On 2024-06-08, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> In article <v409dr$29rni$2@dont-email.me>, chris.the.guy@usatoday.com
> says...
>>
>> On 6/7/2024 3:13 PM, On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth
>> waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried ? and
>> *failed* ? to bullshit:
>>
>> > In news:v3vnph$2788n$1@dont-email.me, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com>
>> > typed:
>> >
>> >> On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried ? and *failed* ? to bullshit:
>> >
>> >>> I have it on the authority of New York Times guest editorialist Norm
>> >>> Eisen that Trump's 34 felony convictions concern "profoundly
>> >>> serious" crimes. But one point I'm still not clear on is how Trump
>> >>> was supposed to describe his payments to Stormy Daniels.
>> >
>> >>> That is, after all, the heart of the case: Trump committed felonies
>> >>> by recording the payment to Daniels -- made through his lawyer
>> >>> Michael Cohen -- as a "legal expense," thus creating a "false
>> >>> business record."
>> >
>> >>> How was he supposed to describe it?
>> >
>> >> Not lie about it. The payment wasn't illegal. In New York the
>> >> lying was. Make the payment and whatever campaign finance
>> >> disclosures that would require.
>> >
>> > No FEC reports were required-- Trump's payments were in 2017.
>>
>> They were reimbursement for illegal campaign contributions Cohen made to Trump's
>> campaign, o oozing scarlet red maxipad. That made them Trump's illegal campaign
>> contributions.
>
> No illegal contributions were made.

And coincidentally NYC changed the rape law statutes as well in order to circumvent Jean Carroll's
rape claims having expired.

And just in time to try Trump.
Coincidence?
lol !

--
pothead
Joe Biden is the absolute WORST President Of the U.S. ever.
Nobody else is even close. Including Jimmy Carter.
Vote for ANYBODY but Joe Biden in 2024.

On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 10:54:58 -0600, Skeeter
<skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:

>In article <xIG8O.4$46t.2@fx46.iad>, chris.the.guy@usatoday.com says...
>>
>> The statute of limitations on Trump' felony did *not* run out before his
>> indictment. There is a five year statute of limitations (or "limitions," as
>> Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness puts it) for misdemeanor falsification of
>> business records in the second degree, § 175.05, but Trump was *never* charged
>> with or indicted on that. He was indicted on § 175.10, falsification of business
>> records in the *first* degree, which is a felony and has an extended limitation
>> due to the pandemic:
>>
>> The crimes Trump was convicted of date back more than five years, but they
>> withstood an initial court challenge because of a pandemic-era extension.
>>
>> Trump was indicted on March 30, 2023, more than six years after the earliest
>> charge in the indictment, which dates to Feb. 14, 2017. That's beyond the
>> five years typically allowed by the statute of limitations, but there's a
>> catch: Former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo extended the time limit to file
>> charges in all criminal cases when courts were disrupted by the COVID-19
>> pandemic in 2020.
>>
>> Trump's lawyers moved to dismiss the case in its early stages based on the
>> statute of limitations, but Merchan rejected the argument. In a pretrial
>> decision, the judge said the pandemic extension stretched out the deadline
>> for the prosecution by one year and 47 days.
>>
>> "In other words, this felony prosecution had to be commenced within six years
>> and 47 days from when the crimes were allegedly committed," Merchan wrote.
>>
>> Trump was charged within days of the potential deadline. The extension
>> "brought the conduct described in the indictment within the prescribed five-
>> year time limit," Merchan wrote.
>>
>> https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2024/06/05/trump-case-statute-of-limitations-explained/73983592007/
>>
>> So stop lying about "statute of limitations" (or "limitions") ? the case was
>> started on time.
>>
>> And stop lying about it being a misdemeanor. Trump was never charged with a
>> misdemeanor. He *only* was charged with a felony from the outset. It is *not*
>> the case that a misdemeanor was "upgraded" to a felony. It was a felony charge
>> from the beginning.
>
>TDS much?

Rudely needs his bottle.

