >>
> >>>>> You just repeat the
> >>>>> mainstream smear and disinformation campaign for the masses.
> >>>>
> >>>> While you just repeat the right wing smear and disinformation campaign for
> >>>> the masses.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> One must be right. You can't show that yours is.
>
> We *have* shown that yours isn't.
>
> >>
> >> I disagree.  Neither side is right but both have some piece of the puzzle.
> >>
> >>> You lot just smear the same stuff that the corporate MSM smears.
> >>
> >> Lol!  Sunk into the darkest depths of suspicion and dread, you cannot see the
> >> light.
> >>
> >
> >

Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in
news:rdol7j9sjhsc48b060edt0hb6jlutnn6lc@4ax.com:

> On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:50:41 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
> wrote:
>
>>"Governor Swill" wrote in message
>>news:do4j7jts541t5uu6r0osu5672q2u1o3f8v@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 11:49:20 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Fact checking" is for the lazy.
>>>
>>>Really? Only the lazy search for the facts?
>>>
>>
>>On websites that call themselves 'fact checkers', yes that's lazy.
>
> Lol! I still think it's hilarious that you think searching for the
> facts is the "lazy" thing to do.
>
> But, since you insist on hiding from reality, I'll leave you to it.
>
>>You'd
>>just believe and trust any website that boldly call themselves such.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>Then who is sitting back accepting whatever
>>>they're fed?
>>>
>>
>>You. Self declaring 'fact checker' sites feed you stuff and you don't
>>question them.
>
> Um, yes, I do if they're a new site or not reliable. But once a site
> establishes a reputation for getting it right, I don't have to do as
> much fact checking of my own.
>
OTOH, even established sites can get it wrong. Snopes missed the real
issue with "fine people on both sides".

On 6/25/2024 10:21 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:

> "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in message
> news:v5dhne$1cqnf$1@dont-email.me...
>> "J Carlson"  wrote in message news:v5c0rf$v4dv$17@dont-email.me...
>>>
>>> On 6/24/2024 7:40 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 09:11:58 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Governor Swill"  wrote in message
>>>>> news:t5og7j9rp0m3f7ldol3m4t1p6gqao24l4e@4ax.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 09:08:22 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Governor Swill"  wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:ku9c7j9diqmhbjue83fb8afqs95hbmebsa@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't agree with leftists because they're left any more than I disagree
>>>>>> with rightists
>>>>>> just because they're on the right.  I listen to both, corroborate what I
>>>>>> can and make up
>>>>>> my own mind.  I have no handlers telling me what to think.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah yeah. You are influenced. It's the political hate factor undercurrent.
>>>>> You've allowed yourself to be caught up.
>>>>> There is no real evidence that Trump has done anything more illegal than any
>>>>> other New York businessman. None are fully honest.
>>>>
>>>> So here we have your bias and ignorance on full display.  The State of New
>>>> York prosecutes
>>>> nearly a thousand cases a year on these same charges.
>>>>>
>>>>> He was originally indicted on misdemeanours,
>>>>
>>>> Ignorance strikes again.  Your insistence on getting information solely from
>>>> biased
>>>> sources does you a disservice.  Trump was NEVER charged with misdemeanors.
>>>> The charges
>>>> were felonies from the start.
>>>
>>> Exactly right. The only crimes for which Trump was indicted were felonies
>>> from the outset. There is this persistent false believe, which by this point
>>> is a lie, that Trump was charged with misdemeanors which were subsequently
>>> "upgraded" to felonies. That's completely wrong. Trump was indicted 34 times
>>> for violation of § 175.10, "Falsifying business records in the first degree."
>>> https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/PEN/175.10 There were *no*
>>> misdemeanors in the indictment at any time.
>>>
>>
>> They were really misdemeanours, the left just called them felonies for their
>> kangaroo court.
>
> meanwhile Biden was found to have a preponderance of evidence of having
> committed a series of felonies for a crime we know is considered not only a
> felony but an impeachable offense

Bullshit, scooter. That's why you don't identify any "crime," scooter: because
there hasn't been any. There have only been several *debunked* accusations
against President Biden — accusations that the two Jimmy-Hats, Comer and Jordan,
have been forced to *admit* were baseless.

On 6/25/2024 10:38 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:

> In article <v5enlf$1jkrf$7@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
>>
>> On 6/24/2024 10:33 PM, Andrea W, lying trolling HIV-oozing Nazi whore, lied:
>>> "Governor Swill"  wrote in message
>>> news:8s3j7j5rq6fns67q2cfv7dtda5vq7iuast@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 11:01:33 +1000, Andrea W, lying trolling HIV-oozing Nazi whore, lied:
>>>>
>>>>> "Governor Swill"  wrote in message
>>>>> news:s1pg7j1jd0rlsfcsb7ajm77k1h8jk5c92p@4ax.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 09:25:29 +1000, Andrea W, lying trolling HIV-oozing Nazi whore, lied:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Baxter"  wrote in message news:v543qj$376qj$3@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Andrea W, lying trolling HIV-oozing Nazi whore, lied:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Baxter"  wrote in message news:v52rc2$2vlkp$5@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Andrea W, lying trolling HIV-oozing Nazi whore, lied:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's not the same people who are talking about it, dummy. Geez.
>>>>>>>>>>> In some cases people who no longer work for gov. and CIA etc. have
>>>>>>>>>>> come forward about it, at great risk to themselves and their
>>>>>>>> families.
>>>>>>>>>>> Many have been murdered as a result.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Murdered?  That's a load of horse shit.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And how are you so sure of that?
>>>>>>>>> Just another mainstream follower.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Where's YOUR evidence?  Go ahead, post references to these killers
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Where's your thinking ability?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Even the best thinking abilities require evidence.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Where's yours?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you mean where's mine?
>>>>> Thinking leads to research. Research leads to evidence. There's plenty out
>>>>> there.
>>>>
>>>> That's a dodge.  Thinking is useless without data so you have to research
>>>> before you can
>>>> think about it.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Semantics
>>
>> Any time a knuckle-dragging lying trolling Nazi whore blurts "semantics," she is
>> conceding defeat.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We here those conspiracy theories
>>>>>>>>>> all the time,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The MSM and gov. keep claiming they're only conspiracy theories and you
>>>>>>>>> never question or research it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> They have been researched extensively.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, but not by sheep like you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nor by sheep like you who buy every bit of drama you're fed because real
>>>>>> investigation is
>>>>>> too difficult, too time consuming, and takes too long.  Conspiracy theories
>>>>>> cannot stand
>>>>>> the fact that sometimes we *can't* know the truth because there aren't
>>>>>> enough facts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't post 'conspiracy theories'.
>>>>
>>>> You never stop.  Just mentioning "secret societies" proves you're a conspiracy
>>>> theorist.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Secret societies are a reality.
>>
>> Prove it.
>>
>>>>
>>>>> Here's something you don't know - the CIA popularised the term as a disinfo
>>>>> campaign to cover up covert operations from the public.
>>>>
>>>> Really?  Where is your evidence for that?
>>>>
>>>
>>> It's well known
>>
>> Concession of defeat by lying trolling HIV-oozing Nazi whore noted.
>>
>>>>
>>>>> The fact that you chuck that term around like the others here shows your
>>>>> ignorance.
>>>>
>>>> Shows yours.  Conspiracy theories have always existed, just the name has changed.
>>>>
>>>
>>> There are some conspiracy theories thrown around for fun
>>
>> All of yours are thrown around in order to lie.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> never any facts to back them. Vince Foster anyong?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The MSM that you follow doesn't give any facts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's all they give.  The fact free zones are the hard right and hard
>>>>>> left.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hahahaha. You've fallen for the mass spread lies.
>>>>
>>>> That would be you.  The truth is NEVER at the ends.  It's ALWAYS somewhere in
>>>> between the
>>>> extremes.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You are on an extreme
>>
>> No. You are an extremist, and you and we all know it.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> Alex Jones is as fact free as Wonkette.  In a perfect world, neither would
>>>>>> exist.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hahahaha
>>>>
>>>> Comment on the post, not your fantasies.
>>>>
>>>>> You obviously know nothing about the CIA and other corrupt agencies and what
>>>>> they have been doing for decades.
>>>>
>>>> Why do you keep bringing up the CIA?  What is your obsession with them?
>>>>
>>>
>>> The CIA is the biggest threat to democracy in American history.
>>
>> Bullshit. The CIA is just a bogeyman in your febrile conspiracy-obsessed
>> imagination. I'll note that some conspiracies have been real, but *none* of the
>> ones in which you believe are real. They're all bullshit.
>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>> What you call "facts" are bogus conspiracy theories - not actual facts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You never looked into it so you can't claim that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Prove it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> How?
>>>>
>>>> So you can't prove it.  Typical.  If you believe it, if you know it, you also
>>>> know the
>>>> proof of it.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You have to tell me how you want it proved.
>>
>> If you had any clue of how to prove anything, you wouldn't need instruction.
>>
>> You're just a lying trolling HIV-oozing Nazi whore who believes bullshit that
>> can't possibly be proved because it's all false.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> Prove that he's never done any of that research.  Clearly you haven't.
>>>>>
>>>>> Give me your alt.atheism definition of research.
>>>>
>>>> Don't know about alt.atheism.  I'm not posting from there.  One definition of
>>>> research
>>>> would be reading about and/or experimenting with information to see what
>>>> generates
>>>> repeatable results in a controlled environment.
>>>>
>>>
>>> That's just science in labs.
>>
>> It's research, which you can't do.
>>
>> You have no means of finding the truth. You are immunized against the truth.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> You just repeat the
>>>>>>> mainstream smear and disinformation campaign for the masses.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> While you just repeat the right wing smear and disinformation campaign for
>>>>>> the masses.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> One must be right. You can't show that yours is.
>>
>> We *have* shown that yours isn't.
>>
>>>>
>>>> I disagree.  Neither side is right but both have some piece of the puzzle.
>>>>
>>>>> You lot just smear the same stuff that the corporate MSM smears.
>>>>
>>>> Lol!  Sunk into the darkest depths of suspicion and dread, you cannot see the
>>>> light.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
> Every time you kick my flabby doughy pimply ass, I break down sobbing and bawling.

On 6/25/2024 7:46 AM, Baxter wrote:
> "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
> news:v5dhne$1cqnf$1@dont-email.me:
>
>> "J Carlson" wrote in message news:v5c0rf$v4dv$17@dont-email.me...
>>>
>>> On 6/24/2024 7:40 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 09:11:58 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Governor Swill" wrote in message
>>>>> news:t5og7j9rp0m3f7ldol3m4t1p6gqao24l4e@4ax.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 09:08:22 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Governor Swill" wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:ku9c7j9diqmhbjue83fb8afqs95hbmebsa@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't agree with leftists because they're left any more than I
>>>>>> disagree
>>>>>> with rightists
>>>>>> just because they're on the right. I listen to both, corroborate
>>>>>> what I
>>>>>> can and make up
>>>>>> my own mind. I have no handlers telling me what to think.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah yeah. You are influenced. It's the political hate factor
>>>>> undercurrent.
>>>>> You've allowed yourself to be caught up.
>>>>> There is no real evidence that Trump has done anything more illegal
>>>>> than any
>>>>> other New York businessman. None are fully honest.
>>>>
>>>> So here we have your bias and ignorance on full display. The State
>>>> of New York prosecutes
>>>> nearly a thousand cases a year on these same charges.
>>>>>
>>>>> He was originally indicted on misdemeanours,
>>>>
>>>> Ignorance strikes again. Your insistence on getting information
>>>> solely from biased
>>>> sources does you a disservice. Trump was NEVER charged with
>>>> misdemeanors. The charges
>>>> were felonies from the start.
>>>
>>> Exactly right. The only crimes for which Trump was indicted were
>>> felonies from the outset. There is this persistent false believe,
>>> which by this point is a lie, that Trump was charged with misdemeanors
>>> which were subsequently "upgraded" to felonies. That's completely
>>> wrong. Trump was indicted 34 times for violation of § 175.10,
>>> "Falsifying business records in the first degree."
>>> https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/PEN/175.10 There were *no*
>>> misdemeanors in the indictment at any time.
>>>
>>
>> They were really misdemeanours, the left just called them felonies for
>> their kangaroo court.
>>
> the CoverUp is the felonies. That was explained to the Jury.

