On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 14:59:43 -0600, CaLaVeRa <cv@invalid.org> wrote:

>On 6/17/2024 1:11 PM, Malte Runz wrote:
>> The US economy is the envy of the world.
>> Bigger, stronger, and more robust than any other major player.
>
>Military industrial complex.

https://tinyurl.com/2vdpmzf4
***
US Defense Industry Size & Share Analysis - Growth Trends & Forecasts
(2024 - 2032)

The US Defense Market is Segmented by Armed Forces (Army, Navy, and
Air Force) and Type (Fixed-Wing Aircraft, Rotorcraft, Ground Vehicles,
Naval Vessels, C4isr, Weapons and Ammunition, Protection and Training
Equipment, and Unmanned Systems). The Report Offers Market Size and
Forecast for all the Above Segments in Value (USD).

Market Size (2024): USD 309.77 Billion
***

https://tinyurl.com/3hex9y8m
***
US arms exports hit record high in fiscal 2023
WASHINGTON, Jan 29 (Reuters) - Sales of U.S. military equipment to
foreign governments in 2023 rose 16% to a record $238 billion, the
U.S. State Department said on Monday, as countries sought to replenish
stocks sent to Ukraine and prepare for major conflicts.
***

https://tinyurl.com/35hdmats
Estimated size of US GDP in 2024: 28,781.08 billion.

IOW the "Military Industrial Complex' counts for just under 2% of the
US GDP.

What about the other 98%? Illegals? Yeah, I bet it's the illegals.

>https://youtu.be/cyZoUfNsUl8

Never heard of the guy.

That was irony, in case you didn't get it.

--
Malte Runz

On 6/20/2024 2:29 PM, Malte Runz wrote:
> IOW the "Military Industrial Complex' counts for just under 2% of the
> US GDP.
>
> What about the other 98%? Illegals? Yeah, I bet it's the illegals.
>

"...estimates from the Pew Research Center last fall showed that
undocumented immigrants made up 22 percent of the total foreign-born
U.S. population in 2021."

So there's another 22%.

As for GDP - minus trustworthy data and lacking M3 reportage -
impossible to gauge how much the fed printing press is driving those
numbers, a lot however.

https://www.citizen.org/article/military-industrial-complex-contributions-report/

JULY 7, 2022

Military-Industrial Complex Clinches Nearly 450,000% Return on Investment
After Industry Gives $10 Million to Congressional Defense Committee
Members, DOD Receives Potential $45 Billion Spending Increase

https://www.wsj.com/economy/ukraine-war-europe-american-economy-654ca41b

How War in Europe Boosts the U.S. Economy
European rearmament and American aid to Ukraine flow back to defense
industrial base

In the two years since Russia invaded Ukraine, the U.S. defense industry
has experienced a boom in orders for weapons and munitions. Business is
coming from European allies trying to build out their military
capabilities as well as from the Pentagon, which is both buying new
equipment from defense manufacturers and replenishing military stocks
depleted by deliveries to Ukraine.

In article <g7r87j51gh3eabpp7k551l3k9ohrmsqc5i@4ax.com>,
nobodys@busine.ss says...
>
> On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 16:55:51 -0600, CaLaVeRa <cv@invalid.org> wrote:
>
> >On 6/19/2024 4:35 PM, Malte Runz wrote:
> >> On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 14:50:16 -0600, CaLaVeRa <cv@invalid.org> wrote:
> >>
>
> (snip)
>
>
> >>> You never heard of the program?
> >>
> >> Oh yes, I've heard about it. Kooks always parade it as 'proooooooof!'.
> >> Funny thing though, nothing ever came of it.
> >
> >It was top secret, you think they'd reveal the actual results to us?
>
> Then how the hell do you know that it works, if they didn't reveal the
> results?

How do you know it doesn't?
>
> Pull up your pants, for fucks sake.
>
> (snip)

Cowardly
>
> >> "Conclusions
> >> The foregoing observations provide a compelling argument against
> >> continuation of the program within the intelligence community. ..."
> >>
> >> Still there? Your nightmare continues:
> >>
> >> "Even though a statistically significant effect has been observed in
> >> the laboratory, it remains unclear whether the existence of a
> >> paranormal phenomenon, remote viewing, has been demonstrated."
> >>
> >> And doesn't getter any better for you.
> >>
> >> "The laboratory studies do not provide evidence regarding the sources
> >> or origins of the phenomenon, nor do they address an important
> >> methodological issue of inter-judge reliability."
> >
> >It was top secret, ...
>
> So you say. What were they hiding? That it worked? If they didn't want
> us to know that it worked, why even talk about it? OTOH if they tried
> to hide that it didn't work, why not just lie about it and say it
> worked? Your reply simply doesn't make sense.
>
> > ... you think they'd reveal the actual results to us?
>
> [facepalm] Again, if they didn't reveal the results, why do you think
> it worked?
>
> (snip)
>
> >> Sure... But I think I trust the conclusions from that 'official
> >> government doc' you so generously supplied.
> >
> >It was top secret, you think they'd reveal the actual results to us?
>
> Remember that your cited the source as evidence of remote viewing
> being real. Now you're saying, for the third time, that your source
> can't be trusted. It's like you're not even trying.
>
Ever tried DMT?

