Since Donald Trump incited an insurrection following his 2020 electoral loss, he
has moderated neither his rhetoric nor his behavior; on the contrary, both have
become more extreme. If this depresses Republican voter turnout even marginally,
Trump is headed for a major defeat this November.

Mar 6, 2024
REED GALEN

WASHINGTON, DC – Donald Trump was the unlikeliest of American presidents. When
he launched his campaign in 2016, the closest he had come to executive authority
was pretending to fire contestants on a business-themed reality show. As
ridiculous as it seemed, the image of Trump sitting behind a massive boardroom
table uttering his imitable catchphrase – “You’re fired” – convinced millions of
American voters, including many who hadn’t voted previously, that he was a man
who knew how to get things done.

That impression, together with good timing and good luck, enabled Trump to
defeat political icon Hillary Clinton in a race that appeared tailor-made for
her. But contrary to what Trump might claim, his victory was extremely narrow.
In fact, he lost the popular vote by 2.8 million votes – a larger margin than
any other US president in history.

Since then, Trump has proved toxic at the ballot box. In the 2018 midterms, the
Democrats trounced Trump’s Republican Party. In the 2020 presidential election,
Trump lost narrowly in the Electoral College, and in a landslide in the popular
vote. In the 2022 midterm elections, Trump’s handpicked candidates were routed
across the country, and Democratic candidates either held their seats or won
Republican seats in key states – including Arizona, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and
Wisconsin – often by wide margins.

While these failures might have inspired some Republican grumbling, Trump ended
up firmly in control of the party apparatus, its leadership, and its most
extreme members. It is a pattern the GOP will come to regret later this year,
when both Trump and the Republican Party face what is likely to be a devastating
electoral defeat.

Trump’s erratic behavior, anti-democratic rhetoric, and threats against his
opponents will contribute to his loss in November’s presidential election. But
it is America’s demographic makeup that will ultimately send Trump into
permanent retirement. The old wisdom that “demographics is destiny” – coined by
the French philosopher Auguste Comte – may well be more relevant to the outcome
than it has been to any previous presidential election.

Between the 2016 and 2024 elections, some *20 million older voters will have
died*, and about 32 million younger Americans will have reached voting age. Many
young voters disdain both parties, and Republicans are actively recruiting
(mostly white men) on college campuses. But the issues that are dearest to Gen
Z’s heart – such as reproductive rights, democracy, and the environment – will
keep most of them voting Democratic. [emphasis added]

The reality is that since Trump entered US politics in 2016, the Republican
Party has become older, whiter, more male, and more extreme. It is also smaller,
and Trump’s unwillingness to cross his base makes it difficult, if not
impossible, to attract moderates and independents.

US President Joe Biden has more voters available to him than Trump does. That
does not mean victory will be easy, but it does mean he can survive more voters
staying home. If Trump is to win, he will need every possible voter in his party
to show up, and he must pick up votes from as-yet-undecided Americans who might
have long ago soured on him, not only because of his personal behavior, but also
because of policy.

The Republican Party is on the wrong side of every major issue facing the
American people. Consider reproductive rights. The Republican-hijacked US
Supreme Court decided in 2022 to overturn Roe v. Wade, which had ensured
abortion rights for half a century. Ultra-conservative state legislatures have
outlawed abortion even in cases of rape or incest. And the Alabama Supreme Court
recently delivered a ruling equating frozen embryos with children. This trend
has pushed women and moderates even more firmly into the arms of the Democrats –
or, at least, into the undecided or “anyone but Trump” camps.

On national security, Trump has often aligned himself with America’s traditional
adversaries, thereby upsetting, angering, or confusing a key electoral cohort.
Many older Republicans still carry the spirit of Ronald Reagan in their hearts,
and view America as a “shining city on a hill,” a beacon of freedom and
democracy to people around the world. For those who are old enough to remember
the Cold War, Russia is an American foe through and through.

These Republicans largely find Russia’s invasion of democratic Ukraine
unacceptable: one recent survey found that 43% of Republicans believe the United
States is providing either too little or the right amount of aid to Ukraine.
They certainly do not approve of Trump’s threats to abandon NATO and even
encourage Russian aggression against members that do not meet their
military-spending obligations. Trump’s affinity for authoritarian states – from
Russia to Hungary to Saudi Arabia – is anathema to them.

Until this week, Republicans still had another option: Nikki Haley, a former US
ambassador to the United Nations. Haley’s escalating attacks on Trump’s policy
record seem to have had an impact. In the New Hampshire, Nevada, and South
Carolina primaries, she captured about 30% of the vote. But Haley has now ended
her presidential campaign, after losing the “Super Tuesday” primaries in 14 states.

