In article <v55ddp$3if4b$6@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
>
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
> news:6675da81$0$212411$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>
> > In article <v54fot$38mfs$11@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
> >>
> >> On 6/21/2024 10:38 AM, Chips Loral wrote:
> >> > Baxter wrote:
> >> >> Now the video starts with Biden triping on a sandbag - how is that
> >> >> comedic?
> >> >
> >> > How is leaving our borders open for invaders
> >>
> >> There are no "invaders," spammy, you stupid blowjob and feckless
> >> cunt, and the borders are not open. Fuck off, cocksucker.
> >
> > So all those crossing are doing it legally?
> >
>
> So what?! The LAW says, that if you're here you are allowed to apply for
> asylum.

Legally. There is a way to do it legally. Allowing just anyone to wander
in is not the law.

Nikos Aliagas <nospam@oui.fr> wrote in news:v55s7d$3gdlk$5
@news.mixmin.net:

> Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in
> news:v55ddp$3if4b$6@dont-email.me:
>
>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
>> news:6675da81$0$212411$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>>
>>> In article <v54fot$38mfs$11@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 6/21/2024 10:38 AM, Chips Loral wrote:
>>>> > Baxter wrote:
>>>> >> Now the video starts with Biden triping on a sandbag - how is
>>>> >> that comedic?
>>>> >
>>>> > How is leaving our borders open for invaders
>>>>
>>>> There are no "invaders," spammy, you stupid blowjob and feckless
>>>> cunt, and the borders are not open. Fuck off, cocksucker.
>>>
>>> So all those crossing are doing it legally?
>>>
>>
>> So what?! The LAW says, that if you're here you are allowed to apply
>> for asylum.
>
> You've never read the law or you wouldn't have written that.
>
> https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/refugees-and-asylum/asylum
>

Nothing in that reference contradicts what I wrote.

In article <v56ojf$3q388$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
>
> Nikos Aliagas <nospam@oui.fr> wrote in news:v55s7d$3gdlk$5
> @news.mixmin.net:
>
> > Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in
> > news:v55ddp$3if4b$6@dont-email.me:
> >
> >> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
> >> news:6675da81$0$212411$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
> >>
> >>> In article <v54fot$38mfs$11@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 6/21/2024 10:38 AM, Chips Loral wrote:
> >>>> > Baxter wrote:
> >>>> >> Now the video starts with Biden triping on a sandbag - how is
> >>>> >> that comedic?
> >>>> >
> >>>> > How is leaving our borders open for invaders
> >>>>
> >>>> There are no "invaders," spammy, you stupid blowjob and feckless
> >>>> cunt, and the borders are not open. Fuck off, cocksucker.
> >>>
> >>> So all those crossing are doing it legally?
> >>>
> >>
> >> So what?! The LAW says, that if you're here you are allowed to apply
> >> for asylum.
> >
> > You've never read the law or you wouldn't have written that.
> >
> > https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/refugees-and-asylum/asylum
> >
>
> Nothing in that reference contradicts what I wrote.

So you allow them to seek asylum even though they committed a crime to
get here?

On 22 Jun 2024, Malte Runz <nobodys@busine.ss> posted some
news:7n4d7jho250oro247cj6b98n1h4jkpcl8v@4ax.com:

> On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:17:19 -0600, CaLaVeRa <cv@invalid.org> wrote:
>
>>On 6/20/2024 12:15 PM, Malte Runz wrote:
>>> On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 16:55:51 -0600, CaLaVeRa <cv@invalid.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 6/19/2024 4:35 PM, Malte Runz wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 14:50:16 -0600, CaLaVeRa <cv@invalid.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>
>>> (snip)
>>>
>>>
>>>>>> You never heard of the program?
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh yes, I've heard about it. Kooks always parade it as
>>>>> 'proooooooof!'. Funny thing though, nothing ever came of it.
>>>>
>>>> It was top secret, you think they'd reveal the actual results to
>>>> us?
>>>
>>> Then how the hell do you know that it works, if they didn't reveal
>>> the results?
>>
>>Police departments use it on cold cases all the time:
>
> All the time? So there are no unsolved cases?
>>
>>https://lasvegassun.com/news/2012/may/05/seeing-dead-people-remote-view
>>ers-nevada-help-solv/
>>
>>Last year, a California court convicted a swindler of murder in a case
>>that was solved partly, the lead police investigator said, with the
>>help of remote viewing, a type of extrasensory perception (ESP) that
>>was studied by the U.S. military starting in the 1970s as a way to
>>gather intelligence.
>>
>>Knight�s information went beyond the body identification. He told
>>police about a man named Harvey Morrow, a supposed investment adviser,
>>who had befriended Williams and was investing Williams� money � a few
>>million dollars � on his behalf.
>>
>>Investigators looked into it and found that Morrow was stealing
>>Williams� money. By now, after Williams� death, Morrow wasn�t to be
>>found.
>>
>>Knight told detectives that remote viewers believed Morrow had fled to
>>the British Virgin Islands. One of the viewers even sketched a boat
>>with Morrow on board.
>>
>>Both observations turned out to be accurate.
>>
>>Clark said Morrow appeared to have no clue he was a suspect. He left
>>the Caribbean for a job as a used car salesman in Montana � for a boss
>>who was a former cop. He Googled Morrow and discovered he was sought
>>for questioning in the Williams homicide.
>>
>>Morrow was arrested and convicted in November and is now serving a
>>life sentence without possibility of parole.
>
> You guys should get rid of the DOJ entirely. Just get a 'medium' or
> what ever you call them, and let them tell you who did it.

