"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:v5damj$1bhsb$7@dont-email.me...
> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:k28j7jhfdhef9t1f980cu7ra6hfd8e0p9l@4ax.com:
>
>> On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 15:30:34 -0600, Skeeter
>> <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>In article <pv0h7j1ot72t139r6ov39svjsl85u07fpc@4ax.com>,
>>>governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 14:54:40 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
>>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >Nikos Aliagas <nospam@oui.fr> wrote in news:v55s7d$3gdlk$5
>>>> >@news.mixmin.net:
>>>> >
>>>> >> Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in
>>>> >> news:v55ddp$3if4b$6@dont-email.me:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
>>>> >>> news:6675da81$0$212411$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>> In article <v54fot$38mfs$11@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com
>>>> >>>> says...
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> On 6/21/2024 10:38 AM, Chips Loral wrote:
>>>> >>>>> > Baxter wrote:
>>>> >>>>> >> Now the video starts with Biden triping on a sandbag - how
>>>> >>>>> >> is that comedic?
>>>> >>>>> >
>>>> >>>>> > How is leaving our borders open for invaders
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> There are no "invaders," spammy, you stupid blowjob and
>>>> >>>>> feckless cunt, and the borders are not open. Fuck off,
>>>> >>>>> cocksucker.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> So all those crossing are doing it legally?
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> So what?! The LAW says, that if you're here you are allowed to
>>>> >>> apply for asylum.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> You've never read the law or you wouldn't have written that.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/refugees-and-asylum/asylum
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >Nothing in that reference contradicts what I wrote.
>>>>
>>>> It reinforces it.
>>>>
>>>> "You may only file this application if you are physically present in
>>>> the United States, and you are not a U.S. citizen."
>>>>
>>>> Swill
>>>
>>>But if you break the law getting in you should be deported.
>>
>> The Constitution requires due process of law which means they get a
>> hearing before deportation. That hearing then considers their
>> application.
>>
>> Unfortunately, INS is so short of resources that those hearing dates
>> can sometimes by many months away. If we had more immigration courts
>> we could process these people right back out of the country without
>> delay.
>>
>> Sadly, when Biden asked Congress for money to do just that in 2021,
>> Senate Republicans blocked it.
>>
> And later, when the Senate put together a bill on the Border issue, tRump
> demanded the House kill it (and they did).

Yep, and if it had been a clean bill without all the extra shit that
liberals stuck in it.. he would have signed it.

Not going to accept a lollypop buried in a ton of shit... and neither should
you.

"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
news:667acb82$0$3068695$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
> In article <v5damj$1bhsb$7@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
> says...
>>
>> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in
>> news:k28j7jhfdhef9t1f980cu7ra6hfd8e0p9l@4ax.com:
>>
>> > On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 15:30:34 -0600, Skeeter
>> > <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>In article <pv0h7j1ot72t139r6ov39svjsl85u07fpc@4ax.com>,
>> >>governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 14:54:40 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
>> >>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> >Nikos Aliagas <nospam@oui.fr> wrote in news:v55s7d$3gdlk$5
>> >>> >@news.mixmin.net:
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in
>> >>> >> news:v55ddp$3if4b$6@dont-email.me:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
>> >>> >>> news:6675da81$0$212411$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>> In article <v54fot$38mfs$11@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com
>> >>> >>>> says...
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> On 6/21/2024 10:38 AM, Chips Loral wrote:
>> >>> >>>>> > Baxter wrote:
>> >>> >>>>> >> Now the video starts with Biden triping on a sandbag - how
>> >>> >>>>> >> is that comedic?
>> >>> >>>>> >
>> >>> >>>>> > How is leaving our borders open for invaders
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> There are no "invaders," spammy, you stupid blowjob and
>> >>> >>>>> feckless cunt, and the borders are not open. Fuck off,
>> >>> >>>>> cocksucker.
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>> So all those crossing are doing it legally?
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> So what?! The LAW says, that if you're here you are allowed to
>> >>> >>> apply for asylum.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> You've never read the law or you wouldn't have written that.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/refugees-and-asylum/asylum
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >
>> >>> >Nothing in that reference contradicts what I wrote.
>> >>>
>> >>> It reinforces it.
>> >>>
>> >>> "You may only file this application if you are physically present in
>> >>> the United States, and you are not a U.S. citizen."
>> >>>
>> >>> Swill
>> >>
>> >>But if you break the law getting in you should be deported.
>> >
>> > The Constitution requires due process of law which means they get a
>> > hearing before deportation. That hearing then considers their
>> > application.
>> >
>> > Unfortunately, INS is so short of resources that those hearing dates
>> > can sometimes by many months away. If we had more immigration courts
>> > we could process these people right back out of the country without
>> > delay.
>> >
>> > Sadly, when Biden asked Congress for money to do just that in 2021,
>> > Senate Republicans blocked it.
>> >
>> And later, when the Senate put together a bill on the Border issue, tRump
>> demanded the House kill it (and they did).
>
> It was more for other countries with a "border" bill slipped in. No bill
> needed. Just follow the law.