So far, however, Haley has declined to endorse Trump, declaring that it is up to
him to win the support of her voters. And there is good reason to doubt that he
will succeed. In fact, rather than voting for Trump in November, many of Haley’s
supporters are likely either to stay home or to vote for Biden. In Iowa, 49% of
self-identified Haley caucus-goers said they would do just that. [since this
piece was published, Haley has now obscenely said she will vote for the felon Trump]

Trump lost the 2020 election, and then incited an insurrection. Since then, he
has moderated neither his rhetoric nor his behavior; on the contrary, he has
become more extreme. If this depresses Republican voter turnout even marginally,
Trump is in for a major defeat. There simply aren’t enough American voters
willing to put him back in the White House.

https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/trump-will-lose-november-election-owing-to-personality-policy-and-demographics-by-reed-galen-2024-03

Reed Galen is a co-founder of The Lincoln Project, a "never-Trump" group, so a
lot of this might be wish projection. However, he makes some excellent points.

* The Republiscum/QAnon party of Trump is mainly made up of old white racist
men and their fat pig women, and *twenty million* of them have died in the
last eight years

* The Republiscum/QAnon party "is on the wrong side of every major issue facing
the American people" — spot-on correct

* The Republiscum/QAnon party is shrinking

* Trump's unhinged lie-packed rhetoric is more likely to make Republiscum/QAnon
voters stay home, rather than energize them to vote

It was probably a bad idea for Galen to entitle his piece Why Trump *Can't* Win,
but he makes a pretty good case for why Trump is *unlikely* to win.

And of course, if Trump is hit with the crippling heart attack or massive stroke
that *all right-thinking Americans hope to see*, he simply won't win.

On 6/10/24 13:07, J Carlson wrote:
> Since Donald Trump incited an insurrection following his 2020 electoral
> loss, he has moderated neither his rhetoric nor his behavior; on the
> contrary, both have become more extreme.

Given that there is has been no evidence to support the claim that Trump
incited the riot on Jan 6, this one paragraph tells me that the article
is worthless.