In article <ojs87j9qvldv9lqeq9v84pqt1rhpl6o1h8@4ax.com>,
nobodys@busine.ss says...
>
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 10:49:38 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
> wrote:
>
> >"Malte Runz" wrote in message
> >news:70j67j1vf79t1587asq7nmhpvqjmhbsqc4@4ax.com...
> >>
> >>On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 14:50:16 -0600, CaLaVeRa <cv@invalid.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>>On 6/19/2024 2:43 PM, Malte Runz wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 11:58:55 -0600, Loran <loran@invalid.net> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Malte Runz wrote:
> >>>>>> "The real truth", eh? Like space aliens from Orion holding secret
> >>>>>> meetings with governments?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://youtu.be/ItRiw2HwvF0
> >>>>> Aliens are here, and they're not our friends, John Lear says
> >>>>
> >>>> Does your video contain any kind of hard evidence of those meetings
> >>>> having taken place?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Baby-blood drink Hollywood elites?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://youtu.be/YhM5LtOkgXA
> >>>>> Hollywood PANICS as Mel Gibson EXPOSES Them All!!!
> >>>>
> >>>> Three exclamation points. I guess it must be true.
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Remote viewing? Perpetual motion technology? Real truths like that?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yep, just like that:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgwdgnEf3ws
> >>>>> Two physicists working for the government discover psychic abilities
> >>>>> are
> >>>>> real and are then silenced.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_cLp15CaPE
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Russell Targ is an author, physicist - and once upon a time, a
> >>>>> psychic-spy for the Army. He discusses his new book, "Third Eye Spies",
> >>>>> and describes how research at SRI & Stargate may help all of us unlock
> >>>>> our hidden inner potential.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Russell Targ is a physicist, author, and pioneer in the development of
> >>>>> the laser and cofounder of the remote viewing laboratory at Stanford
> >>>>> Research Institute, which investigated psychic abilities in the 1970s
> >>>>> and ?80s. His work in the psychic area has been published in Nature,
> >>>>> The Proceedings of the Institute of Electronic and Electrical Engineers
> >>>>> (IEEE)., and the Proceedings of the American Association in the
> >>>>> Advancement of Science (AAAS).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Targ is the author or co-author of nine books dealing with the
> >>>>> scientific investigation of psychic abilities and Buddhist approaches
> >>>>> to
> >>>>> the transformation of consciousness. As a senior staff scientist at
> >>>>> Lockheed Missiles and Space Company, Targ developed airborne laser
> >>>>> systems for the detection of wind shear and air turbulence. Having
> >>>>> retired in 1997, he now writes books of psychic research and teaches
> >>>>> remote viewing worldwide.
> >>>>>
> >>>> Andrew! I'll be dipped... You've got a soul mate here! Loran turns out
> >>>> to be as gullible and idiotic as yourself.
> >>>
> >>>You never heard of the program?
> >>
> >>Oh yes, I've heard about it. Kooks always parade it as 'proooooooof!'.
> >>
> >
> >"Kooks" is an excuse invented by leftists to do noting.
>
> What an idiotic thing to say. 'Kook' stems from 'cuckoo', when used as
> slang for a crazy person. It goes way back.
> >
> >>
> >>Funny thing though, nothing ever came of it.
> >>
> >
> >Not if you only follow the lamestream media that stomps on everything of
> >import, anything that can empower the people.
>
> I know that you cannot provide a single, verified example of
> successful remote viewing. You know that I know that, but you still
> pretend that you believe you have something. Kooks a funny that way.
> >
> >
> >>
> >>'That's only what They want you to believe. The Deep State is using it
> >>on all of us... to control us!'
> >>
> >>Am I close?
> >>
> >
> >Do you still not know how power, control and money works in this world and
> >the reasons?
>
> I know how kooks are attracted to rabbit holes.
>
> >
> >>
> >>>I trust official government docs will suffice:
> >>
> >>Trusting the enemy??? Never!!!
> >>>
> >
> >You follow and believe the enemy on everything else.
>
> Yes, everything! And blindly. It's almost like I have no control over
> myself anymore.
>
> >>>https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00791R000200180005-5.pdf
> >>
> >>Maybe I should. Let's have a look...
> >>Will you look at that! Page four (I bet you never read that far. You
> >>Gish Gallopers never do):
> >>
> >>"Conclusions
> >>The foregoing observations provide a compelling argument against
> >>continuation of the program within the intelligence community. ..."
> >>
> >>Still there? Your nightmare continues:
> >>
> >>"Even though a statistically significant effect has been observed in
> >>the laboratory, it remains unclear whether the existence of a
> >>paranormal phenomenon, remote viewing, has been demonstrated."
> >>
> >>And doesn't getter any better for you.
> >>
> >>"The laboratory studies do not provide evidence regarding the sources
> >>or origins of the phenomenon, nor do they address an important
> >>methodological issue of inter-judge reliability."
> >>
> >
> >So you just want to speed read a few articles and docs ...
>
> At least I read them. Well... not all of them all the time. But I'm
> fairly certain that I read more of the material you post than you do.
>
> > ... and then have the
> >"hard evidence" just dropped in your lap, otherwise it's just have a laugh
> >and then case closed.
>
> You make the claim, you provide the evidence. That's how shit works in
> the real world up here.
>
> (snip)
>
> >>>Most ancient civilisations appear to have been acquainted with the
> >>>knowledge of this particular faculty of the human mind. ...
> >>
> >>According to an interesting article I just read on Rumor Mill News,
> >>Andrew W's favorite news site, the ancient civilizations didn't have
> >>road or airports. No, they had a "High-tech electric plasma portal."
> >>First, you remote view the place you want to go to. Then you zap
> >>yourself there! Definitely gonna get me one of those!
> >>
> >
> >Why don't you investigate 'ancient tech'?
> >You won't.
>
> There is no 'ancient tech' to investigate. I already understand how
> the wheel works. And blunt instruments. Even sharp ones are no mystery
> to me. But I'm sure you're an expert on all things ancient high-tech
> electric plasma portals.
>
> (snip)
>
> >>>(c)Another example of Precognitive Remote Viewing (1989)
> >>>
> >>>Pentagon asked a viewer about possible Libyan response to U.S. criticism
> >>>of chemical weapons work at Rabta.
> >>>
> >>>The viewer?s response: A ship named ?Patua? or ?Potua? would arrive in
> >>>Tripoli to transport chemicals to an eastern Libyan port.
> >>>
> >>>Verification: A ship named ?Batato? in fact arrived in Tripoli and
> >>>loaded undetermined cargo, which was transported to an eastern Libyan
> >>>port.
> >>
> >>A ship with a funny name arrived with some kind of cargo in Tripoli
> >>heading to another Libyan port. What are the odds!!! I'm convinced
> >>now.
> >>
> >
> >Are you expecting another laugh here?
>
> Another? You mean, there was a first? But no, not really. Sarcasm
> rarely works well as a joke. I'm just letting you guys know what I
> think about your 'research'. If that kind of material is convincing
> evidence to you... Let's just say it explains a lot.
>
> (snip)
>
> > ... the bought off MSM that you follow.
>
> (snip)
>
> >The cabals
>
> (snip)
>
> >You trust any authorities,
>
> (snip)
>
> > ... lies.
>
> (snip)