On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 15:13:01 -0700, "max headroom"
<maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote:

>In news:v3vnph$2788n$1@dont-email.me, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com>
>typed:
>
>> max headroom wrote:
>
>>> I have it on the authority of New York Times guest editorialist Norm
>>> Eisen that Trump's 34 felony convictions concern "profoundly
>>> serious" crimes. But one point I'm still not clear on is how Trump
>>> was supposed to describe his payments to Stormy Daniels.
>
>>> That is, after all, the heart of the case: Trump committed felonies
>>> by recording the payment to Daniels -- made through his lawyer
>>> Michael Cohen -- as a "legal expense," thus creating a "false
>>> business record."
>
>>> How was he supposed to describe it?
>
>> Not lie about it. The payment wasn't illegal. In New York the
>> lying was. Make the payment and whatever campaign finance
>> disclosures that would require.
>
>No FEC reports were required-- Trump's payments were in 2017.

Something else ignornant libs don't understand about the case.

>
>>> Clinton laundered the campaign's payments to Palladino through a law firm and
>>> listed them on Federal Election Commission forms as "legal expenses." Unlike
>>> Trump's personal business records, these entries were being submitted to the
>>> FEC. Those entries had to be perfect!
>

In news:v40992$29rni$1@dont-email.me, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
<chris.the.guy@usatoday.com> typed:

> On every date, Max the Magnanimous typed:
>> In news:v3vpli$27gph$1@dont-email.me, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza typed:
>>> On every date, Max the Magnanimous typed:
>>>> In news:xIG8O.4$46t.2@fx46.iad, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza typed:

>>>>> And stop lying about it being a misdemeanor. Trump was never
>>>>> charged with a misdemeanor. He *only* was charged with a felony
>>>>> from the outset. It is *not* the case that a misdemeanor was
>>>>> "upgraded" to a felony. It was a felony charge from the beginning.

>>>> How Liberals Pay Off Their Bimbos

>>> No.

>>>> I have it on the authority of New York Times guest editorialist Norm Eisen
>>>> that Trump's 34 felony convictions concern "profoundly serious" crimes. But
>>>> one point I'm still not clear on is how Trump was supposed to describe his
>>>> payments to Stormy Daniels.

>>>> That is, after all, the heart of the case: Trump committed felonies by
>>>> recording the payment to Daniels -- made through his lawyer Michael
>>>> Cohen -- as a "legal expense," thus creating a "false business record."

>>>> How was he supposed to describe it?

>>> If he had just paid it from his personal bank account, Your Grace, he
>>> wouldn't have had to describe or classify it at all.

>> "Cohen would be paid in a series of monthly payments of $35,000 over the
>> course of 2017. The first check was for $70,000, covering two months. Cohen
>> sent an invoice to the Trump Organization for each check, portraying the
>> payment as his 'retainer.' Every time he was paid, a bookkeeper generated a
>> record for the company's files, known as a voucher, with the description
>> 'legal expense.' The first three payments were made from Trump's trust, while
>> the remaining nine came from his personal account.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-charges-conviction-guilty-verdict/

> No, Your Grace!

'Fraid so, troll.

On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 19:05:13 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:

>In article <v409dr$29rni$2@dont-email.me>, chris.the.guy@usatoday.com
>says...
>>
>> On 6/7/2024 3:13 PM, On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth
>> waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried ? and
>> *failed* ? to bullshit:
>>
>> > In news:v3vnph$2788n$1@dont-email.me, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com>
>> > typed:
>> >
>> >> On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried ? and *failed* ? to bullshit:
>> >
>> >>> I have it on the authority of New York Times guest editorialist Norm
>> >>> Eisen that Trump's 34 felony convictions concern "profoundly
>> >>> serious" crimes. But one point I'm still not clear on is how Trump
>> >>> was supposed to describe his payments to Stormy Daniels.
>> >
>> >>> That is, after all, the heart of the case: Trump committed felonies
>> >>> by recording the payment to Daniels -- made through his lawyer
>> >>> Michael Cohen -- as a "legal expense," thus creating a "false
>> >>> business record."
>> >
>> >>> How was he supposed to describe it?
>> >
>> >> Not lie about it. The payment wasn't illegal. In New York the
>> >> lying was. Make the payment and whatever campaign finance
>> >> disclosures that would require.
>> >
>> > No FEC reports were required-- Trump's payments were in 2017.
>>
>> They were reimbursement for illegal campaign contributions Cohen made to Trump's
>> campaign, o oozing scarlet red maxipad. That made them Trump's illegal campaign
>> contributions.
>
>No illegal contributions were made.

Liar.

Swill
NP: Steely Dan - Black Cow
--
We now have it from the horse's mouth that the Trumps are white supremacists.