> If this depresses Republican
> voter turnout even marginally, Trump is headed for a major defeat this
> November.
>
> Mar 6, 2024
> REED GALEN
>
> WASHINGTON, DC – Donald Trump was the unlikeliest of American
> presidents. When he launched his campaign in 2016, the closest he had
> come to executive authority was pretending to fire contestants on a
> business-themed reality show. As ridiculous as it seemed, the image of
> Trump sitting behind a massive boardroom table uttering his imitable
> catchphrase – “You’re fired” – convinced millions of American voters,
> including many who hadn’t voted previously, that he was a man who knew
> how to get things done.
>
> That impression, together with good timing and good luck, enabled Trump
> to defeat political icon Hillary Clinton in a race that appeared
> tailor-made for her. But contrary to what Trump might claim, his victory
> was extremely narrow. In fact, he lost the popular vote by 2.8 million
> votes – a larger margin than any other US president in history.
>
> Since then, Trump has proved toxic at the ballot box. In the 2018
> midterms, the Democrats trounced Trump’s Republican Party. In the 2020
> presidential election, Trump lost narrowly in the Electoral College, and
> in a landslide in the popular vote. In the 2022 midterm elections,
> Trump’s handpicked candidates were routed across the country, and
> Democratic candidates either held their seats or won Republican seats in
> key states – including Arizona, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin –
> often by wide margins.
>
> While these failures might have inspired some Republican grumbling,
> Trump ended up firmly in control of the party apparatus, its leadership,
> and its most extreme members. It is a pattern the GOP will come to
> regret later this year, when both Trump and the Republican Party face
> what is likely to be a devastating electoral defeat.
>
> Trump’s erratic behavior, anti-democratic rhetoric, and threats against
> his opponents will contribute to his loss in November’s presidential
> election. But it is America’s demographic makeup that will ultimately
> send Trump into permanent retirement. The old wisdom that “demographics
> is destiny” – coined by the French philosopher Auguste Comte – may well
> be more relevant to the outcome than it has been to any previous
> presidential election.
>
> Between the 2016 and 2024 elections, some *20 million older voters will
> have died*, and about 32 million younger Americans will have reached
> voting age. Many young voters disdain both parties, and Republicans are
> actively recruiting (mostly white men) on college campuses. But the
> issues that are dearest to Gen Z’s heart – such as reproductive rights,
> democracy, and the environment – will keep most of them voting
> Democratic. [emphasis added]
>
> The reality is that since Trump entered US politics in 2016, the
> Republican Party has become older, whiter, more male, and more extreme.
> It is also smaller, and Trump’s unwillingness to cross his base makes it
> difficult, if not impossible, to attract moderates and independents.
>
> US President Joe Biden has more voters available to him than Trump does.
> That does not mean victory will be easy, but it does mean he can survive
> more voters staying home. If Trump is to win, he will need every
> possible voter in his party to show up, and he must pick up votes from
> as-yet-undecided Americans who might have long ago soured on him, not
> only because of his personal behavior, but also because of policy.
>
> The Republican Party is on the wrong side of every major issue facing
> the American people. Consider reproductive rights. The
> Republican-hijacked US Supreme Court decided in 2022 to overturn Roe v.
> Wade, which had ensured abortion rights for half a century.
> Ultra-conservative state legislatures have outlawed abortion even in
> cases of rape or incest. And the Alabama Supreme Court recently
> delivered a ruling equating frozen embryos with children. This trend has
> pushed women and moderates even more firmly into the arms of the
> Democrats – or, at least, into the undecided or “anyone but Trump” camps.
>
> On national security, Trump has often aligned himself with America’s
> traditional adversaries, thereby upsetting, angering, or confusing a key
> electoral cohort. Many older Republicans still carry the spirit of
> Ronald Reagan in their hearts, and view America as a “shining city on a
> hill,” a beacon of freedom and democracy to people around the world. For
> those who are old enough to remember the Cold War, Russia is an American
> foe through and through.
>
> These Republicans largely find Russia’s invasion of democratic Ukraine
> unacceptable: one recent survey found that 43% of Republicans believe
> the United States is providing either too little or the right amount of
> aid to Ukraine. They certainly do not approve of Trump’s threats to
> abandon NATO and even encourage Russian aggression against members that
> do not meet their military-spending obligations. Trump’s affinity for
> authoritarian states – from Russia to Hungary to Saudi Arabia – is
> anathema to them.
>
> Until this week, Republicans still had another option: Nikki Haley, a
> former US ambassador to the United Nations. Haley’s escalating attacks
> on Trump’s policy record seem to have had an impact. In the New
> Hampshire, Nevada, and South Carolina primaries, she captured about 30%
> of the vote. But Haley has now ended her presidential campaign, after
> losing the “Super Tuesday” primaries in 14 states.
>
> So far, however, Haley has declined to endorse Trump, declaring that it
> is up to him to win the support of her voters. And there is good reason
> to doubt that he will succeed. In fact, rather than voting for Trump in
> November, many of Haley’s supporters are likely either to stay home or
> to vote for Biden. In Iowa, 49% of self-identified Haley caucus-goers
> said they would do just that. [since this piece was published, Haley has
> now obscenely said she will vote for the felon Trump]
>
> Trump lost the 2020 election, and then incited an insurrection. Since
> then, he has moderated neither his rhetoric nor his behavior; on the
> contrary, he has become more extreme. If this depresses Republican voter
> turnout even marginally, Trump is in for a major defeat. There simply
> aren’t enough American voters willing to put him back in the White House.
>
> https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/trump-will-lose-november-election-owing-to-personality-policy-and-demographics-by-reed-galen-2024-03
>
> Reed Galen is a co-founder of The Lincoln Project, a "never-Trump"
> group, so a lot of this might be wish projection. However, he makes some
> excellent points.
>
>  * The Republiscum/QAnon party of Trump is mainly made up of old white
> racist
>    men and their fat pig women, and *twenty million* of them have died
> in the
>    last eight years
>
>  * The Republiscum/QAnon party "is on the wrong side of every major
> issue facing
>    the American people" — spot-on correct
>
>  * The Republiscum/QAnon party is shrinking
>
>  * Trump's unhinged lie-packed rhetoric is more likely to make
> Republiscum/QAnon
>    voters stay home, rather than energize them to vote
>
> It was probably a bad idea for Galen to entitle his piece Why Trump
> *Can't* Win, but he makes a pretty good case for why Trump is *unlikely*
> to win.
>
> And of course, if Trump is hit with the crippling heart attack or
> massive stroke that *all right-thinking Americans hope to see*, he
> simply won't win.

Having read the entire article, I find that my original judgement is
accurate.

>
>Given that there is has been no evidence to support the claim that Trump
>incited the riot on Jan 6, this one paragraph tells me that the article
>is worthless.

Trump says he's tired of winning all the time. That's why he's been on such
a prolonged losing streek.

On 6/10/2024 11:15 AM, David Hartung wrote:
> On 6/10/24 13:07, J Carlson wrote:
>> Since Donald Trump incited an insurrection following his 2020 electoral loss,
>> he has moderated neither his rhetoric nor his behavior; on the contrary, both
>> have become more extreme.
>
> Given that there is has been no evidence to support the claim that Trump incited
> the riot on Jan 6,

Trump incited the insurrection. This is beyond dispute and is the verdict of
history. You know it was an insurrection, and you're just pissing and moaning
because it failed.

>> If this depresses Republican voter turnout even marginally, Trump is headed
>> for a major defeat this November.
>>
>> Mar 6, 2024
>> REED GALEN
>>
>> [...]
>
> Having read the entire article, I find that my original judgement [sic] is accurate.