On 6/20/2024 1:56 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:

> In article <ojs87j9qvldv9lqeq9v84pqt1rhpl6o1h8@4ax.com>,
> nobodys@busine.ss says...
>>
>> On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 10:49:38 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> "Malte Runz" wrote in message
>>> news:70j67j1vf79t1587asq7nmhpvqjmhbsqc4@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 14:50:16 -0600, CaLaVeRa <cv@invalid.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 6/19/2024 2:43 PM, Malte Runz wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 11:58:55 -0600, Loran <loran@invalid.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Malte Runz wrote:
>>>>>>>> "The real truth", eh? Like space aliens from Orion holding secret
>>>>>>>> meetings with governments?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/ItRiw2HwvF0
>>>>>>> Aliens are here, and they're not our friends, John Lear says
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does your video contain any kind of hard evidence of those meetings
>>>>>> having taken place?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Baby-blood drink Hollywood elites?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/YhM5LtOkgXA
>>>>>>> Hollywood PANICS as Mel Gibson EXPOSES Them All!!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Three exclamation points. I guess it must be true.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Remote viewing? Perpetual motion technology? Real truths like that?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yep, just like that:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgwdgnEf3ws
>>>>>>> Two physicists working for the government discover psychic abilities
>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>> real and are then silenced.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_cLp15CaPE
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Russell Targ is an author, physicist - and once upon a time, a
>>>>>>> psychic-spy for the Army. He discusses his new book, "Third Eye Spies",
>>>>>>> and describes how research at SRI & Stargate may help all of us unlock
>>>>>>> our hidden inner potential.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Russell Targ is a physicist, author, and pioneer in the development of
>>>>>>> the laser and cofounder of the remote viewing laboratory at Stanford
>>>>>>> Research Institute, which investigated psychic abilities in the 1970s
>>>>>>> and ?80s. His work in the psychic area has been published in Nature,
>>>>>>> The Proceedings of the Institute of Electronic and Electrical Engineers
>>>>>>> (IEEE)., and the Proceedings of the American Association in the
>>>>>>> Advancement of Science (AAAS).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Targ is the author or co-author of nine books dealing with the
>>>>>>> scientific investigation of psychic abilities and Buddhist approaches
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> the transformation of consciousness. As a senior staff scientist at
>>>>>>> Lockheed Missiles and Space Company, Targ developed airborne laser
>>>>>>> systems for the detection of wind shear and air turbulence. Having
>>>>>>> retired in 1997, he now writes books of psychic research and teaches
>>>>>>> remote viewing worldwide.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Andrew! I'll be dipped... You've got a soul mate here! Loran turns out
>>>>>> to be as gullible and idiotic as yourself.
>>>>>
>>>>> You never heard of the program?
>>>>
>>>> Oh yes, I've heard about it. Kooks always parade it as 'proooooooof!'.
>>>>
>>>
>>> "Kooks" is an excuse invented by leftists to do noting.
>>
>> What an idiotic thing to say. 'Kook' stems from 'cuckoo', when used as
>> slang for a crazy person. It goes way back.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Funny thing though, nothing ever came of it.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Not if you only follow the lamestream media that stomps on everything of
>>> import, anything that can empower the people.
>>
>> I know that you cannot provide a single, verified example of
>> successful remote viewing. You know that I know that, but you still
>> pretend that you believe you have something. Kooks a funny that way.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> 'That's only what They want you to believe. The Deep State is using it
>>>> on all of us... to control us!'
>>>>
>>>> Am I close?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Do you still not know how power, control and money works in this world and
>>> the reasons?
>>
>> I know how kooks are attracted to rabbit holes.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I trust official government docs will suffice:
>>>>
>>>> Trusting the enemy??? Never!!!
>>>>>
>>>
>>> You follow and believe the enemy on everything else.
>>
>> Yes, everything! And blindly. It's almost like I have no control over
>> myself anymore.
>>
>>>>> https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00791R000200180005-5.pdf
>>>>
>>>> Maybe I should. Let's have a look...
>>>> Will you look at that! Page four (I bet you never read that far. You
>>>> Gish Gallopers never do):
>>>>
>>>> "Conclusions
>>>> The foregoing observations provide a compelling argument against
>>>> continuation of the program within the intelligence community. ..."
>>>>
>>>> Still there? Your nightmare continues:
>>>>
>>>> "Even though a statistically significant effect has been observed in
>>>> the laboratory, it remains unclear whether the existence of a
>>>> paranormal phenomenon, remote viewing, has been demonstrated."
>>>>
>>>> And doesn't getter any better for you.
>>>>
>>>> "The laboratory studies do not provide evidence regarding the sources
>>>> or origins of the phenomenon, nor do they address an important
>>>> methodological issue of inter-judge reliability."
>>>>
>>>
>>> So you just want to speed read a few articles and docs ...
>>
>> At least I read them. Well... not all of them all the time. But I'm
>> fairly certain that I read more of the material you post than you do.
>>
>>> ... and then have the
>>> "hard evidence" just dropped in your lap, otherwise it's just have a laugh
>>> and then case closed.
>>
>> You make the claim, you provide the evidence. That's how shit works in
>> the real world up here.
>>
>> (snip)
>>
>>>>> Most ancient civilisations appear to have been acquainted with the
>>>>> knowledge of this particular faculty of the human mind. ...
>>>>
>>>> According to an interesting article I just read on Rumor Mill News,
>>>> Andrew W's favorite news site, the ancient civilizations didn't have
>>>> road or airports. No, they had a "High-tech electric plasma portal."
>>>> First, you remote view the place you want to go to. Then you zap
>>>> yourself there! Definitely gonna get me one of those!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Why don't you investigate 'ancient tech'?
>>> You won't.
>>
>> There is no 'ancient tech' to investigate. I already understand how
>> the wheel works. And blunt instruments. Even sharp ones are no mystery
>> to me. But I'm sure you're an expert on all things ancient high-tech
>> electric plasma portals.
>>
>> (snip)
>>
>>>>> (c)Another example of Precognitive Remote Viewing (1989)
>>>>>
>>>>> Pentagon asked a viewer about possible Libyan response to U.S. criticism
>>>>> of chemical weapons work at Rabta.
>>>>>
>>>>> The viewer?s response: A ship named ?Patua? or ?Potua? would arrive in
>>>>> Tripoli to transport chemicals to an eastern Libyan port.
>>>>>
>>>>> Verification: A ship named ?Batato? in fact arrived in Tripoli and
>>>>> loaded undetermined cargo, which was transported to an eastern Libyan
>>>>> port.
>>>>
>>>> A ship with a funny name arrived with some kind of cargo in Tripoli
>>>> heading to another Libyan port. What are the odds!!! I'm convinced
>>>> now.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Are you expecting another laugh here?
>>
>> Another? You mean, there was a first? But no, not really. Sarcasm
>> rarely works well as a joke. I'm just letting you guys know what I
>> think about your 'research'. If that kind of material is convincing
>> evidence to you... Let's just say it explains a lot.
>>
>> (snip)
>>
>>> ... the bought off MSM that you follow.
>>
>> (snip)
>>
>>> The cabals
>>
>> (snip)
>>
>>> You trust any authorities,
>>
>> (snip)
>>
>>> ... lies.
>>
>> (snip)
>
> Cowardly done.