We got a TV show named "Medium" that does exactly that.

"Governor Swill" wrote in message
news:ku9c7j9diqmhbjue83fb8afqs95hbmebsa@4ax.com...
>
>On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 12:50:33 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote:
>
>>"Governor Swill" wrote in message
>>news:c1g97jt0aeq0unru7nnh4qb9n1ifq6j980@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 09:27:46 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>It was worse under Obama and his predecessors. It was on the way down
>>>>under
>>>>Trump.
>>>
>>>It's mind boggling to see how much of Trump's candy you suck on.
>>>
>>
>>Candy? Like the MSM kool aid?
>
>I ignore the MSM, as you call it. There are too many other ways of getting
>information.
>

Really? Funny how you badmouth Trump like the MSM.

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

"Governor Swill" wrote in message
news:r3ac7jlmtrmte93vnhts5em88gkdqbthc7@4ax.com...
>
>On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 13:57:59 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com>
>wrote:
>
>>Discrediting sources is the government's number one tactic for burying
>>information that they don't
>>approve of.
>
>The *government's* number one tactic?
>
>BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>

You call yourself Governor but obviously know nothing about governments,
except what they portray to the public. It's fake.
Like Michael Jackson said, they don't care about us.

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

"Baxter" wrote in message news:v543qj$376qj$3@dont-email.me...
>
>"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in news:v5313l$30qr3$1@dont-
>email.me:
>
>> "Baxter" wrote in message news:v52rc2$2vlkp$5@dont-email.me...
>>>
>>>"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
>>>news:v52pf4$2vibu$1@dont-email.me:
>>>
>>>
>>>> It's not the same people who are talking about it, dummy. Geez.
>>>> In some cases people who no longer work for gov. and CIA etc. have
>>>> come forward about it, at great risk to themselves and their
>families.
>>>> Many have been murdered as a result.
>>>>
>>>Murdered? That's a load of horse shit.
>>>
>>
>> And how are you so sure of that?
>> Just another mainstream follower.
>
>Where's YOUR evidence? Go ahead, post references to these killers
>>

Where's your thinking ability?

>>
>>>
>>>We here those conspiracy theories
>>>all the time,
>>>
>>
>> The MSM and gov. keep claiming they're only conspiracy theories and you
>> never question or research it.
>
>They have been researched extensively.
>

Yes, but not by sheep like you.

>>
>>
>>>
>>>never any facts to back them. Vince Foster anyong?
>>>
>>
>> The MSM that you follow doesn't give any facts.
>>
>>
>What you call "facts" are bogus conspiracy theories - not actual facts.
>

You never looked into it so you can't claim that. You just repeat the
mainstream smear and disinformation campaign for the masses.

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

"Baxter" wrote in message news:v55cph$3if4b$1@dont-email.me...
>
>Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
>news:667598fd$0$3068691$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>
>> In article <v543qj$376qj$3@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
>> says...
>>>
>>> "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in news:v5313l$30qr3$1@dont-
>>> email.me:
>>>
>>> > "Baxter" wrote in message news:v52rc2$2vlkp$5@dont-email.me...
>>> >>
>>> >>"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
>>> >>news:v52pf4$2vibu$1@dont-email.me:
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>> It's not the same people who are talking about it, dummy. Geez.
>>> >>> In some cases people who no longer work for gov. and CIA etc.
>>> >>> have come forward about it, at great risk to themselves and their
>>> families.
>>> >>> Many have been murdered as a result.
>>> >>>
>>> >>Murdered? That's a load of horse shit.
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > And how are you so sure of that?
>>> > Just another mainstream follower.
>>>
>>> Where's YOUR evidence? Go ahead, post references to these killers
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >>We here those conspiracy theories
>>> >>all the time,
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > The MSM and gov. keep claiming they're only conspiracy theories and
>>> > you never question or research it.
>>>
>>> They have been researched extensively.
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >>never any facts to back them. Vince Foster anyong?
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > The MSM that you follow doesn't give any facts.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> What you call "facts" are bogus conspiracy theories - not actual
>>> facts.
>>
>> Oh the irony, we have made you totally run from most topics here. Try
>> again.
>>
>
>See above - I called for you to support your claim = and you run from it.
>

Your type only accept convenient mainstream stuff.