Eric at a press conference in New York Wed, May 29, 2024
after his father's guilty verdict was handed down said:

"I cannot wait for the day that we win. We will. We're white. The country knows
that this is nonsense."
<https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/internet-roasting-eric-trump-viral-172538135.html>

(video at link)

Not left, not right, forward. https://www.forwardparty.com/

Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!

Sláva Ukrajíni! Glory to Ukraine!

Putin tse prezervatyv! Putin is a condom!

Go here to donate to Ukrainian relief.
<https://www2.deloitte.com/ua/uk/pages/registration-forms/help-cities.html>

On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 17:30:40 -0700, Chris Mueller <chris.the.guy@usatoday.com> wrote:

>On 6/7/2024 3:45 PM, CaLaVeRa wrote:
>> On 6/7/2024 1:41 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
>>> The payment wasn't illegal. In New York the lying was.
>>
>> 5 year staute of limitations = expired.
>
>It was extended, spammy.

No. It wasn't. The SoL for a misdemeanor isn't the same as the SoL for a felony.

Swill
--
We now have it from the horse's mouth that the Trumps are white supremacists.

Eric at a press conference in New York Wed, May 29, 2024
after his father's guilty verdict was handed down said:

"I cannot wait for the day that we win. We will. We're white. The country knows
that this is nonsense."
<https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/internet-roasting-eric-trump-viral-172538135.html>

(video at link)

Not left, not right, forward. https://www.forwardparty.com/

Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!

Sláva Ukrajíni! Glory to Ukraine!

Putin tse prezervatyv! Putin is a condom!

Go here to donate to Ukrainian relief.
<https://www2.deloitte.com/ua/uk/pages/registration-forms/help-cities.html>

On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 15:35:45 -0700, Lexor <nobody@greenpiece.con> wrote:

>On 6/7/2024 9:38 AM, Rudy Canoza new sock Chris Mueller wrote:
>> The statute of limitations on Trump' felony did *not* run out before his
>> indictment.
>
>If New York state had not extended the statue of limitations prior to
>that it would have.

There was no extension. The SoL for felonies is not the same a for misdemeanors.

Swill
--
We now have it from the horse's mouth that the Trumps are white supremacists.

Eric at a press conference in New York Wed, May 29, 2024
after his father's guilty verdict was handed down said:

"I cannot wait for the day that we win. We will. We're white. The country knows
that this is nonsense."
<https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/internet-roasting-eric-trump-viral-172538135.html>

(video at link)

Not left, not right, forward. https://www.forwardparty.com/

Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!

Sláva Ukrajíni! Glory to Ukraine!

Putin tse prezervatyv! Putin is a condom!

Go here to donate to Ukrainian relief.
<https://www2.deloitte.com/ua/uk/pages/registration-forms/help-cities.html>

On 6/8/2024 12:21 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
> Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!
>
> Sláva Ukrajíni! Glory to Ukraine!
>
> Putin tse prezervatyv! Putin is a condom!
>
> Go here to donate to Ukrainian relief.

So just exactly when are you going to sign up to go fight there
yourself, Jonathan 'little man' Ball?

You stolen valor, gutless, hypocritical Suckramento lawn puke!

On 6/8/2024 12:19 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
> Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!
>
> Sláva Ukrajíni! Glory to Ukraine!

So just exactly when are you going to sign up to go fight there
yourself, Jonathan 'little man' Ball?

You stolen valor, gutless, hypocritical Suckramento lawn puke!

On 6/8/2024 12:18 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
> Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!
>
> Sláva Ukrajíni! Glory to Ukraine!
>
> Putin tse prezervatyv! Putin is a condom!
>
> Go here to donate to Ukrainian relief.

So just exactly when are you going to sign up to go fight there
yourself, Jonathan 'little man' Ball?

You stolen valor, gutless, hypocritical Suckramento lawn puke!