In article <gpu87jlguffarccvvnag9mcdu52fhf9t2a@4ax.com>,
nobodys@busine.ss says...
> >just take it easy and be shown everything?
>
> No. How often do I need to spell it out for you? How fucking dense are
> you? When I ask that question I already know the answer. I ask it
> because I want to expose you guys. Just for the fun of it.
>

What a load of "look at me run but with style"

Malte Runz wrote:
>>> "The laboratory studies do not provide evidence regarding the sources
>>> or origins of the phenomenon, nor do they address an important
>>> methodological issue of inter-judge reliability."
>>>
>> So you just want to speed read a few articles and docs ...
> At least I read them. Well... not all of them all the time. But I'm
> fairly certain that I read more of the material you post than you do.
>

First Earth Battalion.

https://ejmas.com/jnc/jncart_channon_0200.htm

https://web.archive.org/web/20110811190649/http://arcturus.org/field_manual.pdf

--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 22:36:49 +0200, Malte Runz <nobodys@busine.ss> wrote:

>On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 11:59:57 -0600, Loran <loran@invalid.net> wrote:

>>I'm well aware of that, now yours just got booted forward, enjoy, you
>>exterminable shitbag!
>
>From the guy, who reacts to the record low unemployment figures by
>yelling "Illegals!".
>
>And do you still think I'm Rudy? Are you still a deluded fuckwad?

He's Rudy, he's just trying to throw us off track.

Swill

On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 18:12:21 -0600, CaLaVeRa <cv@invalid.org> wrote:

>
>Gains from ILLEGALS who depress wages for the rest of the job market,
>thereby creating MORE income inequality, ya dolthead dane.

Is that why Republicans have supported illegal immigration since Reagan?

Swill

On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 09:27:46 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote:

>It was worse under Obama and his predecessors. It was on the way down under
>Trump.

It's mind boggling to see how much of Trump's candy you suck on.

Swill

On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 19:53:09 +0200, Malte Runz <nobodys@busine.ss> wrote:

>On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 09:27:46 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
>wrote:

>>Same with bringing manufacturing back to America which Trump was doing.
>
>Sure about that? Show me your numbers.