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

"Governor Swill" wrote in message
news:u2ac7jhdmcdt5rjb09f3pdb5tkafpq9702@4ax.com...
>
>On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 14:55:11 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote:
>
>>The MSM and gov. keep claiming they're only conspiracy theories and you
>>never question or research it.
>
>Yeah, we do and yes, they are.
>

Pretend research on Google is not research. Do you know who controls Google
and other large info/media corporations?

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

"Governor Swill" wrote in message
news:g1ac7jpecosf0pl7n78tkure10e9gqoanr@4ax.com...
>
>On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 12:44:31 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote:
>
>>It's not the same people who are talking about it, dummy. Geez.
>>In some cases people who no longer work for gov. and CIA etc. have come
>>forward about it, at great risk to themselves and their families. Many
>>have
>>been murdered as a result.
>
>You can't prove any of that either.
>

There's no need to prove it. Just start using your brain and look into
things.
Only the lazy and ignorant demand proof for everything, except for what
establishments claim.

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

"Governor Swill" wrote in message
news:96ac7jl38umbhnv7lrb7aolhvofi3456v9@4ax.com...
>
>On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 15:39:21 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote:
>
>>There is plenty of insider information on non human civilisations living
>>below the earth, oceans and in this solar system. You just don't know
>>anything about it.
>
>No offense but ... you're nuts. No, really, I mean it. You're
>infuckingsane. Makes it
>easier to understand your support for the orange asshole.
>

A typical response from one who only looks at stuff the mainstream media and
science puts out.
Unbribed/uncontrolled/uninfluenced alt sources are where the real truths
are.
Do you ever question the establishments? Your type only seem to question
those who go against them. Says a lot.

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

"Malte Runz" wrote in message
news:7nad7jpucn20n9fustdcv0ap5no5cl40cv@4ax.com...
>
>On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 15:39:21 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
>wrote:
>
>>"Malte Runz" wrote in message
>>news:gpu87jlguffarccvvnag9mcdu52fhf9t2a@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 10:04:31 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Malte Runz" wrote in message
>>>>news:7cg67jt9mh7lo1jjd7i1k9r654teon4d60@4ax.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 11:58:55 -0600, Loran <loran@invalid.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Malte Runz wrote:
>>>>>>> "The real truth", eh? Like space aliens from Orion holding secret
>>>>>>> meetings with governments?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>https://youtu.be/ItRiw2HwvF0
>>>>>>Aliens are here, and they're not our friends, John Lear says
>>>>>
>>>>>Does your video contain any kind of hard evidence of those meetings
>>>>>having taken place?
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>You mean so ~you~ don't have to do any research or investigation and can
>>>>just take it easy and be shown everything?
>>>
>>>No. How often do I need to spell it out for you? How fucking dense are
>>>you? When I ask that question I already know the answer. I ask it
>>>because I want to expose you guys. Just for the fun of it.
>>>
>>
>>So you think you already know everything in the world ...
>
>Strawman.
>

Really? You can't see your own behaviour.

>
>> ... and just want to have
>>fun like a spoiled kid.
>
>Exposing your BS is rather fun.
>

You just made my case again.

>>
>>
>>>
>>>>You will never learn any truths.
>>>
>>>Have you found that secret subterranean alien base outside of Sidney
>>>yet? No? Any news? 'What are the drums saying, Mike?'
>>>
>>
>>You mean Sydney?
>>There is plenty of insider information on non human civilisations living
>>below the earth, oceans and in this solar system. You just don't know
>>anything about it.
>
>And every time we ask you to cite a source or two you run like hell
>and blame me for not having tried to find it myself.
>

Because you only accept mainstream sources, ones that align with your
limited beliefs and prejudice.
And as for running, you keep running back to the quick and satisfying
mainstream.

>>
>>News? Yes. They are systematically removing the scumbags, like the ones
>>you
>>follow.
>
>Who are "they" in this case?
>>

Clueless as usual.

>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Baby-blood drink Hollywood elites?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>https://youtu.be/YhM5LtOkgXA
>>>>>>Hollywood PANICS as Mel Gibson EXPOSES Them All!!!
>>>>>
>>>>>Three exclamation [marks]. I guess it must be true.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>But the mainstream media stuff ~is~ true?
>>>
>>>Why don't you find out for yourself?
>>>
>>
>>Why don't you?
>
>You're the one constantly fixating on 'MSM'.
>>

The propaganda MSM happens to be the greatest threat to democracy and
freedom/free speech.