Bingo.

Baxter's idea of a good bill..

Take a massive pile of steaming shit.. and put a cherry on top....

after all everyone like a cherry...

....he just doesn't talk about all they shit they would have to eat as well.

"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in message
news:v5dhne$1cqnf$1@dont-email.me...
> "J Carlson" wrote in message news:v5c0rf$v4dv$17@dont-email.me...
>>
>>On 6/24/2024 7:40 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
>>> On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 09:11:58 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Governor Swill" wrote in message
>>>> news:t5og7j9rp0m3f7ldol3m4t1p6gqao24l4e@4ax.com...
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 09:08:22 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Governor Swill" wrote in message
>>>>>> news:ku9c7j9diqmhbjue83fb8afqs95hbmebsa@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't agree with leftists because they're left any more than I
>>>>> disagree
>>>>> with rightists
>>>>> just because they're on the right. I listen to both, corroborate what
>>>>> I
>>>>> can and make up
>>>>> my own mind. I have no handlers telling me what to think.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah yeah. You are influenced. It's the political hate factor
>>>> undercurrent.
>>>> You've allowed yourself to be caught up.
>>>> There is no real evidence that Trump has done anything more illegal
>>>> than any
>>>> other New York businessman. None are fully honest.
>>>
>>> So here we have your bias and ignorance on full display. The State of
>>> New York prosecutes
>>> nearly a thousand cases a year on these same charges.
>>>>
>>>> He was originally indicted on misdemeanours,
>>>
>>> Ignorance strikes again. Your insistence on getting information solely
>>> from biased
>>> sources does you a disservice. Trump was NEVER charged with
>>> misdemeanors. The charges
>>> were felonies from the start.
>>
>>Exactly right. The only crimes for which Trump was indicted were felonies
>>from the outset. There is this persistent false believe, which by this
>>point is a lie, that Trump was charged with misdemeanors which were
>>subsequently "upgraded" to felonies. That's completely wrong. Trump was
>>indicted 34 times for violation of § 175.10, "Falsifying business records
>>in the first degree." https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/PEN/175.10
>>There were *no* misdemeanors in the indictment at any time.
>>
>
> They were really misdemeanours, the left just called them felonies for
> their kangaroo court.

meanwhile Biden was found to have a preponderance of evidence of having
committed a series of felonies for a crime we know is considered not only a
felony but an impeachable offense.. but it was decided that Biden was too
incompetent to even understand the charges against him..

HOWEVER.. that same idiot is utterly competent to remain President and even
run for re-election to that office.

So which is it? Should he be removed from office due to his mental
incapacity.. or prosecuted for the multiple felonies he has been shown to
have committed?

Further, as long as Biden is in office.. they have no basis to complain that
Trump is in any manner mentally impaired.

On 6/25/2024 9:25 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
> I'm a woke leftist

How'd you lose that Sleazynews account Rudey?

Are they charging you their $500 SPAM cleanup fee, little man Ball?

And where did your Giganews account run off to?

On 6/25/2024 9:24 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
> Then how did you find out?

How'd you lose that Sleazynews account Rudey?

Are they charging you their $500 SPAM cleanup fee, little man Ball?

And where did your Giganews account run off to?

On 6/25/2024 9:17 AM, J Carlson wrote:
> just lies.

How'd you lose that Sleazynews account Rudey?

Are they charging you their $500 SPAM cleanup fee, little man Ball?

And where did your Giganews account run off to?