They don't have numbers. They have only talking points they parrot at their handlers'
request.
>>It was worse under Obama and his predecessors. It was on the way down under
>>Trump.
>
>Look at the graph. The unemployment rate was on the way down under
>Obama. Obama became President when the whole world was suffering
>economic hardship after the crash in 2008. Trump piggy backed on the
>success of Obama's policies.

Exactly! Bush and the Republicans ran the entire planet's economy off a cliff. By the
time Trump got in, Obama had fixed virtually all of it. Unemployment had already reached
target levels.

Trump came in to a healthy economy.

Swill

On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 16:54:51 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote:

>"Governor Swill" wrote in message
>news:nit47jphfbbgqoelp2jgjkcag1lnp2u5ea@4ax.com...
>>
>>On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 11:40:07 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"Malte Runz" wrote in message
>>>news:q0t37jtdkbuipqm4tpigbs90o315krvtq9@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>>On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 14:53:59 -0600, Loran <loran@invalid.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Malte Runz wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 11:26:40 -0600, Loran <loran@invalid.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Malte Runz wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 15:07:37 -0600, Loran <loran@invalid.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Americans know a traitor when they read one.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You treasonous moron.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm Danish, living in Denmark... moron.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rudey, Rudey, Rudey...is that the best Jonathan Ball can muster after
>>>>>>> being booted by sleazynews?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Seek help.
>>>>>
>>>>>Get a new Jetta, little man.
>>>>
>>>>I'm 1.87 m. That's six feet two inches in your archaic units.
>>>>
>>>
>>>'Little' in mentality.
>>>Rightists always dodge and deny the real truth.
>>
>>True, but why bring it up now?
>
>We also change words to suit our false reality.

We know all too well.

Swill

On 2024-06-20, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> In article <v51gao$2k8e5$6@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
> says...
>>
>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
>> news:v5196a$2iost$6@dont-email.me:
>>
>> > On 2024-06-20, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
>> >> "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
>> >> news:v501k2$2c70c$1@dont-email.me:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> Another example of someone swallowing left mainstream media
>> >>> gaslighting. Truth: Most of the world is laughing at America,
>> >>> particularly its politics. Millions of middle class Americans
>> >>> struggling to pay their bills. Many unemployed and quite a few
>> >>> homeless. Suicide is up.
>> >>>
>> >> Go ahead link to some of those foreign news sites that are laughing
>> >> at us.
>> >>
>> >
>> > "Bumbling Joe Biden is an international laughing stock"
>> >
>> > <https://youtu.be/hpb0_yG6ttQ?si=Z-1_MAJBWmibidJb>
>> >
>> =================
>> Overall, we rate Sky News Australia Right-Biased based on story selection
>> and editorial positions that mostly favor the right. We also rate them
>> borderline Questionable and Mixed for factual reporting due to several
>> failed fact checks, unproven claims, and the promotion of conspiracy
>> theories and misinformation.
>>
>> https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/sky-news-australia/
>> ===============
>>
>> Sky News is the laughingstock of the rest of the world.
>
> But you can't refute what they say.

Of course he can't.
It's classic left wing progressives attack the messenger instead of the message.

--
Charlie Glock
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms"
- Thomas Jefferson 1776

"J Carlson" wrote in message news:v51uo3$2mtci$4@dont-email.me...
>
>On 6/20/2024 12:02 PM, CaLaVeRa wrote:
>> On 6/20/2024 11:53 AM, Malte Runz wrote:
>>> Is there currently a labor shortage in the US?
>>
>> a.) yes
>>
>> https://www.lisep.org/tru
>>
>> True
>> Rate of Unemployment
>> 24.6%
>
>That's a lie from a lie site.
>

And you'd know a lot about lie sites, newsgroup follow-ups modifier.

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

On 6/20/2024 6:56 PM, Andrea W, neo-Nazi pig-blowing whore, lied:

> "J Carlson"  wrote in message news:v51uo3$2mtci$4@dont-email.me...
>>
>> On 6/20/2024 12:02 PM, CaLaVeRa wrote:
>>> On 6/20/2024 11:53 AM, Malte Runz wrote:
>>>> Is there currently a labor shortage in the US?
>>>
>>> a.) yes
>>>
>>> https://www.lisep.org/tru
>>>
>>> True
>>> Rate of Unemployment
>>> 24.6%
>>
>> That's a lie from a lie site.
>>
>
> And you'd know a lot about lie sites,

I recognize all the ones you neo-Nazis cite, Andrea, you pig-blowing whore.

"Malte Runz" wrote in message
news:g7r87j51gh3eabpp7k551l3k9ohrmsqc5i@4ax.com...
>
>On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 16:55:51 -0600, CaLaVeRa <cv@invalid.org> wrote:
>
>>On 6/19/2024 4:35 PM, Malte Runz wrote:
>>> On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 14:50:16 -0600, CaLaVeRa <cv@invalid.org> wrote:
>>>
>
>(snip)
>
>
>>>> You never heard of the program?
>>>
>>> Oh yes, I've heard about it. Kooks always parade it as 'proooooooof!'.
>>> Funny thing though, nothing ever came of it.
>>
>>It was top secret, you think they'd reveal the actual results to us?
>
>Then how the hell do you know that it works, if they didn't reveal the
>results?
>

Freedom of information act, various documents on the net, ex-gov, ex-CIA,
whistle blowers, books by insiders and experiencers. There are many sources
available today.