>>
>>>
>>>(snip)
>>>
>>>>>"Psychic abilities are real" What a fucking moron...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Again you just totally ignore all the above mentioned experienced
>>>>researchers, investigators and prominent people ...
>>>
>>>Ignore? I just went through (most of) the material posted as evidence.
>>>I didn't buy any of it, and I made it clear that I didn't.
>>>
>>
>>You didn't buy it? You haven't done any research on it. ...
>
>There is nothing substantial to research.
>

Bahahaha. Ok Mr tunnel vision.

>
>Finding youtubers repeating
>the claims is not researching anything.
>

Youtube is just a starting point for newbies. You failed the test ages ago.

>
>>You think this is all just about believe or not believe. You're just an
>>armchair critic. Very immature.
>
>One cannot choose what to believe.
>

Huh? Belief is a choice.
Maybe you just can't choose not to believe establishment's claims.

>
>>
>>>
>>>I've seen
>>>and read a lot about the subject. That's why I know it's BS.
>>>
>>
>>You read a bunch of stuff to look for some laughing material. ...
>
>It turned out that way.
>

That's all you do. Your type need lots of entertainment for some reason.
But there's serious stuff going on in the world.

>
>> ... Wow.
>>And you somehow just magically know what's true and what's BS.
>
>I formed an opinion based on what I learned.
>

You learned lopsided and don't know it.

>
>>>> ... who are far smarter and
>>>>knowledgeable than you. You just sling mud all the time. ...
>>>
>>>And my aim is no less than spectacular!
>>>
>>
>>You just gave away your big ego again.
>
>And you just showed us again that you can't spot irony.
>

I can, but you don't qualify for relying on irony for your responses. You
overstep your true position.

>>
>>
>>>
>>>> ... You're a smart
>>>>arse.
>>>
>>>Deep State makes me do it, remember! I'm the real victim here.
>>>
>>
>>Until recently you never even heard the term deep state. ...
>
>How do you know when I first heard about the term?
>

If you did you would have investigated it before forming a stone hard
opinion.
Your opinions and preconceptions are like that of religious zealots. You
hear it, you like it, it's "fact".

>
>In any case, the
>term is not the important part. It's the concept. 'They' have always
>been part of the conspiracy lore.
>

And you know little to nothing about it.

>
>> ... Yet somehow you
>>just know it's all BS. Because it sounds crazy - to your narrow immature
>>mind.
>
>I'm a classic rationalist.
>

You're not a rationalist. Rationalists do far more to find out truths and
are not so biased and prejudiced, sticking like glue to only one mainstream
side of a story.

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

"Malte Runz" wrote in message
news:0l197j1842rael2umg10pjsfchdmim96d1@4ax.com...
>
>On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 14:59:43 -0600, CaLaVeRa <cv@invalid.org> wrote:
>
>>On 6/17/2024 1:11 PM, Malte Runz wrote:
>>> The US economy is the envy of the world.
>>> Bigger, stronger, and more robust than any other major player.
>>
>>Military industrial complex.
>
>https://tinyurl.com/2vdpmzf4
>***
>US Defense Industry Size & Share Analysis - Growth Trends & Forecasts
>(2024 - 2032)
>
>The US Defense Market is Segmented by Armed Forces (Army, Navy, and
>Air Force) and Type (Fixed-Wing Aircraft, Rotorcraft, Ground Vehicles,
>Naval Vessels, C4isr, Weapons and Ammunition, Protection and Training
>Equipment, and Unmanned Systems). The Report Offers Market Size and
>Forecast for all the Above Segments in Value (USD).
>
>Market Size (2024): USD 309.77 Billion
>***
>
>https://tinyurl.com/3hex9y8m
>***
>US arms exports hit record high in fiscal 2023
>WASHINGTON, Jan 29 (Reuters) - Sales of U.S. military equipment to
>foreign governments in 2023 rose 16% to a record $238 billion, the
>U.S. State Department said on Monday, as countries sought to replenish
>stocks sent to Ukraine and prepare for major conflicts.
>***
>
>https://tinyurl.com/35hdmats
>Estimated size of US GDP in 2024: 28,781.08 billion.
>
>IOW the "Military Industrial Complex' counts for just under 2% of the
>US GDP.
>

Ever heard of black budgets and covert appropriations, Mr mainstream?