There was nothing illegal about what Trump did. District Attorney's
make those kinds of deals every day.

When will the paid whore Stormy Daniels pay Trump what she owes him for
violating the NDA she signed to get money?

"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
news:667aff8c$0$3068680$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
> In article <v5emn3$1jkrf$4@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
>>
>> On 6/24/2024 9:40 PM, Andrea W, lying trolling whore, lied:
>> > "J Carlson" wrote in message news:v5c0rf$v4dv$17@dont-email.me...
>> >>
>> >> On 6/24/2024 7:40 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
>> >>> On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 09:11:58 +1000, Andrea W, lying trolling whore,
>> >>> lied:
>> >>>
>> >>>> "Governor Swill" wrote in message
>> >>>> news:t5og7j9rp0m3f7ldol3m4t1p6gqao24l4e@4ax.com...
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 09:08:22 +1000, Andrea W, lying trolling whore,
>> >>>>> lied:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> "Governor Swill" wrote in message
>> >>>>>> news:ku9c7j9diqmhbjue83fb8afqs95hbmebsa@4ax.com...
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I don't agree with leftists because they're left any more than I
>> >>>>> disagree
>> >>>>> with rightists
>> >>>>> just because they're on the right. I listen to both, corroborate
>> >>>>> what I
>> >>>>> can and make up
>> >>>>> my own mind. I have no handlers telling me what to think.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Yeah yeah. You are influenced. It's the political hate factor
>> >>>> undercurrent.
>> >>>> You've allowed yourself to be caught up.
>> >>>> There is no real evidence that Trump has done anything more illegal
>> >>>> than any
>> >>>> other New York businessman. None are fully honest.
>> >>>
>> >>> So here we have your bias and ignorance on full display. The State
>> >>> of New
>> >>> York prosecutes
>> >>> nearly a thousand cases a year on these same charges.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> He was originally indicted on misdemeanours,
>> >>>
>> >>> Ignorance strikes again. Your insistence on getting information
>> >>> solely from
>> >>> biased
>> >>> sources does you a disservice. Trump was NEVER charged with
>> >>> misdemeanors.
>> >>> The charges
>> >>> were felonies from the start.
>> >>
>> >> Exactly right. The only crimes for which Trump was indicted were
>> >> felonies from
>> >> the outset. There is this persistent false believe, which by this
>> >> point is a
>> >> lie, that Trump was charged with misdemeanors which were subsequently
>> >> "upgraded" to felonies. That's completely wrong. Trump was indicted 34
>> >> times
>> >> for violation of § 175.10, "Falsifying business records in the first
>> >> degree."
>> >> https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/PEN/175.10 There were *no*
>> >> misdemeanors in the indictment at any time.
>> >>
>> >
>> > They were really misdemeanours,
>>
>> No, Andrea, you stupid filthy lying HIV-oozing whore. They were *always*
>> felonies.
>>
>> >
>> >>>
>> >>>> and the left Dem prosecutors
>> >>>> sneakily changed them to felonies because they can't jail him
>> >>>> otherwise.
>> >>>
>> >>> Again, you are quite wrong AND, Trump never went to jail, nor will
>> >>> he.
>> >>
>> >> He might, but not soon.
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>>> They want to take him down.
>> >>>> Why?
>> >>>
>> >>> Because he's a selfish, criminal asshole who's spent his whole life
>> >>> stepping
>> >>> on people and
>> >>> making enemies and is not shocked that they all want a piece of him
>> >>> when they
>> >>> have the
>> >>> chance.
>> >>
>> >> Because he's a criminal and has been one his entire adult life, and
>> >> probably
>> >> for a good part of his pre-adult life.
>> >>
>> >
>> > No your lot are the criminals.
>>
>> No, Trump and all his neo-Nazi followers like you are the criminals,
>> Andrea, you
>> filthy lying Nazi HIV-oozing whore.
>>
>> >
>> >>>
>> >>>> Because Trump is a system buster who called out the real crooked
>> >>>> left
>> >>>> and now they're taking revenge. It's so obvious it's not funny.
>> >>>
>> >>> Actually, it *is* obvious, even if not to you. Now THAT'S funny!
>> >>> Breakdown,
>> >>> "system
>> >>> buster" = "rule breaker", "crooked left" = "anybody who's not a
>> >>> selfish
>> >>> asshole" and
>> >>> "revenge" = "caught him red handed".
>> >>
>> >> Trump is the most blatant selfish asshole in American history.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Hate speech!
>>
>> No, truth speech. Trump is the most corrupt, venal, crooked and amoral
>> president
>> in history, and you *know* this, Andrea, you filthy lying trolling
>> HIV-oozing
>> Nazi whore.
>
> Rudy is losing again. How can we tell? Just read his responses.

You can tell when Rudy realizes he's lost because he starts asserting he
knows what other people are thinking..
.... when the truth is Rudy doesn't even know what he thinks because he
can't. Think that is.

J Carlson wrote: (munged the followups as the coward always will when
caught)

> There have only been several *debunked* accusations against President
> Biden —

How'd you lose that Sleazynews account you were constantly spamming from
Rudey?

And are they charging you their $500 per SPAM cleanup fee?

And what of your Giganews account, we see that one is gone too!

Looks like you're amusenet persona non grata, little man Ball.

Laugh, laugh, laugh, laugh!

J Carlson wrote:(munged the followups as the coward always will when caught)

How'd you lose that Sleazynews account you were constantly spamming from
Rudey?

And are they charging you their $500 per SPAM cleanup fee?