There is no 'e' in "judgment," you illiterate degreeless fat fuck, and your
judgment, as always, is complete bullshit. As I said, Galen might be wrong, but
he makes *excellent* points.

[Default] J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com> typed:

>Since Donald Trump incited an insurrection following his 2020 electoral loss, he
>has moderated neither his rhetoric nor his behavior; on the contrary, both have
>become more extreme. If this depresses Republican voter turnout even marginally,
>Trump is headed for a major defeat this November.

Trump is doomed.

George Clooney just endorsed Biden.
https://www.newsweek.com/george-clooney-fundraise-biden-icc-call-1910109

[Default] "Cunt Flaps" Canoza typed:

>Trump incited the insurrection.

There was no "insurrection," Cunt Flaps.

On 6/10/24 13:24, J Carlson wrote:
> On 6/10/2024 11:15 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>> On 6/10/24 13:07, J Carlson wrote:
>>> Since Donald Trump incited an insurrection following his 2020
>>> electoral loss, he has moderated neither his rhetoric nor his
>>> behavior; on the contrary, both have become more extreme.
>>
>> Given that there is has been no evidence to support the claim that
>> Trump incited the riot on Jan 6,
>
> Trump incited the insurrection. This is beyond dispute and is the
> verdict of history. You know it was an insurrection, and you're just
> pissing and moaning because it failed.
>
>>> If this depresses Republican voter turnout even marginally, Trump is
>>> headed for a major defeat this November.
>>>
>>> Mar 6, 2024
>>> REED GALEN
>>>
>>> [...]
>>
>> Having read the entire article, I find that my original judgement
>> [sic] is accurate.
>
> There is no 'e' in "judgment," you illiterate degreeless fat fuck, and
> your judgment, as always, is complete bullshit. As I said, Galen might
> be wrong, but he makes *excellent* points.

Once again you have had to fall back on grammar flames. That is a sure
sign that you have nothing.