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:6676f517$0$2363146$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

> In article <v56ojf$3q388$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
> says...
>>
>> Nikos Aliagas <nospam@oui.fr> wrote in news:v55s7d$3gdlk$5
>> @news.mixmin.net:
>>
>> > Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in
>> > news:v55ddp$3if4b$6@dont-email.me:
>> >
>> >> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
>> >> news:6675da81$0$212411$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>> >>
>> >>> In article <v54fot$38mfs$11@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com
>> >>> says...
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 6/21/2024 10:38 AM, Chips Loral wrote:
>> >>>> > Baxter wrote:
>> >>>> >> Now the video starts with Biden triping on a sandbag - how is
>> >>>> >> that comedic?
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > How is leaving our borders open for invaders
>> >>>>
>> >>>> There are no "invaders," spammy, you stupid blowjob and feckless
>> >>>> cunt, and the borders are not open. Fuck off, cocksucker.
>> >>>
>> >>> So all those crossing are doing it legally?
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> So what?! The LAW says, that if you're here you are allowed to
>> >> apply for asylum.
>> >
>> > You've never read the law or you wouldn't have written that.
>> >
>> > https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/refugees-and-asylum/asylum
>> >
>>
>> Nothing in that reference contradicts what I wrote.
>
> So you allow them to seek asylum even though they committed a crime to
> get here?
>

Misdemeanor - not "crime" Is jaywalking a "crime"?

And, yes, that's how the law is written - they can APPLY for asylum
regardless of how they got here.

"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in news:v57n9e$cv$1@dont-email.me:

> "Governor Swill" wrote in message
> news:96ac7jl38umbhnv7lrb7aolhvofi3456v9@4ax.com...
>>
>>On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 15:39:21 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>There is plenty of insider information on non human civilisations
>>>living below the earth, oceans and in this solar system. You just
>>>don't know anything about it.
>>
>>No offense but ... you're nuts. No, really, I mean it. You're
>>infuckingsane. Makes it
>>easier to understand your support for the orange asshole.
>>
>
> A typical response from one who only looks at stuff the mainstream
> media and science puts out.
> Unbribed/uncontrolled/uninfluenced alt sources are where the real
> truths are.
> Do you ever question the establishments? Your type only seem to
> question those who go against them. Says a lot.
>
>

There's like 6 people that own 80% of all media sources. Everyone who
works for them spews only what their bosses want. And all of those 6 are
conservatives.

In article <v57vf0$4v5h$4@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
>
> "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in news:v57n9e$cv$1@dont-email.me:
>
> > "Governor Swill" wrote in message
> > news:96ac7jl38umbhnv7lrb7aolhvofi3456v9@4ax.com...
> >>
> >>On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 15:39:21 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>>There is plenty of insider information on non human civilisations
> >>>living below the earth, oceans and in this solar system. You just
> >>>don't know anything about it.
> >>
> >>No offense but ... you're nuts. No, really, I mean it. You're
> >>infuckingsane. Makes it
> >>easier to understand your support for the orange asshole.
> >>
> >
> > A typical response from one who only looks at stuff the mainstream
> > media and science puts out.
> > Unbribed/uncontrolled/uninfluenced alt sources are where the real
> > truths are.
> > Do you ever question the establishments? Your type only seem to
> > question those who go against them. Says a lot.
> >
> >
>
> There's like 6 people that own 80% of all media sources. Everyone who
> works for them spews only what their bosses want. And all of those 6 are
> conservatives.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!

You look so silly when you try to act smart.

In article <v57ush$4v5h$1@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
>
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
> news:6676f517$0$2363146$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>
> > In article <v56ojf$3q388$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
> > says...
> >>
> >> Nikos Aliagas <nospam@oui.fr> wrote in news:v55s7d$3gdlk$5
> >> @news.mixmin.net:
> >>
> >> > Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in
> >> > news:v55ddp$3if4b$6@dont-email.me:
> >> >
> >> >> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
> >> >> news:6675da81$0$212411$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
> >> >>
> >> >>> In article <v54fot$38mfs$11@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com
> >> >>> says...
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On 6/21/2024 10:38 AM, Chips Loral wrote:
> >> >>>> > Baxter wrote:
> >> >>>> >> Now the video starts with Biden triping on a sandbag - how is
> >> >>>> >> that comedic?
> >> >>>> >
> >> >>>> > How is leaving our borders open for invaders
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> There are no "invaders," spammy, you stupid blowjob and feckless
> >> >>>> cunt, and the borders are not open. Fuck off, cocksucker.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> So all those crossing are doing it legally?
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >> So what?! The LAW says, that if you're here you are allowed to
> >> >> apply for asylum.
> >> >
> >> > You've never read the law or you wouldn't have written that.
> >> >
> >> > https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/refugees-and-asylum/asylum
> >> >
> >>
> >> Nothing in that reference contradicts what I wrote.
> >
> > So you allow them to seek asylum even though they committed a crime to
> > get here?
> >
>
> Misdemeanor - not "crime" Is jaywalking a "crime"?