>
>Pull up your pants, for fucks sake.
>
>(snip)
>
>>> "Conclusions
>>> The foregoing observations provide a compelling argument against
>>> continuation of the program within the intelligence community. ..."
>>>
>>> Still there? Your nightmare continues:
>>>
>>> "Even though a statistically significant effect has been observed in
>>> the laboratory, it remains unclear whether the existence of a
>>> paranormal phenomenon, remote viewing, has been demonstrated."
>>>
>>> And doesn't getter any better for you.
>>>
>>> "The laboratory studies do not provide evidence regarding the sources
>>> or origins of the phenomenon, nor do they address an important
>>> methodological issue of inter-judge reliability."
>>
>>It was top secret, ...
>
>So you say. What were they hiding? That it worked? If they didn't want
>us to know that it worked, why even talk about it? OTOH if they tried
>to hide that it didn't work, why not just lie about it and say it
>worked? Your reply simply doesn't make sense.
>

Learn about the technological and political operations of the CIA and other
secretive agencies and orgs. Learn about official secrets acts,
compartmentalisation and systemic corruption.
Until you do that, none of this will make sense.

>
>> ... you think they'd reveal the actual results to us?
>
>[facepalm] Again, if they didn't reveal the results, why do you think
>it worked?
>

They did reveal the results - to military, gov. departments, secret
societies and stock holders.

How did I and others find out about it? Research, that's how.
Note that quick Googling is not research.

>
>(snip)
>
>>> Sure... But I think I trust the conclusions from that 'official
>>> government doc' you so generously supplied.
>>
>>It was top secret, you think they'd reveal the actual results to us?
>
>Remember that your cited the source as evidence of remote viewing
>being real. Now you're saying, for the third time, that your source
>can't be trusted. It's like you're not even trying.
>

You always just want certified pre-packaged convenient evidence so you don't
have to do any research for yourself.
That's not the kind of world we live in. Get with true reality and take your
rose coloured glasses off.

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

"Malte Runz" wrote in message
news:g7r87j51gh3eabpp7k551l3k9ohrmsqc5i@4ax.com...
>
>On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 16:55:51 -0600, CaLaVeRa <cv@invalid.org> wrote:
>
>>On 6/19/2024 4:35 PM, Malte Runz wrote:
>>> On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 14:50:16 -0600, CaLaVeRa <cv@invalid.org> wrote:
>>>
>
>(snip)
>
>
>>>> You never heard of the program?
>>>
>>> Oh yes, I've heard about it. Kooks always parade it as 'proooooooof!'.
>>> Funny thing though, nothing ever came of it.
>>
>>It was top secret, you think they'd reveal the actual results to us?
>
>Then how the hell do you know that it works, if they didn't reveal the
>results?
>
>Pull up your pants, for fucks sake.
>
>(snip)
>
>>> "Conclusions
>>> The foregoing observations provide a compelling argument against
>>> continuation of the program within the intelligence community. ..."
>>>
>>> Still there? Your nightmare continues:
>>>
>>> "Even though a statistically significant effect has been observed in
>>> the laboratory, it remains unclear whether the existence of a
>>> paranormal phenomenon, remote viewing, has been demonstrated."
>>>
>>> And doesn't getter any better for you.
>>>
>>> "The laboratory studies do not provide evidence regarding the sources
>>> or origins of the phenomenon, nor do they address an important
>>> methodological issue of inter-judge reliability."
>>
>>It was top secret, ...
>
>So you say. What were they hiding? That it worked? If they didn't want
>us to know that it worked, why even talk about it? OTOH if they tried
>to hide that it didn't work, why not just lie about it and say it
>worked? Your reply simply doesn't make sense.
>

It's not the same people who are talking about it, dummy. Geez.
In some cases people who no longer work for gov. and CIA etc. have come
forward about it, at great risk to themselves and their families. Many have
been murdered as a result.

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

"Governor Swill" wrote in message
news:c1g97jt0aeq0unru7nnh4qb9n1ifq6j980@4ax.com...
>
>On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 09:27:46 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote:
>
>>It was worse under Obama and his predecessors. It was on the way down
>>under
>>Trump.
>
>It's mind boggling to see how much of Trump's candy you suck on.
>

Candy? Like the MSM kool aid?

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote in
news:6674cb2d$0$2873001$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

> On 2024-06-20, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> In article <v51gao$2k8e5$6@dont-email.me>,
>> bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
>>>
>>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
>>> news:v5196a$2iost$6@dont-email.me:
>>>
>>> > On 2024-06-20, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
>>> >> "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
>>> >> news:v501k2$2c70c$1@dont-email.me:
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>> Another example of someone swallowing left mainstream media
>>> >>> gaslighting. Truth: Most of the world is laughing at America,
>>> >>> particularly its politics. Millions of middle class Americans
>>> >>> struggling to pay their bills. Many unemployed and quite a few
>>> >>> homeless. Suicide is up.
>>> >>>
>>> >> Go ahead link to some of those foreign news sites that are
>>> >> laughing at us.
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > "Bumbling Joe Biden is an international laughing stock"
>>> >
>>> > <https://youtu.be/hpb0_yG6ttQ?si=Z-1_MAJBWmibidJb>
>>> >
>>> =================
>>> Overall, we rate Sky News Australia Right-Biased based on story
>>> selection and editorial positions that mostly favor the right. We
>>> also rate them borderline Questionable and Mixed for factual
>>> reporting due to several failed fact checks, unproven claims, and
>>> the promotion of conspiracy theories and misinformation.
>>>
>>> https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/sky-news-australia/
>>> ===============
>>>
>>> Sky News is the laughingstock of the rest of the world.
>>
>> But you can't refute what they say.
>
> Of course he can't.
> It's classic left wing progressives attack the messenger instead of
> the message.
>
>

You and Sky News is making the claim - it's up to you to prove your
claim.