In article <v47fdq$ifcb$2@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
>
> Since Donald Trump incited an insurrection following his 2020 electoral loss, he
> has moderated neither his rhetoric nor his behavior; on the contrary, both have
> become more extreme. If this depresses Republican voter turnout even marginally,
> Trump is headed for a major defeat this November.
>
> Mar 6, 2024
> REED GALEN
>
> WASHINGTON, DC ? Donald Trump was the unlikeliest of American presidents. When
> he launched his campaign in 2016, the closest he had come to executive authority
> was pretending to fire contestants on a business-themed reality show. As
> ridiculous as it seemed, the image of Trump sitting behind a massive boardroom
> table uttering his imitable catchphrase ? ?You?re fired? ? convinced millions of
> American voters, including many who hadn?t voted previously, that he was a man
> who knew how to get things done.
>
> That impression, together with good timing and good luck, enabled Trump to
> defeat political icon Hillary Clinton in a race that appeared tailor-made for
> her. But contrary to what Trump might claim, his victory was extremely narrow.
> In fact, he lost the popular vote by 2.8 million votes ? a larger margin than
> any other US president in history.
>
> Since then, Trump has proved toxic at the ballot box. In the 2018 midterms, the
> Democrats trounced Trump?s Republican Party. In the 2020 presidential election,
> Trump lost narrowly in the Electoral College, and in a landslide in the popular
> vote. In the 2022 midterm elections, Trump?s handpicked candidates were routed
> across the country, and Democratic candidates either held their seats or won
> Republican seats in key states ? including Arizona, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and
> Wisconsin ? often by wide margins.
>
> While these failures might have inspired some Republican grumbling, Trump ended
> up firmly in control of the party apparatus, its leadership, and its most
> extreme members. It is a pattern the GOP will come to regret later this year,
> when both Trump and the Republican Party face what is likely to be a devastating
> electoral defeat.
>
> Trump?s erratic behavior, anti-democratic rhetoric, and threats against his
> opponents will contribute to his loss in November?s presidential election. But
> it is America?s demographic makeup that will ultimately send Trump into
> permanent retirement. The old wisdom that ?demographics is destiny? ? coined by
> the French philosopher Auguste Comte ? may well be more relevant to the outcome
> than it has been to any previous presidential election.
>
> Between the 2016 and 2024 elections, some *20 million older voters will have
> died*, and about 32 million younger Americans will have reached voting age. Many
> young voters disdain both parties, and Republicans are actively recruiting
> (mostly white men) on college campuses. But the issues that are dearest to Gen
> Z?s heart ? such as reproductive rights, democracy, and the environment ? will
> keep most of them voting Democratic. [emphasis added]
>
> The reality is that since Trump entered US politics in 2016, the Republican
> Party has become older, whiter, more male, and more extreme. It is also smaller,
> and Trump?s unwillingness to cross his base makes it difficult, if not
> impossible, to attract moderates and independents.
>
> US President Joe Biden has more voters available to him than Trump does. That
> does not mean victory will be easy, but it does mean he can survive more voters
> staying home. If Trump is to win, he will need every possible voter in his party
> to show up, and he must pick up votes from as-yet-undecided Americans who might
> have long ago soured on him, not only because of his personal behavior, but also
> because of policy.
>
> The Republican Party is on the wrong side of every major issue facing the
> American people. Consider reproductive rights. The Republican-hijacked US
> Supreme Court decided in 2022 to overturn Roe v. Wade, which had ensured
> abortion rights for half a century. Ultra-conservative state legislatures have
> outlawed abortion even in cases of rape or incest. And the Alabama Supreme Court
> recently delivered a ruling equating frozen embryos with children. This trend
> has pushed women and moderates even more firmly into the arms of the Democrats ?
> or, at least, into the undecided or ?anyone but Trump? camps.
>
> On national security, Trump has often aligned himself with America?s traditional
> adversaries, thereby upsetting, angering, or confusing a key electoral cohort.
> Many older Republicans still carry the spirit of Ronald Reagan in their hearts,
> and view America as a ?shining city on a hill,? a beacon of freedom and
> democracy to people around the world. For those who are old enough to remember
> the Cold War, Russia is an American foe through and through.
>
> These Republicans largely find Russia?s invasion of democratic Ukraine
> unacceptable: one recent survey found that 43% of Republicans believe the United
> States is providing either too little or the right amount of aid to Ukraine.
> They certainly do not approve of Trump?s threats to abandon NATO and even
> encourage Russian aggression against members that do not meet their
> military-spending obligations. Trump?s affinity for authoritarian states ? from
> Russia to Hungary to Saudi Arabia ? is anathema to them.
>
> Until this week, Republicans still had another option: Nikki Haley, a former US
> ambassador to the United Nations. Haley?s escalating attacks on Trump?s policy
> record seem to have had an impact. In the New Hampshire, Nevada, and South
> Carolina primaries, she captured about 30% of the vote. But Haley has now ended
> her presidential campaign, after losing the ?Super Tuesday? primaries in 14 states.
>
> So far, however, Haley has declined to endorse Trump, declaring that it is up to
> him to win the support of her voters. And there is good reason to doubt that he
> will succeed. In fact, rather than voting for Trump in November, many of Haley?s
> supporters are likely either to stay home or to vote for Biden. In Iowa, 49% of
> self-identified Haley caucus-goers said they would do just that. [since this
> piece was published, Haley has now obscenely said she will vote for the felon Trump]
>
> Trump lost the 2020 election, and then incited an insurrection. Since then, he
> has moderated neither his rhetoric nor his behavior; on the contrary, he has
> become more extreme. If this depresses Republican voter turnout even marginally,
> Trump is in for a major defeat. There simply aren?t enough American voters
> willing to put him back in the White House.
>
> https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/trump-will-lose-november-election-owing-to-personality-policy-and-demographics-by-reed-galen-2024-03
>
> Reed Galen is a co-founder of The Lincoln Project, a "never-Trump" group, so a
> lot of this might be wish projection. However, he makes some excellent points.
>
> * The Republiscum/QAnon party of Trump is mainly made up of old white racist
> men and their fat pig women, and *twenty million* of them have died in the
> last eight years
>
> * The Republiscum/QAnon party "is on the wrong side of every major issue facing
> the American people" ? spot-on correct
>
> * The Republiscum/QAnon party is shrinking
>
> * Trump's unhinged lie-packed rhetoric is more likely to make Republiscum/QAnon
> voters stay home, rather than energize them to vote
>
> It was probably a bad idea for Galen to entitle his piece Why Trump *Can't* Win,
> but he makes a pretty good case for why Trump is *unlikely* to win.
>
> And of course, if Trump is hit with the crippling heart attack or massive stroke
> that *all right-thinking Americans hope to see*, he simply won't win.

He scares you. You know he can win. The right thinking people want
Trump.

In article <v47gdu$is9i$1@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
>
> On 6/10/2024 11:15 AM, David Hartung wrote:
> > On 6/10/24 13:07, J Carlson wrote:
> >> Since Donald Trump incited an insurrection following his 2020 electoral loss,
> >> he has moderated neither his rhetoric nor his behavior; on the contrary, both
> >> have become more extreme.
> >
> > Given that there is has been no evidence to support the claim that Trump incited
> > the riot on Jan 6,
>
> Trump incited the insurrection. This is beyond dispute and is the verdict of
> history. You know it was an insurrection, and you're just pissing and moaning
> because it failed.

