On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 07:52:53 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:

>On 1/10/2025 11:37 PM, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>> On 1/10/25 8:56 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
>>> On 1/10/2025 5:02 PM, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>>>> Who cares ?
>>>>
>>>> He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
>>>
>>> He can't because it is a state crime.
>>
>>   Some Wokie govs are suddenly buying red MAGA hats.
>>
>>   So don't bet on everything not being dismissed/disappeared.
>
>While he may prevail on appeal (*), I will bet Trump will not be
>pardoned for this crime.
>
>(*) He will lose on appeal up to the highest NY court. SCOTUS will rule
>5-4 with Roberts being the deciding vote (one way or the other - I'm not
>sure which way).

He WILL win on appeal since the case is a complete farce, and a pardon
wouldn't be necessary. I'll hold you to your laughable prediction.

On 2025-01-12, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 07:52:53 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
><noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>>On 1/10/2025 11:37 PM, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>>> On 1/10/25 8:56 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
>>>> On 1/10/2025 5:02 PM, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>>>>> Who cares ?
>>>>>
>>>>> He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
>>>>
>>>> He can't because it is a state crime.
>>>
>>>   Some Wokie govs are suddenly buying red MAGA hats.
>>>
>>>   So don't bet on everything not being dismissed/disappeared.
>>
>>While he may prevail on appeal (*), I will bet Trump will not be
>>pardoned for this crime.
>>
>>(*) He will lose on appeal up to the highest NY court. SCOTUS will rule
>>5-4 with Roberts being the deciding vote (one way or the other - I'm not
>>sure which way).
>
> He WILL win on appeal since the case is a complete farce, and a pardon
> wouldn't be necessary. I'll hold you to your laughable prediction.

The judge should have recused himself based upon his daughter profiting for
the democrats on the trial.

--
pothead

"Give a man a fish and you turn him into a Democrat for life"
"Teach a man to fish and he might become a self-sufficient conservative Republican"
"Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up,"
--- Barack H. Obama

On 1/12/2025 6:34 AM, NoBody wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 07:52:53 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
> <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>> On 1/10/2025 11:37 PM, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>>> On 1/10/25 8:56 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
>>>> On 1/10/2025 5:02 PM, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>>>>> Who cares ?
>>>>>
>>>>> He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
>>>>
>>>> He can't because it is a state crime.
>>>
>>>   Some Wokie govs are suddenly buying red MAGA hats.
>>>
>>>   So don't bet on everything not being dismissed/disappeared.
>>
>> While he may prevail on appeal (*), I will bet Trump will not be
>> pardoned for this crime.
>>
>> (*) He will lose on appeal up to the highest NY court. SCOTUS will rule
>> 5-4 with Roberts being the deciding vote (one way or the other - I'm not
>> sure which way).
>
> He WILL win on appeal since the case is a complete farce

He will *not* win on appeal in NY courts.

In article <vm12tb$1864s$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> On 1/12/2025 6:34 AM, NoBody wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 07:52:53 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
> > <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 1/10/2025 11:37 PM, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
> >>> On 1/10/25 8:56 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
> >>>> On 1/10/2025 5:02 PM, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
> >>>>> Who cares ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
> >>>>
> >>>> He can't because it is a state crime.
> >>>
> >>>   Some Wokie govs are suddenly buying red MAGA hats.
> >>>
> >>>   So don't bet on everything not being dismissed/disappeared.
> >>
> >> While he may prevail on appeal (*), I will bet Trump will not be
> >> pardoned for this crime.
> >>
> >> (*) He will lose on appeal up to the highest NY court. SCOTUS will rule
> >> 5-4 with Roberts being the deciding vote (one way or the other - I'm not
> >> sure which way).
> >
> > He WILL win on appeal since the case is a complete farce
>
> He will *not* win on appeal in NY courts.

He now has the power to make it happen. They are coming for you.

On 1/12/25 9:52 AM, pothead wrote:
> On 2025-01-12, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 07:52:53 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
>> <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 1/10/2025 11:37 PM, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>>>> On 1/10/25 8:56 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
>>>>> On 1/10/2025 5:02 PM, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>>>>>> Who cares ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
>>>>>
>>>>> He can't because it is a state crime.
>>>>
>>>>   Some Wokie govs are suddenly buying red MAGA hats.
>>>>
>>>>   So don't bet on everything not being dismissed/disappeared.
>>>
>>> While he may prevail on appeal (*), I will bet Trump will not be
>>> pardoned for this crime.
>>>
>>> (*) He will lose on appeal up to the highest NY court. SCOTUS will rule
>>> 5-4 with Roberts being the deciding vote (one way or the other - I'm not
>>> sure which way).
>>
>> He WILL win on appeal since the case is a complete farce, and a pardon
>> wouldn't be necessary. I'll hold you to your laughable prediction.
>
> The judge should have recused himself based upon his daughter profiting from
> the democrats on the trial.