And what of your Giganews account, we see that one is gone too!

Looks like you're amusenet persona non grata, little man Ball.

Laugh, laugh, laugh, laugh!

> I know. It's great.

Is it?

Lol.

Scout wrote:
>
>
> "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
> news:667aff8c$0$3068680$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>> In article <v5emn3$1jkrf$4@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
>>>
>>> On 6/24/2024 9:40 PM, Andrea W, lying trolling whore, lied:
>>> > "J Carlson"  wrote in message news:v5c0rf$v4dv$17@dont-email.me...
>>> >>
>>> >> On 6/24/2024 7:40 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
>>> >>> On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 09:11:58 +1000, Andrea W, lying trolling
>>> whore, >>> lied:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> "Governor Swill"  wrote in message
>>> >>>> news:t5og7j9rp0m3f7ldol3m4t1p6gqao24l4e@4ax.com...
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 09:08:22 +1000, Andrea W, lying trolling
>>> whore, >>>>> lied:
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>> "Governor Swill"  wrote in message
>>> >>>>>> news:ku9c7j9diqmhbjue83fb8afqs95hbmebsa@4ax.com...
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> I don't agree with leftists because they're left any more than
>>> I >>>>> disagree
>>> >>>>> with rightists
>>> >>>>> just because they're on the right.  I listen to both,
>>> corroborate >>>>> what I
>>> >>>>> can and make up
>>> >>>>> my own mind.  I have no handlers telling me what to think.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Yeah yeah. You are influenced. It's the political hate factor
>>> >>>> undercurrent.
>>> >>>> You've allowed yourself to be caught up.
>>> >>>> There is no real evidence that Trump has done anything more
>>> illegal >>>> than any
>>> >>>> other New York businessman. None are fully honest.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> So here we have your bias and ignorance on full display.  The
>>> State >>> of New
>>> >>> York prosecutes
>>> >>> nearly a thousand cases a year on these same charges.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> He was originally indicted on misdemeanours,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Ignorance strikes again.  Your insistence on getting information
>>> >>> solely from
>>> >>> biased
>>> >>> sources does you a disservice.  Trump was NEVER charged with >>>
>>> misdemeanors.
>>> >>> The charges
>>> >>> were felonies from the start.
>>> >>
>>> >> Exactly right. The only crimes for which Trump was indicted were
>>> >> felonies from
>>> >> the outset. There is this persistent false believe, which by this
>>> >> point is a
>>> >> lie, that Trump was charged with misdemeanors which were subsequently
>>> >> "upgraded" to felonies. That's completely wrong. Trump was
>>> indicted 34 >> times
>>> >> for violation of § 175.10, "Falsifying business records in the
>>> first >> degree."
>>> >> https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/PEN/175.10 There were *no*
>>> >> misdemeanors in the indictment at any time.
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > They were really misdemeanours,
>>>
>>> No, Andrea, you stupid filthy lying HIV-oozing whore. They were
>>> *always* felonies.
>>>
>>> >
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> and the left Dem prosecutors
>>> >>>> sneakily changed them to felonies because they can't jail him
>>> >>>> otherwise.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Again, you are quite wrong AND, Trump never went to jail, nor
>>> will >>> he.
>>> >>
>>> >> He might, but not soon.
>>> >>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> They want to take him down.
>>> >>>> Why?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Because he's a selfish, criminal asshole who's spent his whole
>>> life >>> stepping
>>> >>> on people and
>>> >>> making enemies and is not shocked that they all want a piece of
>>> him >>> when they
>>> >>> have the
>>> >>> chance.
>>> >>
>>> >> Because he's a criminal and has been one his entire adult life,
>>> and >> probably
>>> >> for a good part of his pre-adult life.
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > No your lot are the criminals.
>>>
>>> No, Trump and all his neo-Nazi followers like you are the criminals,
>>> Andrea, you
>>> filthy lying Nazi HIV-oozing whore.
>>>
>>> >
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> Because Trump is a system buster who called out the real crooked
>>> >>>> left
>>> >>>> and now they're taking revenge. It's so obvious it's not funny.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Actually, it *is* obvious, even if not to you.  Now THAT'S funny!
>>> >>> Breakdown,
>>> >>> "system
>>> >>> buster"  =  "rule breaker", "crooked left" = "anybody who's not a
>>> >>> selfish
>>> >>> asshole" and
>>> >>> "revenge" = "caught him red handed".
>>> >>
>>> >> Trump is the most blatant selfish asshole in American history.
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > Hate speech!
>>>
>>> No, truth speech. Trump is the most corrupt, venal, crooked and
>>> amoral president
>>> in history, and you *know* this, Andrea, you filthy lying trolling
>>> HIV-oozing
>>> Nazi whore.
>>
>> Rudy is losing again. How can we tell? Just read his responses.
>
> You can tell when Rudy realizes he's lost because he starts asserting he
> knows what other people are thinking..
> ... when the truth is Rudy doesn't even know what he thinks because he
> can't. Think that is.

Rudey has been booted by both Easynews and Giganews in the past month.

Friends (all of you), thank you for sending in your abuse complaints on
this psychotic spammer and subhuman death threat machine, they really
mattered!!!

:-)

Oh and always remember to fix the spelling on the followup groups that
he corrupts.

He is a consummate coward, little man Ball is.

waiting <waiting@yahoo.com> wrote in news:v5f1mn$8t8t$2@news.mixmin.net:

> There was nothing illegal about what Trump did. District Attorney's
> make those kinds of deals every day.
>
The jury said what he did was illegal - felonies.