No one has been charged with insurrection.
>
> >> If this depresses Republican voter turnout even marginally, Trump is headed
> >> for a major defeat this November.
> >>
> >> Mar 6, 2024
> >> REED GALEN
> >>
> >> [...]
> >
> > Having read the entire article, I find that my original judgement [sic] is accurate.
>
> There is no 'e' in "judgment," you illiterate degreeless fat fuck, and your
> judgment, as always, is complete bullshit. As I said, Galen might be wrong, but
> he makes *excellent* points.

So wrong people make excellent points? No wonder you're so misinformed.

On 6/10/2024 1:07 PM, David Hartung wrote:
> On 6/10/24 13:24, J Carlson wrote:
>> On 6/10/2024 11:15 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>> On 6/10/24 13:07, J Carlson wrote:
>>>> Since Donald Trump incited an insurrection following his 2020 electoral
>>>> loss, he has moderated neither his rhetoric nor his behavior; on the
>>>> contrary, both have become more extreme.
>>>
>>> Given that there is has been no evidence to support the claim that Trump
>>> incited the riot on Jan 6,
>>
>> Trump incited the insurrection. This is beyond dispute and is the verdict of
>> history. You know it was an insurrection, and you're just pissing and moaning
>> because it failed.
>>
>>>> If this depresses Republican voter turnout even marginally, Trump is headed
>>>> for a major defeat this November.
>>>>
>>>> Mar 6, 2024
>>>> REED GALEN
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Having read the entire article, I find that my original judgement [sic] is
>>> accurate.
>>
>> There is no 'e' in "judgment," you illiterate degreeless fat fuck, and your
>> judgment, as always, is complete bullshit. As I said, Galen might be wrong,
>> but he makes *excellent* points.
>
> Once again[inverse Hartung comma] you have had to fall back on grammar flames.

You need a comma after "again."

It's not a grammar flame. It's a flame on your overall illiteracy, shitty
education and shitty intellect.

Once again, you demonstrate a total inability to address the material. As I
acknowledged, Galen might be wrong, but he seems to me to be right. He makes
excellent points, and you can't address them at all. Perhaps Galen was wrong in
calling it why Trump "can't" win, because possibly he can, but it is *not* going
to be the "landslide" you filthy treasonous Trumpswabs are expecting, and he
very likely will lose. It's too be hoped that he loses, because he is totally
unfit for office. He waged war on the Constitution and the rule of law.

[Default] "Cunt Flaps" Canoza typed:

>On 6/10/2024 1:07 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>> On 6/10/24 13:24, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza typed:
>>> On 6/10/2024 11:15 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>> On 6/10/24 13:07, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza typed:
>>>>> Since Donald Trump incited an insurrection following his 2020 electoral
>>>>> loss, he has moderated neither his rhetoric nor his behavior; on the
>>>>> contrary, both have become more extreme.
>>>>
>>>> Given that there is has been no evidence to support the claim that Trump
>>>> incited the riot on Jan 6,
>>>
>>> Trump incited the insurrection. This is beyond dispute and is the verdict of
>>> history. You know it was an insurrection, and you're just pissing and moaning
>>> because it failed.
>>>
>>>>> If this depresses Republican voter turnout even marginally, Trump is headed
>>>>> for a major defeat this November.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mar 6, 2024
>>>>> REED GALEN
>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> Having read the entire article, I find that my original judgement [sic] is
>>>> accurate.
>>>
>>> There is no 'e' in "judgment," you illiterate degreeless fat fuck, and your
>>> judgment, as always, is complete bullshit. As I said, Galen might be wrong,
>>> but he makes *excellent* points.
>>
>> Once again[inverse Hartung comma] you have had to fall back on grammar flames.

==================================================
==================================================
================= WARNING! ========================
**** DESPERATE RUDY GRAMMAR FLAME AHEAD ****
================= WARNING! ========================
==================================================
==================================================

>You need a comma after "again."
>
>It's not a grammar flame.

Yes, "Cunt Flaps." It is.

In article <v47ovr$kg3l$2@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
>
> On 6/10/2024 1:07 PM, David Hartung wrote:
> > On 6/10/24 13:24, J Carlson wrote:
> >> On 6/10/2024 11:15 AM, David Hartung wrote:
> >>> On 6/10/24 13:07, J Carlson wrote:
> >>>> Since Donald Trump incited an insurrection following his 2020 electoral
> >>>> loss, he has moderated neither his rhetoric nor his behavior; on the
> >>>> contrary, both have become more extreme.
> >>>
> >>> Given that there is has been no evidence to support the claim that Trump
> >>> incited the riot on Jan 6,
> >>
> >> Trump incited the insurrection. This is beyond dispute and is the verdict of
> >> history. You know it was an insurrection, and you're just pissing and moaning
> >> because it failed.
> >>
> >>>> If this depresses Republican voter turnout even marginally, Trump is headed
> >>>> for a major defeat this November.
> >>>>
> >>>> Mar 6, 2024
> >>>> REED GALEN
> >>>>
> >>>> [...]
> >>>
> >>> Having read the entire article, I find that my original judgement [sic] is
> >>> accurate.
> >>
> >> There is no 'e' in "judgment," you illiterate degreeless fat fuck, and your
> >> judgment, as always, is complete bullshit. As I said, Galen might be wrong,
> >> but he makes *excellent* points.
> >
> > Once again[inverse Hartung comma] you have had to fall back on grammar flames.
>
> You need a comma after "again."
>
> It's not a grammar flame. It's a flame on your overall illiteracy, shitty
> education and shitty intellect.