It's all corrupt to to the bone - 2nd/3rd-world 'lawfare'.
Ask Maduro how it works .......

My FEAR is that this is only the start - that BOTH major
parties will now try to out-do each other using 'lawfare'.
Once it starts ............

ENDS very badly.

Pick yer Fearless Leader - because that's where it looks
like we're heading. In the end, soon, it'll be General
Somebody in charge - martial law for 50 years. Won't
we be just SO proud to be like Myanmar/Yemen/etc ???

Really REALLY hate to say it, but the "Experiment In
Democracy" hasn't turned out so well. Not in the USA,
not in the EU. Not much of anywhere. Looks like kings
and war-lords and dictators and ayatollahs have
re-asserted themselves as the 'historical default' systems
of govt.

Churchill said 'democracy' was the worst system of govt,
except for all the others. Alas he wouldn't even recognize
the UK, or EU, or barely even the USA as 'democracies'
anymore.

On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 09:34:35 -0500, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 07:52:53 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
><noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>>On 1/10/2025 11:37 PM, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>>> On 1/10/25 8:56 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
>>>> On 1/10/2025 5:02 PM, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>>>>> Who cares ?
>>>>>
>>>>> He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
>>>>
>>>> He can't because it is a state crime.
>>>
>>>   Some Wokie govs are suddenly buying red MAGA hats.
>>>
>>>   So don't bet on everything not being dismissed/disappeared.
>>
>>While he may prevail on appeal (*), I will bet Trump will not be
>>pardoned for this crime.
>>
>>(*) He will lose on appeal up to the highest NY court. SCOTUS will rule
>>5-4 with Roberts being the deciding vote (one way or the other - I'm not
>>sure which way).
>
>He WILL win on appeal since the case is a complete farce, and a pardon
>wouldn't be necessary. I'll hold you to your laughable prediction.

Silence from Josh.

On 2025-01-13, 186282@ud0s4.net <186283@ud0s4.net> wrote:
> On 1/12/25 9:52 AM, pothead wrote:
>> On 2025-01-12, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 07:52:53 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
>>> <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 1/10/2025 11:37 PM, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>>>>> On 1/10/25 8:56 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/10/2025 5:02 PM, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>>>>>>> Who cares ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He can't because it is a state crime.
>>>>>
>>>>>   Some Wokie govs are suddenly buying red MAGA hats.
>>>>>
>>>>>   So don't bet on everything not being dismissed/disappeared.
>>>>
>>>> While he may prevail on appeal (*), I will bet Trump will not be
>>>> pardoned for this crime.
>>>>
>>>> (*) He will lose on appeal up to the highest NY court. SCOTUS will rule
>>>> 5-4 with Roberts being the deciding vote (one way or the other - I'm not
>>>> sure which way).
>>>
>>> He WILL win on appeal since the case is a complete farce, and a pardon
>>> wouldn't be necessary. I'll hold you to your laughable prediction.
>>
>> The judge should have recused himself based upon his daughter profiting from
>> the democrats on the trial.
>
>
> It's all corrupt to to the bone - 2nd/3rd-world 'lawfare'.
> Ask Maduro how it works .......

Indeed.

> My FEAR is that this is only the start - that BOTH major
> parties will now try to out-do each other using 'lawfare'.
> Once it starts ............
>
> ENDS very badly.

Extremely.
Trump needs to focus on rebuilding the mess that Joe Biden has left.
Investigate the corruption and deep state operatives sure, but don't once again
have republicans starting useless investigations that tend to go nowhere and simply
waste time and money.

> Pick yer Fearless Leader - because that's where it looks
> like we're heading. In the end, soon, it'll be General
> Somebody in charge - martial law for 50 years. Won't
> we be just SO proud to be like Myanmar/Yemen/etc ???

That would surely be the end of the country as we know it.