On 6/25/2024 9:17 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
> More clues:

How'd you lose that Sleazynews account Rudey?

Are they charging you their $500 SPAM cleanup fee, little man Ball?

And where did your Giganews account run off to?

On 6/25/2024 9:13 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
> But don't take my word for it.

How'd you lose that Sleazynews account Rudey?

Are they charging you their $500 SPAM cleanup fee, little man Ball?

And where did your Giganews account run off to?

On 6/25/2024 9:11 AM, J Carlson wrote:
> No truth speech.

How'd you lose that Sleazynews account Rudey?

Are they charging you their $500 SPAM cleanup fee, little man Ball?

And where did your Giganews account run off to?

On 6/25/2024 9:04 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
> And this is the guy who knows what reality is?

How'd you lose that Sleazynews account Rudey?

Are they charging you their $500 SPAM cleanup fee, little man Ball?

And where did your Giganews account run off to?

On 6/25/2024 8:56 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
> Where is your evidence?

How'd you lose that Sleazynews account Rudey?

Are they charging you their $500 SPAM cleanup fee, little man Ball?

And where did your Giganews account run off to?

On 6/25/2024 8:53 AM, J Carlson wrote:
> rock-solid unimpeachable fact.

How'd you lose that Sleazynews account Rudey?

Are they charging you their $500 SPAM cleanup fee, little man Ball?

And where did your Giganews account run off to?

On 6/25/2024 8:52 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
> Show us the charging documents.
>
> Swill

How'd you lose that Sleazynews account Rudey?

Are they charging you their $500 SPAM cleanup fee, little man Ball?

And where did your Giganews account run off to?

On 6/24/2024 5:45 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
> He actually said that?

How'd you lose that Sleazynews account Rudey?

Are they charging you their $500 SPAM cleanup fee, little man Ball?

And where did your Giganews account run off to?

On 6/24/2024 5:50 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
> Thus my question and an earlier comment

How'd you lose that Sleazynews account Rudey?

Are they charging you their $500 SPAM cleanup fee, little man Ball?

And where did your Giganews account run off to?

On 6/24/2024 6:01 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
> Put your money where your mouth is

How'd you lose that Sleazynews account Rudey?

Are they charging you their $500 SPAM cleanup fee, little man Ball?

And where did your Giganews account run off to?

On 6/24/2024 6:03 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
> population rises.
>
> Swill

How'd you lose that Sleazynews account Rudey?

Are they charging you their $500 SPAM cleanup fee, little man Ball?

And where did your Giganews account run off to?

On 6/24/2024 6:06 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
> You weren't invited?

How'd you lose that Sleazynews account Rudey?

Are they charging you their $500 SPAM cleanup fee, little man Ball?

And where did your Giganews account run off to?