CLV <cv@invalid.org> wrote in news:v5ev67$1k5qv$74@dont-email.me:

> On 6/25/2024 11:32 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>> In article <v5ema7$1jk6h$6@dont-email.me>,
>> bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
>>>
>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
>>> news:667acb82$0$3068695$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>>>
>>>> In article <v5damj$1bhsb$7@dont-email.me>,
>>>> bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
>>>>>
>>>
>>>>> And later, when the Senate put together a bill on the Border
>>>>> issue, tRump demanded the House kill it (and they did).
>>>>
>>>> It was more for other countries with a "border" bill slipped in. No
>>>> bill needed. Just follow the law.
>>>>
>>> We hear that propaganda again and again, but somehow the courts
>>> think otherwise.
>>
>> The same courts that are trying to get rid of Trump? The bill was for
>> sending tons of money to Ukraine and very little to the border. No
>> money needed, just follow the fucking law.
>
> https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/02/05/senate-border-bill-d
> etails/
>
> The overall aid package includes $14 billion in assistance for Israel,
> $60 billion for Ukraine and $4.83 billion to Indo-Pacific nations. It
> also has $9.2 billion in humanitarian aid for civilians in Gaza, the
> West Bank, Ukraine and other nations, as well as $20 billion in U.S.
> border funds.
>

That was AFTER they stripped out the Border stuff.
=====
In October 2023, the Administration transmitted an emergency
supplemental request to Congress for the southwest border and migration
issues totaling $13.6 billion. The Budget includes, and therefore
reiterates the need for, the unmet needs from the October supplemental
request. In addition to urgent requirements, the request includes
investments to build longer-term capacity in the areas of border
security, immigration enforcement, and countering illicit fentanyl,
totaling $4.3 billion for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and
the Department of Justice (DOJ). This amount includes $405 million to
hire 1,300 additional Border Patrol Agents to secure the border, $239
million to hire 1,000 additional CBP Officers to stop illicit fentanyl
and other contraband from entering the U.S., $755 million to hire an
additional 1,600 Asylum Officers and support staff to facilitate timely
immigration dispositions, $100 million for Homeland Security
Investigations to investigate and disrupt transnational criminal
organizations and drug traffickers, $1.3 billion for the Executive Office
for Immigration Review (EOIR) to fund the hiring of 375 new immigration
judge teams to help reduce the immigration case backlog, and $849 million
for cutting-edge detection technology at ports of entry. Taken together,
these long-term capacity building investments equip the Nation�s border
security and immigration system to more effectively respond to challenges
present along the border. In addition, the Administration appreciates the
Senate�s bipartisan border legislation that would make additional
investments in DHS and provide authorities to bolster the Department�s
efforts to secure and manage the border.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-
releases/2024/03/11/fact-sheet-the-presidents-budget-secures-our-border-
combats-fentanyl-trafficking-and-calls-on-congress-to-enact-critical-
immigration-reform/

=========
You got that? $13.6 Billon for the border - and the Repugs blocked it.

In article <v5fbch$1nmg1$3@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
>
> waiting <waiting@yahoo.com> wrote in news:v5f1mn$8t8t$2@news.mixmin.net:
>
> > There was nothing illegal about what Trump did. District Attorney's
> > make those kinds of deals every day.
> >
> The jury said what he did was illegal - felonies.

The jury was bought.

In article <v5fc4v$1nmg1$8@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
>
> CLV <cv@invalid.org> wrote in news:v5ev67$1k5qv$74@dont-email.me:
>
> > On 6/25/2024 11:32 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >> In article <v5ema7$1jk6h$6@dont-email.me>,
> >> bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
> >>>
> >>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
> >>> news:667acb82$0$3068695$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
> >>>
> >>>> In article <v5damj$1bhsb$7@dont-email.me>,
> >>>> bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>>> And later, when the Senate put together a bill on the Border
> >>>>> issue, tRump demanded the House kill it (and they did).
> >>>>
> >>>> It was more for other countries with a "border" bill slipped in. No
> >>>> bill needed. Just follow the law.
> >>>>
> >>> We hear that propaganda again and again, but somehow the courts
> >>> think otherwise.
> >>
> >> The same courts that are trying to get rid of Trump? The bill was for
> >> sending tons of money to Ukraine and very little to the border. No
> >> money needed, just follow the fucking law.
> >
> > https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/02/05/senate-border-bill-d
> > etails/
> >
> > The overall aid package includes $14 billion in assistance for Israel,
> > $60 billion for Ukraine and $4.83 billion to Indo-Pacific nations. It
> > also has $9.2 billion in humanitarian aid for civilians in Gaza, the
> > West Bank, Ukraine and other nations, as well as $20 billion in U.S.
> > border funds.
> >
>
> That was AFTER they stripped out the Border stuff.
> =====
> In October 2023, the Administration transmitted an emergency
> supplemental request to Congress for the southwest border and migration
> issues totaling $13.6 billion. The Budget includes, and therefore
> reiterates the need for, the unmet needs from the October supplemental
> request. In addition to urgent requirements, the request includes
> investments to build longer-term capacity in the areas of border
> security, immigration enforcement, and countering illicit fentanyl,
> totaling $4.3 billion for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and
> the Department of Justice (DOJ). This amount includes $405 million to
> hire 1,300 additional Border Patrol Agents to secure the border, $239
> million to hire 1,000 additional CBP Officers to stop illicit fentanyl
> and other contraband from entering the U.S., $755 million to hire an
> additional 1,600 Asylum Officers and support staff to facilitate timely
> immigration dispositions, $100 million for Homeland Security
> Investigations to investigate and disrupt transnational criminal
> organizations and drug traffickers, $1.3 billion for the Executive Office
> for Immigration Review (EOIR) to fund the hiring of 375 new immigration
> judge teams to help reduce the immigration case backlog, and $849 million
> for cutting-edge detection technology at ports of entry. Taken together,
> these long-term capacity building investments equip the Nation?s border
> security and immigration system to more effectively respond to challenges
> present along the border. In addition, the Administration appreciates the
> Senate?s bipartisan border legislation that would make additional
> investments in DHS and provide authorities to bolster the Department?s
> efforts to secure and manage the border.
>
> https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-
> releases/2024/03/11/fact-sheet-the-presidents-budget-secures-our-border-
> combats-fentanyl-trafficking-and-calls-on-congress-to-enact-critical-
> immigration-reform/
>
> =========
> You got that? $13.6 Billon for the border - and the Repugs blocked it.