> Really REALLY hate to say it, but the "Experiment In
> Democracy" hasn't turned out so well. Not in the USA,
> not in the EU. Not much of anywhere. Looks like kings
> and war-lords and dictators and ayatollahs have
> re-asserted themselves as the 'historical default' systems
> of govt.

It's always about money and power at which point our elected officials
no longer represent the people but only themselves and how much they
can line their pockets with.

> Churchill said 'democracy' was the worst system of govt,
> except for all the others. Alas he wouldn't even recognize
> the UK, or EU, or barely even the USA as 'democracies'
> anymore.

Right now the system in US has gone corrupt and rogue and when you
couple that with extreme left and extreme right nothing gets done
and it's like a runaway train to nowhere.

Couple that with an extremely corrupt media and ignorant voters
and things are even worse.

I truly believe we are at a turning point in our history. There is so much
wrong right now, globally in fact, that I wonder if Trump can begin to
repair it.
Given our choices, Trump is the only person who stands a chance of doing so.

--
pothead

"Give a man a fish and you turn him into a Democrat for life"
"Teach a man to fish and he might become a self-sufficient conservative Republican"
"Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up,"
--- Barack H. Obama

On 1/13/2025 4:03 AM, NoBody wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 09:34:35 -0500, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>

Fuck off, you fucking baby.

On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:52:32 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:

>The judge should have recused himself based upon his daughter profiting for
>the democrats on the trial.

Except that was a lie.

On 2025-01-13, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:52:32 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>
>>The judge should have recused himself based upon his daughter profiting for
>>the democrats on the trial.
>
> Except that was a lie.
>
Actually no it's not a lie.
It's the truth.
<https://nypost.com/2024/03/30/us-news/dem-clients-of-daughter-of-judge-in-trump-trial-raised-90m-off-case/>

"Dem clients of daughter of NY judge in Trump hush-money trial raised $93M off the case "
"

--
pothead

"Give a man a fish and you turn him into a Democrat for life"
"Teach a man to fish and he might become a self-sufficient conservative Republican"
"Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up,"
--- Barack H. Obama

On 1/13/2025 1:04 PM, pothead wrote:
> On 2025-01-13, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:52:32 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The judge should have recused himself based upon his daughter profiting for
>>> the democrats on the trial.
>>
>> Except that was a lie.
>>
> Actually no it's not a lie.
No, it's a lie. [erase lie claim from NY Post lie site]

pothead wrote:
>>> The judge should have recused himself based upon his daughter profiting from
>>> the democrats on the trial.
>>
>> It's all corrupt to to the bone - 2nd/3rd-world 'lawfare'.
>> Ask Maduro how it works .......
> Indeed.
>

Supreme injustices Alito and Thomas do not have to recuse
themselves on cases involving their owners.

--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 14:46:54 -0800, Siri Cruise
<chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:

>pothead wrote:
>>>> The judge should have recused himself based upon his daughter profiting from
>>>> the democrats on the trial.
>>>
>>> It's all corrupt to to the bone - 2nd/3rd-world 'lawfare'.
>>> Ask Maduro how it works .......
>> Indeed.
>>
>
>Supreme injustices Alito and Thomas do not have to recuse
>themselves on cases involving their owners.

Mighty racist of you to claim such a thing.

On 1/14/2025 3:55 AM, NoBody wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 14:46:54 -0800, Siri Cruise
> <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> pothead wrote:
>>>>> The judge should have recused himself based upon his daughter profiting from
>>>>> the democrats on the trial.
>>>>
>>>> It's all corrupt to to the bone - 2nd/3rd-world 'lawfare'.
>>>> Ask Maduro how it works .......
>>> Indeed.
>>>
>>
>> Supreme injustices Alito and Thomas do not have to recuse
>> themselves on cases involving their owners.
>
> Mighty racist of you to claim such a thing.

He's only describing reality.

On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 21:04:30 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:

>On 2025-01-13, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:52:32 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>
>>>The judge should have recused himself based upon his daughter profiting for
>>>the democrats on the trial.
>>
>> Except that was a lie.
>>
>Actually no it's not a lie.
>It's the truth.
><https://nypost.com/2024/03/30/us-news/dem-clients-of-daughter-of-judge-in-trump-trial-raised-90m-off-case/>
>
>"Dem clients of daughter of NY judge in Trump hush-money trial raised $93M off the case "
>"

Yet it's ok for Alito to accept a six figure vacation from a litigant?