Yes it is in some states.
>
> And, yes, that's how the law is written - they can APPLY for asylum
> regardless of how they got here.

So you approve of the current situation at the border? You are ok with
other countries letting there criminals come here? It doesn't bother you
in the last 3 years more people from China and the Middle East have just
walked in?

Andrew W wrote:
> "Governor Swill" wrote in message
> >On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 12:44:31 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote:
> >
> >>It's not the same people who are talking about it, dummy. Geez.
> >>In some cases people who no longer work for gov. and CIA etc. have come
> >>forward about it, at great risk to themselves and their families. Many
> >>have
> >>been murdered as a result.
> >
> >You can't prove any of that either.
>
> There's no need to prove it. Just start using your brain and look into
> things.
> Only the lazy and ignorant demand proof for everything, except for what
> establishments claim.

Right. Only gullible, lazy sheep read the MSM. But the
ambitious and tireless researcher will believe anything
Andrew says, because, you know, corruption and follow the
money.

On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 19:56:44 -0000 (UTC), cats <invalid@none.com>
wrote:

>On 22 Jun 2024, Malte Runz <nobodys@busine.ss> posted some
>news:7n4d7jho250oro247cj6b98n1h4jkpcl8v@4ax.com:
(snip)

>> You guys should get rid of the DOJ entirely. Just get a 'medium' or
>> what ever you call them, and let them tell you who did it.
>
>We got a TV show named "Medium" that does exactly that.

And does it work?

--
Malte Runz

On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 21:44:33 -0700, El Kabong <twang@the.noodle>
wrote:

>Andrew W wrote:
>> "Governor Swill" wrote in message
>> >On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 12:44:31 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>It's not the same people who are talking about it, dummy. Geez.
>> >>In some cases people who no longer work for gov. and CIA etc. have come
>> >>forward about it, at great risk to themselves and their families. Many
>> >>have
>> >>been murdered as a result.
>> >
>> >You can't prove any of that either.
>>
>> There's no need to prove it. Just start using your brain and look into
>> things.
>> Only the lazy and ignorant demand proof for everything, except for what
>> establishments claim.
>
>Right. Only gullible, lazy sheep read the MSM. But the
>ambitious and tireless researcher will believe anything
>Andrew says, because, you know, corruption and follow the
>money.

And absolutely no fact checking needed. Just open your mind.

--
Malte Runz

On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 10:03:40 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
wrote:

>"Malte Runz" wrote in message
>news:7nad7jpucn20n9fustdcv0ap5no5cl40cv@4ax.com...
>>
>>On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 15:39:21 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>"Malte Runz" wrote in message
>>>news:gpu87jlguffarccvvnag9mcdu52fhf9t2a@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>>On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 10:04:31 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"Malte Runz" wrote in message
>>>>>news:7cg67jt9mh7lo1jjd7i1k9r654teon4d60@4ax.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 11:58:55 -0600, Loran <loran@invalid.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Malte Runz wrote:
>>>>>>>> "The real truth", eh? Like space aliens from Orion holding secret
>>>>>>>> meetings with governments?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>https://youtu.be/ItRiw2HwvF0
>>>>>>>Aliens are here, and they're not our friends, John Lear says
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Does your video contain any kind of hard evidence of those meetings
>>>>>>having taken place?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>You mean so ~you~ don't have to do any research or investigation and can
>>>>>just take it easy and be shown everything?
>>>>
>>>>No. How often do I need to spell it out for you? How fucking dense are
>>>>you? When I ask that question I already know the answer. I ask it
>>>>because I want to expose you guys. Just for the fun of it.
>>>>
>>>
>>>So you think you already know everything in the world ...
>>
>>Strawman.
>>
>
>Really? ...

Yes.

> ... You can't see your own behaviour.

Where have I said that I "already know everything"?

>>> ... and just want to have
>>>fun like a spoiled kid.
>>
>>Exposing your BS is rather fun.
>>
>
>You just made my case again.

Yes, I did. I ADMIT that I'm having fun here, and I don't see the
problem. Again, what we do here has no impact in the real world.
Whether I'm doing this for the fun of it, or like you, think that I'm
fighting wind mil... the Deep State Cabal, it is of no consequence
whatsoever.

>>>>>You will never learn any truths.
>>>>
>>>>Have you found that secret subterranean alien base outside of Sidney
>>>>yet? No? Any news? 'What are the drums saying, Mike?'
>>>>
>>>
>>>You mean Sydney?
>>>There is plenty of insider information on non human civilisations living
>>>below the earth, oceans and in this solar system. You just don't know
>>>anything about it.
>>
>>And every time we ask you to cite a source or two you run like hell
>>and blame me for not having tried to find it myself.
>>
>
>Because you only accept mainstream sources, ones that align with your
>limited beliefs and prejudice.