Because they don't want all that other money going away. We don't need
money for the border, just follow the law.

On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:50:41 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
wrote:

>"Governor Swill" wrote in message
>news:do4j7jts541t5uu6r0osu5672q2u1o3f8v@4ax.com...
>>
>>On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 11:49:20 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"Fact checking" is for the lazy.
>>
>>Really? Only the lazy search for the facts?
>>
>
>On websites that call themselves 'fact checkers', yes that's lazy. You'd
>just believe and trust any website that boldly call themselves such.

Bullshit. They cite sources, weigh the pros and cons, provide you with
all the links you need to go and see for yourself. Methods completely
unknown to you.

>
>>
>>Then who is sitting back accepting whatever
>>they're fed?
>>
>
>You. Self declaring 'fact checker' sites feed you stuff and you don't
>question them.

Have you ever checked any of those sites out? Do you think they simply
declare 'that's a lie!!!' without showing what led to that 'verdict'?

--
Malte Runz

In article <8scm7jh69i00rd199dfn83sh23djq6m8ad@4ax.com>,
nobodys@busine.ss says...
>
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:50:41 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
> wrote:
>
> >"Governor Swill" wrote in message
> >news:do4j7jts541t5uu6r0osu5672q2u1o3f8v@4ax.com...
> >>
> >>On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 11:49:20 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>"Fact checking" is for the lazy.
> >>
> >>Really? Only the lazy search for the facts?
> >>
> >
> >On websites that call themselves 'fact checkers', yes that's lazy. You'd
> >just believe and trust any website that boldly call themselves such.
>
> Bullshit. They cite sources, weigh the pros and cons, provide you with
> all the links you need to go and see for yourself. Methods completely
> unknown to you.
>
>
> >
> >>
> >>Then who is sitting back accepting whatever
> >>they're fed?
> >>
> >
> >You. Self declaring 'fact checker' sites feed you stuff and you don't
> >question them.
>
> Have you ever checked any of those sites out? Do you think they simply
> declare 'that's a lie!!!' without showing what led to that 'verdict'?

How do you know this? They said so?

On 6/25/2024 2:27 PM, Skeeter-shit-for-brains wrote:

> In article <v5fbch$1nmg1$3@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
> says...
>>
>> waiting <waiting@yahoo.com> wrote in news:v5f1mn$8t8t$2@news.mixmin.net:
>>
>>> There was nothing illegal about what Trump did. District Attorney's
>>> make those kinds of deals every day.
>>>
>> The jury said what he did was illegal - felonies.
>
> The jury was

correct in its verdict. Fuck off, loser.

On 6/25/2024 2:46 PM, Malte Runz wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:50:41 +1000, Andrea W, lying trolling HIV-oozing Nazi whore, lied:
>
>> "Governor Swill" wrote in message
>> news:do4j7jts541t5uu6r0osu5672q2u1o3f8v@4ax.com...
>>>
>>> On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 11:49:20 +1000, Andrea W, lying trolling HIV-oozing Nazi whore, lied:
>>>
>>>> "Fact checking" is for the lazy.
>>>
>>> Really? Only the lazy search for the facts?
>>>
>>
>> On websites that call themselves 'fact checkers', yes that's lazy. You'd
>> just believe and trust any website that boldly call themselves such.
>
> Bullshit. They cite sources, weigh the pros and cons, provide you with
> all the links you need to go and see for yourself. Methods completely
> unknown to you.

Right. Andrea (the lying trolling HIV-oozing Nazi whore) doesn't do any research
at all. Being a confirmed ideological extremist, all she does is look for lie
site sources in the far-right echo chamber that appear to confirm what she
already believes.

>
>>
>>>
>>> Then who is sitting back accepting whatever
>>> they're fed?
>>>
>>
>> You. Self declaring 'fact checker' sites feed you stuff and you don't
>> question them.
>
> Have you ever checked any of those sites out? Do you think they simply
> declare 'that's a lie!!!' without showing what led to that 'verdict'?

They don't. As you noted, they state their sources, and there nearly always are
several.

In article <v5fe6b$1nteg$1@dont-email.me>, anc@ie.nt says...
>
> On 6/25/2024 2:27 PM, Skeeter-shit-for-brains wrote:
>
> > In article <v5fbch$1nmg1$3@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
> > says...
> >>
> >> waiting <waiting@yahoo.com> wrote in news:v5f1mn$8t8t$2@news.mixmin.net:
> >>
> >>> There was nothing illegal about what Trump did. District Attorney's
> >>> make those kinds of deals every day.
> >>>
> >> The jury said what he did was illegal - felonies.
> >
> > The jury was
>
> correct in its verdict. Fuck off, loser.

Rudy loses again.

On 6/25/2024 3:48 PM, Skeeter Shit-for-brains-moron wrote:

> In article <v5fe6b$1nteg$1@dont-email.me>, anc@ie.nt says...
>>
>> On 6/25/2024 2:27 PM, Skeeter-shit-for-brains wrote:
>>
>>> In article <v5fbch$1nmg1$3@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
>>> says...
>>>>
>>>> waiting <waiting@yahoo.com> wrote in news:v5f1mn$8t8t$2@news.mixmin.net:
>>>>
>>>>> There was nothing illegal about what Trump did. District Attorney's
>>>>> make those kinds of deals every day.
>>>>>
>>>> The jury said what he did was illegal - felonies.
>>>
>>> The jury was
>>
>> correct in its verdict. Fuck off, loser.
>
> Rudy

didn't post that, you useless assnugget. It's obvious you have shit
for brains.

"Baxter" wrote in message news:v5fbch$1nmg1$3@dont-email.me...
>
>waiting <waiting@yahoo.com> wrote in news:v5f1mn$8t8t$2@news.mixmin.net:
>
>> There was nothing illegal about what Trump did. District Attorney's
>> make those kinds of deals every day.
>>
>The jury said what he did was illegal - felonies.
>

So you just believe it then??
It's blatantly obvious the court was rigged by the Dems.