In article <v5elli$1jkrf$2@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
>
> On 6/24/2024 9:15 PM, Andrea W, lying trolling whore, lied:
>
> > "Governor Swill"  wrote in message
> > news:ls0j7j9pie74o198ig0ovmpro6is9i2t00@4ax.com...
> >>
> >> On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 09:11:58 +1000, "Andrea W, lying trolling whore, lied:
>
> >>
> >>> "Governor Swill"  wrote in message
> >>> news:t5og7j9rp0m3f7ldol3m4t1p6gqao24l4e@4ax.com...
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 09:08:22 +1000, Andrea W, lying trolling whore, lied:
>
> >>>>
> >>>>> "Governor Swill"  wrote in message
> >>>>> news:ku9c7j9diqmhbjue83fb8afqs95hbmebsa@4ax.com...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 12:50:33 +1000, Andrea W, lying trolling whore, lied:
>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> "Governor Swill"  wrote in message
> >>>>>>> news:c1g97jt0aeq0unru7nnh4qb9n1ifq6j980@4ax.com...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 09:27:46 +1000, Andrea W, lying trolling whore, lied:
>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> It was worse under Obama and his predecessors. It was on the way down
> >>>>>>>>> under
> >>>>>>>>> Trump.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> It's mind boggling to see how much of Trump's candy you suck on.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Candy? Like the MSM kool aid?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I ignore the MSM, as you call it.  There are too many other ways of
> >>>>>> getting
> >>>>>> information.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Really? Funny how you badmouth Trump like the MSM.
> >>>>
> >>>> Yeah, I do.  That's because his status as a criminal asshole white
> >>>> supremacist isn't mere
> >>>> MSM propaganda, but is my opinion based on multiple reports across the
> >>>> entire political
> >>>> spectrum including what his own sycophants have to say about him.
> >>>>
> >>>> I don't agree with leftists because they're left any more than I disagree
> >>>> with rightists
> >>>> just because they're on the right.  I listen to both, corroborate what I
> >>>> can and make up
> >>>> my own mind.  I have no handlers telling me what to think.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Yeah yeah. You are influenced. It's the political hate factor undercurrent.
> >>> You've allowed yourself to be caught up.
> >>> There is no real evidence that Trump has done anything more illegal than any
> >>> other New York businessman. None are fully honest.
> >>
> >> So here we have your bias and ignorance on full display.  The State of New
> >> York prosecutes
> >> nearly a thousand cases a year on these same charges.
> >>>
> >
> > Nope. They are far worse cases.
>
> They are not, Andrea, you stupid lying Nazi whore. They are virtually identical.
>
> >>
> >>> He was originally indicted on misdemeanours,
>
> That's a lie. The indictment was *only* on felonies.
>
> >>
> >> Ignorance strikes again.  Your insistence on getting information solely from
> >> biased
> >> sources does you a disservice.  Trump was NEVER charged with misdemeanors. The
> >> charges
> >> were felonies from the start.
> >>
> >
> > I didn't say charged. He was originally accused of misdemeanours.
>
> That's a lie, Andrea, you lying trolling whore. The original indictment was on
> 34 felony counts of falsification of business records in the first degree.
>
> >
> >>
> >>> and the left Dem prosecutors
> >>> sneakily changed them to felonies because they can't jail him otherwise.
> >>
> >> Again, you are quite wrong AND, Trump never went to jail,
> >>
> >
> > I didn't say he did go to jail.
>
> He is *going* to go to jail, and it is to be hoped the shitbag dies behind bars.

The only way you can win.
>
> >
> >>
> >> nor will he.
> >>
> >
> > So this is just election interference.
>
> No, Andrea, you stupid lying trolling Nazi whore.
>
> >>
> >>> They want to take him down.
> >>> Why?
> >>
> >> Because he's a selfish, criminal asshole who's spent his whole life stepping
> >> on people and
> >> making enemies and is not shocked that they all want a piece of him when they
> >> have the
> >> chance.
> >>
> >
> > Rubbish.
>
> No, rock-solid unimpeachable fact.
>
> >
> >>
> >>> Because Trump is a system buster who called out the real crooked left
>
> Bullshit.
>
> >>
> >> Actually, it *is* obvious, even if not to you.  Now THAT'S funny! Breakdown,
> >> "system
> >> buster"  =  "rule breaker", "crooked left" = "anybody who's not a selfish
> >> asshole" and
> >> "revenge" = "caught him red handed".
> >>
> >
> > The crooks are calling him a crook to take him down.
>
> No. The honest people are calling a crook what he is ? a corrupt, venal, amoral
> filthy fucking crook ? and he's whining about it.

What honest people? The ones that lied about the laptop?

In article <v5ema7$1jk6h$6@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
>
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
> news:667acb82$0$3068695$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>
> > In article <v5damj$1bhsb$7@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
> > says...
> >>
>
> >> And later, when the Senate put together a bill on the Border issue,
> >> tRump demanded the House kill it (and they did).
> >
> > It was more for other countries with a "border" bill slipped in. No
> > bill needed. Just follow the law.
> >
> We hear that propaganda again and again, but somehow the courts think
> otherwise.

The same courts that are trying to get rid of Trump? The bill was for
sending tons of money to Ukraine and very little to the border. No money
needed, just follow the fucking law.