It's your way of running.
>
> Once again, you demonstrate a total inability to address the material. As I
> acknowledged, Galen might be wrong, but he seems to me to be right. He makes
> excellent points, and you can't address them at all. Perhaps Galen was wrong in
> calling it why Trump "can't" win, because possibly he can, but it is *not* going
> to be the "landslide" you filthy treasonous Trumpswabs are expecting, and he
> very likely will lose. It's too be hoped that he loses, because he is totally
> unfit for office. He waged war on the Constitution and the rule of law.

On 6/10/2024 1:51 PM, J Carlson wrote:
> On 6/10/2024 1:07 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>> On 6/10/24 13:24, J Carlson wrote:
>>> On 6/10/2024 11:15 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>> On 6/10/24 13:07, J Carlson wrote:
>>>>> Since Donald Trump incited an insurrection following his 2020
>>>>> electoral loss, he has moderated neither his rhetoric nor his
>>>>> behavior; on the contrary, both have become more extreme.
>>>>
>>>> Given that there is has been no evidence to support the claim that
>>>> Trump incited the riot on Jan 6,
>>>
>>> Trump incited the insurrection. This is beyond dispute and is the
>>> verdict of history. You know it was an insurrection, and you're just
>>> pissing and moaning because it failed.
>>>
>>>>> If this depresses Republican voter turnout even marginally, Trump
>>>>> is headed for a major defeat this November.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mar 6, 2024
>>>>> REED GALEN
>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> Having read the entire article, I find that my original judgement
>>>> [sic] is accurate.
>>>
>>> There is no 'e' in "judgment," you illiterate degreeless fat fuck,
>>> and your judgment, as always, is complete bullshit. As I said, Galen
>>> might be wrong, but he makes *excellent* points.
>>
>> Once again[inverse Hartung comma] you have had to fall back on grammar
>> flames.
>
> You need a comma after "again."
>
> It's not a grammar flame. It's a flame on your overall illiteracy,
> shitty education and shitty intellect.
>
> Once again, you demonstrate a total inability to address the material.
> As I acknowledged, Galen might be wrong, but he seems to me to be right.
> He makes excellent points, and you can't address them at all. Perhaps
> Galen was wrong in calling it why Trump "can't" win, because possibly he
> can, but it is *not* going to be the "landslide" you filthy treasonous
> Trumpswabs are expecting, and he very likely will lose. It's too be
> hoped that he loses, because he is totally unfit for office. He waged
> war on the Constitution and the rule of law.

No he didn't and the Jan 6 witch squad destroyed all the evidence they
could proving he didn't.

On 6/10/2024 2:53 PM, Bill Pfister wrote:
> On 6/10/2024 1:51 PM, J Carlson wrote:
>> On 6/10/2024 1:07 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>>> On 6/10/24 13:24, J Carlson wrote:
>>>> On 6/10/2024 11:15 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>> On 6/10/24 13:07, J Carlson wrote:
>>>>>> Since Donald Trump incited an insurrection following his 2020 electoral
>>>>>> loss, he has moderated neither his rhetoric nor his behavior; on the
>>>>>> contrary, both have become more extreme.
>>>>>
>>>>> Given that there is has been no evidence to support the claim that Trump
>>>>> incited the riot on Jan 6,
>>>>
>>>> Trump incited the insurrection. This is beyond dispute and is the verdict of
>>>> history. You know it was an insurrection, and you're just pissing and
>>>> moaning because it failed.
>>>>
>>>>>> If this depresses Republican voter turnout even marginally, Trump is
>>>>>> headed for a major defeat this November.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mar 6, 2024
>>>>>> REED GALEN
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>> Having read the entire article, I find that my original judgement [sic] is
>>>>> accurate.
>>>>
>>>> There is no 'e' in "judgment," you illiterate degreeless fat fuck, and your
>>>> judgment, as always, is complete bullshit. As I said, Galen might be wrong,
>>>> but he makes *excellent* points.
>>>
>>> Once again[inverse Hartung comma] you have had to fall back on grammar flames.
>>
>> You need a comma after "again."
>>
>> It's not a grammar flame. It's a flame on your overall illiteracy, shitty
>> education and shitty intellect.
>>
>> Once again, you demonstrate a total inability to address the material. As I
>> acknowledged, Galen might be wrong, but he seems to me to be right. He makes
>> excellent points, and you can't address them at all. Perhaps Galen was wrong
>> in calling it why Trump "can't" win, because possibly he can, but it is *not*
>> going to be the "landslide" you filthy treasonous Trumpswabs are expecting,
>> and he very likely will lose. It's too be hoped that he loses, because he is
>> totally unfit for office. He waged war on the Constitution and the rule of law.
>
> No he didn't and

Yes, he did.