Now the video starts with Biden triping on a sandbag - how is that
comedic? It has nothing to do with mental ability. Young people
(including adults) trip on stuff all the time - sometimes even on air. I
would note that a trip-fall for an elder is serious - too many elders die
after a fall like that - but Biden picked himself up and continued on -
no report of him going to hospital, needing medical care, etc.

"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
news:v52pf4$2vibu$1@dont-email.me:

> It's not the same people who are talking about it, dummy. Geez.
> In some cases people who no longer work for gov. and CIA etc. have
> come forward about it, at great risk to themselves and their families.
> Many have been murdered as a result.
>
Murdered? That's a load of horse shit. We here those conspiracy theories
all the time, never any facts to back them. Vince Foster anyong?

In article <v52r3s$2vlkp$4@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
>
> Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote in
> news:6674cb2d$0$2873001$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>
> > On 2024-06-20, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >> In article <v51gao$2k8e5$6@dont-email.me>,
> >> bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
> >>>
> >>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
> >>> news:v5196a$2iost$6@dont-email.me:
> >>>
> >>> > On 2024-06-20, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
> >>> >> "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
> >>> >> news:v501k2$2c70c$1@dont-email.me:
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> Another example of someone swallowing left mainstream media
> >>> >>> gaslighting. Truth: Most of the world is laughing at America,
> >>> >>> particularly its politics. Millions of middle class Americans
> >>> >>> struggling to pay their bills. Many unemployed and quite a few
> >>> >>> homeless. Suicide is up.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >> Go ahead link to some of those foreign news sites that are
> >>> >> laughing at us.
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>> > "Bumbling Joe Biden is an international laughing stock"
> >>> >
> >>> > <https://youtu.be/hpb0_yG6ttQ?si=Z-1_MAJBWmibidJb>
> >>> >
> >>> =================
> >>> Overall, we rate Sky News Australia Right-Biased based on story
> >>> selection and editorial positions that mostly favor the right. We
> >>> also rate them borderline Questionable and Mixed for factual
> >>> reporting due to several failed fact checks, unproven claims, and
> >>> the promotion of conspiracy theories and misinformation.
> >>>
> >>> https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/sky-news-australia/
> >>> ===============
> >>>
> >>> Sky News is the laughingstock of the rest of the world.
> >>
> >> But you can't refute what they say.
> >
> > Of course he can't.
> > It's classic left wing progressives attack the messenger instead of
> > the message.
> >
> >
>
> You and Sky News is making the claim - it's up to you to prove your
> claim.
>
> Now the video starts with Biden triping on a sandbag - how is that
> comedic? It has nothing to do with mental ability. Young people
> (including adults) trip on stuff all the time - sometimes even on air. I
> would note that a trip-fall for an elder is serious - too many elders die
> after a fall like that - but Biden picked himself up and continued on -
> no report of him going to hospital, needing medical care, etc.

You focus on one thing and forget the rest.

"Baxter" wrote in message news:v52rc2$2vlkp$5@dont-email.me...
>
>"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
>news:v52pf4$2vibu$1@dont-email.me:
>
>
>> It's not the same people who are talking about it, dummy. Geez.
>> In some cases people who no longer work for gov. and CIA etc. have
>> come forward about it, at great risk to themselves and their families.
>> Many have been murdered as a result.
>>
>Murdered? That's a load of horse shit.
>

And how are you so sure of that?
Just another mainstream follower.

>
>We here those conspiracy theories
>all the time,
>

The MSM and gov. keep claiming they're only conspiracy theories and you
never question or research it.

>
>never any facts to back them. Vince Foster anyong?
>

The MSM that you follow doesn't give any facts.

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

"Malte Runz" wrote in message
news:gpu87jlguffarccvvnag9mcdu52fhf9t2a@4ax.com...
>
>On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 10:04:31 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
>wrote:
>
>>"Malte Runz" wrote in message
>>news:7cg67jt9mh7lo1jjd7i1k9r654teon4d60@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 11:58:55 -0600, Loran <loran@invalid.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Malte Runz wrote:
>>>>> "The real truth", eh? Like space aliens from Orion holding secret
>>>>> meetings with governments?
>>>>
>>>>https://youtu.be/ItRiw2HwvF0
>>>>Aliens are here, and they're not our friends, John Lear says
>>>
>>>Does your video contain any kind of hard evidence of those meetings
>>>having taken place?
>>>>
>>
>>You mean so ~you~ don't have to do any research or investigation and can
>>just take it easy and be shown everything?
>
>No. How often do I need to spell it out for you? How fucking dense are
>you? When I ask that question I already know the answer. I ask it
>because I want to expose you guys. Just for the fun of it.
>

So you think you already know everything in the world and just want to have
fun like a spoiled kid.

>
>>You will never learn any truths.
>
>Have you found that secret subterranean alien base outside of Sidney
>yet? No? Any news? 'What are the drums saying, Mike?'
>

You mean Sydney?
There is plenty of insider information on non human civilisations living
below the earth, oceans and in this solar system. You just don't know
anything about it.

News? Yes. They are systematically removing the scumbags, like the ones you
follow.

>>
>>>>
>>>>> Baby-blood drink Hollywood elites?
>>>>
>>>>https://youtu.be/YhM5LtOkgXA
>>>>Hollywood PANICS as Mel Gibson EXPOSES Them All!!!
>>>
>>>Three exclamation [marks]. I guess it must be true.
>>>
>>
>>But the mainstream media stuff ~is~ true?
>
>Why don't you find out for yourself?
>

Why don't you?