In article <v5emn3$1jkrf$4@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
>
> On 6/24/2024 9:40 PM, Andrea W, lying trolling whore, lied:
> > "J Carlson"  wrote in message news:v5c0rf$v4dv$17@dont-email.me...
> >>
> >> On 6/24/2024 7:40 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 09:11:58 +1000, Andrea W, lying trolling whore, lied:
> >>>
> >>>> "Governor Swill"  wrote in message
> >>>> news:t5og7j9rp0m3f7ldol3m4t1p6gqao24l4e@4ax.com...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 09:08:22 +1000, Andrea W, lying trolling whore, lied:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> "Governor Swill"  wrote in message
> >>>>>> news:ku9c7j9diqmhbjue83fb8afqs95hbmebsa@4ax.com...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I don't agree with leftists because they're left any more than I disagree
> >>>>> with rightists
> >>>>> just because they're on the right.  I listen to both, corroborate what I
> >>>>> can and make up
> >>>>> my own mind.  I have no handlers telling me what to think.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Yeah yeah. You are influenced. It's the political hate factor undercurrent.
> >>>> You've allowed yourself to be caught up.
> >>>> There is no real evidence that Trump has done anything more illegal than any
> >>>> other New York businessman. None are fully honest.
> >>>
> >>> So here we have your bias and ignorance on full display.  The State of New
> >>> York prosecutes
> >>> nearly a thousand cases a year on these same charges.
> >>>>
> >>>> He was originally indicted on misdemeanours,
> >>>
> >>> Ignorance strikes again.  Your insistence on getting information solely from
> >>> biased
> >>> sources does you a disservice.  Trump was NEVER charged with misdemeanors.
> >>> The charges
> >>> were felonies from the start.
> >>
> >> Exactly right. The only crimes for which Trump was indicted were felonies from
> >> the outset. There is this persistent false believe, which by this point is a
> >> lie, that Trump was charged with misdemeanors which were subsequently
> >> "upgraded" to felonies. That's completely wrong. Trump was indicted 34 times
> >> for violation of § 175.10, "Falsifying business records in the first degree."
> >> https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/PEN/175.10 There were *no*
> >> misdemeanors in the indictment at any time.
> >>
> >
> > They were really misdemeanours,
>
> No, Andrea, you stupid filthy lying HIV-oozing whore. They were *always* felonies.
>
> >
> >>>
> >>>> and the left Dem prosecutors
> >>>> sneakily changed them to felonies because they can't jail him otherwise.
> >>>
> >>> Again, you are quite wrong AND, Trump never went to jail, nor will he.
> >>
> >> He might, but not soon.
> >>
> >>>
> >>>> They want to take him down.
> >>>> Why?
> >>>
> >>> Because he's a selfish, criminal asshole who's spent his whole life stepping
> >>> on people and
> >>> making enemies and is not shocked that they all want a piece of him when they
> >>> have the
> >>> chance.
> >>
> >> Because he's a criminal and has been one his entire adult life, and probably
> >> for a good part of his pre-adult life.
> >>
> >
> > No your lot are the criminals.
>
> No, Trump and all his neo-Nazi followers like you are the criminals, Andrea, you
> filthy lying Nazi HIV-oozing whore.
>
> >
> >>>
> >>>> Because Trump is a system buster who called out the real crooked left
> >>>> and now they're taking revenge. It's so obvious it's not funny.
> >>>
> >>> Actually, it *is* obvious, even if not to you.  Now THAT'S funny! Breakdown,
> >>> "system
> >>> buster"  =  "rule breaker", "crooked left" = "anybody who's not a selfish
> >>> asshole" and
> >>> "revenge" = "caught him red handed".
> >>
> >> Trump is the most blatant selfish asshole in American history.
> >>
> >
> > Hate speech!
>
> No, truth speech. Trump is the most corrupt, venal, crooked and amoral president
> in history, and you *know* this, Andrea, you filthy lying trolling HIV-oozing
> Nazi whore.

Rudy is losing again. How can we tell? Just read his responses.

On 6/25/2024 11:32 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <v5ema7$1jk6h$6@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
> says...
>>
>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
>> news:667acb82$0$3068695$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>>
>>> In article <v5damj$1bhsb$7@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
>>> says...
>>>>
>>
>>>> And later, when the Senate put together a bill on the Border issue,
>>>> tRump demanded the House kill it (and they did).
>>>
>>> It was more for other countries with a "border" bill slipped in. No
>>> bill needed. Just follow the law.
>>>
>> We hear that propaganda again and again, but somehow the courts think
>> otherwise.
>
> The same courts that are trying to get rid of Trump? The bill was for
> sending tons of money to Ukraine and very little to the border. No money
> needed, just follow the fucking law.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/02/05/senate-border-bill-details/

The overall aid package includes $14 billion in assistance for Israel,
$60 billion for Ukraine and $4.83 billion to Indo-Pacific nations. It
also has $9.2 billion in humanitarian aid for civilians in Gaza, the
West Bank, Ukraine and other nations, as well as $20 billion in U.S.
border funds.

