Rudy socked up as Max Boot wrote:
> On 5/2/2024 6:01 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>> On 5/1/24 12:44, Max Boot wrote:
>>> On 5/1/2024 8:03 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>> On 5/1/24 09:51, Max Boot wrote:
>>>>> On 5/1/2024 4:53 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 13:22:06 -0500, David Hartung <junk@nogood.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 4/30/24 12:19, Max Boot wrote:
>>>>>>>> The judge in Donald Trump’s New York hush money trial found the
>>>>>>>> former
>>>>>>>> president in contempt Tuesday for his critical public statements as
>>>>>>>> proceedings entered their third week.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> “The court finds the people have met their burden of proof and have
>>>>>>>> demonstrated contempt. Mr. Trump is fined $1,000 on each of
>>>>>>>> those two,”
>>>>>>>> Justice Juan Merchan said in his written decision, referring to
>>>>>>>> one set
>>>>>>>> of alleged gag order violations.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/04/30/trump-hush-money-trial-live-updates/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He is incorrigible. *LOCK HIM UP*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Telling a defendant that he may not speak about his own trial is an
>>>>>>> abomination, and the judge deserves to be removed from the bench for
>>>>>>> this. You and the judge may not like Trump, but dislike is not
>>>>>>> enough
>>>>>>> reason to gag a defendant.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Imagine that.  Rudely thinks that's it great to lock up someone for
>>>>>> using his First Amendment rights.
>>>>>
>>>>> Trump has no "first amendment right" to attack jurors and witnesses
>>>>> in his trial.
>>>>
>>>> Examples of him doing that?
>>>
>>> They're listed in Justice Merchan's contempt order.
>>>
>>> "Read the Judge’s Contempt Ruling Against Trump"
>>> https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/04/30/nyregion/trump-contempt-ruling-gag-order.html
>>>
>>>
>>> It's in the New York Times — the Gold Standard. Read it. Shut the
>>> fuck up and read it.
>>
>> All this article has is a list of posts in which Trump supposedly
>> violated the gag, no actual quotes.
>
> Read his posts.
>
> The prosecutors proved to the judge's satisfaction that Trump's posts
> violated the gag order. The gag order was very specific: nothing that
> attacks witnesses, jurors, or the family members of court staff
> (including the judge and prosecutors). The judge found that the posts
> made such attacks. They did.
>
> When Trump attacks people he is ordered not to attack, he is not
> "exercising his first amendment rights." You don't know what those
> rights are.
>
>
hey tRudy, does your asshole every get jealous
of the amount of shit that comes out of your mouth