On 10 Jun 2024, J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com> posted some
news:v47su0$knur$5@dont-email.me:

> On 6/10/2024 2:53 PM, Bill Pfister wrote:
>> On 6/10/2024 1:51 PM, J Carlson wrote:
>>> On 6/10/2024 1:07 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>> On 6/10/24 13:24, J Carlson wrote:
>>>>> On 6/10/2024 11:15 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/10/24 13:07, J Carlson wrote:
>>>>>>> Since Donald Trump incited an insurrection following his 2020
>>>>>>> electoral loss, he has moderated neither his rhetoric nor his
>>>>>>> behavior; on the contrary, both have become more extreme.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Given that there is has been no evidence to support the claim
>>>>>> that Trump incited the riot on Jan 6,
>>>>>
>>>>> Trump incited the insurrection. This is beyond dispute and is the
>>>>> verdict of history. You know it was an insurrection, and you're
>>>>> just pissing and moaning because it failed.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> If this depresses Republican voter turnout even marginally,
>>>>>>> Trump is headed for a major defeat this November.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mar 6, 2024
>>>>>>> REED GALEN
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Having read the entire article, I find that my original judgement
>>>>>> [sic] is accurate.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is no 'e' in "judgment," you illiterate degreeless fat fuck,
>>>>> and your judgment, as always, is complete bullshit. As I said,
>>>>> Galen might be wrong, but he makes *excellent* points.
>>>>
>>>> Once again[inverse Hartung comma] you have had to fall back on
>>>> grammar flames.
>>>
>>> You need a comma after "again."
>>>
>>> It's not a grammar flame. It's a flame on your overall illiteracy,
>>> shitty education and shitty intellect.
>>>
>>> Once again, you demonstrate a total inability to address the
>>> material. As I acknowledged, Galen might be wrong, but he seems to
>>> me to be right. He makes excellent points, and you can't address
>>> them at all. Perhaps Galen was wrong in calling it why Trump "can't"
>>> win, because possibly he can, but it is *not* going to be the
>>> "landslide" you filthy treasonous Trumpswabs are expecting, and he
>>> very likely will lose. It's too be hoped that he loses, because he
>>> is totally unfit for office. He waged war on the Constitution and
>>> the rule of law.
>>
>> No he didn't and
>
> Yes, he did.

President Trump tells rioters at Capitol to 'go home'

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2021/01/06/donald-trump-go-home-
message-rioters-jake-tapper-vpx.cnn

Pelosi waged war on the constitution trying to stick it to Trump.

On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 13:15:24 -0500, David Hartung <junk@nogood.com> wrote:

>On 6/10/24 13:07, J Carlson wrote:
>> Since Donald Trump incited an insurrection following his 2020 electoral
>> loss, he has moderated neither his rhetoric nor his behavior; on the
>> contrary, both have become more extreme.
>
>Given that there is has been no evidence to support the claim that Trump
>incited the riot on Jan 6, this one paragraph tells me that the article
>is worthless.

Trump: Making Felonies Great Again
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/ST_ZAQ6UobQ?feature=share

Swill
--
"I don't like saying the word, "bullshit" in front of these beautiful children so I won't say it. I will not say it."
- Donald Trump in Phoenix, AZ - Thursday, June 6, 2024

Not left, Not right, forward. https://www.forwardparty.com/

Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!

Sláva Ukrajíni! Glory to Ukraine!

Putin tse prezervatyv! Putin is a condom!

Go here to donate to Ukrainian relief.
<https://www2.deloitte.com/ua/uk/pages/registration-forms/help-cities.html>

On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 14:53:54 -0700, Bill Pfister <nobody@there.org> wrote:

>No he didn't and the Jan 6 witch squad destroyed all the evidence they
>could proving he didn't.

Trump Rally Live
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6l5CoSD1Jk

Swill
--
"I don't like saying the word, "bullshit" in front of these beautiful children so I won't say it. I will not say it."
- Donald Trump in Phoenix, AZ - Thursday, June 6, 2024

Not left, Not right, forward. https://www.forwardparty.com/

Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!

Sláva Ukrajíni! Glory to Ukraine!

Putin tse prezervatyv! Putin is a condom!

Go here to donate to Ukrainian relief.
<https://www2.deloitte.com/ua/uk/pages/registration-forms/help-cities.html>