In article <v5en2m$1jkrf$5@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
>
> On 6/24/2024 9:56 PM, Andrea W, lying trolling whore, lied:
> > "Malte Runz"  wrote in message news:jooj7j519746u5tqgtmqp384ikee70dnda@4ax.com...
> >>
> >> On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 11:35:22 +1000, Andrea W, lying trolling whore, lied:
> >>
> >>> "Malte Runz"  wrote in message
> >>> news:bfdh7jp32p6q7en0edq2gvuqfuki6iarer@4ax.com...
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 09:16:40 +1000, Andrea W, lying trolling whore, lied:
> >>>>
> >>>>> "Governor Swill"  wrote in message
> >>>>> news:jkog7jt69hru914uhl9qnpemvr7ie2hgtu@4ax.com...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 12:36:26 +0200, Malte Runz <nobodys@busine.ss> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> You guys should get rid of the DOJ entirely. Just get a 'medium' or
> >>>>>>> what ever you call them, and let them tell you who did it.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Why are you even responding to some conspiracist idiot who believes in
> >>>>>> ESP?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The CIA created your mentality. ...
> >>>>
> >>>> That's a conspiracy theory.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Haha! Ignorant lazy fool.
> >>
> >> From the guy who believes stories from Real Raw News.
> >>
> >
> > Nope I consider certain accounts as possibilities.
>
> You only read fake news from neo-Nazi lie sites.
>
> >>
> >>>>> ... They've been flogging the 'conspiracy
> >>>>> theory' meme in the media for decades.
> >>>>
> >>>> The concept is far older than the CIA.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Ok whatever.
> >>
> >> Maybe you should have looked into it.
> >>
> >
> > I already knew.
>
> You didn't know and you don't know, Andrea, you filthy lying trolling HIV-oozing
> Nazi whore.
>
> >
> >>
> >>>>> Alt.atheism is a ship of blind ignorant materialist fools.
> >>>>
> >>>> And your job is to give us information about what really goes on,
> >>>> correct?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Just a heads up.
>
> No ? just lies.
>
> >>
> >> 'Say what? The negative space aliens are from Orion. I didn't know
> >> that. Thanks, Andrew!'
> >>
> >> Is that how you expect people to react to your "heads up"?
> >>
> >
> > I don't say things the way you make out.
>
> You just lie, you filthy lying trolling HIV-oozing Nazi whore.
How long before you lose this account?

In article <2aol7j1m7c3kog2pkfsmev9ndthmpjsslo@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:42:33 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote:
>
> >You got that right. Woke leftists follow their feelings instead of facts.
> >They just talk about facts. Anyone who keeps on about facts constantly is
> >doing so because they haven't got any and are trying to cover it up.
>
> Good thing I'm not a woke leftist.

You are really close.

In article <rdol7j9sjhsc48b060edt0hb6jlutnn6lc@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:50:41 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote:
>
> >"Governor Swill" wrote in message
> >news:do4j7jts541t5uu6r0osu5672q2u1o3f8v@4ax.com...
> >>
> >>On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 11:49:20 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>"Fact checking" is for the lazy.
> >>
> >>Really? Only the lazy search for the facts?
> >>
> >
> >On websites that call themselves 'fact checkers', yes that's lazy.
>
> Lol! I still think it's hilarious that you think searching for the facts is the "lazy"
> thing to do.
>
> But, since you insist on hiding from reality, I'll leave you to it.
>
> >You'd
> >just believe and trust any website that boldly call themselves such.
> >
> >
> >>
> >>Then who is sitting back accepting whatever
> >>they're fed?
> >>
> >
> >You. Self declaring 'fact checker' sites feed you stuff and you don't
> >question them.
>
> Um, yes, I do if they're a new site or not reliable. But once a site establishes a
> reputation for getting it right, I don't have to do as much fact checking of my own.
>
> Swill

Who decides if they are right?