>
>(snip)
>
>>>"Psychic abilities are real" What a fucking moron...
>>>
>>
>>Again you just totally ignore all the above mentioned experienced
>>researchers, investigators and prominent people ...
>
>Ignore? I just went through (most of) the material posted as evidence.
>I didn't buy any of it, and I made it clear that I didn't.
>

You didn't buy it? You haven't done any research on it.
You think this is all just about believe or not believe. You're just an
armchair critic. Very immature.

>
>I've seen
>and read a lot about the subject. That's why I know it's BS.
>

You read a bunch of stuff to look for some laughing material. Wow.
And you somehow just magically know what's true and what's BS.

>
>> ... who are far smarter and
>>knowledgeable than you. You just sling mud all the time. ...
>
>And my aim is no less than spectacular!
>

You just gave away your big ego again.

>
>> ... You're a smart
>>arse.
>
>Deep State makes me do it, remember! I'm the real victim here.
>

Until recently you never even heard the term deep state. Yet somehow you
just know it's all BS. Because it sounds crazy - to your narrow immature
mind.

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

On 2024-06-21, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> In article <v52r3s$2vlkp$4@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
> says...
>>
>> Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote in
>> news:6674cb2d$0$2873001$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>>
>> > On 2024-06-20, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> >> In article <v51gao$2k8e5$6@dont-email.me>,
>> >> bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
>> >>>
>> >>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
>> >>> news:v5196a$2iost$6@dont-email.me:
>> >>>
>> >>> > On 2024-06-20, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
>> >>> >> "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
>> >>> >> news:v501k2$2c70c$1@dont-email.me:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> Another example of someone swallowing left mainstream media
>> >>> >>> gaslighting. Truth: Most of the world is laughing at
America,https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ny-gov-kathy-hochul-scrambles-to-get-business-to-
stay-tries-to-downplay-massive-fine-against-trump/ar-BB1ixQtj
>> >>> >>> particularly its politics. Millions of middle class Americans
>> >>> >>> struggling to pay their bills. Many unemployed and quite a few
>> >>> >>> homeless. Suicide is up.
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >> Go ahead link to some of those foreign news sites that are
>> >>> >> laughing at us.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >
>> >>> > "Bumbling Joe Biden is an international laughing stock"
>> >>> >
>> >>> > <https://youtu.be/hpb0_yG6ttQ?si=Z-1_MAJBWmibidJb>
>> >>> >
>> >>> =================
>> >>> Overall, we rate Sky News Australia Right-Biased based on story
>> >>> selection and editorial positions that mostly favor the right. We
>> >>> also rate them borderline Questionable and Mixed for factual
>> >>> reporting due to several failed fact checks, unproven claims, and
>> >>> the promotion of conspiracy theories and misinformation.
>> >>>
>> >>> https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/sky-news-australia/
>> >>> ===============
>> >>>
>> >>> Sky News is the laughingstock of the rest of the world.
>> >>
>> >> But you can't refute what they say.
>> >
>> > Of course he can't.
>> > It's classic left wing progressives attack the messenger instead of
>> > the message.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> You and Sky News is making the claim - it's up to you to prove your
>> claim.
>>
>> Now the video starts with Biden triping on a sandbag - how is that
>> comedic? It has nothing to do with mental ability. Young people
>> (including adults) trip on stuff all the time - sometimes even on air. I
>> would note that a trip-fall for an elder is serious - too many elders die
>> after a fall like that - but Biden picked himself up and continued on -
>> no report of him going to hospital, needing medical care, etc.
>
> You focus on one thing and forget the rest.

+1
Typical libby tactic.
--
pothead
Joe Biden is the absolute WORST President Of the U.S. ever.
Nobody else is even close. Including Jimmy Carter.
Vote for ANYBODY but Joe Biden in 2024.

On 2024-06-21, Andrew W <space@defense.com> wrote:
> "Baxter" wrote in message news:v52rc2$2vlkp$5@dont-email.me...
>>
>>"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
>>news:v52pf4$2vibu$1@dont-email.me:
>>
>>
>>> It's not the same people who are talking about it, dummy. Geez.
>>> In some cases people who no longer work for gov. and CIA etc. have
>>> come forward about it, at great risk to themselves and their families.
>>> Many have been murdered as a result.
>>>
>>Murdered? That's a load of horse shit.
>>
>
> And how are you so sure of that?
> Just another mainstream follower.
>
>
>>
>>We here those conspiracy theories
>>all the time,
>>
>
> The MSM and gov. keep claiming they're only conspiracy theories and you
> never question or research it.
>
>
>>
>>never any facts to back them. Vince Foster anyong?
>>
>
> The MSM that you follow doesn't give any facts.
>

Discrediting sources is the government's number one tactic for burying information that they don't
approve of.

ie: that wasn't a UFO, it was a weather balloon.

It's very important for the people to carefully observe how the government reacts to situations
because their actions eventually give them away every single time.

Some of these so called conspiracy theories end up being factual
The Hunter Biden laptop for one.

The MSM and government are in lock step with each other and it's a very powerful combination. The
sooner people realize this, the sooner the country can return to being a republic instead of a tin
pot dictatorship.

--
pothead
Joe Biden is the absolute WORST President Of the U.S. ever.
Nobody else is even close. Including Jimmy Carter.
Vote for ANYBODY but Joe Biden in 2024.