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

"Governor Swill" wrote in message
news:dcml7j9k0qm46tsnhqflisnvbs6ek3dgh0@4ax.com...
>
>On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 14:40:12 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote:
>
>>They were really misdemeanours, the left just called them felonies for
>>their
>>kangaroo court.
>
>Show us the charging documents.
>

Show us your still functioning brain cells.

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

"Chips Loral" wrote in message news:v5f6vq$1mvri$1@dont-email.me...
>
>Scout wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:667aff8c$0$3068680$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>>> In article <v5emn3$1jkrf$4@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 6/24/2024 9:40 PM, Andrea W, lying trolling whore, lied:
>>>> > "J Carlson" wrote in message news:v5c0rf$v4dv$17@dont-email.me...
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On 6/24/2024 7:40 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
>>>> >>> On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 09:11:58 +1000, Andrea W, lying trolling
>>>> whore, >>> lied:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>> "Governor Swill" wrote in message
>>>> >>>> news:t5og7j9rp0m3f7ldol3m4t1p6gqao24l4e@4ax.com...
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 09:08:22 +1000, Andrea W, lying trolling
>>>> whore, >>>>> lied:
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> "Governor Swill" wrote in message
>>>> >>>>>> news:ku9c7j9diqmhbjue83fb8afqs95hbmebsa@4ax.com...
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> I don't agree with leftists because they're left any more than
>>>> I >>>>> disagree
>>>> >>>>> with rightists
>>>> >>>>> just because they're on the right. I listen to both,
>>>> corroborate >>>>> what I
>>>> >>>>> can and make up
>>>> >>>>> my own mind. I have no handlers telling me what to think.
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Yeah yeah. You are influenced. It's the political hate factor
>>>> >>>> undercurrent.
>>>> >>>> You've allowed yourself to be caught up.
>>>> >>>> There is no real evidence that Trump has done anything more
>>>> illegal >>>> than any
>>>> >>>> other New York businessman. None are fully honest.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> So here we have your bias and ignorance on full display. The
>>>> State >>> of New
>>>> >>> York prosecutes
>>>> >>> nearly a thousand cases a year on these same charges.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> He was originally indicted on misdemeanours,
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Ignorance strikes again. Your insistence on getting information
>>>> >>> solely from
>>>> >>> biased
>>>> >>> sources does you a disservice. Trump was NEVER charged with >>>
>>>> misdemeanors.
>>>> >>> The charges
>>>> >>> were felonies from the start.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Exactly right. The only crimes for which Trump was indicted were
>>>> >> felonies from
>>>> >> the outset. There is this persistent false believe, which by this
>>>> >> point is a
>>>> >> lie, that Trump was charged with misdemeanors which were
>>>> >> subsequently
>>>> >> "upgraded" to felonies. That's completely wrong. Trump was
>>>> indicted 34 >> times
>>>> >> for violation of § 175.10, "Falsifying business records in the
>>>> first >> degree."
>>>> >> https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/PEN/175.10 There were *no*
>>>> >> misdemeanors in the indictment at any time.
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> > They were really misdemeanours,
>>>>
>>>> No, Andrea, you stupid filthy lying HIV-oozing whore. They were
>>>> *always* felonies.
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>> and the left Dem prosecutors
>>>> >>>> sneakily changed them to felonies because they can't jail him
>>>> >>>> otherwise.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Again, you are quite wrong AND, Trump never went to jail, nor
>>>> will >>> he.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> He might, but not soon.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>> They want to take him down.
>>>> >>>> Why?
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Because he's a selfish, criminal asshole who's spent his whole
>>>> life >>> stepping
>>>> >>> on people and
>>>> >>> making enemies and is not shocked that they all want a piece of
>>>> him >>> when they
>>>> >>> have the
>>>> >>> chance.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Because he's a criminal and has been one his entire adult life,
>>>> and >> probably
>>>> >> for a good part of his pre-adult life.
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> > No your lot are the criminals.
>>>>
>>>> No, Trump and all his neo-Nazi followers like you are the criminals,
>>>> Andrea, you
>>>> filthy lying Nazi HIV-oozing whore.
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>> Because Trump is a system buster who called out the real crooked
>>>> >>>> left
>>>> >>>> and now they're taking revenge. It's so obvious it's not funny.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Actually, it *is* obvious, even if not to you. Now THAT'S funny!
>>>> >>> Breakdown,
>>>> >>> "system
>>>> >>> buster" = "rule breaker", "crooked left" = "anybody who's not a
>>>> >>> selfish
>>>> >>> asshole" and
>>>> >>> "revenge" = "caught him red handed".
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Trump is the most blatant selfish asshole in American history.
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> > Hate speech!
>>>>
>>>> No, truth speech. Trump is the most corrupt, venal, crooked and amoral
>>>> president
>>>> in history, and you *know* this, Andrea, you filthy lying trolling
>>>> HIV-oozing
>>>> Nazi whore.
>>>
>>> Rudy is losing again. How can we tell? Just read his responses.
>>
>> You can tell when Rudy realizes he's lost because he starts asserting he
>> knows what other people are thinking..
>> ... when the truth is Rudy doesn't even know what he thinks because he
>> can't. Think that is.
>
>Rudey has been booted by both Easynews and Giganews in the past month.
>

Was he really? Haha. How did you find out?

>
>Friends (all of you), thank you for sending in your abuse complaints on
>this psychotic spammer and subhuman death threat machine, they really
>mattered!!!
>
>:-)
>
>
>Oh and always remember to fix the spelling on the followup groups that he
>corrupts.
>
>He is a consummate coward, little man Ball is.
>

He needs therapy. We should make an appointment for him asap.