And that's your excuse for not providing evidence. Stop the charade.
We know you have no 'specialist insider advanced scientist' you could
name.

>And as for running, you keep running back to the quick and satisfying
>mainstream.

I should only cite youtubers, twitter posters, Rumblers, and Rumor
Millers?

>>>News? Yes. They are systematically removing the scumbags, like the ones
>>>you
>>>follow.
>>
>>Who are "they" in this case?
>>>
>
>Clueless as usual.

"They" is a very generic term in you circles. Could be anyone.

>>>>>>>> Baby-blood drink Hollywood elites?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>https://youtu.be/YhM5LtOkgXA
>>>>>>>Hollywood PANICS as Mel Gibson EXPOSES Them All!!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Three exclamation [marks]. I guess it must be true.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>But the mainstream media stuff ~is~ true?
>>>>
>>>>Why don't you find out for yourself?
>>>>
>>>
>>>Why don't you?
>>
>>You're the one constantly fixating on 'MSM'.
>>>
>
>The propaganda MSM happens to be the greatest threat to democracy and
>freedom/free speech.

You regard FOX as MSM, right?

>>>>(snip)
>>>>
>>>>>>"Psychic abilities are real" What a fucking moron...
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Again you just totally ignore all the above mentioned experienced
>>>>>researchers, investigators and prominent people ...
>>>>
>>>>Ignore? I just went through (most of) the material posted as evidence.
>>>>I didn't buy any of it, and I made it clear that I didn't.
>>>>
>>>
>>>You didn't buy it? You haven't done any research on it. ...
>>
>>There is nothing substantial to research.
>>
>
>Bahahaha. Ok Mr tunnel vision.

I could set up a very simple remote viewing experiment that would
convince me on the spot if it worked. Two rooms, one 'Beamer', one
'Medium', one deck of cards. Do you know anyone who would like to
participate?

>>Finding youtubers repeating
>>the claims is not researching anything.
>>
>
>Youtube is just a starting point for newbies. You failed the test ages ago.

Should I graduate to 8Chan? Rumble? Twitter? Listen, if you have
better and more reliable sources why don't you list them?

'You just want me to do all the work for you! I'm just here to give
you information! You must learn to do your own research!'

>>>You think this is all just about believe or not believe. You're just an
>>>armchair critic. Very immature.
>>
>>One cannot choose what to believe.
>>
>
>Huh? Belief is a choice.

No, it's not. Could you choose to believe the Earth is flat? No, you
know it's a sphere because of the 'data' you have accepted as true.
Your belief in a spherical Earth is a result of that.

>Maybe you just can't choose not to believe establishment's claims.

Non-belief is not a choice either.

>>>>I've seen
>>>>and read a lot about the subject. That's why I know it's BS.
>>>>
>>>
>>>You read a bunch of stuff to look for some laughing material. ...
>>
>>It turned out that way.
>>
>
>That's all you do. Your type need lots of entertainment for some reason.
>But there's serious stuff going on in the world.

And I deal with that in a serious way. Your beliefs in space aliens
and remote viewing is not serious stuff.

>>> ... Wow.
>>>And you somehow just magically know what's true and what's BS.
>>
>>I formed an opinion based on what I learned.
>>
>
>You learned lopsided and don't know it.

Yeah, I should have listened more closely when they taught 'Earth's
vibrational energy 1.01'

>>>>> ... who are far smarter and
>>>>>knowledgeable than you. You just sling mud all the time. ...
>>>>
>>>>And my aim is no less than spectacular!
>>>>
>>>
>>>You just gave away your big ego again.
>>
>>And you just showed us again that you can't spot irony.
>>
>
>I can, ...

Yet to be proven.

> ... but you don't qualify for relying on irony for your responses. You
>overstep your true position.

Come again?

>>>>> ... You're a smart
>>>>>arse.
>>>>
>>>>Deep State makes me do it, remember! I'm the real victim here.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Until recently you never even heard the term deep state. ...
>>
>>How do you know when I first heard about the term?
>>
>
>If you did you would have investigated it before forming a stone hard
>opinion.

'Deep State' is just a new name for the same 'bogeyman'. 'Knights
Templar', 'Illuminati', 'The Freemasons', 'Bilderberg', and of course
'The Jews'. A nefarious group, a secret society, that controls the
world. Nothing new there.