In article <33896jtjqh6ersl3rgh3fvmp53ffl4atkf@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>
> On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 19:05:13 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <v409dr$29rni$2@dont-email.me>, chris.the.guy@usatoday.com
> >says...
> >>
> >> On 6/7/2024 3:13 PM, On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth
> >> waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried ? and
> >> *failed* ? to bullshit:
> >>
> >> > In news:v3vnph$2788n$1@dont-email.me, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com>
> >> > typed:
> >> >
> >> >> On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried ? and *failed* ? to bullshit:
> >> >
> >> >>> I have it on the authority of New York Times guest editorialist Norm
> >> >>> Eisen that Trump's 34 felony convictions concern "profoundly
> >> >>> serious" crimes. But one point I'm still not clear on is how Trump
> >> >>> was supposed to describe his payments to Stormy Daniels.
> >> >
> >> >>> That is, after all, the heart of the case: Trump committed felonies
> >> >>> by recording the payment to Daniels -- made through his lawyer
> >> >>> Michael Cohen -- as a "legal expense," thus creating a "false
> >> >>> business record."
> >> >
> >> >>> How was he supposed to describe it?
> >> >
> >> >> Not lie about it. The payment wasn't illegal. In New York the
> >> >> lying was. Make the payment and whatever campaign finance
> >> >> disclosures that would require.
> >> >
> >> > No FEC reports were required-- Trump's payments were in 2017.
> >>
> >> They were reimbursement for illegal campaign contributions Cohen made to Trump's
> >> campaign, o oozing scarlet red maxipad. That made them Trump's illegal campaign
> >> contributions.
> >
> >No illegal contributions were made.
>
> Liar.
Name calling and no facts is the calling card of a liberal.

On Sat, 8 Jun 2024 13:25:22 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:

>On 2024-06-08, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> In article <v40992$29rni$1@dont-email.me>, chris.the.guy@usatoday.com
>> says...
>>>
>>> On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the thought of
>>> his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried ? and *failed* ? to bullshit:
>>> > In news:v3vpli$27gph$1@dont-email.me, Rudy Canoza, the intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior to oozing scarlet red macipad, the cuntflaps, *wrote* (not "typed" ? only stupid cuntflaps configure custom attributions):
>>> >
>>> >> On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried ? and *failed* ? to bullshit:
>>> >>> In news:xIG8O.4$46t.2@fx46.iad, Rudy Canoza, the intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior to oozing scarlet red macipad, the cuntflaps, *wrote* (not "typed" ? only stupid cuntflaps configure custom attributions):
>>> >
>>> >>>> And stop lying about it being a misdemeanor. Trump was never charged
>>> >>>> with a misdemeanor. He *only* was charged with a felony from the
>>> >>>> outset. It is *not* the case that a misdemeanor was "upgraded" to a
>>> >>>> felony. It was a felony charge from the beginning.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >>> How Liberals Pay Off Their Bimbos
>>> >
>>> >> No.
>>> >
>>> >>> I have it on the authority of New York Times guest editorialist Norm Eisen
>>> >>> that Trump's 34 felony convictions concern "profoundly serious" crimes. But
>>> >>> one point I'm still not clear on is how Trump was supposed to describe his
>>> >>> payments to Stormy Daniels.
>>> >
>>> >>> That is, after all, the heart of the case: Trump committed felonies by
>>> >>> recording the payment to Daniels -- made through his lawyer Michael Cohen --
>>> >>> as a "legal expense," thus creating a "false business record."
>>> >
>>> >>> How was he supposed to describe it?
>>> >
>>> >> If he had just paid it from his personal bank account, o oozing scarlet red maxipad, he wouldn't
>>> >> have had to describe or classify it at all.
>>> >
>>> > "Cohen would be
>>>
>>> No, o oozing scarlet red maxipad. Trump committed crimes, fucked up, and got
>>> caught. He fucked up because he can never *not* be a cheat and a chiseler.
>>
>> Joes border order is failing. Another fail from the senile puppet.
>>
>> https://www.reuters.com/world/us/migrants-around-world-traverse-
>> california-desert-reach-us-2024-06-06/
>>
>> https://www.voanews.com/a/the-latest-hot-spot-for-illegal-border-
>> crossings-is-san-diego-but-routes-change-quickly-/7617274.html
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ggRUIVUAUc
>
>I believe it took one day for yet another one of Joe Biden's policies to fail.
>Joe Biden is accumulating quite the track record for failure.
>indeed he is.

It doesn't matter as they will simply say he "fixed the border".

"Andrew W" wrote in message news:v40f7q$2eh71$1@dont-email.me...

> Rudy Canoza

Oh, God, is that crank still around?

"Byker" wrote in message
news:_FSdncdPYZOzp_r7nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@earthlink.com...
>
>"Andrew W" wrote in message news:v40f7q$2eh71$1@dont-email.me...
>> Rudy Canoza
>
>Oh, God, is that crank still around?
>

Correct me if I'm wrong but most of the 'convict Trump' posts here are by
him under various names.

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site