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

In article <v5fhmc$1os16$1@dont-email.me>, anc@ie.nt says...
>
> On 6/25/2024 3:48 PM, Skeeter Shit-for-brains-moron wrote:
>
> > In article <v5fe6b$1nteg$1@dont-email.me>, anc@ie.nt says...
> >>
> >> On 6/25/2024 2:27 PM, Skeeter-shit-for-brains wrote:
> >>
> >>> In article <v5fbch$1nmg1$3@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
> >>> says...
> >>>>
> >>>> waiting <waiting@yahoo.com> wrote in news:v5f1mn$8t8t$2@news.mixmin.net:
> >>>>
> >>>>> There was nothing illegal about what Trump did. District Attorney's
> >>>>> make those kinds of deals every day.
> >>>>>
> >>>> The jury said what he did was illegal - felonies.
> >>>
> >>> The jury was
> >>
> >> correct in its verdict. Fuck off, loser.
> >
> > Rudy
>
> didn't post that, you useless assnugget. It's obvious you have shit
> for brains.

Look at Rudy lie. To much defense nimrod.

"J Carlson" wrote in message news:v5elli$1jkrf$2@dont-email.me...
>
>On 6/24/2024 9:15 PM, Andrea W, lying trolling whore, lied:
>
>> "Governor Swill" wrote in message
>> news:ls0j7j9pie74o198ig0ovmpro6is9i2t00@4ax.com...
>>>
>>> On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 09:11:58 +1000, "Andrea W, lying trolling whore,
>>> lied:
>
>>>
>>>> "Governor Swill" wrote in message
>>>> news:t5og7j9rp0m3f7ldol3m4t1p6gqao24l4e@4ax.com...
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 09:08:22 +1000, Andrea W, lying trolling whore,
>>>>> lied:
>
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Governor Swill" wrote in message
>>>>>> news:ku9c7j9diqmhbjue83fb8afqs95hbmebsa@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 12:50:33 +1000, Andrea W, lying trolling whore,
>>>>>>> lied:
>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Governor Swill" wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:c1g97jt0aeq0unru7nnh4qb9n1ifq6j980@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 09:27:46 +1000, Andrea W, lying trolling
>>>>>>>>> whore, lied:
>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It was worse under Obama and his predecessors. It was on the way
>>>>>>>>>> down
>>>>>>>>>> under
>>>>>>>>>> Trump.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's mind boggling to see how much of Trump's candy you suck on.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Candy? Like the MSM kool aid?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I ignore the MSM, as you call it. There are too many other ways of
>>>>>>> getting
>>>>>>> information.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Really? Funny how you badmouth Trump like the MSM.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, I do. That's because his status as a criminal asshole white
>>>>> supremacist isn't mere
>>>>> MSM propaganda, but is my opinion based on multiple reports across the
>>>>> entire political
>>>>> spectrum including what his own sycophants have to say about him.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't agree with leftists because they're left any more than I
>>>>> disagree
>>>>> with rightists
>>>>> just because they're on the right. I listen to both, corroborate what
>>>>> I
>>>>> can and make up
>>>>> my own mind. I have no handlers telling me what to think.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah yeah. You are influenced. It's the political hate factor
>>>> undercurrent.
>>>> You've allowed yourself to be caught up.
>>>> There is no real evidence that Trump has done anything more illegal
>>>> than any
>>>> other New York businessman. None are fully honest.
>>>
>>> So here we have your bias and ignorance on full display. The State of
>>> New York prosecutes
>>> nearly a thousand cases a year on these same charges.
>>>>
>>
>> Nope. They are far worse cases.
>
>They are not, Andrea, you stupid lying Nazi whore. They are virtually
>identical.
>
>>>
>>>> He was originally indicted on misdemeanours,
>
>That's a lie. The indictment was *only* on felonies.
>
>>>
>>> Ignorance strikes again. Your insistence on getting information solely
>>> from biased
>>> sources does you a disservice. Trump was NEVER charged with
>>> misdemeanors. The charges
>>> were felonies from the start.
>>>
>>
>> I didn't say charged. He was originally accused of misdemeanours.
>
>That's a lie, Andrea, you lying trolling whore. The original indictment was
>on 34 felony counts of falsification of business records in the first
>degree.
>
>>
>>>
>>>> and the left Dem prosecutors
>>>> sneakily changed them to felonies because they can't jail him
>>>> otherwise.
>>>
>>> Again, you are quite wrong AND, Trump never went to jail,
>>>
>>
>> I didn't say he did go to jail.
>
>He is *going* to go to jail, and it is to be hoped the shitbag dies behind
>bars.
>
>>
>>>
>>> nor will he.
>>>
>>
>> So this is just election interference.
>
>No, Andrea, you stupid lying trolling Nazi whore.
>
>>>
>>>> They want to take him down.
>>>> Why?
>>>
>>> Because he's a selfish, criminal asshole who's spent his whole life
>>> stepping on people and
>>> making enemies and is not shocked that they all want a piece of him when
>>> they have the
>>> chance.
>>>
>>
>> Rubbish.
>
>No, rock-solid unimpeachable fact.
>
>>
>>>
>>>> Because Trump is a system buster who called out the real crooked left
>
>Bullshit.
>
>>>
>>> Actually, it *is* obvious, even if not to you. Now THAT'S funny!
>>> Breakdown, "system
>>> buster" = "rule breaker", "crooked left" = "anybody who's not a
>>> selfish asshole" and
>>> "revenge" = "caught him red handed".
>>>
>>
>> The crooks are calling him a crook to take him down.
>
>No. The honest people are calling a crook what he is — a corrupt, venal,
>amoral filthy fucking crook — and he's whining about it.
>

Broken record. Get a new gig.

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

"Governor Swill" wrote in message
news:ciml7j5mv1gau60grvgb7a13rbl1g9ka8o@4ax.com...
>
>On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 14:15:08 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote:
>
>>>So here we have your bias and ignorance on full display. The State of
>>>New
>>>York prosecutes
>>>nearly a thousand cases a year on these same charges.
>>>>
>>
>>Nope. They are far worse cases.
>
>Where is your evidence?
>

Try using your brain. It helps.

>
>Oh, you don't have any? So you're just talking out of your ass?
>
>https://x.com/raggapegs/status/1778298156913979405/photo/1
>

How juvenile.

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site