On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 10:17:57 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
wrote:

>"Malte Runz" wrote in message
>news:0l197j1842rael2umg10pjsfchdmim96d1@4ax.com...
>>
>>On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 14:59:43 -0600, CaLaVeRa <cv@invalid.org> wrote:
>>
>>>On 6/17/2024 1:11 PM, Malte Runz wrote:
>>>> The US economy is the envy of the world.
>>>> Bigger, stronger, and more robust than any other major player.
>>>
>>>Military industrial complex.
>>
>>https://tinyurl.com/2vdpmzf4
>>***
>>US Defense Industry Size & Share Analysis - Growth Trends & Forecasts
>>(2024 - 2032)
>>
>>The US Defense Market is Segmented by Armed Forces (Army, Navy, and
>>Air Force) and Type (Fixed-Wing Aircraft, Rotorcraft, Ground Vehicles,
>>Naval Vessels, C4isr, Weapons and Ammunition, Protection and Training
>>Equipment, and Unmanned Systems). The Report Offers Market Size and
>>Forecast for all the Above Segments in Value (USD).
>>
>>Market Size (2024): USD 309.77 Billion
>>***
>>
>>https://tinyurl.com/3hex9y8m
>>***
>>US arms exports hit record high in fiscal 2023
>>WASHINGTON, Jan 29 (Reuters) - Sales of U.S. military equipment to
>>foreign governments in 2023 rose 16% to a record $238 billion, the
>>U.S. State Department said on Monday, as countries sought to replenish
>>stocks sent to Ukraine and prepare for major conflicts.
>>***
>>
>>https://tinyurl.com/35hdmats
>>Estimated size of US GDP in 2024: 28,781.08 billion.
>>
>>IOW the "Military Industrial Complex' counts for just under 2% of the
>>US GDP.
>>
>
>Ever heard of black budgets and covert appropriations, Mr mainstream?

I'm sure this is another example of you having access to superduper
top secret hush hush evidence of enormous amounts of dollars that are
spent in the most evil ways possible by the cabal.

--
Malte Runz

>Right. Only gullible, lazy sheep read the MSM.

Fox News and One America News tell me what to think, along with Youtube
videos, social media memes and some Trump loving boys in their mother's
basement posting crap because they refuse to find a paying job.

Who needs the MSM?

On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 10:54:32 +0200, Malte Runz <nobodys@busine.ss> wrote:
>On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 12:56:26 -0600, CaLaVeRa <cv@invalid.org> wrote:
>>On 6/20/2024 11:19 AM, Malte Runz wrote:
>>> Illegals depress wages and that creates income inequality which
>>> results in gaines in living standards...
>>
>>No, it results in massive unemployment in the black community mainly:
>>
>>https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/illegal-immigration-and-black-voters/
>
>What you are saying is that the low paying jobs, that can be handled
>by the unskilled and under-educated 'illegals' should be given to the
>members of the black community.

Precisely. The audacity of first, the abolitionists of the last, er, I mean, 19th century
then the so-called 'equal rights' crowd from a few years ag, er, the last century,
insisting that negroes have the right to improve their lot in life without help from the
superior white man, would ... would ... where was I ...

Oh, yeah, uppity niggahs wantin' ta live like white folks!

>(snip)
>
>No need to post the text. I always read the links.
>>
>>> Shooting yourself in the foot is not a coup de grace in my book.
>>
>>But supporting wage slave social deflation is?
>
>You seem to be fine with it, as long as it keeps the black community
>in their proper place.

Anybody not white, not protestant and/or lacking a Y chromosome.

The problem is that any society needs a low wage underclass to do work that can't be done
by machines. Yet.

The ancients; Rome, Greece, Egypt, China, etc., had slaves. Even the British had a
servile underclass of cockney types or Irish.

In America the servile class was even more starkly noticeable by the color of the skin of
the slaves Europeans brought here to grow sugar, rice and indigo.

Now, the descendents of those Africans expect better and are still vacating the lower
class jobs which have to be filled by somebody. That means allowing large scale
immigration (as in the late 19th century). But "they" will tell us we should keep the
immigrants out despite having the strongest job market in over half a century.

Swill
NP: Peter Gabriel - Blood of Eden (Secret World Live)

On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 10:57:53 +0200, Malte Runz <nobodys@busine.ss> wrote:

>On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:02:51 -0600, CaLaVeRa <cv@invalid.org> wrote:
>
>>On 6/20/2024 11:53 AM, Malte Runz wrote:
>>> Is there currently a labor shortage in the US?
>>
>>a.) yes
>>
>>https://www.lisep.org/tru
>>
>>True
>>Rate of Unemployment
>>24.6%
>>May 2024
>
>Do you think "labor shortage" is the same as 'high rate of
>unemployment'?

What's funny is that Trump ran on the TRU in 2016. But when the first unemployment
numbers came out after his first month as President, he dropped the TRU number in favor of
the BLM standard measure and took credit for the improvement. Watching him shave 21
points of the UE rate just on his say so was but ONE of the first rolleye moments of his
too-long Presidency.

Swill
NP: Peter Gabriel - San Jacinto (Secret World Live)